Merge pull request 'feat: add conflict-fix leases and stale-head protection (Closes #399)' (#416) from feat/issue-399-conflict-fix-leases into master
This commit was merged in pull request #416.
This commit is contained in:
+28
-16
@@ -284,21 +284,38 @@ class TestSimpleToolAudit(_AuditWiringBase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["number"], 9)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_NO_PR_WORK_LEASE_BLOCK = {"block": False, "reasons": [], "mutation_allowed": True}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestGatedToolAudit(_AuditWiringBase):
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
super().setUp()
|
||||
from mcp_server import init_review_decision_lock
|
||||
from tests.test_mcp_server import _install_owned_reviewer_lease
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease
|
||||
|
||||
# init_review_decision_lock clears any prior session lease (#407).
|
||||
init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
self._lease_patch = _install_owned_reviewer_lease(8)
|
||||
self._lease_patch.start()
|
||||
self._auth_identity_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._authenticated_username", return_value="reviewer-bot"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._auth_identity_patch.start()
|
||||
self._pr_lease_comments_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._pr_lease_comments_patch.start()
|
||||
self._pr_work_lease_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block",
|
||||
return_value=dict(_NO_PR_WORK_LEASE_BLOCK),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._pr_work_lease_patch.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._auth_identity_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._pr_lease_comments_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._pr_work_lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease)
|
||||
|
||||
def _pr(self, author, state="open", sha="abc123", mergeable=True):
|
||||
@@ -350,7 +367,9 @@ class TestGatedToolAudit(_AuditWiringBase):
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.api_request")
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
|
||||
def test_submit_review_success_audited(self, _auth, mock_api):
|
||||
# mark_final_review_decision and submit each run eligibility (user + PR).
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer-bot"}, self._pr("author-bot"),
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer-bot"}, self._pr("author-bot"),
|
||||
{"id": 7, "state": "APPROVED"},
|
||||
[{"id": 7, "user": {"login": "reviewer-bot"}, "state": "APPROVED",
|
||||
@@ -359,23 +378,16 @@ class TestGatedToolAudit(_AuditWiringBase):
|
||||
env = self._env(GITEA_PROFILE_NAME="gitea-reviewer",
|
||||
GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS="read,review,approve")
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
from mcp_server import init_review_decision_lock, gitea_mark_final_review_decision
|
||||
from tests.test_mcp_server import _install_owned_reviewer_lease
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_mark_final_review_decision
|
||||
|
||||
init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
lease_patch = _install_owned_reviewer_lease(8)
|
||||
lease_patch.start()
|
||||
try:
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="approve",
|
||||
body="LGTM", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
lease_patch.stop()
|
||||
reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease()
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
8, "approve", expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="approve",
|
||||
body="LGTM", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(r["performed"])
|
||||
recs = self._records()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(recs), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ def _review_handoff(**overrides):
|
||||
"- Selected PR: #203",
|
||||
"- Reviewer eligibility: eligible",
|
||||
"- Pinned reviewed head: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Reviewed head SHA: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Final live head SHA before approval: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Final live head SHA before merge: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Push occurred during validation: no",
|
||||
"- Worktree path: branches/review-203",
|
||||
"- Worktree dirty: clean",
|
||||
"- Scratch worktree used: yes (branches/review-203)",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -122,15 +122,19 @@ class TestShaCannotBypassSelfReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.api_request")
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
|
||||
def test_review_tool_refuses_self_approval_despite_sha(self, _auth, mock_api, mock_get_all):
|
||||
mock_get_all.return_value = [{"number": 9, "title": "PR 9", "state": "open", "head": {"ref": "branch9", "sha": "abc1234"}, "base": {"ref": "master"}, "mergeable": True, "user": {"login": "jcwalker3"}}]
|
||||
from mcp_server import init_review_decision_lock
|
||||
from tests.test_mcp_server import FULL_HEAD_SHA, _seed_ready_review_decision
|
||||
|
||||
head_sha = FULL_HEAD_SHA
|
||||
mock_get_all.return_value = [{"number": 9, "title": "PR 9", "state": "open", "head": {"ref": "branch9", "sha": head_sha}, "base": {"ref": "master"}, "mergeable": True, "user": {"login": "jcwalker3"}}]
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{"login": "jcwalker3"}, # /user (inventory)
|
||||
{"login": "jcwalker3"}, # /user (submit eligibility)
|
||||
{"user": {"login": "jcwalker3"}, "state": "open", "head": {"sha": "abc1234"}, "mergeable": True}, # /pulls/9
|
||||
{"user": {"login": "jcwalker3"}, "state": "open", "head": {"sha": head_sha}, "mergeable": True}, # /pulls/9
|
||||
]
|
||||
from mcp_server import init_review_decision_lock, gitea_mark_final_review_decision
|
||||
init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(9, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]):
|
||||
_seed_ready_review_decision(9, "approve", sha=head_sha, remote="prgs")
|
||||
env = self._env(SHA_WOULD_BE_REVIEWER, "reviewer")
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_review_pr(
|
||||
|
||||
+163
-51
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ import mcp_server
|
||||
import issue_lock_store
|
||||
|
||||
FAKE_AUTH = "Basic dGVzdDp0ZXN0"
|
||||
FULL_HEAD_SHA = "a" * 40
|
||||
|
||||
_NO_BLOCKER_FEEDBACK = {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
@@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ def _mark_request_changes_ready(pr_number=8, **kwargs):
|
||||
suppression feedback fetch stubbed to 'no existing blocker'."""
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server.gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=dict(_NO_BLOCKER_FEEDBACK)):
|
||||
kwargs.setdefault("expected_head_sha", "abc123")
|
||||
return gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number, "request_changes", **kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -82,6 +84,7 @@ def _visible_approval_reviews(reviewer="reviewer-bot", sha="abc123"):
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_DEFAULT_LEASE_SESSION = "mcp-test-reviewer-lease"
|
||||
_NO_PR_WORK_LEASE_BLOCK = {"block": False, "reasons": [], "mutation_allowed": True}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _reviewer_lease_comment(
|
||||
@@ -139,6 +142,45 @@ def _install_owned_reviewer_lease(
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _seed_ready_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number,
|
||||
action,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
sha=FULL_HEAD_SHA,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org=None,
|
||||
repo=None,
|
||||
):
|
||||
"""Mark the review-decision lock ready without mark_final API calls (#399)."""
|
||||
import mcp_server as _m
|
||||
|
||||
resolved_org, resolved_repo = org, repo
|
||||
if remote in _m.REMOTES:
|
||||
_, resolved_org, resolved_repo = _m._resolve(remote, None, org, repo)
|
||||
profile_name = (_m.get_profile().get("profile_name") or "").strip()
|
||||
session_lock = (
|
||||
(os.environ.get(_m.SESSION_PROFILE_LOCK_ENV) or "").strip()
|
||||
or profile_name
|
||||
)
|
||||
_m._save_review_decision_lock({
|
||||
"task": "review_pr",
|
||||
"remote": remote,
|
||||
"session_pid": os.getpid(),
|
||||
"session_profile": profile_name,
|
||||
"session_profile_lock": session_lock,
|
||||
"final_review_decision_ready": True,
|
||||
"ready_pr_number": pr_number,
|
||||
"ready_action": action,
|
||||
"ready_expected_head_sha": sha,
|
||||
"ready_remote": remote,
|
||||
"ready_org": resolved_org,
|
||||
"ready_repo": resolved_repo,
|
||||
"live_mutations": [],
|
||||
"correction_authorized": False,
|
||||
"correction_reason": None,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Issue-write tools are profile-gated (#69).
|
||||
ISSUE_WRITE_ENV = {
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": (
|
||||
@@ -638,6 +680,17 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._auth_identity_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease)
|
||||
self._pr_lease_comments_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._pr_lease_comments_patch.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._pr_lease_comments_patch.stop)
|
||||
self._pr_work_lease_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block",
|
||||
return_value=dict(_NO_PR_WORK_LEASE_BLOCK),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._pr_work_lease_patch.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._pr_work_lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
|
||||
def _pr(self, author, state="open", sha="abc123", mergeable=True):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
@@ -711,7 +764,8 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
expected_changed_files=["b.py", "a.py"], remote="prgs")
|
||||
expected_changed_files=["b.py", "a.py"],
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(r["performed"])
|
||||
|
||||
# -- read-back / cleanup surfacing (#98) -----------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -729,8 +783,10 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-merger",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,merge"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
remote="prgs")
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
# The merge itself is still reported performed/successful.
|
||||
self.assertTrue(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(r["merge_result"], "PR #8 merged via 'merge'.")
|
||||
@@ -758,8 +814,10 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-merger",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,merge"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
remote="prgs")
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(r["merge_commit"], "c9")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(r["cleanup_status"].startswith("skipped (cleanup error:"))
|
||||
@@ -773,7 +831,7 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-merger",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,merge"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(pr_number=8, confirmation="", remote="prgs")
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(pr_number=8, confirmation="", expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("explicit confirmation required" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
@@ -784,7 +842,7 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-merger",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,merge"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(pr_number=8, confirmation="MERGE PR 9", remote="prgs")
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(pr_number=8, confirmation="MERGE PR 9", expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -918,7 +976,8 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
expected_changed_files=["a.py", "b.py"], remote="prgs")
|
||||
expected_changed_files=["a.py", "b.py"],
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"PR changed files do not match expected_changed_files (fail closed)",
|
||||
@@ -931,7 +990,7 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_invalid_merge_method_rejected(self, mock_api):
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation="MERGE PR 8", do="octopus", remote="prgs")
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation="MERGE PR 8", do="octopus", expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("unknown merge method" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
@@ -949,7 +1008,9 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"GITEA_TOKEN": "super-secret-token"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8), remote="prgs")
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
blob = repr(r).lower()
|
||||
for secret in ("super-secret-token", "authorization", "basic ", FAKE_AUTH.lower()):
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(secret, blob)
|
||||
@@ -966,7 +1027,9 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,merge"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8), remote="prgs")
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
blob = repr(r)
|
||||
self.assertIn("[REDACTED]", blob)
|
||||
@@ -1007,7 +1070,9 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,merge"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8), remote="prgs")
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r.get("approval_visible"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("no visible APPROVED review" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
@@ -1028,7 +1093,9 @@ class TestMergePR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,merge"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8), remote="prgs")
|
||||
pr_number=8, confirmation=self._confirm(8),
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(r.get("has_blocking_change_requests"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("REQUEST_CHANGES" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
@@ -1129,16 +1196,18 @@ class TestReviewPR(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
"base_url": None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
mock_get_all.return_value = [{"number": 1, "title": "PR 1", "state": "open", "head": {"ref": "branch1", "sha": "abc1234"}, "base": {"ref": "master"}, "mergeable": True, "user": {"login": "jcwalker3"}}]
|
||||
head_sha = FULL_HEAD_SHA
|
||||
mock_get_all.return_value = [{"number": 1, "title": "PR 1", "state": "open", "head": {"ref": "branch1", "sha": head_sha}, "base": {"ref": "master"}, "mergeable": True, "user": {"login": "jcwalker3"}}]
|
||||
# mock_api responses: 1) /user (inventory), 2) /user (eligibility), 3) /pulls/1 (eligibility)
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{"login": "jcwalker3"}, # /api/v1/user (inventory)
|
||||
{"login": "jcwalker3"}, # /api/v1/user (submit eligibility)
|
||||
{"user": {"login": "jcwalker3"}, "state": "open", "head": {"sha": "abc1234"}, "mergeable": True}, # /pulls/1
|
||||
{"user": {"login": "jcwalker3"}, "state": "open", "head": {"sha": head_sha}, "mergeable": True}, # /pulls/1
|
||||
]
|
||||
from mcp_server import init_review_decision_lock
|
||||
init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(1, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]):
|
||||
_seed_ready_review_decision(1, "approve", sha=head_sha, remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = gitea_review_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=1,
|
||||
event="APPROVE",
|
||||
@@ -1794,7 +1863,7 @@ class TestReviewDecisionValidationGate(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Block incidental live review mutations during validation."""
|
||||
|
||||
PR = 203
|
||||
SHA = "abc123"
|
||||
SHA = FULL_HEAD_SHA
|
||||
|
||||
def _pr(self, author, sha=SHA):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
@@ -1819,6 +1888,18 @@ class TestReviewDecisionValidationGate(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._auth_identity_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease)
|
||||
self._pr_lease_comments_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._pr_lease_comments_patch.start()
|
||||
self._pr_work_lease_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block",
|
||||
return_value=dict(_NO_PR_WORK_LEASE_BLOCK),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._pr_work_lease_patch.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._pr_lease_comments_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._pr_work_lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _env(self):
|
||||
return patch.dict(os.environ, {
|
||||
@@ -1916,15 +1997,28 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease
|
||||
|
||||
init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
self._lease_patch = _install_owned_reviewer_lease(8)
|
||||
self._lease_patch.start()
|
||||
self._auth_identity_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._authenticated_username", return_value="reviewer-bot"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._auth_identity_patch.start()
|
||||
self._pr_lease_comments_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._pr_lease_comments_patch.start()
|
||||
self._pr_work_lease_patch = patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block",
|
||||
return_value=dict(_NO_PR_WORK_LEASE_BLOCK),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._pr_work_lease_patch.start()
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
8, "approve", remote="prgs", expected_head_sha="abc123",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._auth_identity_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._pr_lease_comments_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._pr_work_lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease)
|
||||
|
||||
def _pr(self, author, state="open", sha="abc123", mergeable=True):
|
||||
@@ -2085,10 +2179,11 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.api_request")
|
||||
@patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH)
|
||||
def test_comment_succeeds_when_review_eligible(self, _auth, mock_api):
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "comment", remote="prgs")
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer-bot"}, self._pr("author-bot"),
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer-bot"}, self._pr("author-bot"), {"id": 3},
|
||||
]
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "comment", remote="prgs", expected_head_sha="abc123")
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-reviewer",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,review"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
@@ -2104,12 +2199,15 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH), \
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.api_request") as mock_api:
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{"login": "jcwalker3"}, self._pr("jcwalker3"),
|
||||
{"login": "jcwalker3"}, self._pr("jcwalker3"), {"id": 4},
|
||||
]
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-reviewer",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,review"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "comment", remote="prgs")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
8, "comment", remote="prgs", expected_head_sha="abc123",
|
||||
)
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="comment", body="note", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
@@ -2152,14 +2250,14 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH), \
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.api_request") as mock_api:
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer-bot"}, self._pr("author-bot", sha="abc123"),
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer-bot"}, self._pr("author-bot", sha="deadbeef"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-reviewer",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,review,approve"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="approve",
|
||||
expected_head_sha="deadbeef", remote="prgs",
|
||||
expected_head_sha="abc123", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["performed"])
|
||||
@@ -2210,7 +2308,7 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,review,approve",
|
||||
"GITEA_TOKEN": "super-secret-token"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(5, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(5, "approve", remote="prgs", expected_head_sha="abc123")
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=5, action="approve", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
@@ -2230,7 +2328,6 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-reviewer",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,review,approve"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="approve", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
@@ -2320,7 +2417,7 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mark_final_decision_rejects_remote_mismatch(self):
|
||||
init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
r = gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "approve", remote="dadeschools")
|
||||
r = gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "approve", remote="dadeschools", expected_head_sha="abc123")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(r["marked_ready"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("does not match locked remote" in x for x in r["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2332,28 +2429,30 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
{"id": 42, "state": "APPROVED"},
|
||||
[_formal_review("reviewer-bot", "APPROVED", review_id=42)],
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer-bot"}, self._pr("author-bot"),
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer-bot"}, self._pr("author-bot"),
|
||||
{"id": 43, "state": "REQUEST_CHANGES"},
|
||||
[_formal_review("reviewer-bot", "REQUEST_CHANGES", review_id=43)],
|
||||
]
|
||||
env = {"GITEA_PROFILE_NAME": "gitea-reviewer",
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,review,approve,request_changes"}
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
first = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="approve", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
auth = gitea_authorize_review_correction(
|
||||
prior_review_id=42,
|
||||
prior_review_state="approve",
|
||||
reason="operator approved correcting mistaken approve",
|
||||
operator_authorized=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_mark_request_changes_ready(remote="prgs")
|
||||
second = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="request_changes", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server.gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=dict(_NO_BLOCKER_FEEDBACK)):
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
first = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="approve", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
auth = gitea_authorize_review_correction(
|
||||
prior_review_id=42,
|
||||
prior_review_state="approve",
|
||||
reason="operator approved correcting mistaken approve",
|
||||
operator_authorized=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_mark_request_changes_ready(remote="prgs")
|
||||
second = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=8, action="request_changes", remote="prgs",
|
||||
final_review_decision_ready=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(first["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(auth["authorized"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(second["performed"])
|
||||
@@ -2365,7 +2464,7 @@ class TestSubmitPrReview(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"GITEA_ALLOWED_OPERATIONS": "read,review,approve"}
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
|
||||
# Mark decision for specific remote, org, repo
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "approve", remote="prgs", org="MyOrg", repo="MyRepo")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(8, "approve", remote="prgs", expected_head_sha="abc123", org="MyOrg", repo="MyRepo")
|
||||
|
||||
# Mismatched remote
|
||||
r = gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
@@ -2407,6 +2506,11 @@ class TestTrackerHygieneCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.mock_audit = patch("gitea_audit.write_event").start()
|
||||
# gitea.pr.close: closing a PR via gitea_edit_pr is capability-gated (#216).
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.get_profile", return_value={"profile_name": "test", "allowed_operations": ["read", "merge", "edit", "close", "gitea.pr.close", "gitea.issue.close"], "audit_label": "test", "forbidden_operations": []}).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block",
|
||||
return_value=dict(_NO_PR_WORK_LEASE_BLOCK),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
patch.stopall()
|
||||
@@ -2453,7 +2557,8 @@ class TestTrackerHygieneCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_merge_pr_with_closes_removes_label(self):
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease
|
||||
|
||||
lease_patch = _install_owned_reviewer_lease(1, head_sha="sha123")
|
||||
head_sha = FULL_HEAD_SHA
|
||||
lease_patch = _install_owned_reviewer_lease(1, head_sha=head_sha)
|
||||
lease_patch.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease)
|
||||
@@ -2462,12 +2567,12 @@ class TestTrackerHygieneCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "/user" in url:
|
||||
return {"login": "merger"}
|
||||
if method == "GET" and url.endswith("/reviews"):
|
||||
return [_formal_review("reviewer", "APPROVED", sha="sha123")]
|
||||
return [_formal_review("reviewer", "APPROVED", sha=head_sha)]
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "pulls/1" in url and "/files" not in url:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"user": {"login": "author"},
|
||||
"state": "open",
|
||||
"head": {"sha": "sha123", "ref": "feat/my-branch"},
|
||||
"head": {"sha": head_sha, "ref": "feat/my-branch"},
|
||||
"base": {"ref": "main"},
|
||||
"mergeable": True,
|
||||
"merged_commit_sha": "merge123",
|
||||
@@ -2487,14 +2592,18 @@ class TestTrackerHygieneCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = api_side_effect
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_merge_pr(pr_number=1, confirmation="MERGE PR 1", do="merge")
|
||||
res = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=1, confirmation="MERGE PR 1", do="merge",
|
||||
expected_head_sha=head_sha,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["cleanup_status"].get(123), "released")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merge_pr_with_branch_name_removes_label(self):
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease
|
||||
|
||||
lease_patch = _install_owned_reviewer_lease(1, head_sha="sha123")
|
||||
head_sha = FULL_HEAD_SHA
|
||||
lease_patch = _install_owned_reviewer_lease(1, head_sha=head_sha)
|
||||
lease_patch.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
self.addCleanup(reviewer_pr_lease.clear_session_lease)
|
||||
@@ -2503,12 +2612,12 @@ class TestTrackerHygieneCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "/user" in url:
|
||||
return {"login": "merger"}
|
||||
if method == "GET" and url.endswith("/reviews"):
|
||||
return [_formal_review("reviewer", "APPROVED", sha="sha123")]
|
||||
return [_formal_review("reviewer", "APPROVED", sha=head_sha)]
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "pulls/1" in url and "/files" not in url:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"user": {"login": "author"},
|
||||
"state": "open",
|
||||
"head": {"sha": "sha123", "ref": "fix/issue-123-slug"},
|
||||
"head": {"sha": head_sha, "ref": "fix/issue-123-slug"},
|
||||
"base": {"ref": "main"},
|
||||
"mergeable": True,
|
||||
"merged_commit_sha": "merge123",
|
||||
@@ -2528,7 +2637,10 @@ class TestTrackerHygieneCleanup(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = api_side_effect
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_merge_pr(pr_number=1, confirmation="MERGE PR 1", do="merge")
|
||||
res = gitea_merge_pr(
|
||||
pr_number=1, confirmation="MERGE PR 1", do="merge",
|
||||
expected_head_sha=head_sha,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["cleanup_status"].get(123), "released")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -230,7 +230,9 @@ class TestEligibilityDenialReport(PermissionReportBase):
|
||||
return PR_PAYLOAD
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
mcp_server.init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(42, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
from tests.test_mcp_server import _seed_ready_review_decision
|
||||
|
||||
_seed_ready_review_decision(42, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("author-profile")):
|
||||
res = mcp_server.gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=42, action="approve", body="lgtm", remote="prgs",
|
||||
@@ -272,7 +274,9 @@ class TestReviewCommentPathUsesCanonicalOp(PermissionReportBase):
|
||||
return PR_PAYLOAD
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
mcp_server.init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(42, "comment", remote="prgs")
|
||||
from tests.test_mcp_server import _seed_ready_review_decision
|
||||
|
||||
_seed_ready_review_decision(42, "comment", remote="prgs")
|
||||
with patch.dict(os.environ, self._env("author-profile")):
|
||||
res = mcp_server.gitea_submit_pr_review(
|
||||
pr_number=42, action="comment", body="finding", remote="prgs",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -128,18 +128,29 @@ class TestPRQueueInventory(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
"base_url": None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
from mcp_server import init_review_decision_lock
|
||||
from tests.test_mcp_server import (
|
||||
FULL_HEAD_SHA,
|
||||
_install_owned_reviewer_lease,
|
||||
_seed_ready_review_decision,
|
||||
)
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease
|
||||
|
||||
head_sha = FULL_HEAD_SHA
|
||||
mock_fetch.return_value = _final_page_fetch([
|
||||
{"number": 1, "title": "PR 1", "state": "open", "head": {"ref": "branch1", "sha": "abc1"}, "base": {"ref": "master"}, "mergeable": True, "user": {"login": "other_user"}}
|
||||
{"number": 1, "title": "PR 1", "state": "open",
|
||||
"head": {"ref": "branch1", "sha": head_sha},
|
||||
"base": {"ref": "master"}, "mergeable": True,
|
||||
"user": {"login": "other_user"}}
|
||||
])
|
||||
# mock_api: inventory whoami, eligibility whoami, eligibility PR,
|
||||
# POST review (#244: state + visible-verdict GET reviews).
|
||||
mock_api.side_effect = [
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer1"},
|
||||
{"login": "reviewer1"},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"user": {"login": "other_user"},
|
||||
"state": "open",
|
||||
"head": {"sha": "abc1"},
|
||||
"head": {"sha": head_sha},
|
||||
"mergeable": True,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{"id": 100, "state": "APPROVED"},
|
||||
@@ -148,22 +159,19 @@ class TestPRQueueInventory(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"id": 100,
|
||||
"user": {"login": "reviewer1"},
|
||||
"state": "APPROVED",
|
||||
"commit_id": "abc1",
|
||||
"commit_id": head_sha,
|
||||
"submitted_at": "2026-07-06T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"dismissed": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
from mcp_server import init_review_decision_lock, gitea_mark_final_review_decision
|
||||
from tests.test_mcp_server import _install_owned_reviewer_lease
|
||||
import reviewer_pr_lease
|
||||
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server._authenticated_username", return_value="reviewer1"):
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server._authenticated_username", return_value="reviewer1"), \
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]):
|
||||
init_review_decision_lock("prgs", "review_pr")
|
||||
gitea_mark_final_review_decision(1, "approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
_seed_ready_review_decision(1, "approve", sha=head_sha, remote="prgs")
|
||||
lease_patch = _install_owned_reviewer_lease(
|
||||
1, head_sha="abc1", session_id="inventory-review-lease",
|
||||
1, head_sha=head_sha, session_id="inventory-review-lease",
|
||||
)
|
||||
lease_patch.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(lease_patch.stop)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
"""Regression tests for conflict-fix and reviewer PR work leases (#399)."""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
|
||||
|
||||
from pr_work_lease import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
REVIEWER_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
assess_conflict_fix_final_report,
|
||||
assess_conflict_fix_push,
|
||||
assess_head_sha_equality,
|
||||
assess_reviewer_mutation_blocked,
|
||||
assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report,
|
||||
format_conflict_fix_lease_body,
|
||||
parse_conflict_fix_lease_comment,
|
||||
parse_reviewer_lease_comment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
HEAD_A = "a" * 40
|
||||
HEAD_B = "b" * 40
|
||||
NOW = datetime(2026, 7, 7, 15, 0, tzinfo=timezone.utc)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _reviewer_lease_body(*, phase: str = "validating", expires_minutes: int = 60) -> str:
|
||||
expires = (NOW + timedelta(minutes=expires_minutes)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
return "\n".join([
|
||||
REVIEWER_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
"phase: " + phase,
|
||||
f"candidate_head: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"expires_at: {expires}",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _conflict_fix_body(*, phase: str = "claimed", worktree: str = "branches/fix-376") -> str:
|
||||
expires = (NOW + timedelta(minutes=60)).isoformat().replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
return "\n".join([
|
||||
CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER,
|
||||
"pr: #376",
|
||||
f"phase: {phase}",
|
||||
f"worktree: {worktree}",
|
||||
f"head_before: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"expires_at: {expires}",
|
||||
"profile: prgs-author",
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestLeaseParsing(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_parse_reviewer_lease(self):
|
||||
parsed = parse_reviewer_lease_comment(_reviewer_lease_body())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed["pr_number"], 376)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed["phase"], "validating")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed["candidate_head"], HEAD_A)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_parse_conflict_fix_lease(self):
|
||||
parsed = parse_conflict_fix_lease_comment(_conflict_fix_body())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed["pr_number"], 376)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed["phase"], "claimed")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestConflictFixPushGate(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_blocks_push_during_active_reviewer_lease(self):
|
||||
comments = [{"body": _reviewer_lease_body()}]
|
||||
result = assess_conflict_fix_push(
|
||||
pr_number=376,
|
||||
comments=comments,
|
||||
branch_head_before=HEAD_A,
|
||||
branch_head_after=HEAD_B,
|
||||
worktree_path="branches/fix-376",
|
||||
push_cwd="/proj/branches/fix-376",
|
||||
is_fast_forward=True,
|
||||
now=NOW,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["push_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("reviewer lease" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_rejects_non_fast_forward(self):
|
||||
result = assess_conflict_fix_push(
|
||||
pr_number=376,
|
||||
comments=[],
|
||||
branch_head_before=HEAD_A,
|
||||
branch_head_after=HEAD_B,
|
||||
worktree_path="branches/fix-376",
|
||||
push_cwd="/proj/branches/fix-376",
|
||||
is_fast_forward=False,
|
||||
now=NOW,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["push_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("non-fast-forward" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_cwd_push_attempt(self):
|
||||
result = assess_conflict_fix_push(
|
||||
pr_number=376,
|
||||
comments=[],
|
||||
branch_head_before=HEAD_A,
|
||||
branch_head_after=HEAD_B,
|
||||
worktree_path="branches/fix-376",
|
||||
push_cwd="/proj/master",
|
||||
is_fast_forward=True,
|
||||
now=NOW,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["push_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("cwd" in r.lower() for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sibling_conflict_fix_collision(self):
|
||||
comments = [{"body": _conflict_fix_body(phase="pushing", worktree="branches/other")}]
|
||||
result = assess_conflict_fix_push(
|
||||
pr_number=376,
|
||||
comments=comments,
|
||||
branch_head_before=HEAD_A,
|
||||
branch_head_after=HEAD_B,
|
||||
worktree_path="branches/fix-376",
|
||||
push_cwd="/proj/branches/fix-376",
|
||||
is_fast_forward=True,
|
||||
now=NOW,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["push_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("sibling conflict-fix" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestReviewerMutationGate(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_blocks_review_during_conflict_fix(self):
|
||||
comments = [{"body": _conflict_fix_body(phase="pushing")}]
|
||||
result = assess_reviewer_mutation_blocked(
|
||||
pr_number=376,
|
||||
comments=comments,
|
||||
reviewed_head_sha=HEAD_A,
|
||||
live_head_sha=HEAD_A,
|
||||
mutation="approve",
|
||||
now=NOW,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["mutation_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("conflict-fix lease" in r for r in result["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_head_blocks_approval(self):
|
||||
result = assess_reviewer_mutation_blocked(
|
||||
pr_number=376,
|
||||
comments=[],
|
||||
reviewed_head_sha=HEAD_A,
|
||||
live_head_sha=HEAD_B,
|
||||
mutation="merge",
|
||||
now=NOW,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["mutation_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["head_check"]["head_changed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_head_equality_required_fields(self):
|
||||
result = assess_head_sha_equality(HEAD_A, HEAD_B)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["head_changed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestFinalReportProof(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_reviewer_stale_head_report_requires_fields(self):
|
||||
result = assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report("no head proof here")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reviewer_stale_head_report_passes(self):
|
||||
report = "\n".join([
|
||||
f"Reviewed head SHA: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"Final live head SHA before approval: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"Final live head SHA before merge: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
"Push occurred during validation: no",
|
||||
])
|
||||
result = assess_reviewer_stale_head_final_report(report)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_conflict_fix_report_requires_fields(self):
|
||||
result = assess_conflict_fix_final_report("incomplete")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_conflict_fix_report_passes(self):
|
||||
report = "\n".join([
|
||||
f"Branch head before push: {HEAD_A}",
|
||||
f"Branch head after push: {HEAD_B}",
|
||||
"Active reviewer lease status: none",
|
||||
"Whether push was fast-forward: yes",
|
||||
"Whether any reviewer was active: no",
|
||||
])
|
||||
result = assess_conflict_fix_final_report(report)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["proven"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestFormatLease(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_format_conflict_fix_lease_includes_marker(self):
|
||||
body = format_conflict_fix_lease_body(
|
||||
pr_number=376,
|
||||
branch="feat/x",
|
||||
worktree="branches/fix-376",
|
||||
profile="prgs-author",
|
||||
head_before=HEAD_A,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn(CONFLICT_FIX_LEASE_MARKER, body)
|
||||
parsed = parse_conflict_fix_lease_comment(body)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(parsed["pr_number"], 376)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -19,7 +19,11 @@ def _minimal_review_report(**overrides):
|
||||
"- Issue/PR: #182 / PR #203",
|
||||
"- Branch/SHA: feat/x @ 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Files changed: review_proofs.py",
|
||||
"- Validation: pytest tests/test_review_proofs.py -q in branches/review-203",
|
||||
"- Validation: pass: pytest tests/test_review_proofs.py -q in branches/review-203",
|
||||
"- Reviewed head SHA: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Final live head SHA before approval: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Final live head SHA before merge: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9",
|
||||
"- Push occurred during validation: no",
|
||||
"- Mutations: review only",
|
||||
"- File edits by reviewer: none",
|
||||
"- Worktree/index mutations: none",
|
||||
@@ -80,7 +84,7 @@ class TestReviewFinalReportSchema(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reviewed_head_without_validation_blocks(self):
|
||||
report = _minimal_review_report().replace(
|
||||
"- Validation: pytest tests/test_review_proofs.py -q in branches/review-203",
|
||||
"- Validation: pass: pytest tests/test_review_proofs.py -q in branches/review-203",
|
||||
"- Validation: not run",
|
||||
)
|
||||
report += "\n- Pinned reviewed head: 0fdc8f582026b72a229d59a172c0a63ac4aaeaf9"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
import mcp_server
|
||||
|
||||
HEAD_SHA = "a" * 40
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _lock(mutations=None, correction=False):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
@@ -127,10 +129,20 @@ def _feedback(blocking, stale=False, success=True):
|
||||
"success": success,
|
||||
"has_blocking_change_requests": blocking,
|
||||
"review_feedback_stale": stale,
|
||||
"current_head_sha": "abc123",
|
||||
"current_head_sha": HEAD_SHA,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _mark(action, pr_number=6, **kwargs):
|
||||
kwargs.setdefault("expected_head_sha", HEAD_SHA)
|
||||
no_lease_block = {"block": False, "reasons": [], "mutation_allowed": True}
|
||||
with patch("mcp_server._list_pr_lease_comments", return_value=[]), \
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._pr_work_lease_reviewer_block", return_value=no_lease_block):
|
||||
return mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=pr_number, action=action, remote="prgs", **kwargs
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
mcp_server._save_review_decision_lock(None)
|
||||
@@ -139,8 +151,7 @@ class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
_seed()
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=_feedback(blocking=True, stale=False)):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="request_changes", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("request_changes")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["marked_ready"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("duplicate" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
|
||||
@@ -150,16 +161,14 @@ class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
_seed()
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=_feedback(blocking=True, stale=True)):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="request_changes", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("request_changes")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["marked_ready"], result.get("reasons"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_request_changes_allowed_when_no_blocker(self):
|
||||
_seed()
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=_feedback(blocking=False)):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="request_changes", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("request_changes")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["marked_ready"], result.get("reasons"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_request_changes_fails_closed_when_feedback_unavailable(self):
|
||||
@@ -167,8 +176,7 @@ class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
return_value=_feedback(blocking=False,
|
||||
success=False)):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="request_changes", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("request_changes")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["marked_ready"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("could not verify" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
|
||||
@@ -178,8 +186,7 @@ class TestDuplicateRequestChangesSuppression(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
_seed()
|
||||
with patch.object(mcp_server, "gitea_get_pr_review_feedback",
|
||||
side_effect=AssertionError("must not be called")):
|
||||
result = mcp_server.gitea_mark_final_review_decision(
|
||||
pr_number=6, action="approve", remote="prgs")
|
||||
result = _mark("approve")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["marked_ready"], result.get("reasons"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user