Merge branch 'master' into feat/issue-628-autonomous-handoffs-orchestration

tests/conftest.py

@@ -167,6 +167,35 @@ def _reset_mutation_authority(monkeypatch):
 import pytest
 
 
+@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
+def _hermetic_live_remote_master_head():
+    """#610 / PR #788 F1/F2: keep live-remote parity reads offline in tests.
+
+    ``read_remote_master_head`` would otherwise ``git ls-remote`` whenever
+    ``GITEA_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD`` is unset. Feature worktrees under
+    ``branches/`` always differ from live master, so legacy suites that assert
+    runtime-context ``safe_next_action`` flip to live_stale. Module-level
+    hermetic mode survives ``patch.dict(os.environ, …, clear=True)``.
+    Tests that exercise the real probe path call
+    ``master_parity_gate.set_hermetic_test_mode(False)`` and/or set
+    ``GITEA_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE``.
+    """
+    try:
+        import master_parity_gate as _mpg
+
+        _mpg.set_hermetic_test_mode(True)
+    except Exception:
+        _mpg = None
+    try:
+        yield
+    finally:
+        if _mpg is not None:
+            try:
+                _mpg.set_hermetic_test_mode(False)
+            except Exception:
+                pass
+
+
 @pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
 def _deterministic_workspace_remotes():
     try:

tests/test_arch01_platform.py

@@ -0,0 +1,572 @@
+"""Executable acceptance tests for ARCH-01 Slice A (#822).
+
+Each acceptance criterion (#822 §12) and named test (#822 §13) is exercised
+against a real SQLite database. The migration runs on a fresh DB in ``setUp``;
+the test-run output is the durable evidence the issue requires (§14).
+
+Enforcement being proven:
+
+* ``[TRUSTED-SERVICE]`` — the ``cp_*`` actor functions exist only on the
+  trusted kernel connection; a raw connection cannot satisfy the triggers.
+* ``[SCHEMA]`` — fail-closed aborts, exact dominance set, NOT-NULL class,
+  immutability, and the last-active-grant floor are enforced by
+  CHECK/FK/trigger, verified here including raw-write bypass and concurrency.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import sqlite3
+import tempfile
+import threading
+import unittest
+from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
+
+import arch01_platform as ap
+from arch01_platform import (
+    ALREADY_INSTALLED,
+    AUTHORIZATION_DENIED,
+    CONCURRENT_INSTALLATION_LOST,
+    DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID,
+    DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH,
+    DOMINANCE_TUPLES,
+    INSTALLED,
+    INVALID_ACTOR_CONTEXT,
+    INVALID_BOOTSTRAP_STATE,
+    PlatformKernel,
+)
+
+INSTALLER = "platform.installer"
+
+_BOOTSTRAP_TABLES = (
+    "principal_equivalence_classes",
+    "principals",
+    "authoritative_issuers",
+    "authority_dominance",
+    "platform_bootstrap_seed",
+    "platform_bootstrap_grants",
+    "platform_active_invariant",
+    "install_state",
+)
+
+
+def _count(kernel: PlatformKernel, table: str) -> int:
+    return kernel._conn.execute(f"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {table}").fetchone()[0]
+
+
+def _count_where(kernel: PlatformKernel, table: str, where: str) -> int:
+    return kernel._conn.execute(f"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {table} WHERE {where}").fetchone()[0]
+
+
+def _all_bootstrap_empty(kernel: PlatformKernel) -> bool:
+    return all(_count(kernel, t) == 0 for t in _BOOTSTRAP_TABLES)
+
+
+class Arch01MemoryTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Single-connection behavior on an in-memory database."""
+
+    def setUp(self) -> None:
+        self.kernel = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
+
+    def tearDown(self) -> None:
+        self.kernel.close()
+
+    # -- AC1 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_install_clean(self) -> None:  # t_install_clean(+)
+        res = self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER)
+        self.assertEqual(res.code, INSTALLED)
+        self.assertTrue(self.kernel.is_installed())
+        self.assertEqual(_count(self.kernel, "install_state"), 1)
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.active_grant_count(), 1)
+        self.assertIn(ap.EVT_PLATFORM_INSTALLED, self.kernel.audit_events())
+        rows = set(
+            self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                "SELECT dominant, subordinate FROM authority_dominance"
+            ).fetchall()
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(rows, set(DOMINANCE_TUPLES))
+        issuer_ref = self.kernel._conn.execute(
+            "SELECT i.issuer_ref FROM principals p JOIN authoritative_issuers i "
+            "ON p.issuer_id = i.issuer_id WHERE p.principal_id = ?",
+            (INSTALLER,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        self.assertEqual(issuer_ref[0], DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID)
+
+    # -- AC2 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_install_twice(self) -> None:  # t_install_twice(-)
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        res2 = self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER)
+        self.assertEqual(res2.code, ALREADY_INSTALLED)
+        self.assertEqual(_count(self.kernel, "principals"), 1)
+        self.assertEqual(_count(self.kernel, "platform_bootstrap_grants"), 1)
+        self.assertEqual(_count(self.kernel, "install_state"), 1)
+
+    # -- AC3 / AC5 -------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_install_stage_rollback(self) -> None:  # t_install_stage_rollback
+        for stop in range(1, 9):
+            with self.subTest(stages=stop):
+                k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
+                try:
+                    self._partial_bootstrap_then_rollback(k, stop)
+                    self.assertTrue(
+                        _all_bootstrap_empty(k),
+                        f"partial rows survived rollback at stage {stop}",
+                    )
+                    self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
+                finally:
+                    k.close()
+
+    def test_no_partial_after_rollback(self) -> None:  # t_no_partial_after_rollback
+        k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
+        try:
+            code = self._seed_bootstrap_and_mark(k, dominance=DOMINANCE_TUPLES[:-1])
+            self.assertEqual(code, DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH)
+            self.assertTrue(_all_bootstrap_empty(k))
+            self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
+        finally:
+            k.close()
+
+    # -- AC4 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_dominance_missing(self) -> None:  # t_dominance_missing(-)
+        k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
+        try:
+            self.assertEqual(
+                self._seed_bootstrap_and_mark(k, dominance=DOMINANCE_TUPLES[:-1]),
+                DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH,
+            )
+            self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
+        finally:
+            k.close()
+
+    def test_dominance_extra(self) -> None:  # t_dominance_extra(-)
+        k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
+        try:
+            extra = DOMINANCE_TUPLES + (("platform.bootstrap", "rogue.extra"),)
+            self.assertEqual(
+                self._seed_bootstrap_and_mark(k, dominance=extra),
+                DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH,
+            )
+            self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
+        finally:
+            k.close()
+
+    def test_dominance_malformed(self) -> None:  # t_dominance_malformed(-)
+        k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
+        try:
+            malformed = DOMINANCE_TUPLES[:-1] + (("supervisor.root", "WRONG.subordinate"),)
+            self.assertEqual(
+                self._seed_bootstrap_and_mark(k, dominance=malformed),
+                DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH,
+            )
+            self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
+        finally:
+            k.close()
+
+    # -- AC6 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_principal_no_class(self) -> None:  # t_principal_no_class(-)
+        with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "install"):
+            with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError):
+                self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO principals"
+                    "(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
+                    "VALUES ('x', 'operator', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
+                )
+
+    # -- AC7 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_noninstaller_null_issuer(self) -> None:  # t_nonobstaller_null_issuer(-)
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
+            cur = self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                "INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
+            )
+            class_id = cur.lastrowid
+            with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
+                self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO principals"
+                    "(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
+                    "VALUES ('rogue', 'operator', ?, NULL, NULL, '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')",
+                    (class_id,),
+                )
+            self.assertIn("INVALID_BOOTSTRAP_STATE", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_installer_null_issuer_only_during_install(self) -> None:
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        with self.kernel.actor_context("i2", "installer", "install"):
+            cur = self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                "INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
+            )
+            class_id = cur.lastrowid
+            with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError):
+                self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO principals"
+                    "(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
+                    "VALUES ('i2', 'installer', ?, NULL, NULL, '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')",
+                    (class_id,),
+                )
+
+    # -- AC8 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_context_missing(self) -> None:  # t_context_missing(-)
+        self.assertIsNone(self.kernel._ctx)
+        with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
+            self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                "INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
+            )
+        self.assertIn("INVALID_ACTOR_CONTEXT", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_context_stale(self) -> None:  # t_context_stale(-)
+        with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
+            self.kernel._ctx.expired = True
+            with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
+                self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
+                )
+            self.assertIn("INVALID_ACTOR_CONTEXT", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_context_epoch_shift(self) -> None:  # t_context_epoch_shift(-)
+        with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
+            self.kernel._ctx.live_epoch = self.kernel._ctx.bound_epoch + 99
+            with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
+                self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
+                )
+            self.assertIn("INVALID_ACTOR_CONTEXT", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_bad_actor_kind_or_mode_rejected(self) -> None:
+        for kind, mode in (("intruder", "normal"), ("operator", "sabotage")):
+            with self.subTest(kind=kind, mode=mode):
+                with self.kernel.actor_context("op", kind, mode):
+                    with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError):
+                        self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                            "INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) "
+                            "VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
+                        )
+
+    # -- AC9 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_bootstrap_immutable_update(self) -> None:  # t_bootstrap_immutable_{update}
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        cases = [
+            ("UPDATE install_state SET installed_at = 'x' WHERE id = 1", "IMMUTABLE_INSTALL_STATE"),
+            ("UPDATE platform_bootstrap_seed SET created_at = 'x' WHERE seed_id = 1", "IMMUTABLE_SEED"),
+            ("UPDATE authority_dominance SET subordinate = 'x' WHERE dominant = 'supervisor.root'", "IMMUTABLE_DOMINANCE"),
+            (f"UPDATE authoritative_issuers SET issuer_ref = 'x' WHERE issuer_ref = '{DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID}'", "IMMUTABLE_ISSUER"),
+            (f"UPDATE principals SET actor_kind = 'operator' WHERE principal_id = '{INSTALLER}'", "IMMUTABLE_PRINCIPAL"),
+        ]
+        for sql, tag in cases:
+            with self.subTest(sql=sql):
+                with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
+                    with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
+                        self.kernel._conn.execute(sql)
+                    self.assertIn(tag, str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_bootstrap_immutable_delete(self) -> None:  # t_bootstrap_immutable_{delete}
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        cases = [
+            ("DELETE FROM install_state WHERE id = 1", "IMMUTABLE_INSTALL_STATE"),
+            ("DELETE FROM platform_bootstrap_seed WHERE seed_id = 1", "IMMUTABLE_SEED"),
+            ("DELETE FROM authority_dominance", "IMMUTABLE_DOMINANCE"),
+            ("DELETE FROM authoritative_issuers", "IMMUTABLE_ISSUER"),
+            (f"DELETE FROM principals WHERE principal_id = '{INSTALLER}'", "IMMUTABLE_PRINCIPAL"),
+            ("DELETE FROM platform_bootstrap_grants", "IMMUTABLE_GRANT"),
+        ]
+        for sql, tag in cases:
+            with self.subTest(sql=sql):
+                with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
+                    with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
+                        self.kernel._conn.execute(sql)
+                    self.assertIn(tag, str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_grant_reactivation_rejected(self) -> None:
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        self.kernel.register_principal(
+            "op1", "operator", DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, actor_principal=INSTALLER
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            self.kernel.grant_platform_bootstrap("op1", INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED
+        )
+        gid = self.kernel._conn.execute(
+            "SELECT grant_id FROM platform_bootstrap_grants WHERE grantee_principal_id = 'op1'"
+        ).fetchone()[0]
+        self.assertEqual(
+            self.kernel.revoke_platform_bootstrap(gid, actor_principal=INSTALLER).code,
+            INSTALLED,
+        )
+        with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
+            with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
+                self.kernel._conn.execute(
+                    "UPDATE platform_bootstrap_grants SET active = 1 WHERE grant_id = ?",
+                    (gid,),
+                )
+            self.assertIn("IMMUTABLE_GRANT", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    # -- AC12 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_raw_write_bypass(self) -> None:  # t_raw_write_bypass(raw-bypass)
+        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
+            path = os.path.join(tmp, "p.sqlite3")
+            k = PlatformKernel(path)
+            self.assertEqual(k.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+            k.close()
+            raw = sqlite3.connect(path)
+            raw.execute("PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON")
+            try:
+                with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.Error):
+                    raw.execute(
+                        "INSERT INTO audit_records(event, created_at) "
+                        "VALUES ('forged', '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
+                    )
+                    raw.commit()
+                with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.Error):
+                    raw.execute("UPDATE install_state SET installed_at = 'x' WHERE id = 1")
+                    raw.commit()
+                with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.Error):
+                    raw.execute("DELETE FROM platform_bootstrap_grants")
+                    raw.commit()
+            finally:
+                raw.close()
+
+    # -- AC13 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_audit_created(self) -> None:  # t_audit_created(+)
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        self.kernel.register_principal(
+            "op1", "operator", DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, actor_principal=INSTALLER
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            self.kernel.grant_platform_bootstrap("op1", INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED
+        )
+        gid = self.kernel._conn.execute(
+            "SELECT grant_id FROM platform_bootstrap_grants WHERE grantee_principal_id = 'op1'"
+        ).fetchone()[0]
+        self.assertEqual(
+            self.kernel.revoke_platform_bootstrap(gid, actor_principal=INSTALLER).code,
+            INSTALLED,
+        )
+        events = self.kernel.audit_events()
+        for evt in (
+            ap.EVT_PLATFORM_INSTALLED,
+            ap.EVT_GRANT_CREATED,
+            ap.EVT_GRANT_REVOKED,
+            ap.EVT_PRINCIPAL_REGISTERED,
+        ):
+            self.assertIn(evt, events)
+
+    # -- AC14 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_audit_immutable(self) -> None:  # t_audit_immutable(raw-bypass)
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
+            with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as up:
+                self.kernel._conn.execute("UPDATE audit_records SET event = 'x' WHERE audit_id = 1")
+            self.assertIn("IMMUTABLE_AUDIT", str(up.exception))
+            with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as dl:
+                self.kernel._conn.execute("DELETE FROM audit_records WHERE audit_id = 1")
+            self.assertIn("IMMUTABLE_AUDIT", str(dl.exception))
+
+    # -- meta ------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_schema_meta(self) -> None:
+        rows = dict(self.kernel._conn.execute("SELECT key, value FROM arch01_meta").fetchall())
+        self.assertEqual(rows["schema_version"], str(ap.SCHEMA_VERSION))
+        self.assertIn("disabled by default", rows["architecture"])
+
+    def test_register_principal_creates_class_first(self) -> None:
+        self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        res = self.kernel.register_principal(
+            "svc1", "service", DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, actor_principal=INSTALLER
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(res.code, INSTALLED)
+        row = self.kernel._conn.execute(
+            "SELECT current_class_id FROM principals WHERE principal_id = 'svc1'"
+        ).fetchone()
+        self.assertIsNotNone(row[0])
+
+    # -- helpers ---------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def _partial_bootstrap_then_rollback(self, k: PlatformKernel, stop: int) -> None:
+        """Execute the first ``stop`` bootstrap statements, then ROLLBACK."""
+        now = "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z"
+        k._conn.execute("BEGIN IMMEDIATE")
+        class_id = None
+        issuer_id = None
+        try:
+            with k.actor_context(INSTALLER, "installer", "install"):
+                c = k._conn
+                if stop >= 1:
+                    class_id = c.execute(
+                        "INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES (?)", (now,)
+                    ).lastrowid
+                if stop >= 2:
+                    c.execute(
+                        "INSERT INTO principals(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
+                        "VALUES (?, 'installer', ?, NULL, ?, ?)",
+                        (INSTALLER, class_id, INSTALLER, now),
+                    )
+                if stop >= 3:
+                    issuer_id = c.execute(
+                        "INSERT INTO authoritative_issuers(issuer_kind, issuer_ref, created_at) VALUES ('operator-key', ?, ?)",
+                        (DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, now),
+                    ).lastrowid
+                if stop >= 4:
+                    c.execute(
+                        "UPDATE principals SET issuer_id = ? WHERE principal_id = ?",
+                        (issuer_id, INSTALLER),
+                    )
+                if stop >= 5:
+                    c.executemany(
+                        "INSERT INTO authority_dominance(dominant, subordinate) VALUES (?, ?)",
+                        DOMINANCE_TUPLES,
+                    )
+                if stop >= 6:
+                    c.execute(
+                        "INSERT INTO platform_bootstrap_seed(seed_id, installer_principal_id, created_at) VALUES (1, ?, ?)",
+                        (INSTALLER, now),
+                    )
+                if stop >= 7:
+                    c.execute(
+                        "INSERT INTO platform_bootstrap_grants(grantee_principal_id, granted_by, active, created_at) VALUES (?, NULL, 1, ?)",
+                        (INSTALLER, now),
+                    )
+                if stop >= 8:
+                    c.execute("INSERT INTO platform_active_invariant(id, active_count) VALUES (1, 1)")
+        finally:
+            k._conn.execute("ROLLBACK")
+
+    def _seed_bootstrap_and_mark(self, k: PlatformKernel, dominance) -> str:
+        """Seed a full bootstrap with a caller-supplied dominance set, then
+        attempt the marker insert. Returns the classified failure code (or
+        INSTALLED). Rolls back on failure so no partial rows remain."""
+        now = "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z"
+        k._conn.execute("BEGIN IMMEDIATE")
+        try:
+            with k.actor_context(INSTALLER, "installer", "install"):
+                c = k._conn
+                class_id = c.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES (?)", (now,)
+                ).lastrowid
+                c.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO principals(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
+                    "VALUES (?, 'installer', ?, NULL, ?, ?)",
+                    (INSTALLER, class_id, INSTALLER, now),
+                )
+                issuer_id = c.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO authoritative_issuers(issuer_kind, issuer_ref, created_at) VALUES ('operator-key', ?, ?)",
+                    (DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, now),
+                ).lastrowid
+                c.execute(
+                    "UPDATE principals SET issuer_id = ? WHERE principal_id = ?",
+                    (issuer_id, INSTALLER),
+                )
+                c.executemany(
+                    "INSERT INTO authority_dominance(dominant, subordinate) VALUES (?, ?)",
+                    dominance,
+                )
+                c.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO platform_bootstrap_seed(seed_id, installer_principal_id, created_at) VALUES (1, ?, ?)",
+                    (INSTALLER, now),
+                )
+                c.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO platform_bootstrap_grants(grantee_principal_id, granted_by, active, created_at) VALUES (?, NULL, 1, ?)",
+                    (INSTALLER, now),
+                )
+                c.execute("INSERT INTO platform_active_invariant(id, active_count) VALUES (1, 1)")
+                c.execute(
+                    "INSERT INTO install_state(id, marker, installed_at) VALUES (1, 'installed', ?)",
+                    (now,),
+                )
+            k._conn.execute("COMMIT")
+            return INSTALLED
+        except sqlite3.Error as exc:
+            k._safe_rollback()
+            return PlatformKernel._classify(exc)
+
+
+class Arch01ConcurrencyTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Concurrency invariants require file-backed DBs and independent connections."""
+
+    def setUp(self) -> None:
+        self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
+        self.path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "p.sqlite3")
+
+    def tearDown(self) -> None:
+        self._tmp.cleanup()
+
+    # -- AC10 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_concurrent_install(self) -> None:  # t_concurrent_install(concurrency)
+        k1 = PlatformKernel(self.path, busy_timeout_ms=0)
+        k2 = PlatformKernel(self.path, busy_timeout_ms=0)
+        barrier = threading.Barrier(2)
+        results = {}
+
+        def _install(name, kernel):
+            barrier.wait()
+            results[name] = kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code
+
+        try:
+            with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2) as ex:
+                f1 = ex.submit(_install, "a", k1)
+                f2 = ex.submit(_install, "b", k2)
+                f1.result()
+                f2.result()
+            codes = sorted(results.values())
+            self.assertEqual(codes.count(INSTALLED), 1, f"exactly one install expected: {results}")
+            other = [c for c in results.values() if c != INSTALLED][0]
+            self.assertIn(other, (ALREADY_INSTALLED, CONCURRENT_INSTALLATION_LOST))
+            self.assertTrue(k1.is_installed())
+            self.assertEqual(_count(k1, "install_state"), 1)
+            self.assertEqual(_count(k1, "principals"), 1)
+        finally:
+            k1.close()
+            k2.close()
+
+    # -- AC11 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
+    def test_concurrent_last_grant_revoke(self) -> None:  # t_concurrent_last_grant_revoke
+        setup = PlatformKernel(self.path)
+        self.assertEqual(setup.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        setup.register_principal("op1", "operator", DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, actor_principal=INSTALLER)
+        self.assertEqual(setup.grant_platform_bootstrap("op1", INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+        self.assertEqual(setup.active_grant_count(), 2)
+        gids = [
+            r[0]
+            for r in setup._conn.execute(
+                "SELECT grant_id FROM platform_bootstrap_grants WHERE active = 1 ORDER BY grant_id"
+            ).fetchall()
+        ]
+        setup.close()
+        self.assertEqual(len(gids), 2)
+
+        k1 = PlatformKernel(self.path, busy_timeout_ms=3000)
+        k2 = PlatformKernel(self.path, busy_timeout_ms=3000)
+        barrier = threading.Barrier(2)
+        results = {}
+
+        def _revoke(name, kernel, gid):
+            barrier.wait()
+            results[name] = kernel.revoke_platform_bootstrap(gid, actor_principal=INSTALLER).code
+
+        try:
+            with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2) as ex:
+                f1 = ex.submit(_revoke, "a", k1, gids[0])
+                f2 = ex.submit(_revoke, "b", k2, gids[1])
+                f1.result()
+                f2.result()
+            codes = list(results.values())
+            self.assertEqual(codes.count(INSTALLED), 1, f"exactly one revoke should win: {results}")
+            self.assertEqual(codes.count(AUTHORIZATION_DENIED), 1, f"one revoke must be denied: {results}")
+            self.assertEqual(k1.active_grant_count(), 1)
+            self.assertEqual(_count_where(k1, "platform_bootstrap_grants", "active = 1"), 1)
+        finally:
+            k1.close()
+            k2.close()
+
+    def test_revoke_final_grant_denied(self) -> None:
+        k = PlatformKernel(self.path)
+        try:
+            self.assertEqual(k.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
+            gid = k._conn.execute(
+                "SELECT grant_id FROM platform_bootstrap_grants WHERE active = 1"
+            ).fetchone()[0]
+            res = k.revoke_platform_bootstrap(gid, actor_principal=INSTALLER)
+            self.assertEqual(res.code, AUTHORIZATION_DENIED)
+            self.assertEqual(k.active_grant_count(), 1)
+            self.assertEqual(_count_where(k, "platform_bootstrap_grants", "active = 1"), 1)
+        finally:
+            k.close()
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_cross_role_queue_allocation.py

@@ -0,0 +1,581 @@
+"""Authoritative controller cross-role generic queue allocation (#840)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import tempfile
+import unittest
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+from allocator_service import (
+    ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
+    ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
+    OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
+    OUTCOME_PREVIEW,
+    OUTCOME_WAIT,
+    ROLE_AUTHOR,
+    ROLE_CONTROLLER,
+    ROLE_MERGER,
+    ROLE_RECONCILER,
+    ROLE_REVIEWER,
+    WorkCandidate,
+    allocate_next_work,
+    build_selection_dict,
+    classify_skip,
+    required_namespace_for_role,
+    required_profile_for_role,
+    resolve_allocation_mode,
+    selected_action_for_candidate,
+)
+from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB
+import role_session_router
+from role_session_router import (
+    ROUTE_ALLOWED,
+    ROUTE_AMBIGUOUS,
+    ROUTE_WRONG_ROLE,
+    route_task_session,
+)
+import namespace_workspace_binding as nwb
+import task_capability_map
+
+
+class CrossRoleAllocationModeTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_controller_defaults_to_cross_role(self) -> None:
+        self.assertEqual(
+            resolve_allocation_mode(ROLE_CONTROLLER),
+            ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
+        )
+
+    def test_worker_defaults_to_role_scoped(self) -> None:
+        for role in (ROLE_AUTHOR, ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_MERGER, ROLE_RECONCILER):
+            self.assertEqual(
+                resolve_allocation_mode(role),
+                ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
+            )
+
+    def test_explicit_modes(self) -> None:
+        self.assertEqual(
+            resolve_allocation_mode(ROLE_CONTROLLER, "role_scoped"),
+            ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            resolve_allocation_mode(ROLE_AUTHOR, "cross_role"),
+            ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
+        )
+
+
+class CrossRoleSelectionPayloadTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_selection_contains_required_fields(self) -> None:
+        c = WorkCandidate(
+            kind="issue",
+            number=840,
+            labels=("status:ready",),
+            title="cross-role",
+            priority=20,
+        )
+        sel = build_selection_dict(
+            c,
+            active_role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
+            required_role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
+            profile_name="prgs-controller",
+            allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(sel["number"], 840)
+        self.assertEqual(sel["kind"], "issue")
+        self.assertEqual(sel["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
+        self.assertEqual(sel["selected_action"], "implement")
+        self.assertEqual(sel["action"], "implement")
+        self.assertEqual(sel["required_profile"], "prgs-author")
+        self.assertEqual(sel["required_namespace"], "gitea-author")
+        self.assertEqual(sel["pinned"]["number"], 840)
+        self.assertIsNone(sel["pinned"]["head_sha"])
+
+    def test_profile_prefix_preserved(self) -> None:
+        self.assertEqual(
+            required_profile_for_role(ROLE_REVIEWER, profile_name="dadeschools-controller"),
+            "dadeschools-reviewer",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            required_namespace_for_role(ROLE_MERGER),
+            "gitea-merger",
+        )
+
+    def test_selected_actions_per_role(self) -> None:
+        issue = WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=1, labels=("status:ready",))
+        pr_review = WorkCandidate(kind="pr", number=2, head_sha="a" * 40)
+        pr_rc = WorkCandidate(
+            kind="pr",
+            number=3,
+            head_sha="b" * 40,
+            request_changes_current_head=True,
+        )
+        pr_merge = WorkCandidate(
+            kind="pr",
+            number=4,
+            head_sha="c" * 40,
+            approval_on_current_head=True,
+            mergeable=True,
+        )
+        pr_recon = WorkCandidate(
+            kind="pr",
+            number=5,
+            head_sha="d" * 40,
+            approval_contaminated=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(selected_action_for_candidate(issue, ROLE_AUTHOR), "implement")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            selected_action_for_candidate(pr_rc, ROLE_AUTHOR),
+            "address_pr_change_requests",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            selected_action_for_candidate(pr_review, ROLE_REVIEWER), "review"
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(selected_action_for_candidate(pr_merge, ROLE_MERGER), "merge")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            selected_action_for_candidate(pr_recon, ROLE_RECONCILER),
+            "reconcile_contaminated_approval",
+        )
+
+
+class CrossRoleAllocateServiceTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    def setUp(self) -> None:
+        self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
+        self.db = ControlPlaneDB(os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3"))
+
+    def tearDown(self) -> None:
+        self._tmp.cleanup()
+
+    def _alloc(self, **kwargs):
+        defaults = dict(
+            db=self.db,
+            session_id="ctrl-session",
+            role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
+            remote="prgs",
+            org="org",
+            repo="repo",
+            candidates=[],
+            apply=False,
+            profile_name="prgs-controller",
+            username="controller-bot",
+            controller_instance_id="ctrl-1",
+        )
+        defaults.update(kwargs)
+        return allocate_next_work(**defaults)
+
+    def test_eligible_author_work(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=100,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                title="author work",
+                priority=20,
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_PREVIEW)
+        self.assertEqual(res["allocation_mode"], ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE)
+        self.assertIsNotNone(res["selected"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 100)
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected_action"], "implement")
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_profile"], "prgs-author")
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_namespace"], "gitea-author")
+        self.assertIn("allocate", res["controller_allowed_actions"])
+        self.assertIn("merge", res["controller_forbidden_actions"])
+        self.assertFalse(res["allocation_evidence"]["lease_created"])
+
+    def test_eligible_reviewer_work(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="pr",
+                number=200,
+                head_sha="e" * 40,
+                title="needs review",
+                priority=30,
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 200)
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_REVIEWER)
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected_action"], "review")
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_profile"], "prgs-reviewer")
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["pinned"]["head_sha"], "e" * 40)
+
+    def test_eligible_merger_work(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="pr",
+                number=300,
+                head_sha="f" * 40,
+                approval_on_current_head=True,
+                mergeable=True,
+                priority=40,
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 300)
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_MERGER)
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected_action"], "merge")
+
+    def test_eligible_reconciler_work(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="pr",
+                number=400,
+                head_sha="1" * 40,
+                approval_contaminated=True,
+                priority=50,
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 400)
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_RECONCILER)
+        self.assertIn("reconcile", res["selected_action"])
+
+    def test_no_eligible_work(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=10,
+                labels=("status:blocked",),
+                blocked=True,
+                priority=99,
+            ),
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=11,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                dependency_unmet=True,
+                dependency_reason="blocked by #10",
+                priority=98,
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        self.assertTrue(res["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_NO_SAFE)
+        self.assertIsNone(res["selected"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["allocation_mode"], ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE)
+
+    def test_leased_work_skipped(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=50,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                priority=20,
+            ),
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=51,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                priority=10,
+            ),
+        ]
+        # Seed a foreign lease on issue 50 via assign_and_lease under another session.
+        other = allocate_next_work(
+            self.db,
+            session_id="other-worker",
+            role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
+            remote="prgs",
+            org="org",
+            repo="repo",
+            candidates=cands[:1],
+            apply=True,
+            profile_name="prgs-author",
+            controller_instance_id="other-ctrl",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(other["outcome"], "assigned_work")
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        self.assertIsNotNone(res["selected"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 51)
+        self.assertTrue(any(s["number"] == 50 for s in res["skipped"]))
+        self.assertTrue(res["claims_excluded"])
+
+    def test_dependencies_skipped(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=1,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                priority=99,
+                dependency_unmet=True,
+                dependency_reason="needs #2",
+            ),
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=2,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                priority=1,
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 2)
+        skipped = {s["number"]: s["reason"] for s in res["skipped"]}
+        self.assertIn(1, skipped)
+        self.assertIn("needs #2", skipped[1])
+
+    def test_pagination_limit_only_truncates_skip_report(self) -> None:
+        """Ranking uses full inventory; reporting limit is MCP-layer only.
+
+        Service ranks all candidates; prove higher-priority eligible item
+        wins even when many skipped precede it.
+        """
+        cands = []
+        for n in range(1, 30):
+            cands.append(
+                WorkCandidate(
+                    kind="issue",
+                    number=n,
+                    labels=("status:ready",),
+                    priority=100 - n,
+                    dependency_unmet=True,
+                    dependency_reason=f"dep {n}",
+                )
+            )
+        cands.append(
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=999,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                priority=1,
+            )
+        )
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 999)
+        self.assertGreaterEqual(len(res["skipped"]), 29)
+
+    def test_role_scoped_controller_legacy_still_restricts(self) -> None:
+        """role_scoped controller only takes reconciler-needed items."""
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=1,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                priority=50,
+            ),
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="pr",
+                number=2,
+                head_sha="a" * 40,
+                approval_contaminated=True,
+                priority=1,
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(
+            candidates=cands,
+            allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(res["allocation_mode"], ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED)
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 2)
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_RECONCILER)
+
+    def test_cross_role_prefers_highest_priority_across_roles(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=10,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                priority=10,
+            ),
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="pr",
+                number=20,
+                head_sha="b" * 40,
+                priority=50,
+            ),
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="pr",
+                number=30,
+                head_sha="c" * 40,
+                approval_on_current_head=True,
+                mergeable=True,
+                priority=20,
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        # PR #20 highest priority → reviewer
+        self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 20)
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_REVIEWER)
+
+    def test_apply_creates_lease_evidence_for_required_role(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=777,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+                priority=20,
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands, apply=True)
+        self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], "assigned_work")
+        self.assertTrue(res["allocation_evidence"]["lease_created"])
+        self.assertEqual(res["allocation_evidence"]["lease_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
+        proof = res["lease_proof"]
+        self.assertIsNotNone(proof["lease_id"])
+        self.assertEqual(proof["lease_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
+        self.assertIn("implement", proof["allowed_actions"])
+        # Controller isolation: controller still forbids merge/push/create_pr
+        self.assertIn("merge", res["controller_forbidden_actions"])
+        self.assertIn("push", res["controller_forbidden_actions"])
+
+    def test_metadata_consistency_role_is_controller(self) -> None:
+        cands = [
+            WorkCandidate(
+                kind="issue",
+                number=1,
+                labels=("status:ready",),
+            ),
+        ]
+        res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
+        self.assertEqual(res["role"], ROLE_CONTROLLER)
+        self.assertEqual(res["routing_role"], ROLE_CONTROLLER)
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
+
+
+class ProcessWorkQueueRouterTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    def tearDown(self) -> None:
+        role_session_router.clear_route_state()
+
+    def test_process_work_queue_allowed_for_controller(self) -> None:
+        res = route_task_session(
+            "process_work_queue",
+            active_profile="prgs-controller",
+            active_role_kind="controller",
+            allowed_in_current_session=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(res["route_result"], ROUTE_ALLOWED)
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], "controller")
+        self.assertTrue(res["downstream_allowed"])
+
+    def test_process_work_queue_hyphen_alias(self) -> None:
+        res = route_task_session(
+            "process-work-queue",
+            active_profile="prgs-controller",
+            active_role_kind="controller",
+            allowed_in_current_session=True,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(res["route_result"], ROUTE_ALLOWED)
+
+    def test_process_work_queue_wrong_role_for_author(self) -> None:
+        res = route_task_session(
+            "process_work_queue",
+            active_profile="prgs-author",
+            active_role_kind="author",
+            allowed_in_current_session=False,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(res["route_result"], ROUTE_WRONG_ROLE)
+        self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], "controller")
+        self.assertFalse(res["downstream_allowed"])
+
+    def test_unknown_still_ambiguous(self) -> None:
+        res = route_task_session(
+            "not_a_real_task",
+            active_profile="prgs-controller",
+            active_role_kind="controller",
+            allowed_in_current_session=False,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(res["route_result"], ROUTE_AMBIGUOUS)
+
+    def test_capability_map_process_work_queue_is_controller(self) -> None:
+        self.assertEqual(
+            task_capability_map.required_role("process_work_queue"),
+            "controller",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            task_capability_map.required_permission("process_work_queue"),
+            "gitea.read",
+        )
+
+
+class ControllerRoleMetadataTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_normalize_role_kind_controller(self) -> None:
+        self.assertEqual(
+            nwb.normalize_role_kind("controller"),
+            "controller",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            nwb.normalize_role_kind("author", profile_name="prgs-controller"),
+            "controller",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            nwb.normalize_role_kind("reconciler", profile_name="prgs-controller"),
+            "controller",
+        )
+
+    def test_profile_role_kind_prefers_declared_controller(self) -> None:
+        # Import from worktree package path via sys.path already set by pytest.
+        import gitea_mcp_server as mcp
+
+        profile = {
+            "profile_name": "prgs-controller",
+            "role": "controller",
+            "allowed_operations": [
+                "gitea.read",
+                "gitea.issue.comment",
+                "gitea.pr.close",
+            ],
+            "forbidden_operations": [
+                "gitea.pr.approve",
+                "gitea.pr.merge",
+                "gitea.pr.create",
+                "gitea.branch.push",
+            ],
+        }
+        # Declared role wins even if permissions look reconciler-like.
+        self.assertEqual(mcp._profile_role_kind(profile), "controller")
+        # Name-based fallback.
+        profile_no_role = dict(profile)
+        profile_no_role["role"] = None
+        profile_no_role["role_kind"] = None
+        self.assertEqual(mcp._profile_role_kind(profile_no_role), "controller")
+
+    def test_permission_inference_without_controller_name_stays_reconciler(self) -> None:
+        import gitea_mcp_server as mcp
+
+        # Pure permission inference still may return reconciler when no controller
+        # declaration exists — that is intentional for reconciler profiles.
+        role = mcp._role_kind(
+            ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.close", "gitea.issue.comment"],
+            ["gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge", "gitea.pr.create", "gitea.branch.push"],
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(role, "reconciler")
+
+
+class DashboardRemainsExplanatoryTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_dashboard_prompt_points_at_allocator_not_self_select(self) -> None:
+        import workflow_dashboard as wd
+
+        self.assertIn("gitea_allocate_next_work", wd.PROMPT_CONTROLLER)
+        self.assertIn("process_work_queue", wd.PROMPT_CONTROLLER)
+        self.assertIn("never replaces allocator", wd.PROMPT_CONTROLLER.lower())
+        self.assertNotIn("self-select", wd.PROMPT_CONTROLLER.lower())
+
+
+class ClassifySkipCrossRoleTest(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_controller_cross_role_accepts_author_issue(self) -> None:
+        c = WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=1, labels=("status:ready",))
+        self.assertIsNone(
+            classify_skip(
+                c,
+                role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
+                terminal_pr=None,
+                allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_legacy_controller_skips_author_issue(self) -> None:
+        c = WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=1, labels=("status:ready",))
+        reason = classify_skip(
+            c,
+            role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
+            terminal_pr=None,
+            allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
+        )
+        self.assertIsNotNone(reason)
+        self.assertIn("does not require controller", reason or "")
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_812_publish_unpublished_commit.py

@@ -0,0 +1,650 @@
+"""Publication of an unpublished local commit (#812 AC20).
+
+Entry point B of #812: a registered worktree, clean, on its issue branch,
+holding a local commit that has never been published. Exact-owner lease renewal
+refuses such a claim for want of an observable remote head, and every existing
+publication path is lock-derived, so the two predicates close a cycle around
+work that is otherwise complete.
+
+These tests exercise the disposition through its *evidence*, never through any
+particular issue number: every case uses an arbitrary issue number against a
+synthetic repository, and the same assertions hold for any other. Nothing here
+reads, writes, or references the live protected worktree named in #812 AC17 —
+that content is preserved evidence for the duration of this work, so the
+fixtures below build their own repositories from scratch.
+
+The remote is a local bare repository, so publication and read-after-write
+verification are genuinely executed rather than mocked.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import subprocess
+import sys
+import tempfile
+import unittest
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
+sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
+
+import branch_publish  # noqa: E402
+import issue_lock_provenance  # noqa: E402
+import issue_lock_renewal  # noqa: E402
+import issue_lock_store  # noqa: E402
+import mcp_server  # noqa: E402
+from mutation_profile_fixture import shared_mutation_env  # noqa: E402
+
+ISSUE = 9812
+BRANCH = f"feat/issue-{ISSUE}-publish-fixture"
+IDENTITY = "example-user"
+PROFILE = "test-author-prgs"
+ORG = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
+REPO = "Gitea-Tools"
+GIT_REMOTE = "prgs"
+
+
+def _ts(hours: int) -> str:
+    return (
+        (datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(hours=hours))
+        .isoformat()
+        .replace("+00:00", "Z")
+    )
+
+
+class _PublishBase(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Real git repo + real bare remote + durable lock naming the caller.
+
+    The recorded owner pid is deliberately **this live process**. That mirrors
+    the production shape #812 documents, where the pid belongs to a long-running
+    MCP daemon rather than to a dead author client, and it proves publication
+    never depends on a dead process (#812 AC24).
+    """
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        self.lock_dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
+        self.addCleanup(self.lock_dir.cleanup)
+        self.origin = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="issue812-origin-")
+        self.repo = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="issue812-work-")
+        for path in (self.origin, self.repo):
+            self.addCleanup(
+                lambda p=path: subprocess.run(["rm", "-rf", p], check=False)
+            )
+        self._init_repos()
+        self.remotes = patch.dict(
+            mcp_server.REMOTES,
+            {"prgs": {"host": "gitea.prgs.cc", "org": ORG, "repo": REPO}},
+        )
+        self.remotes.start()
+        self.addCleanup(patch.stopall)
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+
+    # ── fixture construction ─────────────────────────────────────────────
+    def _git(self, *args, cwd=None):
+        return subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "-C", cwd or self.repo, *args],
+            capture_output=True,
+            text=True,
+            check=True,
+        )
+
+    def _init_repos(self):
+        subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "init", "-q", "--bare", "-b", "master", self.origin], check=True
+        )
+        self._git("init", "-q", "-b", "master")
+        self._git("config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
+        self._git("config", "user.name", "Test")
+        self._git("remote", "add", GIT_REMOTE, self.origin)
+
+        with open(os.path.join(self.repo, "seed.txt"), "w") as fh:
+            fh.write("seed\n")
+        self._git("add", "seed.txt")
+        self._git("commit", "-q", "-m", "seed")
+        self.base_sha = self._git("rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip()
+        self._git("push", "-q", GIT_REMOTE, "master")
+
+        self._git("checkout", "-q", "-b", BRANCH)
+        with open(os.path.join(self.repo, "work.txt"), "w") as fh:
+            fh.write("unpublished implementation\n")
+        self._git("add", "work.txt")
+        self._git("commit", "-q", "-m", "unpublished implementation")
+        self.head_sha = self._git("rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip()
+        self.worktree = os.path.realpath(self.repo)
+
+    def lock_path(self):
+        return issue_lock_store.lock_file_path(
+            remote="prgs", org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
+            lock_dir=self.lock_dir.name,
+        )
+
+    def write_lock(self, **overrides):
+        path = self.lock_path()
+        claimant = overrides.pop(
+            "claimant", {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE}
+        )
+        pid = overrides.pop("session_pid", os.getpid())
+        lease = {
+            "operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
+            "issue_number": ISSUE,
+            "pr_number": None,
+            "branch": overrides.get("branch_name", BRANCH),
+            "worktree_path": overrides.get("worktree_path", self.worktree),
+            "claimant": claimant,
+            "created_at": _ts(-2),
+            "last_heartbeat_at": _ts(-2),
+            # Expired: entry point B's lease has lapsed, which is precisely why
+            # renewal — and therefore a published head — is needed.
+            "expires_at": _ts(-1),
+        }
+        lease.update(overrides.pop("work_lease", {}))
+        data = {
+            "issue_number": ISSUE,
+            "branch_name": BRANCH,
+            "remote": "prgs",
+            "org": ORG,
+            "repo": REPO,
+            "worktree_path": self.worktree,
+            "session_pid": pid,
+            "pid": pid,
+            "lock_generation": 1,
+            "work_lease": lease,
+            "lock_provenance": issue_lock_provenance.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+                tool="gitea_lock_issue", claimant=claimant
+            ),
+        }
+        data.update(overrides)
+        data["lock_file_path"] = path
+        issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(path, data)
+        return path
+
+    def _tool_env(self):
+        env = shared_mutation_env(
+            PROFILE, include_example_repo=True,
+            GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR=self.lock_dir.name,
+        )
+        env["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
+        # These tests repoint PROJECT_ROOT at a synthetic repository so the
+        # registered-worktree proof runs for real. Pin the parity gate to the
+        # server's own startup head so that repointing does not read as a stale
+        # daemon; the gate itself stays live and enforced.
+        startup_head = mcp_server._STARTUP_PARITY.get("startup_head") or ""
+        env["GITEA_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD"] = startup_head
+        env["GITEA_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD"] = startup_head
+        return env
+
+    # ── tool driver ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+    def run_publish(self, *, open_prs=None, expected_head=None, **kwargs):
+        """Drive the public publication tool against the synthetic fixture."""
+        env = self._tool_env()
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server._list_open_pulls", return_value=list(open_prs or [])
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server._auth", return_value="token x"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server._work_lease_claimant",
+            return_value={"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "PROJECT_ROOT", self.repo
+        ), patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
+            os.environ["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
+            return mcp_server.gitea_publish_unpublished_issue_branch(
+                issue_number=kwargs.pop("issue_number", ISSUE),
+                branch_name=kwargs.pop("branch_name", BRANCH),
+                worktree_path=kwargs.pop("worktree_path", self.worktree),
+                expected_head=expected_head or self.head_sha,
+                remote="prgs",
+                git_remote_name=kwargs.pop("git_remote_name", GIT_REMOTE),
+                **kwargs,
+            )
+
+    def remote_head(self, branch=BRANCH):
+        res = subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "-C", self.origin, "rev-parse", "--verify", "--quiet", branch],
+            capture_output=True, text=True, check=False,
+        )
+        return (res.stdout or "").strip() or None
+
+
+class TestSuccessfulPublication(_PublishBase):
+    """AC20 — the branch becomes observable and is verified after the write."""
+
+    def test_publishes_clean_unpublished_commit(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head(), "fixture must start unpublished")
+
+        result = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"], result.get("reasons"))
+        self.assertTrue(result["performed"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["published"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["verified"], "read-after-write must be proven")
+        self.assertEqual(result["remote_head_sha"], self.head_sha)
+        self.assertEqual(self.remote_head(), self.head_sha)
+
+    def test_publication_does_not_rewrite_the_commit(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        self.run_publish()
+        # The published object is the same commit, not a copy or a rewrite.
+        self.assertEqual(self.remote_head(), self.head_sha)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            self._git("rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip(), self.head_sha
+        )
+
+    def test_exact_next_action_names_the_lock_call(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        result = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertIn("gitea_lock_issue", result["exact_next_action"])
+
+
+class TestFailsClosed(_PublishBase):
+    """AC20/AC9 — each refusal reason, exercised independently."""
+
+    def test_changed_local_head_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        stale = self.base_sha  # a real commit, but not the declared head
+        result = self.run_publish(expected_head=stale)
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("local commit changed" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head(), "refusal must not publish")
+
+    def test_abbreviated_sha_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        result = self.run_publish(expected_head=self.head_sha[:8])
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("40-character" in r for r in result["reasons"]), result["reasons"]
+        )
+
+    def test_dirty_tracked_worktree_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        with open(os.path.join(self.repo, "work.txt"), "a") as fh:
+            fh.write("uncommitted edit\n")
+
+        result = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("dirty tracked files" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+        self.assertIn("work.txt", result["evidence"]["dirty_tracked_files"])
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head())
+
+    def test_untracked_file_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        with open(os.path.join(self.repo, "stray.txt"), "w") as fh:
+            fh.write("not committed\n")
+
+        result = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("untracked files" in r for r in result["reasons"]), result["reasons"]
+        )
+        self.assertIn("stray.txt", result["evidence"]["untracked_files"])
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head())
+
+    def test_unexpected_remote_head_refuses(self):
+        """A remote head that is not an ancestor must never be overwritten."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        # Publish a divergent commit to the branch from a separate line.
+        self._git("checkout", "-q", "-b", "divergent", self.base_sha)
+        with open(os.path.join(self.repo, "other.txt"), "w") as fh:
+            fh.write("someone else's work\n")
+        self._git("add", "other.txt")
+        self._git("commit", "-q", "-m", "divergent")
+        divergent = self._git("rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip()
+        self._git("push", "-q", GIT_REMOTE, f"{divergent}:refs/heads/{BRANCH}")
+        self._git("checkout", "-q", BRANCH)
+
+        result = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("not an ancestor" in r for r in result["reasons"]), result["reasons"]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            self.remote_head(), divergent, "the other head must survive intact"
+        )
+
+    def test_fast_forward_remote_head_is_allowed(self):
+        """An ancestor head is an honest fast-forward, not a conflict."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        self._git("push", "-q", GIT_REMOTE, f"{self.base_sha}:refs/heads/{BRANCH}")
+
+        result = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"], result.get("reasons"))
+        self.assertTrue(result["evidence"]["fast_forward_from_remote"])
+        self.assertEqual(self.remote_head(), self.head_sha)
+
+    def test_content_hash_mismatch_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        wrong = {"work.txt": "0" * 64}
+
+        result = self.run_publish(expected_file_hashes=wrong)
+
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("declared content hashes" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(result["evidence"]["file_hashes_verified"])
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head())
+
+    def test_matching_content_hashes_publish(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        digests = branch_publish.hash_worktree_files(self.worktree, ["work.txt"])
+
+        result = self.run_publish(expected_file_hashes=digests)
+
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"], result.get("reasons"))
+        self.assertTrue(result["evidence"]["file_hashes_verified"])
+
+    def test_missing_declared_file_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        result = self.run_publish(expected_file_hashes={"absent.txt": "0" * 64})
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("missing or unreadable" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_foreign_claimant_refuses(self):
+        """Ownership comes from the durable record, not from the caller."""
+        self.write_lock(claimant={"username": "someone-else", "profile": PROFILE})
+
+        result = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("foreign claim" in r for r in result["reasons"]), result["reasons"]
+        )
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head())
+
+    def test_foreign_profile_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock(
+            claimant={"username": IDENTITY, "profile": "test-reviewer-prgs"}
+        )
+        result = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("claimant profile" in r for r in result["reasons"]), result["reasons"]
+        )
+
+    def test_absent_lock_record_refuses(self):
+        """No recorded claim means this cannot be used to bypass the lock."""
+        result = self.run_publish()  # no write_lock()
+
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("no durable issue-lock record" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head())
+
+    def test_branch_mismatch_against_lock_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock(branch_name=f"feat/issue-{ISSUE}-different")
+        result = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("records branch" in r for r in result["reasons"]), result["reasons"]
+        )
+
+    def test_worktree_mismatch_against_lock_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock(worktree_path="/tmp/some/other/worktree")
+        result = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("records worktree" in r for r in result["reasons"]), result["reasons"]
+        )
+
+    def test_competing_open_pr_on_another_branch_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        competing = [{"number": 4242, "head": {"ref": f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-rival"}}]
+
+        result = self.run_publish(open_prs=competing)
+
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("already claim issue" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head())
+
+    def test_open_pr_on_the_same_branch_is_not_competing(self):
+        """This branch's own PR is not a rival claim against itself."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        own = [{"number": 77, "head": {"ref": BRANCH}}]
+
+        result = self.run_publish(open_prs=own)
+
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"], result.get("reasons"))
+
+
+class TestGuardStrictnessPreserved(_PublishBase):
+    """AC15 — publication is an operation, never a weakening of the guards."""
+
+    def test_non_issue_branch_refuses(self):
+        self._git("checkout", "-q", "-b", "scratch/not-issue-linked")
+        self.write_lock(branch_name="scratch/not-issue-linked")
+
+        result = self.run_publish(branch_name="scratch/not-issue-linked")
+
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("issue-linked" in r for r in result["reasons"]), result["reasons"]
+        )
+
+    def test_stable_branch_refuses(self):
+        self.write_lock(branch_name="master")
+        result = self.run_publish(branch_name="master")
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("issue-linked" in r or "stable branch" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_branch_number_must_match_the_issue(self):
+        other = "feat/issue-7777-mismatched"
+        self._git("checkout", "-q", "-b", other)
+        self.write_lock(branch_name=other)
+        result = self.run_publish(branch_name=other)
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("does not carry issue number" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_unregistered_worktree_refuses(self):
+        """#713 — an improvised directory is not a registered worktree."""
+        path = self.write_lock()
+        assessment = branch_publish.assess_unpublished_commit_publication(
+            issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(path),
+            issue_number=ISSUE, branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.worktree,
+            expected_head=self.head_sha, remote="prgs", org=ORG, repo=REPO,
+            identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE,
+            worktree_state={
+                "current_branch": BRANCH, "porcelain_status": "",
+                "head_sha": self.head_sha,
+            },
+            worktree_registered=False,
+            remote_probe={"probe_ok": True, "remote_branch_exists": False},
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(assessment["outcome"], branch_publish.REFUSED)
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("not listed in git worktree list" in r
+                for r in assessment["reasons"]),
+            assessment["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_unobservable_remote_refuses(self):
+        """An unknown remote state must not be mistaken for an absent branch."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        result = self.run_publish(git_remote_name="no-such-remote")
+        self.assertFalse(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("could not be observed" in r for r in result["reasons"]),
+            result["reasons"],
+        )
+
+
+class TestRecordSeparation(_PublishBase):
+    """AC23 — the durable issue lock and the workflow lease are distinct."""
+
+    def test_publication_leaves_the_issue_lock_byte_identical(self):
+        path = self.write_lock()
+        with open(path, "rb") as fh:
+            before = fh.read()
+
+        result = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"], result.get("reasons"))
+        with open(path, "rb") as fh:
+            after = fh.read()
+        self.assertEqual(before, after, "publication must not mutate the lock record")
+        self.assertFalse(result["issue_lock_record_mutated"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["workflow_lease_touched"])
+
+    def test_refusal_also_reports_untouched_records(self):
+        result = self.run_publish()  # refuses: no lock record
+        self.assertFalse(result["issue_lock_record_mutated"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["workflow_lease_touched"])
+
+    def test_lock_generation_is_not_advanced(self):
+        path = self.write_lock()
+        self.run_publish()
+        lock = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(path)
+        self.assertEqual(lock["lock_generation"], 1)
+
+
+class TestTruthfulProcessEvidence(_PublishBase):
+    """AC24 — a live daemon pid is never represented as a dead process."""
+
+    def test_live_recorded_pid_does_not_block_publication(self):
+        # The recorded pid is this live process, standing in for the live MCP
+        # daemon. Reclaim would refuse here; publication legitimately does not.
+        path = self.write_lock(session_pid=os.getpid())
+        lock = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(path)
+        self.assertEqual(lock["pid"], os.getpid())
+
+        result = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"], result.get("reasons"))
+        self.assertEqual(self.remote_head(), self.head_sha)
+
+    def test_liveness_is_not_consulted_as_evidence(self):
+        self.write_lock(session_pid=os.getpid())
+        result = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertFalse(result["evidence"]["owner_pid_liveness_consulted"])
+
+    def test_reclaim_still_refuses_for_the_same_live_pid(self):
+        """Publication does not soften the reclaim predicate it routes around."""
+        path = self.write_lock(session_pid=os.getpid())
+        lock = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(path)
+        reclaim = issue_lock_store.assess_expired_lock_reclaim(lock)
+        self.assertFalse(reclaim["reclaim_allowed"])
+
+
+class TestIdempotentRetry(_PublishBase):
+    """AC20 — retry is safe and read-after-write is proven every time."""
+
+    def test_second_publication_reports_already_published(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        first = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertTrue(first["performed"])
+
+        second = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertTrue(second["success"], second.get("reasons"))
+        self.assertFalse(second["performed"], "no second push is needed")
+        self.assertTrue(second["published"])
+        self.assertTrue(second["verified"])
+        self.assertEqual(second["outcome"], branch_publish.ALREADY_PUBLISHED)
+        self.assertEqual(self.remote_head(), self.head_sha)
+
+
+class TestDryRun(_PublishBase):
+    """AC12 — dry run reports the decision and mutates nothing."""
+
+    def test_dry_run_reports_intent_without_publishing(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+
+        result = self.run_publish(dry_run=True)
+
+        self.assertTrue(result["success"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["dry_run"])
+        self.assertTrue(result["would_publish"])
+        self.assertFalse(result["performed"])
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head(), "dry run must not publish")
+
+    def test_dry_run_and_apply_agree_on_a_refusal(self):
+        """AC11 — the reported decision does not depend on which mode ran."""
+        self.write_lock(claimant={"username": "someone-else", "profile": PROFILE})
+
+        dry = self.run_publish(dry_run=True)
+        applied = self.run_publish()
+
+        self.assertFalse(dry["success"])
+        self.assertFalse(applied["success"])
+        self.assertEqual(dry["reasons"], applied["reasons"])
+
+
+class TestRenewalUnblocked(_PublishBase):
+    """AC20/AC21 — renewal is permitted only after verified publication."""
+
+    def _renewal(self, remote_head):
+        return issue_lock_renewal.assess_exact_owner_lease_renewal(
+            issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(self.lock_path()),
+            issue_number=ISSUE, branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.worktree,
+            remote="prgs", org=ORG, repo=REPO,
+            identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE,
+            current_branch=BRANCH, porcelain_status="", worktree_exists=True,
+            head_sha=self.head_sha, remote_head_sha=remote_head,
+        )
+
+    def test_renewal_refuses_before_publication(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        decision = self._renewal(None)
+        self.assertFalse(decision["renewal_sanctioned"])
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any("unpublished branch" in r for r in decision["reasons"]),
+            decision["reasons"],
+        )
+
+    def test_renewal_is_sanctioned_after_publication(self):
+        self.write_lock()
+        result = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertTrue(result["verified"], result.get("reasons"))
+
+        decision = self._renewal(self.remote_head())
+
+        self.assertTrue(decision["renewal_sanctioned"], decision["reasons"])
+
+
+class TestProtectedAssetUntouched(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC17 — no test or fixture may reference the protected worktree."""
+
+    def test_no_reference_to_the_protected_worktree(self):
+        here = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
+        root = os.path.dirname(here)
+        needle = "issue-635-project-registry" + "-api"
+        for path in (
+            os.path.join(here, "test_issue_812_publish_unpublished_commit.py"),
+            os.path.join(root, "branch_publish.py"),
+        ):
+            with open(path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
+                body = fh.read()
+            self.assertNotIn(needle, body)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":  # pragma: no cover
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_issue_815_preflight_worktree_forwarding.py

@@ -0,0 +1,622 @@
+"""Publication preflight must receive the caller's worktree (#815).
+
+``gitea_publish_unpublished_issue_branch`` takes a **required** ``worktree_path``
+but resolved it only *after* ``verify_preflight_purity`` had already run. Every
+workspace-resolution layer behind that preflight — canonical root, root checkout,
+create-issue bootstrap, the #618 branches-only guard, issue scope, and anti-stomp
+— therefore received ``None`` and fell back to the MCP process root. A daemon
+rooted at the stable control checkout refused a valid registered issue worktree
+that the caller had explicitly supplied, before the publication assessor ever ran.
+
+The #812 suite could not see this. Its fixture sets ``self.worktree =
+os.path.realpath(self.repo)`` and patches ``PROJECT_ROOT`` to that same path, so
+the fallback resolved to the very worktree the argument named. The production
+topology — control checkout on a stable branch, issue worktree somewhere else —
+was never constructed, and preflight additionally no-ops under pytest unless
+production guards are forced on.
+
+These tests build that topology honestly:
+
+* ``PROJECT_ROOT`` is a control checkout sitting on ``master``;
+* the registered issue worktree is a genuinely separate path under ``branches/``;
+* ``GITEA_TEST_FORCE_PRODUCTION_GUARDS`` is set so the #618 guard really runs;
+* no patch makes the issue worktree appear to be ``PROJECT_ROOT``.
+
+Nothing here reads, writes, or references the protected worktree named in #812
+AC17 and #815 AC9. Every fixture is built from scratch against a local bare
+remote, so publication and read-after-write verification genuinely execute.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import subprocess
+import sys
+import tempfile
+import unittest
+from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
+sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))
+
+import issue_lock_provenance  # noqa: E402
+import issue_lock_store  # noqa: E402
+import mcp_server  # noqa: E402
+from mutation_profile_fixture import shared_mutation_env  # noqa: E402
+
+ISSUE = 9815
+BRANCH = f"feat/issue-{ISSUE}-forwarding-fixture"
+WORKTREE_DIRNAME = BRANCH.replace("/", "-")
+IDENTITY = "example-user"
+PROFILE = "test-author-prgs"
+ORG = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
+REPO = "Gitea-Tools"
+GIT_REMOTE = "prgs"
+
+AUTHOR_PROFILE = {
+    "profile_name": "prgs-author",
+    "role": "author",
+    "allowed_operations": [
+        "gitea.read", "gitea.issue.create", "gitea.issue.comment",
+        "gitea.pr.create", "gitea.repo.commit", "gitea.branch.push",
+    ],
+    "forbidden_operations": [],
+    "audit_label": "prgs-author",
+}
+
+
+def _ts(hours: int) -> str:
+    return (
+        (datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(hours=hours))
+        .isoformat()
+        .replace("+00:00", "Z")
+    )
+
+
+class TestPreflightReceivesTheWorktree(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC1 — the supplied path reaches ``verify_preflight_purity`` itself.
+
+    Follows the #735 capture pattern: replace preflight with a recorder that
+    raises, so the argument can be proven forwarded without performing the
+    mutation. This is the direct unit-level statement of the defect.
+    """
+
+    def _capture_preflight(self, **kwargs):
+        captured: dict = {}
+
+        def _capture(*a, **kw):
+            captured.update(kw)
+            captured["_args"] = a
+            raise RuntimeError("capture-only")
+
+        with patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "verify_preflight_purity", side_effect=_capture
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "get_profile", return_value=AUTHOR_PROFILE
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "_resolve",
+            return_value=("gitea.prgs.cc", ORG, REPO),
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "_auth", return_value="token fake",
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server.role_session_router,
+            "check_author_mutation_after_reviewer_stop",
+            return_value=(True, []),
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "_namespace_mutation_block", return_value=None
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "_profile_permission_block", return_value=None
+        ):
+            try:
+                mcp_server.gitea_publish_unpublished_issue_branch(**kwargs)
+            except RuntimeError as exc:
+                if "capture-only" not in str(exc) and not captured:
+                    raise
+        self.assertTrue(
+            captured,
+            "gitea_publish_unpublished_issue_branch never called "
+            "verify_preflight_purity",
+        )
+        return captured
+
+    def _base_kwargs(self, **overrides):
+        kwargs = {
+            "issue_number": ISSUE,
+            "branch_name": BRANCH,
+            "worktree_path": "/tmp/issue-815-explicit-worktree",
+            "expected_head": "a" * 40,
+            "remote": "prgs",
+            "org": ORG,
+            "repo": REPO,
+            "git_remote_name": GIT_REMOTE,
+        }
+        kwargs.update(overrides)
+        return kwargs
+
+    def test_explicit_worktree_path_reaches_preflight(self):
+        captured = self._capture_preflight(**self._base_kwargs())
+        self.assertEqual(
+            captured.get("worktree_path"),
+            os.path.realpath(os.path.abspath("/tmp/issue-815-explicit-worktree")),
+            "the authoritative worktree_path must be forwarded into preflight",
+        )
+
+    def test_forwarded_path_is_the_one_publication_uses(self):
+        """AC4 — preflight and publication must judge the same resolved path."""
+        raw = "/tmp/issue-815-explicit-worktree/./"
+        captured = self._capture_preflight(**self._base_kwargs(worktree_path=raw))
+        expected = os.path.realpath(os.path.abspath(raw.strip()))
+        self.assertEqual(captured.get("worktree_path"), expected)
+
+    def test_blank_worktree_path_forwards_none(self):
+        """AC5/AC8 — nothing usable supplied keeps the fail-closed fallback."""
+        for blank in ("", "   "):
+            with self.subTest(blank=repr(blank)):
+                captured = self._capture_preflight(
+                    **self._base_kwargs(worktree_path=blank)
+                )
+                self.assertIsNone(
+                    captured.get("worktree_path"),
+                    "a blank worktree must not resolve to the process cwd",
+                )
+
+    def test_org_repo_and_task_forwarding_are_not_regressed(self):
+        """AC6 — #735's org/repo forwarding and the task name still hold."""
+        captured = self._capture_preflight(**self._base_kwargs())
+        self.assertEqual(captured.get("org"), ORG)
+        self.assertEqual(captured.get("repo"), REPO)
+        self.assertEqual(captured.get("task"), "publish_unpublished_branch")
+
+
+class _ProductionTopologyBase(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Control checkout on master + a distinct registered issue worktree.
+
+    This is the shape the production daemon runs in and the shape the #812
+    fixture never built. ``PROJECT_ROOT`` is the control checkout; the issue
+    worktree is a real registered worktree at a different path; production
+    guards are forced on so the #618 branches-only guard genuinely evaluates.
+    """
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        self.lock_dir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
+        self.addCleanup(self.lock_dir.cleanup)
+        self.origin = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="issue815-origin-")
+        self.control = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="issue815-control-")
+        for path in (self.origin, self.control):
+            self.addCleanup(
+                lambda p=path: subprocess.run(["rm", "-rf", p], check=False)
+            )
+        self._init_repos()
+        self.remotes = patch.dict(
+            mcp_server.REMOTES,
+            {"prgs": {"host": "gitea.prgs.cc", "org": ORG, "repo": REPO}},
+        )
+        self.remotes.start()
+        self.addCleanup(patch.stopall)
+        mcp_server._IDENTITY_CACHE.clear()
+
+    def _git(self, *args, cwd=None):
+        return subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "-C", cwd or self.control, *args],
+            capture_output=True, text=True, check=True,
+        )
+
+    def _init_repos(self):
+        subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "init", "-q", "--bare", "-b", "master", self.origin], check=True
+        )
+        self._git("init", "-q", "-b", "master")
+        self._git("config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
+        self._git("config", "user.name", "Test")
+        self._git("remote", "add", GIT_REMOTE, self.origin)
+
+        with open(os.path.join(self.control, "seed.txt"), "w") as fh:
+            fh.write("seed\n")
+        # The real repository gitignores branches/, so a registered worktree
+        # living there does not dirty the stable control checkout. Mirror that,
+        # or the #615 dirty-runtime block fires on the worktree we just created.
+        with open(os.path.join(self.control, ".gitignore"), "w") as fh:
+            fh.write("branches/\n")
+        self._git("add", "seed.txt", ".gitignore")
+        self._git("commit", "-q", "-m", "seed")
+        self.base_sha = self._git("rev-parse", "HEAD").stdout.strip()
+        self._git("push", "-q", GIT_REMOTE, "master")
+
+        # The control checkout STAYS on master. This is the whole point: the
+        # daemon's process root is the stable control checkout, never the
+        # worktree the publication targets.
+        self.worktree = os.path.realpath(
+            os.path.join(self.control, "branches", WORKTREE_DIRNAME)
+        )
+        self._git("worktree", "add", "-q", "-b", BRANCH, self.worktree, "master")
+
+        with open(os.path.join(self.worktree, "work.txt"), "w") as fh:
+            fh.write("unpublished implementation\n")
+        self._git("add", "work.txt", cwd=self.worktree)
+        self._git("commit", "-q", "-m", "unpublished implementation", cwd=self.worktree)
+        self.head_sha = self._git("rev-parse", "HEAD", cwd=self.worktree).stdout.strip()
+
+        self.control_branch = self._git(
+            "rev-parse", "--abbrev-ref", "HEAD"
+        ).stdout.strip()
+
+    # ── durable lock naming the caller and the issue worktree ────────────
+    def lock_path(self):
+        return issue_lock_store.lock_file_path(
+            remote="prgs", org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
+            lock_dir=self.lock_dir.name,
+        )
+
+    def write_lock(self, *, bind_session=True, **overrides):
+        path = self.lock_path()
+        claimant = overrides.pop(
+            "claimant", {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE}
+        )
+        pid = overrides.pop("session_pid", os.getpid())
+        lease = {
+            "operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
+            "issue_number": ISSUE,
+            "pr_number": None,
+            "branch": overrides.get("branch_name", BRANCH),
+            "worktree_path": overrides.get("worktree_path", self.worktree),
+            "claimant": claimant,
+            "created_at": _ts(-2),
+            "last_heartbeat_at": _ts(-2),
+            "expires_at": _ts(-1),
+        }
+        lease.update(overrides.pop("work_lease", {}))
+        data = {
+            "issue_number": ISSUE,
+            "branch_name": BRANCH,
+            "remote": "prgs",
+            "org": ORG,
+            "repo": REPO,
+            "worktree_path": self.worktree,
+            "session_pid": pid,
+            "pid": pid,
+            "lock_generation": 1,
+            "work_lease": lease,
+            "lock_provenance": issue_lock_provenance.build_sanctioned_lock_provenance(
+                tool="gitea_lock_issue", claimant=claimant
+            ),
+        }
+        data.update(overrides)
+        data["lock_file_path"] = path
+        issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(path, data)
+        # Bind the session pointer so the #683 issue-scope guard resolves an
+        # owning issue for this author session. In real production the publish
+        # task does not require a session lock — require_author_lock is keyed on
+        # the test-only production_guards_forced() flag, which this suite must
+        # set to make preflight run at all — so this pointer is fixture
+        # scaffolding to clear a guard production would not apply here, never a
+        # softening of the worktree-forwarding behaviour under test. The
+        # preflight-negative cases below leave it unbound precisely so the #618
+        # guard is reached with no session fallback to rescue a bad worktree.
+        if bind_session:
+            pointer = {
+                "pid": os.getpid(),
+                "lock_file_path": path,
+                "issue_number": ISSUE,
+                "branch_name": data["branch_name"],
+                "remote": "prgs",
+                "org": ORG,
+                "repo": REPO,
+            }
+            issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(
+                issue_lock_store.session_pointer_path(self.lock_dir.name), pointer
+            )
+        return path
+
+    def _tool_env(self):
+        env = shared_mutation_env(
+            PROFILE, include_example_repo=True,
+            GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR=self.lock_dir.name,
+        )
+        env["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
+        # The defect only exists where preflight actually runs. Under pytest the
+        # production root/branches/scope guards are skipped unless forced on, so
+        # force them: this test exists to exercise the #618 guard, not to bypass
+        # it. Parity is pinned to the server's own startup head so repointing
+        # PROJECT_ROOT does not read as a stale daemon.
+        env["GITEA_TEST_FORCE_PRODUCTION_GUARDS"] = "1"
+        # Production is a promoted stable-control runtime. The pytest process
+        # itself runs from a branches/ worktree, which the #615 runtime-mode
+        # gate correctly classifies as dev-test; declaring the sanctioned mode
+        # models the production daemon rather than defeating the gate. Without
+        # this, forcing production guards on would trip the *runtime-mode* block
+        # for a reason unrelated to the #815 worktree-forwarding defect.
+        env["GITEA_MCP_RUNTIME_MODE"] = "stable-control"
+        startup_head = mcp_server._STARTUP_PARITY.get("startup_head") or ""
+        env["GITEA_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD"] = startup_head
+        env["GITEA_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD"] = startup_head
+        return env
+
+    def run_publish(self, *, open_prs=None, expected_head=None, **kwargs):
+        """Drive the public tool with PROJECT_ROOT pinned to the CONTROL checkout."""
+        env = self._tool_env()
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server._list_open_pulls", return_value=list(open_prs or [])
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server._auth", return_value="token x"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server._work_lease_claimant",
+            return_value={"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
+        ), patch.object(
+            # NOTE: the control checkout — deliberately NOT self.worktree.
+            mcp_server, "PROJECT_ROOT", self.control
+        ), patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
+            os.environ["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
+            return mcp_server.gitea_publish_unpublished_issue_branch(
+                issue_number=kwargs.pop("issue_number", ISSUE),
+                branch_name=kwargs.pop("branch_name", BRANCH),
+                worktree_path=kwargs.pop("worktree_path", self.worktree),
+                expected_head=expected_head or self.head_sha,
+                remote="prgs",
+                git_remote_name=kwargs.pop("git_remote_name", GIT_REMOTE),
+                **kwargs,
+            )
+
+    def remote_head(self, branch=BRANCH):
+        res = subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "-C", self.origin, "rev-parse", "--verify", "--quiet", branch],
+            capture_output=True, text=True, check=False,
+        )
+        return (res.stdout or "").strip() or None
+
+
+class TestForwardingClearsThe618Guard(_ProductionTopologyBase):
+    """AC2 — the faithful production reproduction, and the sharpest fix proof.
+
+    The production recovery worker had **no** session issue lock — acquiring one
+    was the very thing the deadlock prevented — so preflight had nothing but the
+    explicit ``worktree_path`` argument to resolve the workspace from. This class
+    reproduces exactly that: no session pointer is bound, so there is no
+    author-lock fallback to rescue a dropped argument.
+
+    With the argument forwarded (fixed source) the #618 branches-only guard
+    accepts the registered issue worktree and the call advances to the next
+    guard. With the argument dropped (the buggy source this issue reports)
+    preflight falls back to ``PROJECT_ROOT`` — the stable control checkout — and
+    the #618 guard traps the call there. The two outcomes are told apart by the
+    guard that fired, on its own error text.
+
+    This test therefore *fails* against the unpatched source (the call is trapped
+    at #618 instead of clearing it), which is what makes it a regression rather
+    than a smoke test.
+    """
+
+    _CONTROL_CHECKOUT_MARKERS = ("stable control checkout", "#618")
+
+    def test_explicit_worktree_clears_618_without_a_session_lock(self):
+        # No write_lock(): the session is deliberately unbound, as in production.
+        with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+            self.run_publish()
+        message = str(ctx.exception)
+        # The workspace guard is satisfied — the failure is the *later* scope
+        # guard (no owning issue), never the control-checkout refusal. If the
+        # argument were dropped, this call would be trapped at #618 instead.
+        for marker in self._CONTROL_CHECKOUT_MARKERS:
+            self.assertNotIn(
+                marker, message,
+                f"the explicit worktree must clear #618; got a control-checkout "
+                f"refusal instead: {message}",
+            )
+        self.assertIn(
+            "owning issue", message,
+            f"expected the downstream scope guard to fire, got: {message}",
+        )
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head())
+
+    def test_dropped_argument_would_be_trapped_at_618(self):
+        # Simulate the buggy call shape directly: no session lock, and preflight
+        # given no worktree, exactly as the unpatched source left it. This pins
+        # the control-checkout refusal that the fix eliminates, so the pair of
+        # tests brackets the defect from both sides regardless of which source
+        # version is loaded.
+        env = self._tool_env()
+        with patch(
+            "mcp_server._list_open_pulls", return_value=[]
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server._auth", return_value="token x"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value="token x"
+        ), patch(
+            "mcp_server._work_lease_claimant",
+            return_value={"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
+        ), patch.object(
+            mcp_server, "PROJECT_ROOT", self.control
+        ), patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
+            os.environ["GITEA_ISSUE_LOCK_DIR"] = self.lock_dir.name
+            with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+                # Drive verify_preflight_purity the way the buggy body did:
+                # no worktree_path forwarded at all.
+                mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity(
+                    "prgs",
+                    task="publish_unpublished_branch",
+                    org=ORG,
+                    repo=REPO,
+                )
+        message = str(ctx.exception)
+        self.assertTrue(
+            any(m in message for m in self._CONTROL_CHECKOUT_MARKERS),
+            f"a dropped worktree must trap at the control checkout: {message}",
+        )
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head())
+
+
+class TestProductionTopologyPublishes(_ProductionTopologyBase):
+    """AC2/AC4/AC7 — the explicit registered worktree is what preflight validates."""
+
+    def test_fixture_is_genuinely_the_production_topology(self):
+        """Guard the guard: if this drifts, the regression stops meaning anything."""
+        self.assertNotEqual(
+            os.path.realpath(self.control), self.worktree,
+            "the issue worktree must not be PROJECT_ROOT",
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            self.control_branch, "master",
+            "the control checkout must sit on a stable branch",
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(
+            os.path.realpath(self.worktree).startswith(
+                os.path.realpath(os.path.join(self.control, "branches")) + os.sep
+            ),
+            "the issue worktree must live under branches/",
+        )
+        listed = subprocess.run(
+            ["git", "-C", self.control, "worktree", "list"],
+            capture_output=True, text=True, check=True,
+        ).stdout
+        self.assertIn(
+            self.worktree, listed, "the issue worktree must be genuinely registered"
+        )
+
+    def test_publishes_from_a_control_rooted_daemon(self):
+        """The exact production failure: this refused with #618 before the fix."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head(), "fixture must start unpublished")
+        res = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertTrue(res.get("success"), res)
+        self.assertTrue(res.get("performed"), res)
+        self.assertEqual(self.remote_head(), self.head_sha)
+
+    def test_dry_run_uses_the_explicit_worktree(self):
+        """AC4 — dry-run reaches the same decision without publishing."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        res = self.run_publish(dry_run=True)
+        self.assertTrue(res.get("success"), res)
+        self.assertFalse(res.get("performed"), res)
+        self.assertTrue(res.get("would_publish"), res)
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head(), "dry-run must not publish")
+
+    def test_dry_run_and_apply_agree_on_the_same_worktree(self):
+        """AC4 — both paths resolve the same workspace, so both succeed."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        dry = self.run_publish(dry_run=True)
+        self.assertTrue(dry.get("would_publish"), dry)
+        applied = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertTrue(applied.get("performed"), applied)
+        self.assertEqual(self.remote_head(), self.head_sha)
+
+    def test_read_after_write_verification_still_runs(self):
+        """AC6 — PR #814's post-publication verification is unchanged."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        res = self.run_publish()
+        self.assertTrue(res.get("verified"), res)
+        self.assertEqual(res.get("remote_head_sha"), self.head_sha)
+
+
+class TestProductionTopologyFailsClosed(_ProductionTopologyBase):
+    """AC3/AC5/AC8 — the fix does not weaken any refusal.
+
+    A refusal reaches the caller by one of two mechanisms, and this class holds
+    them apart deliberately. A bad *workspace* is caught by the #618 preflight
+    guard, which raises before the assessor is built. A bad *content/ownership*
+    fact passes preflight (the worktree itself is fine) and is then refused by
+    the publication assessor, which returns ``success: False``. Both are
+    fail-closed; asserting the wrong mechanism would hide a regression.
+    """
+
+    # ── #618 preflight refusals: no session lock, so nothing rescues a bad
+    #    workspace and the guard fires exactly as it does in production ──────
+    def _assert_preflight_raises(self, **kwargs):
+        with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError) as ctx:
+            self.run_publish(**kwargs)
+        self.assertIsNone(
+            self.remote_head(), "a blocked publication must not reach the remote"
+        )
+        return str(ctx.exception)
+
+    def test_blank_worktree_path_fails_closed_via_618(self):
+        """AC5 — a blank path forwards None, so preflight sees the control root."""
+        for blank in ("", "   "):
+            with self.subTest(blank=repr(blank)):
+                message = self._assert_preflight_raises(worktree_path=blank)
+                self.assertIn("618", message)
+
+    def test_control_checkout_as_worktree_fails_closed_via_618(self):
+        """AC5 — naming the stable control checkout explicitly is still refused."""
+        message = self._assert_preflight_raises(worktree_path=self.control)
+        self.assertIn("618", message)
+
+    def test_unregistered_directory_fails_closed(self):
+        """AC3 — a plain directory under branches/ is not a registered worktree."""
+        bogus = os.path.join(self.control, "branches", "not-a-worktree")
+        os.makedirs(bogus, exist_ok=True)
+        self._assert_preflight_raises(worktree_path=bogus)
+
+    def test_missing_worktree_path_fails_closed(self):
+        """AC3 — a path that does not exist is refused, not silently replaced."""
+        missing = os.path.join(self.control, "branches", "absent-worktree")
+        self._assert_preflight_raises(worktree_path=missing)
+
+    # ── assessor refusals: preflight passes on a valid worktree, then the
+    #    publication assessor refuses on content/ownership evidence ──────────
+    def _assert_assessor_refuses(self, **kwargs):
+        res = self.run_publish(**kwargs)
+        self.assertFalse(res.get("success"), res)
+        self.assertFalse(res.get("performed"), res)
+        self.assertIsNone(self.remote_head())
+        return res
+
+    def test_changed_local_head_still_refuses(self):
+        """AC6 — the declared expected_head remains authoritative."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        self._assert_assessor_refuses(expected_head="b" * 40)
+
+    def test_foreign_claimant_still_refuses(self):
+        """AC6 — ownership still comes from the durable lock record."""
+        self.write_lock(claimant={"username": "someone-else", "profile": PROFILE})
+        self._assert_assessor_refuses()
+
+    def test_dirty_worktree_still_refuses(self):
+        """AC6 — cleanliness enforcement survives the forwarding change."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        with open(os.path.join(self.worktree, "work.txt"), "a") as fh:
+            fh.write("uncommitted drift\n")
+        self._assert_assessor_refuses()
+
+    def test_competing_open_pr_still_refuses(self):
+        """AC6 — a rival claim on another branch still blocks."""
+        self.write_lock()
+        self._assert_assessor_refuses(
+            open_prs=[{"number": 4242, "head": {"ref": f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-rival"}}]
+        )
+
+    def test_issue_lock_record_is_not_mutated_by_a_refusal(self):
+        """AC6 — record separation (#812 AC23) is unaffected by this change."""
+        path = self.write_lock()
+        with open(path, "rb") as fh:
+            before = fh.read()
+        self._assert_assessor_refuses(expected_head="c" * 40)
+        with open(path, "rb") as fh:
+            self.assertEqual(before, fh.read())
+
+
+class TestProtectedFixtureNotReferenced(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC9 — this regression never names the protected #635 fixture.
+
+    The forbidden tokens are reconstructed from fragments so this assertion
+    file does not itself contain them and produce a false positive.
+    """
+
+    def test_no_reference_to_the_protected_worktree(self):
+        forbidden = [
+            "issue-635-" + "project-registry-api",
+            "b2f6e9a6dc40e9651ef8" + "76f322dd0a68bddebfd8",
+        ]
+        here = os.path.abspath(__file__)
+        with open(here, "r", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
+            text = fh.read()
+        for token in forbidden:
+            self.assertNotIn(
+                token, text,
+                f"the protected #635 fixture must not be referenced: {token}",
+            )
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_master_parity_gate.py

@@ -78,6 +78,95 @@ class TestBlockReasonsAndReport(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertTrue(report["recovery"])
 
 
+class TestLiveRemoteParity(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#610: parity must account for the live remote master, not just local.
+
+    The daemon can be stale relative to the live remote target while the local
+    checkout HEAD still matches the daemon's startup commit, so local parity
+    reports green even though a mutation would run against outdated code.
+    """
+
+    SHA_C = "c" * 40
+
+    def test_distinguishes_three_shas(self):
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity(
+            {"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
+        self.assertEqual(res["daemon_start_head"], SHA_A)
+        self.assertEqual(res["local_head"], SHA_A)
+        self.assertEqual(res["live_remote_head"], SHA_B)
+
+    def test_mutation_safe_only_when_all_three_match(self):
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity(
+            {"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_A)
+        self.assertTrue(res["mutation_safe"])
+        self.assertTrue(res["live_known"])
+        self.assertFalse(res["live_stale"])
+
+    def test_live_stale_when_remote_advanced_past_daemon(self):
+        # Local checkout still matches the daemon start (local parity green),
+        # but the live remote master has advanced -> daemon is live-stale.
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity(
+            {"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
+        self.assertTrue(res["in_parity"])  # local parity still green
+        self.assertTrue(res["live_stale"])
+        self.assertFalse(res["mutation_safe"])
+        self.assertTrue(any("live" in r.lower() for r in res["reasons"]))
+
+    def test_live_unknown_is_not_mutation_safe_but_not_stale(self):
+        # Non-goal: unfetchable live remote must not be treated as stale for
+        # read-only, but a mutation-safe claim fails closed.
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity(
+            {"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=None)
+        self.assertFalse(res["live_known"])
+        self.assertFalse(res["mutation_safe"])
+        self.assertFalse(res["live_stale"])
+        self.assertTrue(res["in_parity"])
+
+    def test_default_live_remote_preserves_legacy_shape(self):
+        # Callers that do not supply a live head keep the pre-#610 behavior:
+        # in-parity, not live-stale, no live-derived block.
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity({"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A)
+        self.assertFalse(res["live_stale"])
+        self.assertEqual(mp.parity_block_reasons(res), [])
+
+
+class TestLiveStaleBlockAndReport(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#610: live-staleness must block mutations and surface a typed blocker."""
+
+    def test_live_stale_produces_block_reasons(self):
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity(
+            {"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
+        self.assertTrue(mp.parity_block_reasons(res))
+
+    def test_disable_env_suppresses_live_stale_block(self):
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity(
+            {"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_DISABLE: "1"}):
+            self.assertEqual(mp.parity_block_reasons(res), [])
+
+    def test_resolver_disagreement_returns_typed_blocker(self):
+        # Parity says local-green, resolver says restart required -> disagreement
+        # is a typed, fail-closed blocker naming the resolver as authoritative.
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity({"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A)
+        blocker = mp.parity_resolver_disagreement(res, resolver_restart_required=True)
+        self.assertIsNotNone(blocker)
+        self.assertEqual(blocker["kind"], "parity_resolver_disagreement")
+        self.assertTrue(blocker["restart_required"])
+        self.assertTrue(blocker["resolver_authoritative"])
+
+    def test_no_disagreement_when_resolver_agrees(self):
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity({"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A)
+        self.assertIsNone(
+            mp.parity_resolver_disagreement(res, resolver_restart_required=False))
+
+    def test_live_stale_report_names_live_remote(self):
+        res = mp.assess_master_parity(
+            {"startup_head": SHA_A}, SHA_A, live_remote_head=SHA_B)
+        report = mp.parity_report(res)
+        self.assertEqual(report["live_remote_head"], SHA_B)
+        self.assertTrue(report["restart_required"])
+
+
 class TestReadGitHead(unittest.TestCase):
     def test_test_override_takes_precedence(self):
         with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD: SHA_B}):
@@ -95,6 +184,149 @@ class TestReadGitHead(unittest.TestCase):
             self.assertIsNone(mp.read_git_head(""))
 
 
+class TestReadRemoteMasterHead(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#610: live remote master head reader (env-overridable, fails to None)."""
+
+    def test_test_override_takes_precedence(self):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_B}):
+            self.assertEqual(mp.read_remote_master_head("/nonexistent"), SHA_B)
+
+    def test_blank_override_is_none(self):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: "   "}):
+            self.assertIsNone(mp.read_remote_master_head("/nonexistent"))
+
+    def test_unfetchable_remote_is_none(self):
+        # No override; a bogus root/remote must fail closed to None, never raise.
+        env = {k: v for k, v in os.environ.items()
+               if k != mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD}
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
+            self.assertIsNone(
+                mp.read_remote_master_head("/nonexistent", remote="nope"))
+
+
+class TestRemoteHeadCache(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#610: live remote reads are cached with a TTL to stay off the network.
+
+    The parity gate runs on every mutation and every runtime-context read, so an
+    unbounded ``git ls-remote`` per call would be a latency/flakiness regression.
+    """
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        # These cases intentionally exercise the subprocess/cache path, so they
+        # opt out of suite-wide hermetic mode (PR #788 F1).
+        self._saved_hermetic = mp.hermetic_test_mode()
+        mp.set_hermetic_test_mode(False)
+        mp._clear_remote_head_cache()
+        env = {
+            k: v for k, v in os.environ.items()
+            if k not in (mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD,
+                         mp.ENV_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE,
+                         "PYTEST_CURRENT_TEST")
+        }
+        # Allow the probe path under hermetic defenses while still mocking
+        # subprocess so no real network call runs.
+        env[mp.ENV_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE] = "1"
+        self._env = patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True)
+        self._env.start()
+        self.addCleanup(self._env.stop)
+        self.addCleanup(mp._clear_remote_head_cache)
+        self.addCleanup(
+            lambda: mp.set_hermetic_test_mode(self._saved_hermetic)
+        )
+
+    def _fake_run(self, sha):
+        class _R:
+            returncode = 0
+            stdout = f"{sha}\trefs/heads/master\n"
+        calls = {"n": 0}
+
+        def run(*args, **kwargs):
+            calls["n"] += 1
+            return _R()
+        return run, calls
+
+    def test_second_call_within_ttl_uses_cache(self):
+        run, calls = self._fake_run(SHA_B)
+        with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", run):
+            a = mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs", ttl=100)
+            b = mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs", ttl=100)
+        self.assertEqual(a, SHA_B)
+        self.assertEqual(b, SHA_B)
+        self.assertEqual(calls["n"], 1)
+
+    def test_zero_ttl_bypasses_cache(self):
+        run, calls = self._fake_run(SHA_B)
+        with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", run):
+            mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs", ttl=0)
+            mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs", ttl=0)
+        self.assertEqual(calls["n"], 2)
+
+    def test_env_override_never_touches_subprocess(self):
+        run, calls = self._fake_run(SHA_B)
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_A}):
+            with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", run):
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs"), SHA_A)
+        self.assertEqual(calls["n"], 0)
+
+
+class TestHermeticLiveRemoteReads(unittest.TestCase):
+    """#610 / PR #788 F1/F2: suite hermetic mode never hits the network."""
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        self._saved = mp.hermetic_test_mode()
+        mp.set_hermetic_test_mode(True)
+        mp._clear_remote_head_cache()
+        self.addCleanup(lambda: mp.set_hermetic_test_mode(self._saved))
+        self.addCleanup(mp._clear_remote_head_cache)
+
+    def test_hermetic_mode_returns_none_without_subprocess(self):
+        run_calls = {"n": 0}
+
+        def boom(*args, **kwargs):
+            run_calls["n"] += 1
+            raise AssertionError("ls-remote must not run under hermetic mode")
+
+        env = {
+            k: v for k, v in os.environ.items()
+            if k not in (mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD,
+                         mp.ENV_TEST_ALLOW_LIVE_REMOTE_PROBE)
+        }
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, env, clear=True):
+            with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", boom):
+                self.assertIsNone(
+                    mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo", remote="prgs")
+                )
+        self.assertEqual(run_calls["n"], 0)
+
+    def test_hermetic_mode_survives_clear_true_env(self):
+        """Module flag, not env pin: clear=True cannot re-enable the probe."""
+        run_calls = {"n": 0}
+
+        def boom(*args, **kwargs):
+            run_calls["n"] += 1
+            raise AssertionError("ls-remote must not run after clear=True")
+
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {}, clear=True):
+            with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", boom):
+                self.assertIsNone(mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo"))
+        self.assertEqual(run_calls["n"], 0)
+
+    def test_explicit_override_still_wins_under_hermetic(self):
+        run_calls = {"n": 0}
+
+        def boom(*args, **kwargs):
+            run_calls["n"] += 1
+            raise AssertionError("override must bypass subprocess")
+
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_B}):
+            with patch.object(mp.subprocess, "run", boom):
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    mp.read_remote_master_head("/repo"), SHA_B
+                )
+        self.assertEqual(run_calls["n"], 0)
+
+
 class TestServerWiring(unittest.TestCase):
     """Integration with the gate choke point in the server namespace."""
 
@@ -105,6 +337,13 @@ class TestServerWiring(unittest.TestCase):
         self._saved = self.srv._STARTUP_PARITY
         self.srv._STARTUP_PARITY = {"root": self.srv.PROJECT_ROOT,
                                     "startup_head": SHA_A}
+        # Keep the live-remote read hermetic (no real ls-remote network call):
+        # default the live master to the daemon start so parity is fully green
+        # unless a test overrides the live head explicitly (#610).
+        self._live_patch = patch.dict(
+            os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_A})
+        self._live_patch.start()
+        self.addCleanup(self._live_patch.stop)
 
     def tearDown(self):
         self.srv._STARTUP_PARITY = self._saved
@@ -147,6 +386,36 @@ class TestServerWiring(unittest.TestCase):
             self.assertTrue(out["in_parity"])
             self.assertNotIn("report", out)
 
+    # --- #610: live-remote wiring -------------------------------------------
+
+    def test_live_stale_blocks_mutation_though_local_green(self):
+        # Local checkout matches the daemon start (local parity green) but the
+        # live remote master has advanced -> mutations must fail closed.
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD: SHA_A,
+                                     mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_B}):
+            self.assertEqual(self.srv._master_parity_block("gitea.read"), [])
+            self.assertTrue(
+                self.srv._master_parity_block("gitea.pr.create"))
+
+    def test_assess_tool_exposes_three_distinct_shas(self):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD: SHA_A,
+                                     mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_B}):
+            out = self.srv.gitea_assess_master_parity(remote="prgs")
+            self.assertEqual(out["daemon_start_head"], SHA_A)
+            self.assertEqual(out["local_head"], SHA_A)
+            self.assertEqual(out["live_remote_head"], SHA_B)
+            self.assertTrue(out["live_stale"])
+            self.assertFalse(out["mutation_safe"])
+            self.assertIn("report", out)
+
+    def test_assess_tool_mutation_safe_when_all_three_match(self):
+        with patch.dict(os.environ, {mp.ENV_TEST_CURRENT_HEAD: SHA_A,
+                                     mp.ENV_TEST_LIVE_REMOTE_HEAD: SHA_A}):
+            out = self.srv.gitea_assess_master_parity(remote="prgs")
+            self.assertTrue(out["mutation_safe"])
+            self.assertFalse(out["live_stale"])
+            self.assertNotIn("report", out)
+
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
     unittest.main()

tests/test_task_capability_role_invariants.py

@@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ EXPECTED_ROLE_EXCLUSIVE_TASKS = frozenset(
         "gitea_release_merger_pr_lease",
         "create_branch",
         "push_branch",
+        # #812 AC20: publishing an unpublished local head is author-only for the
+        # same reason every other push is — it writes a branch to the remote.
+        "publish_unpublished_branch",
         "create_pr",
         "commit_files",
         "gitea_commit_files",

tests/test_webui_architecture_docs.py

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+"""Documentation acceptance for the web console architecture ADR (#632 / epic #631).
+
+Enforces the acceptance criteria of issue #632:
+
+* AC1 — the ADR exists and covers layers, authority, phases, API versioning,
+  and a page map.
+* AC2 — every #631 child (#632–#651) maps to at least one architectural
+  component.
+* AC3 — the closed MVP (#425–#436) is stated as foundation, not recreated.
+* AC4 — forbidden paths are explicit: raw provider incidents as work,
+  browser-held tokens, process-kill recovery.
+* AC5 — a controller can approve the document without reading chat history.
+
+Plus the linkage requirement: ``docs/webui-local-dev.md`` cross-links the ADR.
+"""
+from pathlib import Path
+
+REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
+ADR = (
+    REPO_ROOT
+    / "docs"
+    / "architecture"
+    / "webui-control-plane-console-architecture-adr.md"
+)
+ADR_BASENAME = "webui-control-plane-console-architecture-adr.md"
+LOCAL_DEV = REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "webui-local-dev.md"
+
+# Epic #631 children, phases 1-4 (twenty capability areas).
+EPIC_CHILDREN = tuple(f"#{number}" for number in range(632, 652))
+
+
+def _read(path: Path) -> str:
+    assert path.is_file(), f"missing {path.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)}"
+    return path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+
+
+def test_ac1_adr_exists_with_required_sections():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    lower = text.lower()
+    assert text.lstrip().startswith("#"), "ADR lacks a title"
+    assert "#631" in text and "#632" in text
+    for heading in (
+        "## 2. Decision summary",
+        "## 4. Authority boundaries",
+        "## 5. Request flow and the redaction boundary",
+        "## 6. API naming and versioning",
+        "## 7. Page map",
+        "## 8. Component ownership",
+        "## 9. Phase gates",
+        "## 11. Forbidden paths",
+    ):
+        assert heading in text, f"ADR must contain section {heading!r}"
+    assert "browser ui" in lower and "domain loader" in lower
+    assert "control-plane db" in lower and "capability gate" in lower
+
+
+def test_ac1_api_versioning_is_decided_including_legacy_routes():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    assert "/api/v1/" in text, "ADR must decide the versioned API prefix"
+    assert "/api/v2/" in text, "ADR must state how breaking changes are handled"
+    lower = text.lower()
+    assert "compatibility alias" in lower, (
+        "ADR must say what happens to the existing unversioned MVP exports"
+    )
+
+
+def test_ac1_page_map_covers_mvp_routes():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    for route in ("`/`", "`/health`", "`/projects`", "`/prompts`", "`/runtime`",
+                  "`/audit`", "`/actions`"):
+        assert route in text, f"page map must account for MVP route {route}"
+
+
+def test_ac2_every_epic_child_maps_to_a_component():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    ownership = text.split("## 8. Component ownership", 1)[-1].split("## 9.", 1)[0]
+    missing = [child for child in EPIC_CHILDREN if child not in ownership]
+    assert not missing, (
+        f"epic #631 children without an architectural component: {missing}"
+    )
+
+
+def test_ac2_every_child_row_declares_a_phase():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    ownership = text.split("## 8. Component ownership", 1)[-1].split("## 9.", 1)[0]
+    for child in EPIC_CHILDREN:
+        row = next(
+            (line for line in ownership.splitlines() if line.startswith(f"| {child} ")),
+            None,
+        )
+        assert row is not None, f"no ownership row for {child}"
+        assert row.rstrip().endswith(("| 1 |", "| 2 |", "| 3 |", "| 4 |")), (
+            f"ownership row for {child} must end with its phase: {row!r}"
+        )
+
+
+def test_ac3_mvp_is_foundation_not_recreated():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    assert "#425" in text and "#436" in text
+    lower = text.lower()
+    assert "do not recreate" in lower or "recreating mvp scope" in lower
+    assert "retained and evolved" in lower
+
+
+def test_ac4_forbidden_paths_are_explicit():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    forbidden = text.split("## 11. Forbidden paths", 1)[-1].split("## 12.", 1)[0]
+    lower = forbidden.lower()
+    assert "raw provider incidents" in lower and "#612" in forbidden
+    assert "browser-held tokens" in lower
+    assert "process-kill recovery" in lower and "#630" in forbidden
+    assert "ungated browser mutations" in lower
+
+
+def test_ac5_approval_checklist_is_self_contained():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    assert "## 12. Approval checklist" in text
+    checklist = text.split("## 12. Approval checklist", 1)[-1].split("## 13.", 1)[0]
+    for marker in ("1.", "2.", "3.", "4.", "5.", "6."):
+        assert marker in checklist, f"approval checklist missing item {marker}"
+
+
+def test_adr_states_the_two_boundary_invariants():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    lower = text.lower()
+    assert "no secrets to the browser" in lower
+    assert "no ungated mutations" in lower
+
+
+def test_open_questions_are_recorded_not_implied():
+    text = _read(ADR)
+    assert "## 13. Open questions and follow-ups" in text
+    section = text.split("## 13. Open questions and follow-ups", 1)[-1]
+    assert "#633" in section, "deferred authorization work must name its issue"
+
+
+def test_local_dev_doc_cross_links_the_adr():
+    text = _read(LOCAL_DEV)
+    assert ADR_BASENAME in text, (
+        "docs/webui-local-dev.md must cross-link the console architecture ADR "
+        "(issue #632 scope)"
+    )
+
+
+def test_docs_do_not_embed_secrets():
+    for path in (ADR, LOCAL_DEV):
+        text = _read(path)
+        for marker in ("ghp_", "BEGIN PRIVATE KEY", "Authorization: Bearer"):
+            assert marker not in text, f"{path.name} contains {marker!r}"

tests/test_webui_console_authz_audit.py

@@ -0,0 +1,703 @@
+"""Console authorization, redaction, and audit model tests (#633).
+
+Covers each acceptance criterion and each required test named in the issue:
+
+* AC1 — RBAC matrix and privileged-action list.
+* AC2 — redaction rules, unit-tested against sample payloads.
+* AC3 — audit event schema with required fields and retention defaults.
+* AC4 — Phase 2 integration points.
+* AC5 — local-dev mode with explicit insecurity warnings.
+
+Required tests: redaction units (token, keychain, password patterns),
+default-deny for unauthenticated write stubs, and audit record creation for a
+simulated privileged preview.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import datetime
+import json
+import os
+import pathlib
+import sys
+import tempfile
+import unittest
+
+from starlette.testclient import TestClient
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]))
+
+from task_capability_map import TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP  # noqa: E402
+from webui import console_audit, console_authz  # noqa: E402
+from webui.app import create_app  # noqa: E402
+from webui.console_redaction import (  # noqa: E402
+    REDACTED,
+    redact_payload,
+    redact_text,
+    redaction_policy,
+    scan_for_secrets,
+)
+
+DOCS = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "docs"
+AUTHZ_DOC = DOCS / "webui-authz-audit.md"
+
+
+def _principal(role: str) -> console_authz.Principal:
+    return console_authz.Principal(
+        subject=f"{role}@example.com",
+        role=role,
+        identity_source=console_authz.IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY,
+        authenticated=True,
+    )
+
+
+class TestRoleMatrix(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC1 — the written RBAC matrix and privileged-action list."""
+
+    def test_roles_are_ordered_least_to_most_authority(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            console_authz.ROLE_ORDER,
+            ("viewer", "operator", "controller", "admin"),
+        )
+
+    def test_every_role_has_a_description(self):
+        for role in console_authz.ROLE_ORDER:
+            with self.subTest(role=role):
+                self.assertTrue(console_authz.ROLE_DESCRIPTIONS[role].strip())
+
+    def test_higher_roles_inherit_lower_role_actions(self):
+        matrix = {
+            entry["role"]: set(entry["permitted_actions"])
+            for entry in console_authz.rbac_matrix()["roles"]
+        }
+        for lower, higher in zip(
+            console_authz.ROLE_ORDER, console_authz.ROLE_ORDER[1:]
+        ):
+            with self.subTest(lower=lower, higher=higher):
+                self.assertTrue(matrix[lower].issubset(matrix[higher]))
+
+    def test_viewer_holds_no_write_action(self):
+        matrix = {
+            entry["role"]: set(entry["permitted_actions"])
+            for entry in console_authz.rbac_matrix()["roles"]
+        }
+        self.assertEqual(matrix["viewer"], set())
+
+    def test_privileged_action_list_is_non_empty_and_classified(self):
+        privileged = console_authz.privileged_actions()
+        self.assertTrue(privileged)
+        ids = {action.action_id for action in privileged}
+        # Merge and branch deletion are the canonical privileged pair.
+        self.assertIn("merge_pr", ids)
+        self.assertIn("delete_branch", ids)
+
+    def test_merge_and_delete_require_dual_control_and_break_glass(self):
+        for action_id in ("merge_pr", "delete_branch"):
+            with self.subTest(action=action_id):
+                action = console_authz.get_action(action_id)
+                self.assertTrue(action.dual_control)
+                self.assertTrue(action.break_glass)
+                self.assertTrue(action.requires_confirmation)
+
+    def test_every_write_action_requires_confirmation(self):
+        for action in console_authz.ACTIONS.values():
+            with self.subTest(action=action.action_id):
+                self.assertTrue(action.requires_confirmation)
+
+    def test_delete_branch_is_admin_only(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            console_authz.get_action("delete_branch").minimum_role,
+            console_authz.ADMIN,
+        )
+
+    def test_actions_map_to_real_mcp_capability_vocabulary(self):
+        """The console must not invent an authority the MCP layer lacks."""
+        for action in console_authz.ACTIONS.values():
+            with self.subTest(action=action.action_id):
+                self.assertIn(action.task_key, TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP)
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    action.mcp_permission,
+                    TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP[action.task_key]["permission"],
+                )
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    action.mcp_role,
+                    TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP[action.task_key]["role"],
+                )
+
+    def test_matrix_declares_deny_by_default_and_execution_disabled(self):
+        matrix = console_authz.rbac_matrix()
+        self.assertEqual(matrix["default_decision"], "deny")
+        self.assertFalse(matrix["execution_enabled"])
+
+
+class TestAuthorizeDefaultDeny(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Fail-closed behaviour of the authorization decision."""
+
+    def test_anonymous_is_denied_every_action(self):
+        for action_id in console_authz.ACTIONS:
+            with self.subTest(action=action_id):
+                decision = console_authz.authorize(action_id)
+                self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
+                self.assertEqual(
+                    decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_UNAUTHENTICATED
+                )
+
+    def test_unknown_action_is_denied(self):
+        decision = console_authz.authorize(
+            "not_a_real_action", _principal("admin")
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
+        self.assertEqual(decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_UNKNOWN_ACTION)
+
+    def test_unknown_role_is_denied(self):
+        rogue = console_authz.Principal(
+            subject="[email protected]",
+            role="superuser",
+            identity_source=console_authz.IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY,
+            authenticated=True,
+        )
+        decision = console_authz.authorize("comment_issue", rogue)
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
+        self.assertEqual(decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_UNKNOWN_ROLE)
+
+    def test_insufficient_role_is_denied(self):
+        decision = console_authz.authorize("merge_pr", _principal("operator"))
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_INSUFFICIENT_ROLE
+        )
+
+    def test_sufficient_role_allows_preview_only(self):
+        decision = console_authz.authorize("merge_pr", _principal("controller"))
+        self.assertTrue(decision.allowed)
+        self.assertFalse(decision.execution_enabled)
+
+    def test_execution_is_refused_while_phase_is_not_active(self):
+        decision = console_authz.authorize(
+            "merge_pr", _principal("controller"), for_execution=True
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_PHASE_NOT_ACTIVE
+        )
+
+    def test_allowed_decision_never_reports_execution_enabled(self):
+        for action_id in console_authz.ACTIONS:
+            with self.subTest(action=action_id):
+                decision = console_authz.authorize(
+                    action_id, _principal("admin")
+                )
+                self.assertFalse(decision.execution_enabled)
+
+
+class TestIdentityResolution(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC5 — identity sources, including the insecure local-dev mode."""
+
+    def test_no_auth_mode_yields_anonymous_viewer(self):
+        principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(env={})
+        self.assertFalse(principal.authenticated)
+        self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
+        self.assertEqual(principal.identity_source, console_authz.IDENTITY_NONE)
+
+    def test_local_dev_mode_warns_that_identity_is_unverified(self):
+        principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
+            env={
+                console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "local-dev",
+                console_authz.DEV_SUBJECT_ENV: "[email protected]",
+                console_authz.DEV_ROLE_ENV: "admin",
+            }
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(principal.authenticated)
+        self.assertEqual(principal.role, "admin")
+        self.assertTrue(principal.warnings)
+        self.assertIn("asserted", " ".join(principal.warnings).lower())
+
+    def test_local_dev_without_subject_falls_back_to_anonymous(self):
+        principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
+            env={console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "local-dev"}
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(principal.authenticated)
+
+    def test_local_dev_unknown_role_degrades_to_viewer(self):
+        principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
+            env={
+                console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "local_dev",
+                console_authz.DEV_SUBJECT_ENV: "[email protected]",
+                console_authz.DEV_ROLE_ENV: "root",
+            }
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
+
+    def test_access_proxy_without_header_fails_closed(self):
+        """A proxy-mode request that did not traverse the proxy is anonymous."""
+        principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
+            headers={},
+            env={console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy"},
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(principal.authenticated)
+
+    def test_access_proxy_role_comes_from_server_config_not_client(self):
+        env = {
+            console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy",
+            console_authz.ROLE_MAP_ENV: json.dumps(
+                {"[email protected]": "controller"}
+            ),
+        }
+        principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
+            headers={
+                console_authz.ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER: "[email protected]",
+                "x-role": "admin",  # client-supplied role must be ignored
+            },
+            env=env,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(principal.role, "controller")
+
+    def test_access_proxy_unmapped_subject_defaults_to_viewer(self):
+        principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
+            headers={
+                console_authz.ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER: "[email protected]"
+            },
+            env={console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy"},
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
+
+    def test_malformed_role_map_does_not_raise_and_denies(self):
+        principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
+            headers={console_authz.ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER: "[email protected]"},
+            env={
+                console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy",
+                console_authz.ROLE_MAP_ENV: "{not json",
+            },
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
+
+    def test_probe_auth_is_opt_in(self):
+        self.assertFalse(console_authz.probe_auth_required(env={}))
+        self.assertTrue(
+            console_authz.probe_auth_required(
+                env={console_authz.REQUIRE_PROBE_AUTH_ENV: "1"}
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_probe_auth_is_declared_but_not_yet_enforced(self):
+        """Phase 1 declares the probe-auth policy; no route enforces it yet.
+
+        The flag exists so the Phase 2 action framework has a declared policy
+        to honour instead of inventing a second one. Pinning the current
+        not-enforced status here means wiring it later is a deliberate change
+        that updates this test and the documentation together, rather than a
+        silent behaviour shift. The documentation must say so plainly, because
+        an operator who sets the variable believing it protects a probe is
+        worse off than one who knows it does not.
+        """
+        import inspect
+
+        from webui import app as webui_app
+
+        source = inspect.getsource(webui_app)
+        self.assertNotIn(
+            "probe_auth_required",
+            source,
+            msg=(
+                "webui.app now consults probe_auth_required, so probe auth is "
+                "no longer merely declared. Update the 'Probe authentication' "
+                "section of docs/webui-authz-audit.md, which states it "
+                "enforces nothing, and replace this test with real "
+                "enforcement coverage."
+            ),
+        )
+        self.assertIn(
+            "enforces nothing today",
+            AUTHZ_DOC.read_text(encoding="utf-8"),
+        )
+
+
+class TestRedaction(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC2 — required redaction units: token, keychain, password patterns."""
+
+    def test_token_assignment_is_redacted(self):
+        out = redact_text("GITEA_TOKEN=abcd1234efgh5678ijkl")
+        self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
+        self.assertNotIn("abcd1234efgh5678ijkl", out)
+
+    def test_password_assignment_is_redacted(self):
+        out = redact_text("password: hunter2supersecret")
+        self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
+        self.assertNotIn("hunter2supersecret", out)
+
+    def test_keychain_reference_is_redacted(self):
+        out = redact_text("keychain:gitea-prgs-token")
+        self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
+        self.assertNotIn("gitea-prgs-token", out)
+
+    def test_keychain_command_is_redacted(self):
+        out = redact_text("security find-generic-password -s gitea -w")
+        self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
+        self.assertNotIn("find-generic-password -s gitea", out)
+
+    def test_bearer_credential_is_redacted(self):
+        out = redact_text("Authorization: Bearer abcdef1234567890abcdef")
+        self.assertNotIn("abcdef1234567890abcdef", out)
+
+    def test_jwt_is_redacted(self):
+        token = "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxIn0.abcdefghijklmnop"
+        out = redact_text(f"session={token}")
+        self.assertNotIn(token, out)
+
+    def test_private_key_block_is_redacted(self):
+        pem = (
+            "-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\n"
+            "MIIEowIBAAKCAQEAsecretmaterial\n"
+            "-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----"
+        )
+        out = redact_text(pem)
+        self.assertNotIn("MIIEowIBAAKCAQEAsecretmaterial", out)
+
+    def test_api_key_assignment_is_redacted(self):
+        out = redact_text('api_key = "sk-live-9f8e7d6c5b4a3210"')
+        self.assertNotIn("sk-live-9f8e7d6c5b4a3210", out)
+
+    def test_nested_payload_is_redacted_recursively(self):
+        payload = {
+            "token": "abc123456789",
+            "nested": {"note": "password=letmein12345"},
+            "list": ["keychain:some-entry"],
+            "safe": "plain text",
+        }
+        out = redact_payload(payload)
+        self.assertEqual(out["token"], REDACTED)
+        self.assertNotIn("letmein12345", json.dumps(out))
+        self.assertNotIn("some-entry", json.dumps(out))
+        self.assertEqual(out["safe"], "plain text")
+
+    def test_scan_reports_findings_before_and_none_after(self):
+        dirty = "password: hunter2supersecret"
+        self.assertTrue(scan_for_secrets(dirty))
+        self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(redact_text(dirty)), [])
+
+    def test_non_strings_pass_through_untouched(self):
+        self.assertEqual(redact_text(42), 42)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            redact_payload({"n": 1, "b": True}), {"n": 1, "b": True}
+        )
+
+    def test_policy_is_documented_and_declares_redact_before_persist(self):
+        policy = redaction_policy()
+        self.assertTrue(policy["redact_before_persist"])
+        self.assertIn("audit_records", policy["applies_to"])
+        self.assertTrue(policy["console_rules"])
+
+    def test_policy_statement_contains_no_secret_material(self):
+        self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(redaction_policy()), [])
+
+
+class TestAuditSchema(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC3 — audit event schema, required fields, and retention defaults."""
+
+    def _event(self, action_id="merge_pr", **kwargs):
+        return console_audit.build_event(
+            action_id=action_id,
+            result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED,
+            decision=console_authz.authorize(action_id, _principal("operator")),
+            target={"kind": "pr", "ref": "#123"},
+            request_id="req-test",
+            **kwargs,
+        )
+
+    def test_every_required_field_is_present(self):
+        event = self._event()
+        for field in console_audit.REQUIRED_FIELDS:
+            with self.subTest(field=field):
+                self.assertIn(field, event)
+
+    def test_actor_carries_who_and_how_they_were_identified(self):
+        event = self._event()
+        for field in console_audit.REQUIRED_ACTOR_FIELDS:
+            with self.subTest(field=field):
+                self.assertIn(field, event["actor"])
+
+    def test_correlation_ids_are_present(self):
+        event = self._event()
+        for field in console_audit.REQUIRED_CORRELATION_FIELDS:
+            with self.subTest(field=field):
+                self.assertIn(field, event["correlation"])
+        self.assertEqual(event["correlation"]["request_id"], "req-test")
+        self.assertEqual(event["correlation"]["mcp_task"], "merge_pr")
+
+    def test_timestamp_is_timezone_aware_utc_iso8601(self):
+        now = datetime.datetime(
+            2026, 7, 22, 10, 16, 42, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc
+        )
+        event = self._event(now=now)
+        self.assertEqual(event["timestamp"], "2026-07-22T10:16:42+00:00")
+        parsed = datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(event["timestamp"])
+        self.assertIsNotNone(parsed.tzinfo)
+
+    def test_retention_defaults_by_class(self):
+        self.assertEqual(
+            console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS[console_audit.RETENTION_STANDARD], 90
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS[console_audit.RETENTION_PRIVILEGED],
+            365,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(
+            console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS[console_audit.RETENTION_BREAK_GLASS],
+            730,
+        )
+
+    def test_break_glass_action_retains_longest(self):
+        event = self._event("merge_pr")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            event["retention"]["class"], console_audit.RETENTION_BREAK_GLASS
+        )
+
+    def test_routine_write_uses_standard_retention(self):
+        event = self._event("comment_issue")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            event["retention"]["class"], console_audit.RETENTION_STANDARD
+        )
+
+    def test_unknown_action_retains_as_privileged_not_standard(self):
+        """Conservative direction: keep an unclassifiable record longer."""
+        self.assertEqual(
+            console_audit.retention_class_for(None),
+            console_audit.RETENTION_PRIVILEGED,
+        )
+
+    def test_retention_expiry_matches_declared_days(self):
+        now = datetime.datetime(2026, 7, 22, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc)
+        event = self._event("comment_issue", now=now)
+        expires = datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(
+            event["retention"]["expires_at"]
+        )
+        self.assertEqual((expires - now).days, 90)
+
+    def test_invalid_result_degrades_to_failed(self):
+        event = console_audit.build_event(action_id="merge_pr", result="banana")
+        self.assertEqual(event["result"], console_audit.RESULT_FAILED)
+
+    def test_denied_result_is_representable(self):
+        """An authorization denial has no MCP-side mutation record."""
+        self.assertIn(console_audit.RESULT_DENIED, console_audit.RESULTS)
+
+    def test_event_is_redacted_before_it_is_returned(self):
+        event = console_audit.build_event(
+            action_id="merge_pr",
+            result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED,
+            detail="failed with token=abcdef1234567890",
+            metadata={"password": "hunter2supersecret"},
+        )
+        serialized = json.dumps(event)
+        self.assertNotIn("abcdef1234567890", serialized)
+        self.assertNotIn("hunter2supersecret", serialized)
+        self.assertTrue(event["redacted"])
+
+    def test_audit_policy_reports_schema_and_retention(self):
+        policy = console_audit.audit_policy()
+        self.assertTrue(policy["append_only"])
+        self.assertTrue(policy["redact_before_persist"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            policy["retention_defaults_days"], console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS
+        )
+
+
+class TestAuditSink(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Append-only persistence behaviour."""
+
+    def test_write_is_a_noop_when_sink_is_unconfigured(self):
+        saved = os.environ.pop(console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV, None)
+        try:
+            self.assertFalse(console_audit.audit_enabled())
+            self.assertFalse(console_audit.write_event({"schema_version": 1}))
+        finally:
+            if saved is not None:
+                os.environ[console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV] = saved
+
+    def test_records_append_one_json_line_each(self):
+        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
+            sink = os.path.join(tmp, "console-audit.jsonl")
+            for _ in range(3):
+                event = console_audit.build_event(
+                    action_id="merge_pr", result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED
+                )
+                self.assertTrue(console_audit.write_event(event, path=sink))
+            with open(sink, encoding="utf-8") as handle:
+                lines = [json.loads(line) for line in handle if line.strip()]
+            self.assertEqual(len(lines), 3)
+            self.assertEqual(len({line["event_id"] for line in lines}), 3)
+
+    def test_a_record_that_still_carries_a_secret_is_not_persisted(self):
+        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
+            sink = os.path.join(tmp, "console-audit.jsonl")
+            leaky = {
+                "schema_version": 1,
+                "detail": "password: hunter2supersecret",
+            }
+            self.assertFalse(console_audit.write_event(leaky, path=sink))
+            self.assertFalse(os.path.exists(sink))
+
+    def test_write_never_raises_on_a_bad_path(self):
+        self.assertFalse(
+            console_audit.write_event(
+                {"schema_version": 1}, path="/nonexistent-dir/audit.jsonl"
+            )
+        )
+
+    def test_simulated_privileged_preview_creates_an_audit_record(self):
+        """Required test: audit record creation for a privileged preview."""
+        with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
+            sink = os.path.join(tmp, "console-audit.jsonl")
+            os.environ[console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV] = sink
+            try:
+                decision = console_authz.authorize(
+                    "merge_pr", _principal("controller")
+                )
+                outcome = console_audit.record_event(
+                    action_id="merge_pr",
+                    result=console_audit.RESULT_PREVIEWED,
+                    decision=decision,
+                    target={"kind": "pr", "ref": "#123"},
+                    request_id="req-preview",
+                )
+            finally:
+                os.environ.pop(console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV, None)
+            self.assertTrue(outcome["written"])
+            with open(sink, encoding="utf-8") as handle:
+                record = json.loads(handle.read().strip())
+            self.assertEqual(record["action"], "merge_pr")
+            self.assertEqual(record["result"], console_audit.RESULT_PREVIEWED)
+            self.assertEqual(record["action_class"], "privileged")
+            self.assertTrue(record["decision"]["allowed"])
+            self.assertFalse(record["decision"]["execution_enabled"])
+            self.assertEqual(record["actor"]["role"], "controller")
+
+    def test_decision_block_survives_redaction(self):
+        """Regression: naming it 'authorization' collided with a secret hint.
+
+        ``gitea_audit._SECRET_KEY_HINTS`` contains "authorization" (for the
+        HTTP header), so a block under that key was replaced wholesale by the
+        placeholder and the record lost its decision entirely.
+        """
+        event = console_audit.build_event(
+            action_id="merge_pr",
+            result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED,
+            decision=console_authz.authorize("merge_pr", _principal("admin")),
+        )
+        self.assertIsInstance(event["decision"], dict)
+        self.assertIn("allowed", event["decision"])
+
+
+class TestConsoleRoutes(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC4 — the wired Phase 2 integration points, still fail-closed."""
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        self.client = TestClient(create_app(bind_host="127.0.0.1"))
+
+    def test_unauthenticated_write_stub_is_denied(self):
+        """Required test: default-deny for unauthenticated write stubs."""
+        response = self.client.post(
+            "/api/actions/merge_pr/attempt", json={"pr_number": 99}
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 403)
+        body = response.json()
+        self.assertFalse(body["success"])
+        authorization = body["authorization"]
+        self.assertFalse(authorization["allowed"])
+        self.assertEqual(
+            authorization["reason_code"], console_authz.DENY_UNAUTHENTICATED
+        )
+        self.assertFalse(authorization["execution_enabled"])
+
+    def test_preview_reports_an_authorization_decision(self):
+        response = self.client.get("/api/actions/merge_pr/preview?pr_number=7")
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
+        authorization = response.json()["authorization"]
+        self.assertFalse(authorization["allowed"])
+        self.assertTrue(authorization["dual_control"])
+        self.assertEqual(authorization["required_role"], "controller")
+
+    def test_unknown_action_preview_still_404s(self):
+        response = self.client.get("/api/actions/no_such_action/preview")
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 404)
+
+    def test_security_model_endpoint_publishes_all_three_policies(self):
+        response = self.client.get("/api/console/security-model")
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
+        body = response.json()
+        self.assertIn("rbac", body)
+        self.assertIn("redaction", body)
+        self.assertIn("audit", body)
+        self.assertEqual(body["rbac"]["default_decision"], "deny")
+
+    def test_security_model_endpoint_leaks_no_secrets(self):
+        response = self.client.get("/api/console/security-model")
+        self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(response.json()), [])
+
+    def test_security_model_rejects_writes(self):
+        response = self.client.post("/api/console/security-model", json={})
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 405)
+
+    def test_existing_read_routes_are_unaffected(self):
+        for path in ("/", "/health", "/actions", "/api/actions"):
+            with self.subTest(path=path):
+                self.assertEqual(self.client.get(path).status_code, 200)
+
+
+class TestAuthzAuditDoc(unittest.TestCase):
+    """The model must be written down, not only coded."""
+
+    @classmethod
+    def setUpClass(cls):
+        cls.text = (
+            AUTHZ_DOC.read_text(encoding="utf-8") if AUTHZ_DOC.exists() else ""
+        )
+
+    def test_doc_exists(self):
+        self.assertTrue(AUTHZ_DOC.exists(), f"missing {AUTHZ_DOC}")
+
+    def test_doc_covers_each_required_section(self):
+        for heading in (
+            "Identity sources",
+            "Role matrix",
+            "Privileged actions",
+            "Secret redaction",
+            "Audit event schema",
+            "Retention",
+            "Phase 2 integration",
+            "Local-dev mode",
+        ):
+            with self.subTest(heading=heading):
+                self.assertIn(heading, self.text)
+
+    def test_doc_names_every_role(self):
+        for role in console_authz.ROLE_ORDER:
+            with self.subTest(role=role):
+                self.assertIn(role, self.text)
+
+    def test_doc_names_every_console_action(self):
+        for action_id in console_authz.ACTIONS:
+            with self.subTest(action=action_id):
+                self.assertIn(action_id, self.text)
+
+    def test_doc_states_retention_defaults(self):
+        for days in console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS.values():
+            with self.subTest(days=days):
+                self.assertIn(str(days), self.text)
+
+    def test_doc_warns_local_dev_is_insecure(self):
+        self.assertIn("INSECURE", self.text.upper())
+
+    def test_doc_states_default_deny(self):
+        self.assertIn("deny", self.text.lower())
+
+    def test_doc_contains_no_secret_material(self):
+        self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(self.text), [])
+
+    def test_deployment_doc_links_to_the_model(self):
+        deployment = (DOCS / "webui-deployment.md").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        self.assertIn("webui-authz-audit", deployment)
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":  # pragma: no cover
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_webui_project_registry.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-"""Tests for web UI project registry (#427)."""
+"""Tests for web UI project registry (#427) and its API evolution (#635)."""
 import json
 import sys
 import tempfile
@@ -11,57 +11,246 @@ from starlette.testclient import TestClient
 
 from webui.app import create_app
 from webui.project_registry import (
+    CURRENT_SCHEMA_VERSION,
+    REGISTRY_API_VERSION,
+    SUPPORTED_SCHEMA_VERSIONS,
+    RegistryError,
     default_registry_path,
     load_registry,
+    onboarding_summary,
     project_to_dict,
 )
+from webui.registry_safety import is_forbidden_key
+
+_REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
+_API_DOC = _REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "webui-project-registry-api.md"
 
 
-class TestProjectRegistryLoader(unittest.TestCase):
+def _valid_project(**overrides):
+    project = {
+        "id": "example",
+        "repo_name": "Example",
+        "gitea_owner": "Org",
+        "remote_host": "https://gitea.example.invalid",
+        "default_branch": "main",
+        "local_checkout_path": ".",
+        "profiles": {"author": "a", "reviewer": "r", "reconciler": "c"},
+        "workflow_paths": {"skill": "skills/x.md"},
+    }
+    project.update(overrides)
+    return project
+
+
+def _write_registry(payload) -> Path:
+    with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile("w", suffix=".json", delete=False) as handle:
+        json.dump(payload, handle)
+        return Path(handle.name)
+
+
+class RegistryFileCase(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Base class that cleans up temporary registry files."""
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        self._temp_paths: list[Path] = []
+
+    def tearDown(self):
+        for path in self._temp_paths:
+            path.unlink(missing_ok=True)
+
+    def write_registry(self, payload) -> Path:
+        path = _write_registry(payload)
+        self._temp_paths.append(path)
+        return path
+
+
+class TestProjectRegistryLoader(RegistryFileCase):
     def test_default_registry_loads_gitea_tools(self):
         registry = load_registry()
-        self.assertEqual(registry.version, 1)
+        self.assertEqual(registry.version, CURRENT_SCHEMA_VERSION)
+        self.assertEqual(registry.schema_version, CURRENT_SCHEMA_VERSION)
+        self.assertEqual(registry.api_version, REGISTRY_API_VERSION)
         self.assertEqual(len(registry.projects), 1)
         project = registry.projects[0]
         self.assertEqual(project.id, "gitea-tools")
         self.assertEqual(project.repo_name, "Gitea-Tools")
         self.assertEqual(project.gitea_owner, "Scaled-Tech-Consulting")
+        self.assertEqual(project.repo_full_name, "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools")
         self.assertEqual(project.remote_host, "https://gitea.prgs.cc")
+        self.assertEqual(project.remote_name, "prgs")
+        self.assertEqual(project.status, "active")
         self.assertEqual(project.profiles["author"], "prgs-author")
         self.assertEqual(project.profiles["reviewer"], "prgs-reviewer")
         self.assertEqual(project.profiles["reconciler"], "prgs-reconciler")
         self.assertIn("skill", project.workflow_paths)
         self.assertGreaterEqual(len(project.onboarding_checklist), 4)
 
-    def test_registry_rejects_credential_keys(self):
-        payload = {
+    def test_default_registry_onboarding_summary_is_complete(self):
+        summary = onboarding_summary(load_registry().projects[0])
+        self.assertEqual(summary.total, summary.complete)
+        self.assertEqual(summary.required_outstanding, 0)
+        self.assertTrue(summary.onboarding_complete)
+
+    def test_version_1_registry_still_loads_with_defaults(self):
+        path = self.write_registry({
             "version": 1,
             "projects": [
-                {
-                    "id": "bad",
-                    "repo_name": "Bad",
-                    "gitea_owner": "Org",
-                    "remote_host": "https://gitea.example.invalid",
-                    "default_branch": "main",
-                    "local_checkout_path": ".",
-                    "profiles": {
-                        "author": "a",
-                        "reviewer": "r",
-                        "reconciler": "c",
-                    },
-                    "workflow_paths": {"skill": "skills/x.md"},
-                    "api_token": "secret",
-                }
+                _valid_project(
+                    onboarding_checklist=[
+                        {"id": "step", "title": "Step", "description": "Do it"}
+                    ]
+                )
             ],
-        }
+        })
+        registry = load_registry(path)
+        self.assertEqual(registry.schema_version, 1)
+        self.assertIn(1, SUPPORTED_SCHEMA_VERSIONS)
+        project = registry.projects[0]
+        self.assertEqual(project.status, "active")
+        self.assertIsNone(project.remote_name)
+        self.assertIsNone(project.last_seen_health)
+        step = project.onboarding_checklist[0]
+        self.assertEqual(step.state, "pending")
+        self.assertTrue(step.required)
+        self.assertFalse(onboarding_summary(project).onboarding_complete)
+
+    def test_onboarding_summary_counts_states(self):
+        path = self.write_registry({
+            "version": 2,
+            "projects": [
+                _valid_project(
+                    onboarding_checklist=[
+                        {"id": "a", "title": "A", "description": "d", "state": "complete"},
+                        {"id": "b", "title": "B", "description": "d", "state": "blocked"},
+                        {
+                            "id": "c",
+                            "title": "C",
+                            "description": "d",
+                            "state": "pending",
+                            "required": False,
+                        },
+                        {
+                            "id": "d",
+                            "title": "D",
+                            "description": "d",
+                            "state": "not_applicable",
+                        },
+                    ]
+                )
+            ],
+        })
+        summary = onboarding_summary(load_registry(path).projects[0])
+        self.assertEqual(summary.total, 4)
+        self.assertEqual(summary.complete, 1)
+        self.assertEqual(summary.blocked, 1)
+        self.assertEqual(summary.pending, 1)
+        self.assertEqual(summary.not_applicable, 1)
+        # Only the blocked step is both required and outstanding.
+        self.assertEqual(summary.required_outstanding, 1)
+        self.assertFalse(summary.onboarding_complete)
+
+    def test_last_seen_health_is_parsed_when_present(self):
+        path = self.write_registry({
+            "version": 2,
+            "projects": [
+                _valid_project(
+                    last_seen_health={
+                        "status": "degraded",
+                        "checked_at": "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z",
+                        "detail": "daemon restart pending",
+                    }
+                )
+            ],
+        })
+        health = load_registry(path).projects[0].last_seen_health
+        self.assertIsNotNone(health)
+        self.assertEqual(health.status, "degraded")
+        self.assertEqual(health.checked_at, "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z")
+
+    def test_registry_rejects_credential_keys(self):
+        path = self.write_registry({
+            "version": 1,
+            "projects": [_valid_project(id="bad", api_token="redacted-placeholder")],
+        })
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryError) as ctx:
+            load_registry(path)
+        self.assertIn("credential", ctx.exception.remediation.lower())
+        self.assertEqual(ctx.exception.field_path, "projects[0].api_token")
+
+    def test_unsupported_version_fails_closed_with_remediation(self):
+        path = self.write_registry({"version": 99, "projects": [_valid_project()]})
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryError) as ctx:
+            load_registry(path)
+        self.assertIn("unsupported registry version", ctx.exception.message)
+        self.assertIn(str(CURRENT_SCHEMA_VERSION), ctx.exception.remediation)
+        self.assertEqual(ctx.exception.field_path, "version")
+
+    def test_missing_required_field_fails_closed(self):
+        broken = _valid_project()
+        del broken["default_branch"]
+        path = self.write_registry({"version": 2, "projects": [broken]})
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryError) as ctx:
+            load_registry(path)
+        self.assertIn("default_branch", ctx.exception.message)
+        self.assertEqual(ctx.exception.field_path, "projects[0]")
+
+    def test_unknown_status_fails_closed(self):
+        path = self.write_registry({
+            "version": 2,
+            "projects": [_valid_project(status="mystery")],
+        })
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryError) as ctx:
+            load_registry(path)
+        self.assertEqual(ctx.exception.field_path, "projects[0].status")
+        self.assertIn("active", ctx.exception.remediation)
+
+    def test_unknown_onboarding_state_fails_closed(self):
+        path = self.write_registry({
+            "version": 2,
+            "projects": [
+                _valid_project(
+                    onboarding_checklist=[
+                        {"id": "a", "title": "A", "description": "d", "state": "almost"}
+                    ]
+                )
+            ],
+        })
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryError) as ctx:
+            load_registry(path)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            ctx.exception.field_path,
+            "projects[0].onboarding_checklist[0].state",
+        )
+
+    def test_missing_profile_role_fails_closed(self):
+        path = self.write_registry({
+            "version": 2,
+            "projects": [_valid_project(profiles={"author": "a", "reviewer": "r"})],
+        })
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryError) as ctx:
+            load_registry(path)
+        self.assertEqual(ctx.exception.field_path, "projects[0].profiles.reconciler")
+
+    def test_empty_projects_fails_closed(self):
+        path = self.write_registry({"version": 2, "projects": []})
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryError) as ctx:
+            load_registry(path)
+        self.assertEqual(ctx.exception.field_path, "projects")
+
+    def test_invalid_json_fails_closed_with_location(self):
         with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile("w", suffix=".json", delete=False) as handle:
-            json.dump(payload, handle)
+            handle.write("{not json")
             path = Path(handle.name)
-        try:
-            with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
-                load_registry(path)
-        finally:
-            path.unlink(missing_ok=True)
+        self._temp_paths.append(path)
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryError) as ctx:
+            load_registry(path)
+        self.assertIn("not valid JSON", ctx.exception.message)
+        self.assertIn("line", ctx.exception.remediation)
+
+    def test_missing_file_fails_closed(self):
+        missing = Path(tempfile.gettempdir()) / "webui-registry-does-not-exist.json"
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryError) as ctx:
+            load_registry(missing)
+        self.assertIn("could not be read", ctx.exception.message)
 
     def test_default_registry_path_points_at_packaged_data(self):
         path = default_registry_path()
@@ -81,31 +270,147 @@ class TestProjectRegistryRoutes(unittest.TestCase):
         self.assertIn("prgs-author", response.text)
         self.assertNotIn("child issue", response.text.lower())
 
+    def test_projects_page_shows_status_and_progress(self):
+        response = self.client.get("/projects")
+        self.assertIn("Status", response.text)
+        self.assertIn("Onboarding", response.text)
+        self.assertIn("4/4 complete", response.text)
+
     def test_project_detail_renders_checklist(self):
         response = self.client.get("/projects/gitea-tools")
         self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
         self.assertIn("Onboarding checklist", response.text)
         self.assertIn("Configure execution profiles", response.text)
         self.assertIn("branches/", response.text)
+        self.assertIn("Complete", response.text)
+        self.assertIn("required outstanding 0", response.text)
 
     def test_project_detail_404(self):
         response = self.client.get("/projects/unknown-repo")
         self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 404)
 
-    def test_api_projects_json(self):
+    def test_api_projects_alias_stays_compatible(self):
         response = self.client.get("/api/projects")
         self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
         data = response.json()
-        self.assertEqual(data["version"], 1)
+        # #427 consumers keep these keys.
+        self.assertEqual(data["version"], CURRENT_SCHEMA_VERSION)
+        self.assertIn("source_path", data)
         self.assertEqual(len(data["projects"]), 1)
         self.assertEqual(data["projects"][0]["id"], "gitea-tools")
         self.assertIn("onboarding_checklist", data["projects"][0])
 
+    def test_api_v1_projects_payload(self):
+        response = self.client.get("/api/v1/projects")
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
+        data = response.json()
+        self.assertEqual(data["api_version"], REGISTRY_API_VERSION)
+        self.assertEqual(data["schema_version"], CURRENT_SCHEMA_VERSION)
+        self.assertEqual(data["project_count"], 1)
+        self.assertEqual(data["source"]["kind"], "file")
+        self.assertTrue(data["source"]["inventory_complete"])
+        project = data["projects"][0]
+        self.assertEqual(project["status"], "active")
+        self.assertEqual(project["remote_name"], "prgs")
+        self.assertEqual(
+            project["repo_full_name"], "Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools"
+        )
+        self.assertTrue(project["onboarding_summary"]["onboarding_complete"])
+        self.assertEqual(project["onboarding_checklist"][0]["state"], "complete")
+        self.assertIsNone(project["last_seen_health"])
+
+    def test_api_v1_project_detail(self):
+        response = self.client.get("/api/v1/projects/gitea-tools")
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
+        data = response.json()
+        self.assertEqual(data["api_version"], REGISTRY_API_VERSION)
+        self.assertEqual(data["project"]["id"], "gitea-tools")
+        self.assertEqual(data["source"]["kind"], "file")
+
+    def test_api_v1_project_detail_missing_fails_closed(self):
+        response = self.client.get("/api/v1/projects/not-registered")
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 404)
+        data = response.json()
+        self.assertEqual(data["error"], "project_not_found")
+        self.assertEqual(data["project_id"], "not-registered")
+        self.assertIn("gitea-tools", data["known_project_ids"])
+        self.assertIn("remediation", data)
+
+    def test_api_v1_projects_is_read_only(self):
+        response = self.client.post("/api/v1/projects", json={})
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 405)
+        self.assertEqual(response.json()["error"], "read-only-mvp")
+
     def test_project_to_dict_is_json_safe(self):
         registry = load_registry()
-        encoded = json.dumps(project_to_dict(registry.projects[0]))
+        dto = project_to_dict(registry.projects[0])
+        encoded = json.dumps(dto)
         self.assertIn("gitea-tools", encoded)
+        # Prose may mention tokens; no serialized *key* may look like a secret.
+        for key in dto:
+            with self.subTest(key=key):
+                self.assertFalse(is_forbidden_key(key))
+
+
+class TestInvalidRegistryFailsClosedOverHttp(RegistryFileCase):
+    def setUp(self):
+        super().setUp()
+        self.path = self.write_registry({"version": 42, "projects": []})
+        self.client = TestClient(create_app())
+
+    def _with_bad_registry(self, url: str):
+        import os
+        from unittest import mock
+
+        with mock.patch.dict(
+            os.environ, {"WEBUI_PROJECT_REGISTRY": str(self.path)}, clear=False
+        ):
+            return self.client.get(url)
+
+    def test_api_v1_reports_actionable_error(self):
+        response = self._with_bad_registry("/api/v1/projects")
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 500)
+        data = response.json()
+        self.assertEqual(data["error"], "registry_invalid")
+        self.assertIn("unsupported registry version", data["detail"])
+        self.assertTrue(data["remediation"])
+        self.assertEqual(data["field_path"], "version")
+
+    def test_unversioned_alias_reports_actionable_error(self):
+        response = self._with_bad_registry("/api/projects")
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 500)
+        self.assertEqual(response.json()["error"], "registry_invalid")
+
+    def test_html_page_reports_actionable_error(self):
+        response = self._with_bad_registry("/projects")
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 500)
+        self.assertIn("Project registry unavailable", response.text)
+        self.assertIn("Remediation", response.text)
+
+
+class TestProjectRegistryApiDocs(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_api_contract_is_documented(self):
+        self.assertTrue(_API_DOC.is_file(), f"missing {_API_DOC}")
+        text = _API_DOC.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+        for token in (
+            "/api/v1/projects",
+            "/api/v1/projects/{project_id}",
+            "/api/projects",
+            "onboarding_summary",
+            "last_seen_health",
+            "registry_invalid",
+            "#635",
+        ):
+            with self.subTest(token=token):
+                self.assertIn(token, text)
+
+    def test_route_table_lists_versioned_routes(self):
+        local_dev = (_REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "webui-local-dev.md").read_text(
+            encoding="utf-8"
+        )
+        self.assertIn("/api/v1/projects", local_dev)
+        self.assertIn("webui-project-registry-api.md", local_dev)
 
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":
-    unittest.main()
+    unittest.main()

tests/test_webui_worker_registry.py

@@ -0,0 +1,458 @@
+"""Tests for the worker registry and configuration schema (#798, epic #797)."""
+import json
+import sys
+import tempfile
+import unittest
+from pathlib import Path
+
+sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
+
+from webui.worker_registry import (
+    ALLOWED_ROLES,
+    SCHEMA_VERSION,
+    RegistryValidationError,
+    WorkerRegistry,
+    default_registry_path,
+    find_provider,
+    find_worker,
+    history_dir,
+    list_revisions,
+    load_registry,
+    registry_to_dict,
+    registry_to_document,
+    rollback_to_revision,
+    save_registry,
+    validate_payload,
+    worker_to_dict,
+    workers_for_provider,
+)
+
+_EXPECTED_PROVIDER_IDS = ("claude", "grok", "codex", "agy", "kimi-k")
+
+
+def _provider(provider_id: str = "claude", **overrides) -> dict:
+    payload = {
+        "id": provider_id,
+        "display_name": "Claude",
+        "vendor": "Anthropic",
+        "executable": "claude",
+        "available": True,
+        "models": ["claude-opus-4-8"],
+        "notes": "",
+    }
+    payload.update(overrides)
+    return payload
+
+
+def _worker(worker_id: str = "claude-author", **overrides) -> dict:
+    payload = {
+        "id": worker_id,
+        "display_name": "Claude author",
+        "provider": "claude",
+        "model": "claude-opus-4-8",
+        "project": "gitea-tools",
+        "role": "author",
+        "namespace": "gitea-author",
+        "profile": "prgs-author",
+        "workflow": "skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/work-issue.md",
+        "schedule": {"kind": "cron", "expression": "0 * * * *"},
+        "timeout_seconds": 3600,
+        "enabled": True,
+        "scheduler": {"kind": "launchd", "label": "cc.prgs.claude.author"},
+        "notes": "",
+    }
+    payload.update(overrides)
+    return payload
+
+
+def _document(providers=None, workers=None, **overrides) -> dict:
+    payload = {
+        "version": SCHEMA_VERSION,
+        "revision": 1,
+        "updated_at": "2026-07-22T00:00:00Z",
+        "providers": providers if providers is not None else [_provider()],
+        "workers": workers if workers is not None else [_worker()],
+    }
+    payload.update(overrides)
+    return payload
+
+
+class _TempRegistryCase(unittest.TestCase):
+    """Base case giving each test an isolated registry file."""
+
+    def setUp(self):
+        self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
+        self.addCleanup(self._tmp.cleanup)
+        self.path = Path(self._tmp.name) / "workers.registry.json"
+
+    def write(self, document: dict) -> Path:
+        self.path.write_text(json.dumps(document, indent=2) + "\n", encoding="utf-8")
+        return self.path
+
+    def parse(self, document: dict) -> WorkerRegistry:
+        return validate_payload(document, source_path=self.path)
+
+
+class TestPackagedRegistry(unittest.TestCase):
+    """AC: the declarative registry is the source of truth and ships with the app."""
+
+    def test_default_path_points_at_packaged_data(self):
+        path = default_registry_path()
+        self.assertEqual(path.name, "workers.registry.json")
+        self.assertEqual(path.parent.name, "data")
+
+    def test_packaged_registry_loads_and_validates(self):
+        registry = load_registry()
+        self.assertEqual(registry.version, SCHEMA_VERSION)
+        self.assertGreaterEqual(registry.revision, 1)
+
+    def test_packaged_registry_declares_all_five_providers(self):
+        registry = load_registry()
+        self.assertEqual(
+            tuple(provider.id for provider in registry.providers),
+            _EXPECTED_PROVIDER_IDS,
+        )
+
+    def test_packaged_registry_carries_no_credentials(self):
+        raw = default_registry_path().read_text(encoding="utf-8").lower()
+        for marker in ("token", "password", "secret", "api_key", "credential"):
+            self.assertNotIn(marker, raw)
+
+
+class TestSeparateEntities(_TempRegistryCase):
+    """AC: providers and configured workers are separate entities."""
+
+    def test_provider_may_exist_with_no_workers(self):
+        registry = self.parse(
+            _document(providers=[_provider("grok", display_name="Grok")], workers=[])
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(len(registry.providers), 1)
+        self.assertEqual(registry.workers, ())
+        self.assertEqual(workers_for_provider(registry, "grok"), ())
+
+    def test_many_workers_may_share_one_provider(self):
+        registry = self.parse(
+            _document(
+                workers=[
+                    _worker("claude-author"),
+                    _worker(
+                        "claude-reviewer",
+                        role="reviewer",
+                        namespace="gitea-reviewer",
+                        profile="prgs-reviewer",
+                        scheduler={"kind": "launchd", "label": "cc.prgs.claude.reviewer"},
+                    ),
+                ]
+            )
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(len(workers_for_provider(registry, "claude")), 2)
+        self.assertEqual(len(registry.providers), 1)
+
+    def test_worker_referencing_unknown_provider_is_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(provider="mystery")]))
+        self.assertIn("unknown provider", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_lookup_helpers(self):
+        registry = self.parse(_document())
+        self.assertIsNotNone(find_worker(registry, "claude-author"))
+        self.assertIsNone(find_worker(registry, "absent"))
+        self.assertIsNotNone(find_provider(registry, "claude"))
+        self.assertIsNone(find_provider(registry, "absent"))
+
+
+class TestRecordedFields(_TempRegistryCase):
+    """AC: records provider, model, project, role, namespace/profile, workflow,
+    schedule, timeout, enabled state, and scheduler metadata."""
+
+    def test_every_required_field_is_recorded(self):
+        registry = self.parse(_document())
+        worker = registry.workers[0]
+        self.assertEqual(worker.provider, "claude")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.model, "claude-opus-4-8")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.project, "gitea-tools")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.role, "author")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.namespace, "gitea-author")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.profile, "prgs-author")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.workflow, "skills/llm-project-workflow/workflows/work-issue.md")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.schedule.kind, "cron")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.schedule.expression, "0 * * * *")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.timeout_seconds, 3600)
+        self.assertTrue(worker.enabled)
+        self.assertEqual(worker.scheduler.kind, "launchd")
+        self.assertEqual(worker.scheduler.label, "cc.prgs.claude.author")
+
+    def test_each_required_field_is_individually_required(self):
+        for field in (
+            "provider", "model", "project", "role", "namespace",
+            "profile", "workflow", "schedule", "timeout_seconds",
+            "enabled", "scheduler", "id", "display_name",
+        ):
+            with self.subTest(field=field):
+                worker = _worker()
+                worker.pop(field)
+                with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+                    self.parse(_document(workers=[worker]))
+
+    def test_all_sanctioned_roles_are_accepted(self):
+        for role in ALLOWED_ROLES:
+            with self.subTest(role=role):
+                registry = self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(role=role)]))
+                self.assertEqual(registry.workers[0].role, role)
+
+    def test_unsanctioned_role_is_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(role="admin")]))
+        self.assertIn("role must be one of", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_worker_dict_round_trips_every_field(self):
+        registry = self.parse(_document())
+        encoded = worker_to_dict(registry.workers[0])
+        self.assertEqual(encoded, _worker())
+        json.dumps(encoded)  # must stay JSON-safe for the #799 API
+
+
+class TestSchemaValidation(_TempRegistryCase):
+    """AC: supports schema validation — and fails closed."""
+
+    def test_unsupported_version_is_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+            self.parse(_document(version=2))
+
+    def test_root_must_be_an_object(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+            validate_payload([], source_path=self.path)
+
+    def test_providers_must_be_non_empty(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+            self.parse(_document(providers=[]))
+
+    def test_unknown_top_level_field_is_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(fleet=[]))
+        self.assertIn("unknown fields", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_unknown_worker_field_is_refused_not_ignored(self):
+        # A typo'd field must not be silently dropped: "timeout_second" would
+        # otherwise read as "no timeout declared".
+        worker = _worker()
+        worker["timeout_second"] = 30
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[worker]))
+        self.assertIn("timeout_second", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_credentials_are_refused_anywhere_in_the_document(self):
+        for label, mutate in (
+            ("provider.api_token", lambda doc: doc["providers"][0].__setitem__("api_token", "x")),
+            ("worker.password", lambda doc: doc["workers"][0].__setitem__("password", "x")),
+            ("root.secret", lambda doc: doc.__setitem__("secret", "x")),
+        ):
+            with self.subTest(field=label):
+                document = _document()
+                mutate(document)
+                with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as ctx:
+                    self.parse(document)
+                self.assertIn("credential", str(ctx.exception).lower())
+
+    def test_duplicate_worker_id_is_refused(self):
+        workers = [_worker("dup"), _worker("dup", scheduler={"kind": "manual"})]
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(workers=workers))
+        self.assertIn("duplicate worker id", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_duplicate_provider_id_is_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(providers=[_provider("claude"), _provider("claude")], workers=[]))
+        self.assertIn("duplicate provider id", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_duplicate_launchagent_label_is_refused(self):
+        # Two workers sharing a label would silently overwrite each other's agent.
+        workers = [
+            _worker("a", scheduler={"kind": "launchd", "label": "cc.prgs.same"}),
+            _worker("b", scheduler={"kind": "launchd", "label": "cc.prgs.same"}),
+        ]
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(workers=workers))
+        self.assertIn("duplicate scheduler label", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_manual_scheduler_needs_no_label_and_many_may_coexist(self):
+        workers = [
+            _worker("a", scheduler={"kind": "manual"}),
+            _worker("b", scheduler={"kind": "manual"}),
+        ]
+        registry = self.parse(_document(workers=workers))
+        self.assertEqual([w.scheduler.label for w in registry.workers], [None, None])
+
+    def test_launchd_scheduler_requires_a_label(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(scheduler={"kind": "launchd"})]))
+        self.assertIn("label is required", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_unknown_scheduler_kind_is_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(scheduler={"kind": "systemd", "label": "x"})]))
+
+    def test_timeout_must_be_a_positive_bounded_integer(self):
+        for bad in (0, -1, "3600", 1.5, True, 86_401):
+            with self.subTest(timeout=bad):
+                with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+                    self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(timeout_seconds=bad)]))
+
+    def test_enabled_must_be_a_real_boolean(self):
+        for bad in ("true", 1, None):
+            with self.subTest(enabled=bad):
+                with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+                    self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(enabled=bad)]))
+
+    def test_identifier_shape_is_enforced(self):
+        for bad in ("Claude Author", "-leading", "UPPER", ""):
+            with self.subTest(worker_id=bad):
+                with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+                    self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(bad)]))
+
+
+class TestScheduleValidation(_TempRegistryCase):
+    """Schedules are declarations; next-run computation belongs to #803."""
+
+    def test_interval_schedule_requires_positive_seconds(self):
+        registry = self.parse(
+            _document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "interval", "seconds": 900})])
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(registry.workers[0].schedule.seconds, 900)
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "interval"})]))
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "interval", "seconds": 0})]))
+
+    def test_cron_schedule_requires_five_fields(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "cron", "expression": "0 *"})]))
+        self.assertIn("five crontab fields", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_manual_schedule_needs_no_timing(self):
+        registry = self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "manual"})]))
+        schedule = registry.workers[0].schedule
+        self.assertEqual(schedule.kind, "manual")
+        self.assertIsNone(schedule.seconds)
+        self.assertIsNone(schedule.expression)
+
+    def test_fields_from_the_wrong_kind_are_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "manual", "seconds": 60})]))
+        self.assertIn("not valid for kind", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_unknown_schedule_kind_is_refused(self):
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+            self.parse(_document(workers=[_worker(schedule={"kind": "hourly"})]))
+
+
+class TestAtomicPersistence(_TempRegistryCase):
+    """AC: atomic persistence."""
+
+    def test_save_then_load_round_trips(self):
+        registry = self.parse(_document())
+        save_registry(registry, self.path)
+        reloaded = load_registry(self.path)
+        self.assertEqual(
+            [worker_to_dict(w) for w in reloaded.workers],
+            [worker_to_dict(w) for w in registry.workers],
+        )
+
+    def test_save_leaves_no_temp_files_behind(self):
+        registry = self.parse(_document())
+        save_registry(registry, self.path)
+        save_registry(registry, self.path)
+        leftovers = [p.name for p in self.path.parent.iterdir() if p.name.startswith(".")]
+        self.assertEqual(leftovers, [])
+
+    def test_save_refuses_to_persist_an_invalid_document(self):
+        registry = self.parse(_document())
+        broken = WorkerRegistry(
+            version=registry.version,
+            revision=registry.revision,
+            updated_at=registry.updated_at,
+            providers=registry.providers,
+            # A worker whose provider is not declared in the registry.
+            workers=tuple(
+                type(worker)(**{**worker.__dict__, "provider": "vanished"})
+                for worker in registry.workers
+            ),
+            source_path=self.path,
+        )
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+            save_registry(broken, self.path)
+        self.assertFalse(self.path.exists(), "invalid save must not create the file")
+
+    def test_document_shape_excludes_local_paths_but_api_shape_includes_it(self):
+        registry = self.parse(_document())
+        self.assertNotIn("source_path", registry_to_document(registry))
+        self.assertEqual(registry_to_dict(registry)["source_path"], str(self.path))
+
+
+class TestVersioningAndRollback(_TempRegistryCase):
+    """AC: versioning and rollback."""
+
+    def _seed(self) -> WorkerRegistry:
+        self.write(_document())
+        return load_registry(self.path)
+
+    def test_revision_increments_on_each_save(self):
+        registry = self._seed()
+        self.assertEqual(registry.revision, 1)
+        second = save_registry(registry, self.path)
+        self.assertEqual(second.revision, 2)
+        third = save_registry(second, self.path)
+        self.assertEqual(third.revision, 3)
+
+    def test_updated_at_is_refreshed_and_utc(self):
+        registry = self._seed()
+        saved = save_registry(registry, self.path)
+        self.assertRegex(saved.updated_at, r"^\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}T\d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2}Z$")
+
+    def test_superseded_revisions_are_retained(self):
+        registry = self._seed()
+        second = save_registry(registry, self.path)
+        save_registry(second, self.path)
+        self.assertEqual(list_revisions(self.path), (1, 2))
+        self.assertTrue(history_dir(self.path).is_dir())
+
+    def test_rollback_restores_prior_content_as_a_new_revision(self):
+        self.write(_document(workers=[_worker("original")]))
+        registry = load_registry(self.path)
+
+        changed = WorkerRegistry(
+            version=registry.version,
+            revision=registry.revision,
+            updated_at=registry.updated_at,
+            providers=registry.providers,
+            workers=(),  # operator deletes every worker
+            source_path=self.path,
+        )
+        save_registry(changed, self.path)
+        self.assertEqual(load_registry(self.path).workers, ())
+
+        restored = rollback_to_revision(1, self.path)
+        self.assertEqual([w.id for w in restored.workers], ["original"])
+        # Append-only: the rollback publishes a new head rather than rewinding.
+        self.assertGreater(restored.revision, 2)
+        self.assertEqual([w.id for w in load_registry(self.path).workers], ["original"])
+
+    def test_rollback_to_unknown_revision_fails_closed(self):
+        self._seed()
+        with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError) as ctx:
+            rollback_to_revision(99, self.path)
+        self.assertIn("not retained", str(ctx.exception))
+
+    def test_revision_must_be_a_positive_integer(self):
+        for bad in (0, -1, "1", None):
+            with self.subTest(revision=bad):
+                with self.assertRaises(RegistryValidationError):
+                    self.parse(_document(revision=bad))
+
+    def test_history_is_empty_before_any_save(self):
+        self.write(_document())
+        self.assertEqual(list_revisions(self.path), ())
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    unittest.main()