feat(launcher): trusted client-instance identity for project-scoped launches

Issue #985. The production launcher could mint one trusted
GITEA_MCP_CLIENT_INSTANCE per launch, but two gaps kept real launches on
untrusted legacy-pid-* identities:

1. build_application_mcp_servers required a profile for all five sanctioned
   namespaces, so a project-scoped configuration exposing only author,
   reviewer, and merger could not use it without inventing controller and
   reconciler profiles that must not exist.
2. The module produced configuration data but had no runnable entry point, so
   every real launch bypassed it entirely.

Changes:

- resolve_launch_namespaces() validates an explicit namespace subset as an
  allow-list; unknown, duplicate, and empty selections are refused rather than
  silently narrowing a launch. Omitting it preserves five-namespace behaviour.
- build_application_mcp_servers() accepts that subset, requires profiles only
  for the launched namespaces, starts only those workers, and reports
  excluded_namespaces / project_scoped.
- collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers() inspects the launch's own namespaces
  instead of an assumed five, and reports missing_servers, so a three-namespace
  launch can prove shared attribution without reading as two absent workers.
- Runnable entry point: python3 -m mcp_application_launcher mints one trusted
  identity, writes a per-launch 0600 mcpServers config, and execs the client.
  CLIENT_LAUNCH_SPECS is a data-driven registry so other supported clients use
  the same mint-once/propagate-to-all mechanism. --dry-run prints the plan.
- Provenance sealing now fails closed. The inst- format is public and
  reproducible, so format alone could previously let anyone who set one
  environment variable manufacture a trusted identity. Trust now additionally
  requires GITEA_MCP_INSTANCE_PROVENANCE=trusted_launcher, which only the
  launcher writes; a well-formed but unsealed value is classified
  unsealed_launcher and refused, while still being reported for diagnosis.

Deliberate behaviour change: tests/test_issue_978_instance_fleet_snapshot.py
test_client_hints_trusted_when_set previously asserted that a well-formed ID
alone was trusted. It now supplies the launcher seal, and a new companion test
asserts the unsealed case fails closed. This tightens the contract; no
assertion was weakened.

No static or persistent per-project instance IDs are introduced, duplicate
worker and cohort detection are untouched, and no fleet or mutation gate is
relaxed.

Tests: tests/test_issue_985_project_scoped_launcher.py, 47 passed, 3 subtests.
Full suite from a branches/ worktree: 28 failed, 6252 passed, 6 skipped against
a master baseline at 32ab8392 of 28 failed, 6204 passed, 6 skipped; the failing
sets are byte-identical, so zero regressions and zero masked failures.

Closes #985

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>

docs/instance-fleet-identity.md

@@ -34,8 +34,10 @@ namespaces.
 
 1. Multiple active instances **may** share the same `client_type`.
 2. Every application launch receives a **distinct** `client_instance_id`.
-3. All five namespace workers of one launch report the **same**
+3. All namespace workers of one launch report the **same**
-   `client_instance_id`.
+   `client_instance_id`. For a whole-fleet launch that is five workers; for a
+   project-scoped launch it is exactly the namespaces that launch started
+   (#985).
 4. Each namespace worker has a **distinct** `worker_identity`, process
    identity, generation, and PID.
 5. Instance identity is **never** inferred from PID proximity, timestamps, or
@@ -46,6 +48,92 @@ namespaces.
 This deliberately **replaces** any permanent `exactly_one_per_profile` fleet
 model (#949 assumption) as the operating rule for multi-instance fleets.
 
+## Project-scoped launches and the runnable entry point (#985)
+
+Not every project exposes all five namespaces. A project-scoped configuration
+such as Weekly Briefings intentionally has **author, reviewer, and merger
+only**, and has no controller or reconciler profile to supply. Requiring all
+five would force operators to invent profiles that must not exist, so the
+launcher accepts an explicitly validated subset.
+
+### Running a launch
+
+```bash
+python3 -m mcp_application_launcher \
+    --client claude_code \
+    --namespaces author,reviewer,merger \
+    --profile author=prgs-author \
+    --profile reviewer=prgs-reviewer \
+    --profile merger=prgs-merger
+```
+
+That mints one trusted `client_instance_id`, writes a per-launch `mcpServers`
+config, and executes:
+
+```text
+claude --mcp-config <per-launch.json> --strict-mcp-config
+```
+
+Add `--dry-run` to print the plan (namespaces, excluded namespaces, minted ID,
+argv, config path) as JSON and start nothing. Omit `--namespaces` to launch all
+five exactly as before. Arguments after the flags are forwarded to the client.
+
+Other supported clients register one entry in
+`mcp_application_launcher.CLIENT_LAUNCH_SPECS`; because the argv builder only
+ever receives a config this module wrote, every client necessarily goes through
+the same mint-once/propagate-to-all mechanism.
+
+### Why the config is per-launch and never `.mcp.json`
+
+Persisting a trusted ID into a shared, reused `.mcp.json` would give two
+concurrent sessions **the same** trusted identity — precisely the reuse case
+the duplicate gate must reject. The launcher therefore writes a fresh
+owner-readable-only (`0600`) config per launch. Do not commit one, and do not
+copy a minted `GITEA_MCP_CLIENT_INSTANCE` into any checked-in configuration.
+
+### Provenance sealing
+
+The `inst-…` format is public and reproducible, so format alone cannot
+establish trust: anyone able to set one environment variable could otherwise
+hand-write a valid-looking ID and be believed. Trust therefore requires **both**
+the format and `GITEA_MCP_INSTANCE_PROVENANCE=trusted_launcher`, which only the
+launcher writes. A well-formed but unsealed identity is classified
+`unsealed_launcher` and **fails closed** — it is still reported for diagnosis,
+but never authorizes trusted attribution. Manually asserted trust is not
+possible.
+
+### Migration and coordinated relaunch
+
+Existing configurations that predate this work set no instance key at all, so
+their workers register under `legacy-pid-*` (`legacy_incomplete`) and remain
+mutually indistinguishable when two launches share a profile.
+
+Migrating is a **coordinated relaunch**, not an in-place edit — a running
+worker cannot acquire an identity it was not started with:
+
+1. Stop every LLM client currently running Gitea MCP workers. A single
+   surviving legacy cohort keeps the fleet ambiguous.
+2. Relaunch each application through the command above.
+3. Repeat per application. Concurrent launches are expected and safe: each
+   receives its own trusted ID.
+
+### Post-launch verification
+
+* `gitea_get_runtime_context` → `provenance_assessment.attachment` should show
+  an `inst-…` `client_instance_id` with
+  `instance_id_provenance: trusted_launcher`, not `legacy-pid-*` /
+  `legacy_incomplete`.
+* Every namespace of the same launch must report that **same** ID; two
+  different launches must report different IDs.
+* `gitea_resolve_task_capability` should return
+  `exact_safe_next_action: "None; ready for operations."` with no
+  `blocker_kind`. A `runtime_reconnect_required` naming duplicate PIDs per
+  profile means at least one cohort is still on legacy identity, or a second
+  cohort is genuinely running.
+* `mcp_application_launcher.collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers(servers,
+  namespaces=[...])` returns `shared_single_trusted_id` for a built config, and
+  reports `missing_servers` when an expected namespace entry is absent.
+
 ## How five workers join one instance
 
 1. The host starts one application instance (for example one Codex session).

gitea_config.py

@@ -1286,16 +1286,19 @@ def multi_namespace_launcher_entries(
     profile_by_namespace,
     *,
     client_type,
+    namespaces=None,
     config_path=None,
     client_instance_id=None,
     fleet_run_id=None,
     session_id=None,
     launch_nonce=None,
 ):
-    """Build production mcpServers for all five namespaces of one application launch.
+    """Build production mcpServers for the namespaces of one application launch.
 
     One shared trusted ``client_instance_id`` is minted (or reused) and
-    propagated to every namespace worker env. See
+    propagated to every namespace worker env. *namespaces* selects a validated
+    project-scoped subset (#985); omitting it launches all five sanctioned
+    namespaces as before. See
     :func:`mcp_application_launcher.build_application_mcp_servers`.
     """
     import mcp_application_launcher as app_launcher
@@ -1303,6 +1306,7 @@ def multi_namespace_launcher_entries(
     return app_launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
         profile_by_namespace,
         client_type=client_type,
+        namespaces=namespaces,
         config_path=config_path or DEFAULT_CONFIG_PATH,
         client_instance_id=client_instance_id,
         fleet_run_id=fleet_run_id,

mcp_application_launcher.py

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ from __future__ import annotations
 
 import os
 import secrets
-from typing import Any, Mapping
+from typing import Any, Mapping, Sequence
 
 import mcp_fleet_snapshot as fleet
 import mcp_worker_identity as mwi
@@ -152,10 +152,54 @@ def namespace_worker_env(
     return env
 
 
+def resolve_launch_namespaces(
+    namespaces: "Sequence[str] | None" = None,
+) -> tuple[str, ...]:
+    """Validate an explicit project-scoped namespace subset (#985).
+
+    ``None`` keeps the historical whole-fleet behaviour and resolves to all five
+    sanctioned namespaces. An explicit sequence is validated against
+    :data:`SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES` and returned in canonical fleet order, so a
+    project-scoped configuration (for example author/reviewer/merger only) can
+    launch without inventing controller or reconciler profiles.
+
+    This is an allow-list, not a filter: anything outside the sanctioned set is
+    refused rather than silently dropped, so a typo can never quietly shrink a
+    launch to fewer workers than the operator intended.
+    """
+    if namespaces is None:
+        return tuple(SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES)
+
+    requested = [str(ns).strip().lower() for ns in namespaces]
+    if not requested or any(not ns for ns in requested):
+        raise ValueError(
+            "namespaces must be a non-empty sequence of sanctioned namespace "
+            f"names; choose from {list(SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES)}"
+        )
+
+    unknown = sorted({ns for ns in requested if ns not in SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES})
+    if unknown:
+        raise ValueError(
+            f"unsanctioned namespace(s) {unknown} requested; sanctioned "
+            f"namespaces are {list(SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES)}"
+        )
+
+    duplicates = sorted({ns for ns in requested if requested.count(ns) > 1})
+    if duplicates:
+        raise ValueError(
+            f"duplicate namespace(s) {duplicates} requested; each sanctioned "
+            "namespace may appear at most once in one launch"
+        )
+
+    selected = set(requested)
+    return tuple(ns for ns in SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES if ns in selected)
+
+
 def build_application_mcp_servers(
     profile_by_namespace: Mapping[str, str],
     *,
     client_type: str | None,
+    namespaces: "Sequence[str] | None" = None,
     config_path: str | None = None,
     client_instance_id: str | None = None,
     fleet_run_id: str | None = None,
@@ -175,14 +219,22 @@ def build_application_mcp_servers(
 
     Every namespace server entry receives the **same** instance ID. Separate
     calls with no supplied ID receive distinct IDs.
+
+    *namespaces* selects an explicitly validated project-scoped subset (#985).
+    Omitting it preserves the original whole-fleet behaviour, so existing
+    five-namespace callers are unaffected. Only the resolved namespaces need a
+    profile, and only they are started; excluded namespaces are reported so a
+    caller can prove a controller/reconciler worker was never launched.
     """
+    resolved_namespaces = resolve_launch_namespaces(namespaces)
+
     missing = [
-        ns for ns in SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES if not profile_by_namespace.get(ns)
+        ns for ns in resolved_namespaces if not profile_by_namespace.get(ns)
     ]
     if missing:
         raise ValueError(
             "build_application_mcp_servers requires a profile for every "
-            f"sanctioned namespace; missing: {missing}"
+            f"requested namespace; missing: {missing}"
         )
 
     if client_instance_id is None:
@@ -213,6 +265,13 @@ def build_application_mcp_servers(
             "namespace_server_names": list(NAMESPACE_SERVER_NAMES),
         }
 
+    # The launch record describes only the namespaces this launch actually
+    # starts, so downstream attribution never implies an unstarted worker.
+    launch["namespaces"] = list(resolved_namespaces)
+    launch["namespace_server_names"] = [
+        f"gitea-{ns}" for ns in resolved_namespaces
+    ]
+
     # Resolve command/args from the production server entry when not provided.
     if command is None or args is None:
         import gitea_config
@@ -223,7 +282,7 @@ def build_application_mcp_servers(
 
     servers: dict[str, Any] = {}
     shared_id = launch["client_instance_id"]
-    for namespace in SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES:
+    for namespace in resolved_namespaces:
         server_name = f"gitea-{namespace}"
         profile = profile_by_namespace[namespace]
         env = namespace_worker_env(
@@ -240,14 +299,17 @@ def build_application_mcp_servers(
             "env": env,
         }
 
+    excluded = [ns for ns in SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES if ns not in resolved_namespaces]
     return {
         "mcpServers": servers,
         "launch": launch,
         "client_instance_id": shared_id,
         "client_type": launch["client_type"],
-        "namespaces": list(SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES),
+        "namespaces": list(resolved_namespaces),
+        "excluded_namespaces": excluded,
+        "project_scoped": bool(excluded),
         "shared_instance_id_across_namespaces": True,
-        "namespace_count": len(SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES),
+        "namespace_count": len(resolved_namespaces),
     }
 
 
@@ -316,15 +378,33 @@ def launcher_entry_for_profile(
 
 def collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers(
     mcp_servers: Mapping[str, Any],
+    *,
+    namespaces: "Sequence[str] | None" = None,
 ) -> dict[str, Any]:
     """Inspect a production mcpServers map for shared instance attribution.
 
-    Returns the unique set of client_instance_id values across gitea-* servers
+    Returns the unique set of client_instance_id values across the gitea-*
-    and whether all five namespaces share exactly one trusted ID.
+    servers of one launch and whether every worker of that launch shares
+    exactly one trusted ID.
+
+    The inspected set is the launch's own namespaces, not an assumed five
+    (#985): a project-scoped author/reviewer/merger launch must be able to
+    prove shared attribution without a controller or reconciler entry counting
+    as a missing worker. Pass *namespaces* to assert an exact expected subset;
+    omit it to inspect whichever sanctioned namespace servers are present.
     """
+    if namespaces is None:
+        expected_servers = [
+            name for name in NAMESPACE_SERVER_NAMES if name in mcp_servers
+        ]
+    else:
+        expected_servers = [
+            f"gitea-{ns}" for ns in resolve_launch_namespaces(namespaces)
+        ]
+
     ids: list[str] = []
     by_server: dict[str, str | None] = {}
-    for name in NAMESPACE_SERVER_NAMES:
+    for name in expected_servers:
         entry = mcp_servers.get(name) or {}
         env = entry.get("env") or {}
         raw = (env.get(CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV) or "").strip() or None
@@ -337,14 +417,19 @@ def collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers(
         for i in unique
         if fleet.assess_instance_identity(i)["trusted"]
     ]
+    missing_servers = [n for n in expected_servers if n not in mcp_servers]
     return {
         "server_instance_ids": by_server,
         "unique_instance_ids": unique,
         "trusted_instance_ids": trusted,
+        "inspected_servers": list(expected_servers),
+        "missing_servers": missing_servers,
         "shared_single_trusted_id": (
-            len(unique) == 1
+            bool(expected_servers)
+            and not missing_servers
+            and len(unique) == 1
             and len(trusted) == 1
-            and all(by_server.get(n) == unique[0] for n in NAMESPACE_SERVER_NAMES)
+            and all(by_server.get(n) == unique[0] for n in expected_servers)
         ),
         "namespace_server_count": sum(
             1 for n in NAMESPACE_SERVER_NAMES if n in mcp_servers
@@ -365,20 +450,23 @@ def inherit_or_refuse_client_instance(
     source = dict(env if env is not None else os.environ)
     raw = (source.get(CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV) or "").strip() or None
     provenance_marker = (source.get(INSTANCE_PROVENANCE_ENV) or "").strip()
-    assessment = fleet.assess_instance_identity(raw)
+    assessment = dict(fleet.assess_instance_identity(raw))
-    # Ordinary user-supplied values without launcher provenance marker are
+    # The ``inst-…`` format is public and reproducible, so format alone cannot
-    # still format-checked by assess_instance_identity. When the format is
+    # establish trust: anyone able to set one env var could otherwise hand-write
-    # trusted but the launcher marker is absent, keep the ID but note that
+    # a well-formed ID and be believed. Trust therefore requires the launcher's
-    # provenance is not launcher-sealed (operator hand-set or legacy config).
+    # own seal as well, and a well-formed but unsealed identity fails closed
+    # rather than degrading to a mere annotation (#985).
     if assessment["trusted"] and provenance_marker != LAUNCHER_PROVENANCE_VALUE:
-        assessment = dict(assessment)
         assessment["launcher_sealed"] = False
+        assessment["trusted"] = False
+        assessment["complete"] = False
+        assessment["provenance"] = fleet.INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_UNSEALED
         assessment["reasons"] = list(assessment.get("reasons") or []) + [
             f"{INSTANCE_PROVENANCE_ENV} is not {LAUNCHER_PROVENANCE_VALUE!r}; "
-            "identity format is valid but not sealed by the production launcher"
+            "identity format is valid but not sealed by the production "
+            "launcher, so trusted attribution is refused"
         ]
     else:
-        assessment = dict(assessment)
         assessment["launcher_sealed"] = bool(
             assessment["trusted"]
             and provenance_marker == LAUNCHER_PROVENANCE_VALUE
@@ -391,3 +479,275 @@ def inherit_or_refuse_client_instance(
         (source.get("GITEA_MCP_CLIENT") or "").strip() or None
     )
     return assessment
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Runnable launch path (#985)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+#: How each supported LLM client is started with a per-launch MCP config.
+#:
+#: The launch interface is deliberately a data-driven registry rather than a
+#: Claude-specific code path: adding another supported client is one entry, and
+#: every client necessarily goes through the same mint-once/propagate-to-all
+#: identity mechanism because the argv builder only ever receives a config file
+#: this module wrote.
+CLIENT_LAUNCH_SPECS: dict[str, dict[str, Any]] = {
+    "claude_code": {
+        "command": "claude",
+        "config_args": lambda path: ["--mcp-config", path, "--strict-mcp-config"],
+        "docs": "claude --mcp-config <per-launch.json> --strict-mcp-config",
+    },
+}
+
+
+def supported_launch_clients() -> tuple[str, ...]:
+    """Client types with a sanctioned runnable launch path."""
+    return tuple(sorted(CLIENT_LAUNCH_SPECS))
+
+
+def build_client_launch_argv(
+    client_type: str,
+    config_path: str,
+    *,
+    extra_args: "Sequence[str] | None" = None,
+) -> list[str]:
+    """Build the argv that starts *client_type* against a per-launch config."""
+    client = mwi.normalize_client_name(client_type)
+    spec = CLIENT_LAUNCH_SPECS.get(client)
+    if spec is None:
+        raise ValueError(
+            f"no sanctioned runnable launch path for client {client!r}; "
+            f"supported clients: {list(supported_launch_clients())}"
+        )
+    argv = [str(spec["command"])] + list(spec["config_args"](str(config_path)))
+    if extra_args:
+        argv.extend(str(a) for a in extra_args)
+    return argv
+
+
+def write_launch_config(
+    mcp_servers: Mapping[str, Any],
+    *,
+    directory: str | None = None,
+) -> str:
+    """Write one launch's ``mcpServers`` config to a fresh per-launch file.
+
+    The file is per-launch and owner-readable only. #985 explicitly rules out
+    persisting an instance ID into a shared, reused ``.mcp.json``: two
+    concurrent sessions reading one static trusted ID is precisely the reuse
+    case the duplicate guard must reject. A distinct file per launch keeps the
+    minted identity bound to the launch that minted it.
+    """
+    import json
+    import tempfile
+
+    fd, path = tempfile.mkstemp(
+        prefix="gitea-mcp-launch-", suffix=".json", dir=directory
+    )
+    try:
+        os.fchmod(fd, 0o600)
+        with os.fdopen(fd, "w", encoding="utf-8") as handle:
+            json.dump({"mcpServers": dict(mcp_servers)}, handle, indent=2)
+            handle.write("\n")
+    except Exception:
+        try:
+            os.unlink(path)
+        except OSError:
+            pass
+        raise
+    return path
+
+
+def prepare_application_launch(
+    profile_by_namespace: Mapping[str, str],
+    *,
+    client_type: str,
+    namespaces: "Sequence[str] | None" = None,
+    config_path: str | None = None,
+    fleet_run_id: str | None = None,
+    session_id: str | None = None,
+    launch_nonce: str | None = None,
+    extra_args: "Sequence[str] | None" = None,
+    config_directory: str | None = None,
+    now=None,
+) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Mint one launch and produce everything needed to exec the client.
+
+    Returns the built servers, the per-launch config file path, the argv to
+    exec, and the shared trusted identity — without starting anything, so the
+    same preparation is testable and inspectable via ``--dry-run``.
+    """
+    built = build_application_mcp_servers(
+        profile_by_namespace,
+        client_type=client_type,
+        namespaces=namespaces,
+        config_path=config_path,
+        fleet_run_id=fleet_run_id,
+        session_id=session_id,
+        launch_nonce=launch_nonce,
+        now=now,
+    )
+    # Fail before writing anything if this client has no runnable path.
+    argv_probe = build_client_launch_argv(
+        client_type, "<pending>", extra_args=extra_args
+    )
+    launch_config_path = write_launch_config(
+        built["mcpServers"], directory=config_directory
+    )
+    argv = build_client_launch_argv(
+        client_type, launch_config_path, extra_args=extra_args
+    )
+    proof = collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers(
+        built["mcpServers"], namespaces=built["namespaces"]
+    )
+    return {
+        "client_type": built["client_type"],
+        "client_instance_id": built["client_instance_id"],
+        "namespaces": built["namespaces"],
+        "excluded_namespaces": built["excluded_namespaces"],
+        "project_scoped": built["project_scoped"],
+        "launch_config_path": launch_config_path,
+        "argv": argv,
+        "argv_template": argv_probe,
+        "mcpServers": built["mcpServers"],
+        "launch": built["launch"],
+        "shared_single_trusted_id": proof["shared_single_trusted_id"],
+        "attribution_proof": proof,
+    }
+
+
+def _parse_profile_assignments(values: "Sequence[str]") -> dict[str, str]:
+    """Parse ``namespace=profile`` CLI pairs into a mapping."""
+    profiles: dict[str, str] = {}
+    for raw in values or ():
+        text = str(raw)
+        if "=" not in text:
+            raise ValueError(
+                f"invalid --profile {text!r}; expected namespace=profile-name"
+            )
+        namespace, _, profile = text.partition("=")
+        namespace = namespace.strip().lower()
+        profile = profile.strip()
+        if not namespace or not profile:
+            raise ValueError(
+                f"invalid --profile {text!r}; expected namespace=profile-name"
+            )
+        if namespace in profiles:
+            raise ValueError(f"duplicate --profile entry for namespace {namespace!r}")
+        profiles[namespace] = profile
+    return profiles
+
+
+def main(argv: "Sequence[str] | None" = None) -> int:
+    """Runnable entry point: start a supported LLM client for one launch.
+
+    Example (project-scoped, three namespaces)::
+
+        python3 -m mcp_application_launcher \\
+            --client claude_code \\
+            --namespaces author,reviewer,merger \\
+            --profile author=prgs-author \\
+            --profile reviewer=prgs-reviewer \\
+            --profile merger=prgs-merger
+    """
+    import argparse
+    import json
+
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
+        prog="mcp_application_launcher",
+        description=(
+            "Start a supported LLM client with one trusted, per-launch "
+            "GITEA_MCP_CLIENT_INSTANCE shared by every MCP namespace worker."
+        ),
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--client",
+        default="claude_code",
+        help=f"client to launch; supported: {list(supported_launch_clients())}",
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--namespaces",
+        default=None,
+        help=(
+            "comma-separated sanctioned namespace subset (e.g. "
+            "'author,reviewer,merger'); omit to launch all five"
+        ),
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--profile",
+        action="append",
+        default=[],
+        metavar="NAMESPACE=PROFILE",
+        help="profile for one namespace; repeat once per launched namespace",
+    )
+    parser.add_argument("--config-path", default=None, help="profiles.json path")
+    parser.add_argument("--fleet-run-id", default=None)
+    parser.add_argument("--session-id", default=None)
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--dry-run",
+        action="store_true",
+        help="print the launch plan as JSON and exit without starting anything",
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "client_args",
+        nargs=argparse.REMAINDER,
+        help="arguments forwarded to the client after '--'",
+    )
+    ns = parser.parse_args(list(argv) if argv is not None else None)
+
+    try:
+        profiles = _parse_profile_assignments(ns.profile)
+        requested = (
+            [part.strip() for part in ns.namespaces.split(",") if part.strip()]
+            if ns.namespaces
+            else None
+        )
+        resolved = resolve_launch_namespaces(requested)
+        # Profiles for namespaces that are not being launched are almost always
+        # a mistake (a stale five-namespace invocation), so refuse rather than
+        # silently ignore them.
+        stray = sorted(set(profiles) - set(resolved))
+        if stray:
+            raise ValueError(
+                f"--profile given for namespace(s) {stray} that this launch "
+                f"does not start; launched namespaces are {list(resolved)}"
+            )
+        forwarded = [a for a in (ns.client_args or []) if a != "--"]
+        prepared = prepare_application_launch(
+            profiles,
+            client_type=ns.client,
+            namespaces=requested,
+            config_path=ns.config_path,
+            fleet_run_id=ns.fleet_run_id,
+            session_id=ns.session_id,
+            extra_args=forwarded,
+        )
+    except ValueError as exc:
+        parser.error(str(exc))
+        return 2  # pragma: no cover - argparse.error raises SystemExit
+
+    if ns.dry_run:
+        plan = {
+            key: prepared[key]
+            for key in (
+                "client_type",
+                "client_instance_id",
+                "namespaces",
+                "excluded_namespaces",
+                "project_scoped",
+                "launch_config_path",
+                "argv",
+                "shared_single_trusted_id",
+            )
+        }
+        print(json.dumps(plan, indent=2))
+        return 0
+
+    argv_to_exec = prepared["argv"]
+    os.execvp(argv_to_exec[0], argv_to_exec)
+    return 0  # pragma: no cover - execvp does not return
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":  # pragma: no cover - process entry point
+    raise SystemExit(main())

mcp_fleet_snapshot.py

@@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ SANCTIONED_NAMESPACES = frozenset(
 INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_TRUSTED = "trusted_launcher"
 INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_LEGACY = "legacy_incomplete"
 INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_MISSING = "missing"
+#: Well-formed ``inst-…`` identity presented without the launcher's own
+#: provenance seal (#985). The format alone is public and reproducible, so an
+#: unsealed value is treated as manually asserted trust and fails closed.
+INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_UNSEALED = "unsealed_launcher"
 
 CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV = "GITEA_MCP_CLIENT_INSTANCE"
 FLEET_RUN_ENV = "GITEA_MCP_FLEET_RUN_ID"

tests/test_issue_978_instance_fleet_snapshot.py

@@ -1032,9 +1032,43 @@ class ClientHintsTests(unittest.TestCase):
         )
 
     def test_client_hints_trusted_when_set(self):
+        """Trusted requires the launcher seal as well as the format (#985).
+
+        Before #985 a well-formed ``inst-…`` value alone was accepted as
+        trusted. The format is public and reproducible, so anyone able to set
+        one environment variable could hand-write a valid-looking ID; #985
+        therefore additionally requires the provenance marker that only the
+        production launcher writes. This case now supplies the full sealed env
+        the launcher actually emits.
+        """
         import gitea_mcp_server as server
 
         inst = fleet.generate_client_instance_id("codex", launch_nonce="t", now=NOW)
+        with mock.patch.dict(
+            os.environ,
+            {
+                "GITEA_MCP_CLIENT": "codex",
+                "GITEA_MCP_CLIENT_INSTANCE": inst,
+                "GITEA_MCP_INSTANCE_PROVENANCE": (
+                    fleet.INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_TRUSTED
+                ),
+                "GITEA_MCP_FLEET_RUN_ID": "run-1",
+            },
+            clear=False,
+        ):
+            hints = server._client_identity_hints()
+        self.assertTrue(hints["instance_identity_trusted"])
+        self.assertTrue(hints["instance_launcher_sealed"])
+        self.assertEqual(hints["client_instance_id"], inst)
+        self.assertEqual(hints["fleet_run_id"], "run-1")
+
+    def test_client_hints_wellformed_but_unsealed_not_trusted(self):
+        """#985: a valid-looking ID without the launcher seal fails closed."""
+        import gitea_mcp_server as server
+
+        inst = fleet.generate_client_instance_id(
+            "codex", launch_nonce="unsealed", now=NOW
+        )
         with mock.patch.dict(
             os.environ,
             {
@@ -1044,10 +1078,16 @@ class ClientHintsTests(unittest.TestCase):
             },
             clear=False,
         ):
+            os.environ.pop("GITEA_MCP_INSTANCE_PROVENANCE", None)
             hints = server._client_identity_hints()
-        self.assertTrue(hints["instance_identity_trusted"])
+        self.assertFalse(hints["instance_identity_trusted"])
+        self.assertFalse(hints["instance_launcher_sealed"])
+        # Still reported for diagnosis rather than silently discarded.
         self.assertEqual(hints["client_instance_id"], inst)
-        self.assertEqual(hints["fleet_run_id"], "run-1")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            hints["instance_id_provenance"],
+            fleet.INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_UNSEALED,
+        )
 
     def test_malformed_user_supplied_instance_not_trusted(self):
         import gitea_mcp_server as server

tests/test_issue_985_project_scoped_launcher.py

@@ -0,0 +1,664 @@
+"""#985 — trusted client-instance identity for project-scoped LLM launches.
+
+Covers the acceptance criteria of issue #985:
+
+* a three-namespace (author/reviewer/merger) launch succeeds with no
+  controller or reconciler profile,
+* every worker of one launch shares exactly one trusted instance ID,
+* two concurrent launches receive distinct IDs and stay distinguishable,
+* reuse, missing, legacy, malformed, unsanctioned, and unsealed identities all
+  fail closed,
+* the existing five-namespace behaviour is unchanged,
+* Claude Code has a documented, runnable launch command.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import datetime as _dt
+import json
+import os
+import sys
+import unittest
+
+sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
+
+import mcp_application_launcher as launcher  # noqa: E402
+import mcp_fleet_snapshot as fleet  # noqa: E402
+
+NOW = _dt.datetime(2026, 7, 31, 12, 0, 0, tzinfo=_dt.timezone.utc)
+
+PROJECT_NAMESPACES = ("author", "reviewer", "merger")
+ALL_NAMESPACES = ("author", "reviewer", "merger", "controller", "reconciler")
+
+#: A project-scoped configuration intentionally has no controller/reconciler
+#: profile — that absence is the condition under test, not an omission.
+PROJECT_PROFILES = {ns: f"prgs-{ns}" for ns in PROJECT_NAMESPACES}
+FULL_PROFILES = {ns: f"prgs-{ns}" for ns in ALL_NAMESPACES}
+
+
+def _instance_ids(servers):
+    return {
+        name: entry["env"][launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV]
+        for name, entry in servers.items()
+    }
+
+
+class ResolveLaunchNamespacesTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    """The validated subset allow-list."""
+
+    def test_none_resolves_to_all_five_in_canonical_order(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            launcher.resolve_launch_namespaces(None), tuple(ALL_NAMESPACES)
+        )
+
+    def test_project_subset_resolves_in_canonical_order(self):
+        # Deliberately out of order on input; canonical order on output.
+        self.assertEqual(
+            launcher.resolve_launch_namespaces(["merger", "author", "reviewer"]),
+            ("author", "reviewer", "merger"),
+        )
+
+    def test_case_and_whitespace_normalised(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            launcher.resolve_launch_namespaces([" Author ", "REVIEWER"]),
+            ("author", "reviewer"),
+        )
+
+    def test_unsanctioned_namespace_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
+            launcher.resolve_launch_namespaces(["author", "admin"])
+        self.assertIn("admin", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_typo_is_refused_not_silently_dropped(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            launcher.resolve_launch_namespaces(["author", "reviewr"])
+
+    def test_empty_subset_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            launcher.resolve_launch_namespaces([])
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            launcher.resolve_launch_namespaces(["   "])
+
+    def test_duplicate_namespace_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            launcher.resolve_launch_namespaces(["author", "author"])
+
+
+class ProjectScopedLaunchTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC: three-namespace launch without controller/reconciler profiles."""
+
+    def _build(self, **kwargs):
+        kwargs.setdefault("client_type", "claude_code")
+        kwargs.setdefault("namespaces", PROJECT_NAMESPACES)
+        kwargs.setdefault("command", "python3")
+        kwargs.setdefault("args", ["mcp_server.py"])
+        profiles = kwargs.pop("profiles", PROJECT_PROFILES)
+        return launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(profiles, **kwargs)
+
+    def test_three_namespace_launch_succeeds_without_controller_reconciler(self):
+        built = self._build(launch_nonce="proj-1", now=NOW)
+        servers = built["mcpServers"]
+        self.assertEqual(
+            sorted(servers), ["gitea-author", "gitea-merger", "gitea-reviewer"]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(built["namespace_count"], 3)
+        self.assertEqual(list(built["namespaces"]), list(PROJECT_NAMESPACES))
+
+    def test_excluded_namespaces_are_not_started(self):
+        built = self._build(launch_nonce="proj-2", now=NOW)
+        self.assertNotIn("gitea-controller", built["mcpServers"])
+        self.assertNotIn("gitea-reconciler", built["mcpServers"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            sorted(built["excluded_namespaces"]), ["controller", "reconciler"]
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(built["project_scoped"])
+
+    def test_all_workers_of_one_launch_share_one_trusted_id(self):
+        built = self._build(launch_nonce="proj-3", now=NOW)
+        ids = set(_instance_ids(built["mcpServers"]).values())
+        self.assertEqual(len(ids), 1, ids)
+        shared = next(iter(ids))
+        self.assertTrue(fleet.assess_instance_identity(shared)["trusted"])
+        self.assertEqual(built["client_instance_id"], shared)
+
+    def test_every_worker_env_is_launcher_sealed(self):
+        built = self._build(launch_nonce="proj-4", now=NOW)
+        for name, entry in built["mcpServers"].items():
+            env = entry["env"]
+            self.assertEqual(
+                env[launcher.INSTANCE_PROVENANCE_ENV],
+                fleet.INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_TRUSTED,
+                name,
+            )
+            self.assertEqual(env["GITEA_CLIENT_MANAGED"], "1", name)
+            self.assertFalse(
+                env[launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV].startswith("legacy-"), name
+            )
+
+    def test_attribution_proof_holds_for_three_namespace_launch(self):
+        """A subset launch must not read as 'missing two workers'."""
+        built = self._build(launch_nonce="proj-5", now=NOW)
+        proof = launcher.collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers(
+            built["mcpServers"], namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(proof["shared_single_trusted_id"], proof)
+        self.assertEqual(proof["missing_servers"], [])
+        # And without an explicit expectation it inspects what is present.
+        inferred = launcher.collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers(
+            built["mcpServers"]
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(inferred["shared_single_trusted_id"], inferred)
+
+    def test_missing_profile_for_requested_namespace_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
+            self._build(profiles={"author": "prgs-author"})
+        self.assertIn("merger", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_profile_for_unlaunched_namespace_is_ignored_not_started(self):
+        """Extra profiles never widen the launch beyond the validated subset."""
+        built = self._build(profiles=FULL_PROFILES, launch_nonce="proj-6", now=NOW)
+        self.assertEqual(len(built["mcpServers"]), 3)
+        self.assertNotIn("gitea-controller", built["mcpServers"])
+
+    def test_unsanctioned_namespace_refused_at_build(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            self._build(
+                profiles={**PROJECT_PROFILES, "admin": "prgs-admin"},
+                namespaces=["author", "admin"],
+            )
+
+
+class ConcurrentLaunchDistinctionTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC: concurrent launches are distinct and distinguishable."""
+
+    def _build(self, nonce, namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES, profiles=None):
+        return launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+            profiles or PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=namespaces,
+            launch_nonce=nonce,
+            now=NOW,
+            command="python3",
+            args=["mcp_server.py"],
+        )
+
+    def test_two_concurrent_launches_receive_different_ids(self):
+        a = self._build("concurrent-a")
+        b = self._build("concurrent-b")
+        self.assertNotEqual(a["client_instance_id"], b["client_instance_id"])
+
+    def test_same_profile_across_launches_stays_distinguishable(self):
+        """Same profile, two launches: distinguishable, so not a false duplicate."""
+        a = self._build("dist-a")
+        b = self._build("dist-b")
+        a_author = a["mcpServers"]["gitea-author"]["env"]
+        b_author = b["mcpServers"]["gitea-author"]["env"]
+        # Same profile on purpose — that alone must never imply duplication.
+        self.assertEqual(a_author["GITEA_MCP_PROFILE"], b_author["GITEA_MCP_PROFILE"])
+        self.assertNotEqual(
+            a_author[launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV],
+            b_author[launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV],
+        )
+        for env in (a_author, b_author):
+            assessed = launcher.inherit_or_refuse_client_instance(env)
+            self.assertTrue(assessed["trusted"], assessed)
+            self.assertTrue(assessed["launcher_sealed"], assessed)
+
+    def test_no_nonce_still_yields_distinct_ids(self):
+        a = self._build(None)
+        b = self._build(None)
+        self.assertNotEqual(a["client_instance_id"], b["client_instance_id"])
+
+    def test_ids_are_never_persisted_between_launches(self):
+        """No static per-project ID: two runs of one config differ."""
+        first = self._build("static-check-1")
+        second = self._build("static-check-2")
+        self.assertNotEqual(
+            first["mcpServers"]["gitea-author"]["env"][launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV],
+            second["mcpServers"]["gitea-author"]["env"][launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV],
+        )
+
+
+class FailClosedIdentityTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC: missing / legacy / reused / conflicting / unsealed all fail closed."""
+
+    def test_missing_identity_fails_closed(self):
+        assessed = launcher.inherit_or_refuse_client_instance({})
+        self.assertFalse(assessed["trusted"])
+        self.assertFalse(assessed["launcher_sealed"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            assessed["provenance"], fleet.INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_MISSING
+        )
+
+    def test_legacy_pid_identity_fails_closed(self):
+        for legacy in ("legacy-pid-40578", "pid-1234", "proc-99"):
+            with self.subTest(legacy=legacy):
+                assessed = launcher.inherit_or_refuse_client_instance(
+                    {
+                        launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV: legacy,
+                        launcher.INSTANCE_PROVENANCE_ENV: (
+                            fleet.INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_TRUSTED
+                        ),
+                    }
+                )
+                self.assertFalse(assessed["trusted"], legacy)
+                self.assertFalse(assessed["launcher_sealed"], legacy)
+
+    def test_wellformed_but_unsealed_identity_fails_closed(self):
+        """The decisive case: format alone must not manufacture trust."""
+        forged = fleet.generate_client_instance_id(
+            "claude_code", launch_nonce="forged", now=NOW
+        )
+        # A hand-set env var with a valid-looking ID but no launcher seal.
+        assessed = launcher.inherit_or_refuse_client_instance(
+            {launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV: forged}
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(assessed["trusted"], assessed)
+        self.assertFalse(assessed["launcher_sealed"], assessed)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            assessed["provenance"], fleet.INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_UNSEALED
+        )
+        # The value is still reported for diagnosis, not silently dropped.
+        self.assertEqual(assessed["client_instance_id"], forged)
+
+    def test_wrong_provenance_marker_fails_closed(self):
+        forged = fleet.generate_client_instance_id(
+            "claude_code", launch_nonce="wrong-marker", now=NOW
+        )
+        assessed = launcher.inherit_or_refuse_client_instance(
+            {
+                launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV: forged,
+                launcher.INSTANCE_PROVENANCE_ENV: "totally_trusted",
+            }
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(assessed["trusted"], assessed)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            assessed["provenance"], fleet.INSTANCE_ID_PROVENANCE_UNSEALED
+        )
+
+    def test_sealed_launcher_env_is_trusted(self):
+        env = launcher.namespace_worker_env(
+            profile_name="prgs-author",
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            client_instance_id=fleet.generate_client_instance_id(
+                "claude_code", launch_nonce="sealed", now=NOW
+            ),
+        )
+        assessed = launcher.inherit_or_refuse_client_instance(env)
+        self.assertTrue(assessed["trusted"], assessed)
+        self.assertTrue(assessed["launcher_sealed"], assessed)
+
+    def test_untrusted_id_refused_on_build_and_worker_env(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+                PROJECT_PROFILES,
+                client_type="claude_code",
+                namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+                client_instance_id="legacy-pid-1",
+                command="python3",
+                args=["mcp_server.py"],
+            )
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            launcher.namespace_worker_env(
+                profile_name="prgs-author",
+                client_type="claude_code",
+                client_instance_id="hand-written",
+            )
+
+    def test_extra_env_cannot_forge_seal_or_identity(self):
+        trusted = fleet.generate_client_instance_id(
+            "claude_code", launch_nonce="seal-guard", now=NOW
+        )
+        env = launcher.namespace_worker_env(
+            profile_name="prgs-author",
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            client_instance_id=trusted,
+            extra_env={
+                launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV: "inst-spoof-20260101T000000Z-abcdef",
+                launcher.INSTANCE_PROVENANCE_ENV: "trusted_launcher",
+                "GITEA_CLIENT_MANAGED": "0",
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(env[launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV], trusted)
+        self.assertEqual(env["GITEA_CLIENT_MANAGED"], "1")
+
+    def test_conflicting_ids_across_workers_break_shared_attribution(self):
+        """One launch whose workers disagree must not read as shared."""
+        built = launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+            PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+            launch_nonce="conflict",
+            now=NOW,
+            command="python3",
+            args=["mcp_server.py"],
+        )
+        servers = built["mcpServers"]
+        servers["gitea-merger"]["env"][launcher.CLIENT_INSTANCE_ENV] = (
+            fleet.generate_client_instance_id(
+                "claude_code", launch_nonce="other", now=NOW
+            )
+        )
+        proof = launcher.collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers(
+            servers, namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(proof["shared_single_trusted_id"], proof)
+        self.assertEqual(len(proof["unique_instance_ids"]), 2)
+
+    def test_absent_expected_worker_breaks_shared_attribution(self):
+        built = launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+            PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+            launch_nonce="absent",
+            now=NOW,
+            command="python3",
+            args=["mcp_server.py"],
+        )
+        servers = dict(built["mcpServers"])
+        servers.pop("gitea-merger")
+        proof = launcher.collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers(
+            servers, namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(proof["shared_single_trusted_id"], proof)
+        self.assertEqual(proof["missing_servers"], ["gitea-merger"])
+
+    def test_reused_trusted_id_is_reuse_not_a_fresh_launch(self):
+        """Resume reuses by design; two *live* launches sharing it is the hazard."""
+        first = launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+            PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+            launch_nonce="reuse-src",
+            now=NOW,
+            command="python3",
+            args=["mcp_server.py"],
+        )
+        resumed = launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+            PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+            client_instance_id=first["client_instance_id"],
+            command="python3",
+            args=["mcp_server.py"],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            first["client_instance_id"], resumed["client_instance_id"]
+        )
+        # Two independent launches must never collide by default.
+        independent = launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+            PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+            command="python3",
+            args=["mcp_server.py"],
+        )
+        self.assertNotEqual(
+            first["client_instance_id"], independent["client_instance_id"]
+        )
+
+
+class BackwardCompatibilityTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC: existing full five-namespace behaviour remains compatible."""
+
+    def test_omitting_namespaces_launches_all_five(self):
+        built = launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+            FULL_PROFILES,
+            client_type="codex",
+            launch_nonce="compat",
+            now=NOW,
+            command="python3",
+            args=["mcp_server.py"],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(len(built["mcpServers"]), 5)
+        self.assertEqual(built["namespace_count"], 5)
+        self.assertEqual(built["excluded_namespaces"], [])
+        self.assertFalse(built["project_scoped"])
+        ids = set(_instance_ids(built["mcpServers"]).values())
+        self.assertEqual(len(ids), 1)
+
+    def test_five_namespace_missing_profile_still_refused(self):
+        incomplete = {ns: f"prgs-{ns}" for ns in PROJECT_NAMESPACES}
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
+            launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+                incomplete,
+                client_type="codex",
+                command="python3",
+                args=["mcp_server.py"],
+            )
+        message = str(ctx.exception)
+        self.assertIn("controller", message)
+        self.assertIn("reconciler", message)
+
+    def test_legacy_collect_call_without_namespaces_still_works(self):
+        built = launcher.build_application_mcp_servers(
+            FULL_PROFILES,
+            client_type="codex",
+            launch_nonce="compat-proof",
+            now=NOW,
+            command="python3",
+            args=["mcp_server.py"],
+        )
+        proof = launcher.collect_instance_ids_from_mcp_servers(built["mcpServers"])
+        self.assertTrue(proof["shared_single_trusted_id"], proof)
+        self.assertEqual(proof["namespace_server_count"], 5)
+
+    def test_gitea_config_wrapper_supports_subset(self):
+        import gitea_config
+
+        built = gitea_config.multi_namespace_launcher_entries(
+            PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+            config_path="/cfg/profiles.json",
+            launch_nonce="cfg-subset",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(built["namespace_count"], 3)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            sorted(built["excluded_namespaces"]), ["controller", "reconciler"]
+        )
+
+    def test_gitea_config_wrapper_default_is_five(self):
+        import gitea_config
+
+        built = gitea_config.multi_namespace_launcher_entries(
+            FULL_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            config_path="/cfg/profiles.json",
+            launch_nonce="cfg-full",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(built["namespace_count"], 5)
+
+
+class RunnableLaunchPathTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC: Claude Code has a documented supported launch command."""
+
+    def test_claude_code_is_a_supported_client(self):
+        self.assertIn("claude_code", launcher.supported_launch_clients())
+
+    def test_claude_code_argv_uses_per_launch_config(self):
+        argv = launcher.build_client_launch_argv("claude_code", "/tmp/launch.json")
+        self.assertEqual(argv[0], "claude")
+        self.assertIn("--mcp-config", argv)
+        self.assertIn("/tmp/launch.json", argv)
+        self.assertIn("--strict-mcp-config", argv)
+
+    def test_extra_args_are_forwarded(self):
+        argv = launcher.build_client_launch_argv(
+            "claude_code", "/tmp/launch.json", extra_args=["--resume"]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(argv[-1], "--resume")
+
+    def test_unsupported_client_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            launcher.build_client_launch_argv("not_a_client", "/tmp/x.json")
+
+    def test_prepare_launch_writes_private_per_launch_config(self):
+        prepared = launcher.prepare_application_launch(
+            PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+            launch_nonce="prep-1",
+            now=NOW,
+        )
+        path = prepared["launch_config_path"]
+        self.addCleanup(lambda: os.path.exists(path) and os.unlink(path))
+        self.assertTrue(os.path.exists(path))
+        self.assertEqual(os.stat(path).st_mode & 0o777, 0o600)
+        with open(path, encoding="utf-8") as handle:
+            payload = json.load(handle)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            sorted(payload["mcpServers"]),
+            ["gitea-author", "gitea-merger", "gitea-reviewer"],
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(prepared["shared_single_trusted_id"], prepared)
+        self.assertIn(path, prepared["argv"])
+
+    def test_two_prepared_launches_use_distinct_files_and_ids(self):
+        first = launcher.prepare_application_launch(
+            PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+            now=NOW,
+        )
+        second = launcher.prepare_application_launch(
+            PROJECT_PROFILES,
+            client_type="claude_code",
+            namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+            now=NOW,
+        )
+        for prepared in (first, second):
+            path = prepared["launch_config_path"]
+            self.addCleanup(lambda p=path: os.path.exists(p) and os.unlink(p))
+        self.assertNotEqual(
+            first["launch_config_path"], second["launch_config_path"]
+        )
+        self.assertNotEqual(
+            first["client_instance_id"], second["client_instance_id"]
+        )
+
+    def test_unsupported_client_writes_no_config_file(self):
+        """Fail before creating a file, so a bad invocation leaves no residue."""
+        with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
+            launcher.prepare_application_launch(
+                PROJECT_PROFILES,
+                client_type="not_a_client",
+                namespaces=PROJECT_NAMESPACES,
+                now=NOW,
+            )
+
+
+class CliTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    """The runnable entry point itself."""
+
+    def _run_dry(self, argv):
+        import contextlib
+        import io
+
+        buffer = io.StringIO()
+        with contextlib.redirect_stdout(buffer):
+            code = launcher.main(argv)
+        return code, buffer.getvalue()
+
+    def test_dry_run_project_scoped_plan(self):
+        code, out = self._run_dry(
+            [
+                "--client",
+                "claude_code",
+                "--namespaces",
+                "author,reviewer,merger",
+                "--profile",
+                "author=prgs-author",
+                "--profile",
+                "reviewer=prgs-reviewer",
+                "--profile",
+                "merger=prgs-merger",
+                "--dry-run",
+            ]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(code, 0)
+        plan = json.loads(out)
+        path = plan["launch_config_path"]
+        self.addCleanup(lambda: os.path.exists(path) and os.unlink(path))
+        self.assertEqual(plan["namespaces"], ["author", "reviewer", "merger"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            sorted(plan["excluded_namespaces"]), ["controller", "reconciler"]
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(plan["shared_single_trusted_id"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            fleet.assess_instance_identity(plan["client_instance_id"])["trusted"]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(plan["argv"][0], "claude")
+
+    def test_cli_refuses_profile_for_unlaunched_namespace(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
+            self._run_dry(
+                [
+                    "--namespaces",
+                    "author,reviewer,merger",
+                    "--profile",
+                    "author=prgs-author",
+                    "--profile",
+                    "reviewer=prgs-reviewer",
+                    "--profile",
+                    "merger=prgs-merger",
+                    "--profile",
+                    "controller=prgs-controller",
+                    "--dry-run",
+                ]
+            )
+
+    def test_cli_refuses_unsanctioned_namespace(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
+            self._run_dry(
+                [
+                    "--namespaces",
+                    "author,admin",
+                    "--profile",
+                    "author=prgs-author",
+                    "--dry-run",
+                ]
+            )
+
+    def test_cli_refuses_missing_profile(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
+            self._run_dry(
+                [
+                    "--namespaces",
+                    "author,reviewer",
+                    "--profile",
+                    "author=prgs-author",
+                    "--dry-run",
+                ]
+            )
+
+    def test_cli_refuses_malformed_profile_pair(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(SystemExit):
+            self._run_dry(
+                ["--namespaces", "author", "--profile", "prgs-author", "--dry-run"]
+            )
+
+    def test_two_cli_runs_receive_distinct_ids(self):
+        args = [
+            "--namespaces",
+            "author,reviewer,merger",
+            "--profile",
+            "author=prgs-author",
+            "--profile",
+            "reviewer=prgs-reviewer",
+            "--profile",
+            "merger=prgs-merger",
+            "--dry-run",
+        ]
+        _, first = self._run_dry(args)
+        _, second = self._run_dry(args)
+        a = json.loads(first)
+        b = json.loads(second)
+        for plan in (a, b):
+            path = plan["launch_config_path"]
+            self.addCleanup(lambda p=path: os.path.exists(p) and os.unlink(p))
+        self.assertNotEqual(a["client_instance_id"], b["client_instance_id"])
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":  # pragma: no cover
+    unittest.main()