Merge branch 'master' of https://gitea.prgs.cc/Scaled-Tech-Consulting/Gitea-Tools into feat/issue-636-inventory-api
# Conflicts: # docs/webui-local-dev.md # webui/app.py
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
|
||||
"""Allocator epic / child-only container pre-rank exclusion (#844).
|
||||
|
||||
Covers:
|
||||
* Issue #631-shaped child-only epic is excluded before ranking.
|
||||
* Implementable child issues remain eligible and can be selected.
|
||||
* Ordinary issues that merely mention "epic" in title/body are not excluded.
|
||||
* Excluded containers never receive assignments or workflow leases.
|
||||
* Structured skip reason ``epic_or_child_only_container`` is reported.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
|
||||
from allocator_service import (
|
||||
OUTCOME_ASSIGNED,
|
||||
OUTCOME_PREVIEW,
|
||||
SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER,
|
||||
WorkCandidate,
|
||||
allocate_next_work,
|
||||
classify_epic_or_child_only_container,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB
|
||||
|
||||
REMOTE = "prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
|
||||
REPO = "Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
|
||||
# Minimal body mirroring issue #631 authoritative scope language.
|
||||
_EPIC_631_BODY = """
|
||||
## Scope (umbrella)
|
||||
|
||||
This epic owns the **product roadmap and linkage** for the Web Console.
|
||||
Implementation is delivered via child issues only.
|
||||
|
||||
## Explicit non-goals
|
||||
|
||||
* Do not implement product features in this epic issue itself.
|
||||
* No product feature implementation is claimed complete solely on this epic.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
_CHILD_BODY = """
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Operators need a workflow-event timeline model for Phase 1.
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Timeline model API exists
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _issue(
|
||||
number: int,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
title: str = "",
|
||||
body: str = "",
|
||||
labels: tuple[str, ...] = ("status:ready", "type:feature"),
|
||||
priority: int = 20,
|
||||
) -> WorkCandidate:
|
||||
return WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=number,
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
labels=labels,
|
||||
title=title or f"issue {number}",
|
||||
body=body,
|
||||
priority=priority,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ClassifyEpicContainerTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_631_shaped_body_and_title_is_container(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
631,
|
||||
title="Epic: MCP Control Plane Web Console",
|
||||
body=_EPIC_631_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, detail = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(is_c)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(detail)
|
||||
self.assertIn("body_marker", detail or "")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_body_markers_without_epic_title(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
900,
|
||||
title="Control plane roadmap tracker",
|
||||
body="Implementation is delivered via child issues only.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, _ = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(is_c)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_epic_label_alone_is_container(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
901,
|
||||
title="Roadmap linkage",
|
||||
body="Track children.",
|
||||
labels=("status:ready", "type:epic"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, detail = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(is_c)
|
||||
self.assertIn("type:epic", detail or "")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_title_epic_prefix_alone_not_container(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Title-only 'Epic:' without body scope evidence stays eligible (#844)."""
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
902,
|
||||
title="Epic: something mentioned only in title",
|
||||
body="Implement a concrete fix for the allocator skip list.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, detail = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(is_c)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(detail)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_incidental_epic_word_not_container(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = _issue(
|
||||
903,
|
||||
title="Document epic handoff conventions",
|
||||
body=(
|
||||
"Update the docs so implementable issues that mention an epic "
|
||||
"remain independently executable."
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, _ = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(c)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(is_c)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_prs_never_classified(self) -> None:
|
||||
pr = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=10,
|
||||
state="open",
|
||||
title="Epic: fake",
|
||||
body="Implementation is delivered via child issues only.",
|
||||
head_sha="a" * 40,
|
||||
priority=5,
|
||||
)
|
||||
is_c, _ = classify_epic_or_child_only_container(pr)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(is_c)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class AllocateEpicContainerExclusionTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self._tmp.cleanup)
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3"))
|
||||
|
||||
def _alloc(self, candidates, **kwargs):
|
||||
defaults = dict(
|
||||
session_id="sess-844",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-author",
|
||||
username="jcwalker3",
|
||||
claims={},
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return allocate_next_work(self.db, candidates=candidates, **defaults)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_631_shaped_epic_excluded_child_selected(self) -> None:
|
||||
epic = _issue(
|
||||
631,
|
||||
title="Epic: MCP Control Plane Web Console",
|
||||
body=_EPIC_631_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
child = _issue(
|
||||
637,
|
||||
title="Web Console: Workflow-event timeline model (Phase 1)",
|
||||
body=_CHILD_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc([epic, child], apply=False)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"], res)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_PREVIEW)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 637)
|
||||
skipped = {s["number"]: s for s in res["skipped"]}
|
||||
self.assertIn(631, skipped)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
skipped[631]["reason_code"], SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn(SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER, skipped[631]["reason"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_container_cannot_receive_assignment_or_lease(self) -> None:
|
||||
epic = _issue(
|
||||
631,
|
||||
title="Epic: MCP Control Plane Web Console",
|
||||
body=_EPIC_631_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc([epic], apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"], res)
|
||||
# Only container present → no safe work; never assigned_work.
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res.get("assignment"))
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res.get("selected"))
|
||||
skipped = {s["number"]: s for s in res["skipped"]}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
skipped[631]["reason_code"], SKIP_EPIC_OR_CHILD_ONLY_CONTAINER
|
||||
)
|
||||
# No lease row for the epic.
|
||||
leases = self.db.list_active_leases(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO
|
||||
) if hasattr(self.db, "list_active_leases") else []
|
||||
# Prefer generic inventory if available.
|
||||
if not leases and hasattr(self.db, "list_leases"):
|
||||
leases = self.db.list_leases(remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO)
|
||||
for lease in leases or []:
|
||||
work_number = lease.get("work_number") if isinstance(lease, dict) else None
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(work_number, 631)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_incidental_epic_title_remains_eligible(self) -> None:
|
||||
ordinary = _issue(
|
||||
700,
|
||||
title="Document epic handoff conventions",
|
||||
body="Write runbook text about epic vs child issues.",
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc([ordinary], apply=False)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"], res)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 700)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["skipped"], [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_apply_selects_child_not_epic(self) -> None:
|
||||
epic = _issue(
|
||||
631,
|
||||
title="Epic: MCP Control Plane Web Console",
|
||||
body=_EPIC_631_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
child = _issue(
|
||||
637,
|
||||
title="Web Console: Workflow-event timeline model (Phase 1)",
|
||||
body=_CHILD_BODY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc([epic, child], apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"], res)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 637)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["assignment"]["work_number"], 637)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,572 @@
|
||||
"""Executable acceptance tests for ARCH-01 Slice A (#822).
|
||||
|
||||
Each acceptance criterion (#822 §12) and named test (#822 §13) is exercised
|
||||
against a real SQLite database. The migration runs on a fresh DB in ``setUp``;
|
||||
the test-run output is the durable evidence the issue requires (§14).
|
||||
|
||||
Enforcement being proven:
|
||||
|
||||
* ``[TRUSTED-SERVICE]`` — the ``cp_*`` actor functions exist only on the
|
||||
trusted kernel connection; a raw connection cannot satisfy the triggers.
|
||||
* ``[SCHEMA]`` — fail-closed aborts, exact dominance set, NOT-NULL class,
|
||||
immutability, and the last-active-grant floor are enforced by
|
||||
CHECK/FK/trigger, verified here including raw-write bypass and concurrency.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import threading
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
|
||||
|
||||
import arch01_platform as ap
|
||||
from arch01_platform import (
|
||||
ALREADY_INSTALLED,
|
||||
AUTHORIZATION_DENIED,
|
||||
CONCURRENT_INSTALLATION_LOST,
|
||||
DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID,
|
||||
DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH,
|
||||
DOMINANCE_TUPLES,
|
||||
INSTALLED,
|
||||
INVALID_ACTOR_CONTEXT,
|
||||
INVALID_BOOTSTRAP_STATE,
|
||||
PlatformKernel,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
INSTALLER = "platform.installer"
|
||||
|
||||
_BOOTSTRAP_TABLES = (
|
||||
"principal_equivalence_classes",
|
||||
"principals",
|
||||
"authoritative_issuers",
|
||||
"authority_dominance",
|
||||
"platform_bootstrap_seed",
|
||||
"platform_bootstrap_grants",
|
||||
"platform_active_invariant",
|
||||
"install_state",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _count(kernel: PlatformKernel, table: str) -> int:
|
||||
return kernel._conn.execute(f"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {table}").fetchone()[0]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _count_where(kernel: PlatformKernel, table: str, where: str) -> int:
|
||||
return kernel._conn.execute(f"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {table} WHERE {where}").fetchone()[0]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _all_bootstrap_empty(kernel: PlatformKernel) -> bool:
|
||||
return all(_count(kernel, t) == 0 for t in _BOOTSTRAP_TABLES)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Arch01MemoryTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Single-connection behavior on an in-memory database."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.kernel = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.kernel.close()
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC1 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_install_clean(self) -> None: # t_install_clean(+)
|
||||
res = self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(self.kernel.is_installed())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(_count(self.kernel, "install_state"), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.active_grant_count(), 1)
|
||||
self.assertIn(ap.EVT_PLATFORM_INSTALLED, self.kernel.audit_events())
|
||||
rows = set(
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT dominant, subordinate FROM authority_dominance"
|
||||
).fetchall()
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rows, set(DOMINANCE_TUPLES))
|
||||
issuer_ref = self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT i.issuer_ref FROM principals p JOIN authoritative_issuers i "
|
||||
"ON p.issuer_id = i.issuer_id WHERE p.principal_id = ?",
|
||||
(INSTALLER,),
|
||||
).fetchone()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(issuer_ref[0], DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID)
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC2 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_install_twice(self) -> None: # t_install_twice(-)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
res2 = self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res2.code, ALREADY_INSTALLED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(_count(self.kernel, "principals"), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(_count(self.kernel, "platform_bootstrap_grants"), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(_count(self.kernel, "install_state"), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC3 / AC5 -------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_install_stage_rollback(self) -> None: # t_install_stage_rollback
|
||||
for stop in range(1, 9):
|
||||
with self.subTest(stages=stop):
|
||||
k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
self._partial_bootstrap_then_rollback(k, stop)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
_all_bootstrap_empty(k),
|
||||
f"partial rows survived rollback at stage {stop}",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
k.close()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_partial_after_rollback(self) -> None: # t_no_partial_after_rollback
|
||||
k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
code = self._seed_bootstrap_and_mark(k, dominance=DOMINANCE_TUPLES[:-1])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(code, DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(_all_bootstrap_empty(k))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
k.close()
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC4 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_dominance_missing(self) -> None: # t_dominance_missing(-)
|
||||
k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self._seed_bootstrap_and_mark(k, dominance=DOMINANCE_TUPLES[:-1]),
|
||||
DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
k.close()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dominance_extra(self) -> None: # t_dominance_extra(-)
|
||||
k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
extra = DOMINANCE_TUPLES + (("platform.bootstrap", "rogue.extra"),)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self._seed_bootstrap_and_mark(k, dominance=extra),
|
||||
DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
k.close()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dominance_malformed(self) -> None: # t_dominance_malformed(-)
|
||||
k = PlatformKernel(":memory:")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
malformed = DOMINANCE_TUPLES[:-1] + (("supervisor.root", "WRONG.subordinate"),)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self._seed_bootstrap_and_mark(k, dominance=malformed),
|
||||
DOMINANCE_SET_MISMATCH,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(k.is_installed())
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
k.close()
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC6 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_principal_no_class(self) -> None: # t_principal_no_class(-)
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "install"):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError):
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principals"
|
||||
"(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
|
||||
"VALUES ('x', 'operator', NULL, NULL, NULL, '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC7 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_noninstaller_null_issuer(self) -> None: # t_nonobstaller_null_issuer(-)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
|
||||
cur = self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
|
||||
)
|
||||
class_id = cur.lastrowid
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principals"
|
||||
"(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
|
||||
"VALUES ('rogue', 'operator', ?, NULL, NULL, '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')",
|
||||
(class_id,),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("INVALID_BOOTSTRAP_STATE", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_installer_null_issuer_only_during_install(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("i2", "installer", "install"):
|
||||
cur = self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
|
||||
)
|
||||
class_id = cur.lastrowid
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError):
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principals"
|
||||
"(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
|
||||
"VALUES ('i2', 'installer', ?, NULL, NULL, '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')",
|
||||
(class_id,),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC8 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_context_missing(self) -> None: # t_context_missing(-)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(self.kernel._ctx)
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("INVALID_ACTOR_CONTEXT", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_context_stale(self) -> None: # t_context_stale(-)
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
|
||||
self.kernel._ctx.expired = True
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("INVALID_ACTOR_CONTEXT", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_context_epoch_shift(self) -> None: # t_context_epoch_shift(-)
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
|
||||
self.kernel._ctx.live_epoch = self.kernel._ctx.bound_epoch + 99
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("INVALID_ACTOR_CONTEXT", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bad_actor_kind_or_mode_rejected(self) -> None:
|
||||
for kind, mode in (("intruder", "normal"), ("operator", "sabotage")):
|
||||
with self.subTest(kind=kind, mode=mode):
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("op", kind, mode):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError):
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) "
|
||||
"VALUES ('2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC9 -------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_bootstrap_immutable_update(self) -> None: # t_bootstrap_immutable_{update}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
cases = [
|
||||
("UPDATE install_state SET installed_at = 'x' WHERE id = 1", "IMMUTABLE_INSTALL_STATE"),
|
||||
("UPDATE platform_bootstrap_seed SET created_at = 'x' WHERE seed_id = 1", "IMMUTABLE_SEED"),
|
||||
("UPDATE authority_dominance SET subordinate = 'x' WHERE dominant = 'supervisor.root'", "IMMUTABLE_DOMINANCE"),
|
||||
(f"UPDATE authoritative_issuers SET issuer_ref = 'x' WHERE issuer_ref = '{DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID}'", "IMMUTABLE_ISSUER"),
|
||||
(f"UPDATE principals SET actor_kind = 'operator' WHERE principal_id = '{INSTALLER}'", "IMMUTABLE_PRINCIPAL"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
for sql, tag in cases:
|
||||
with self.subTest(sql=sql):
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(sql)
|
||||
self.assertIn(tag, str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bootstrap_immutable_delete(self) -> None: # t_bootstrap_immutable_{delete}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
cases = [
|
||||
("DELETE FROM install_state WHERE id = 1", "IMMUTABLE_INSTALL_STATE"),
|
||||
("DELETE FROM platform_bootstrap_seed WHERE seed_id = 1", "IMMUTABLE_SEED"),
|
||||
("DELETE FROM authority_dominance", "IMMUTABLE_DOMINANCE"),
|
||||
("DELETE FROM authoritative_issuers", "IMMUTABLE_ISSUER"),
|
||||
(f"DELETE FROM principals WHERE principal_id = '{INSTALLER}'", "IMMUTABLE_PRINCIPAL"),
|
||||
("DELETE FROM platform_bootstrap_grants", "IMMUTABLE_GRANT"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
for sql, tag in cases:
|
||||
with self.subTest(sql=sql):
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(sql)
|
||||
self.assertIn(tag, str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_grant_reactivation_rejected(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
self.kernel.register_principal(
|
||||
"op1", "operator", DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, actor_principal=INSTALLER
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.kernel.grant_platform_bootstrap("op1", INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED
|
||||
)
|
||||
gid = self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT grant_id FROM platform_bootstrap_grants WHERE grantee_principal_id = 'op1'"
|
||||
).fetchone()[0]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.kernel.revoke_platform_bootstrap(gid, actor_principal=INSTALLER).code,
|
||||
INSTALLED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as ctx:
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE platform_bootstrap_grants SET active = 1 WHERE grant_id = ?",
|
||||
(gid,),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("IMMUTABLE_GRANT", str(ctx.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC12 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_raw_write_bypass(self) -> None: # t_raw_write_bypass(raw-bypass)
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
|
||||
path = os.path.join(tmp, "p.sqlite3")
|
||||
k = PlatformKernel(path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(k.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
k.close()
|
||||
raw = sqlite3.connect(path)
|
||||
raw.execute("PRAGMA foreign_keys = ON")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.Error):
|
||||
raw.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO audit_records(event, created_at) "
|
||||
"VALUES ('forged', '2026-01-01T00:00:00Z')"
|
||||
)
|
||||
raw.commit()
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.Error):
|
||||
raw.execute("UPDATE install_state SET installed_at = 'x' WHERE id = 1")
|
||||
raw.commit()
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.Error):
|
||||
raw.execute("DELETE FROM platform_bootstrap_grants")
|
||||
raw.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
raw.close()
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC13 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_audit_created(self) -> None: # t_audit_created(+)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
self.kernel.register_principal(
|
||||
"op1", "operator", DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, actor_principal=INSTALLER
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.kernel.grant_platform_bootstrap("op1", INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED
|
||||
)
|
||||
gid = self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT grant_id FROM platform_bootstrap_grants WHERE grantee_principal_id = 'op1'"
|
||||
).fetchone()[0]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.kernel.revoke_platform_bootstrap(gid, actor_principal=INSTALLER).code,
|
||||
INSTALLED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
events = self.kernel.audit_events()
|
||||
for evt in (
|
||||
ap.EVT_PLATFORM_INSTALLED,
|
||||
ap.EVT_GRANT_CREATED,
|
||||
ap.EVT_GRANT_REVOKED,
|
||||
ap.EVT_PRINCIPAL_REGISTERED,
|
||||
):
|
||||
self.assertIn(evt, events)
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC14 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_audit_immutable(self) -> None: # t_audit_immutable(raw-bypass)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
with self.kernel.actor_context("op", "operator", "normal"):
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as up:
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute("UPDATE audit_records SET event = 'x' WHERE audit_id = 1")
|
||||
self.assertIn("IMMUTABLE_AUDIT", str(up.exception))
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(sqlite3.IntegrityError) as dl:
|
||||
self.kernel._conn.execute("DELETE FROM audit_records WHERE audit_id = 1")
|
||||
self.assertIn("IMMUTABLE_AUDIT", str(dl.exception))
|
||||
|
||||
# -- meta ------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_schema_meta(self) -> None:
|
||||
rows = dict(self.kernel._conn.execute("SELECT key, value FROM arch01_meta").fetchall())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rows["schema_version"], str(ap.SCHEMA_VERSION))
|
||||
self.assertIn("disabled by default", rows["architecture"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_register_principal_creates_class_first(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
res = self.kernel.register_principal(
|
||||
"svc1", "service", DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, actor_principal=INSTALLER
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
row = self.kernel._conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT current_class_id FROM principals WHERE principal_id = 'svc1'"
|
||||
).fetchone()
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(row[0])
|
||||
|
||||
# -- helpers ---------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def _partial_bootstrap_then_rollback(self, k: PlatformKernel, stop: int) -> None:
|
||||
"""Execute the first ``stop`` bootstrap statements, then ROLLBACK."""
|
||||
now = "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z"
|
||||
k._conn.execute("BEGIN IMMEDIATE")
|
||||
class_id = None
|
||||
issuer_id = None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with k.actor_context(INSTALLER, "installer", "install"):
|
||||
c = k._conn
|
||||
if stop >= 1:
|
||||
class_id = c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES (?)", (now,)
|
||||
).lastrowid
|
||||
if stop >= 2:
|
||||
c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principals(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
|
||||
"VALUES (?, 'installer', ?, NULL, ?, ?)",
|
||||
(INSTALLER, class_id, INSTALLER, now),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if stop >= 3:
|
||||
issuer_id = c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO authoritative_issuers(issuer_kind, issuer_ref, created_at) VALUES ('operator-key', ?, ?)",
|
||||
(DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, now),
|
||||
).lastrowid
|
||||
if stop >= 4:
|
||||
c.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE principals SET issuer_id = ? WHERE principal_id = ?",
|
||||
(issuer_id, INSTALLER),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if stop >= 5:
|
||||
c.executemany(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO authority_dominance(dominant, subordinate) VALUES (?, ?)",
|
||||
DOMINANCE_TUPLES,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if stop >= 6:
|
||||
c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO platform_bootstrap_seed(seed_id, installer_principal_id, created_at) VALUES (1, ?, ?)",
|
||||
(INSTALLER, now),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if stop >= 7:
|
||||
c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO platform_bootstrap_grants(grantee_principal_id, granted_by, active, created_at) VALUES (?, NULL, 1, ?)",
|
||||
(INSTALLER, now),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if stop >= 8:
|
||||
c.execute("INSERT INTO platform_active_invariant(id, active_count) VALUES (1, 1)")
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
k._conn.execute("ROLLBACK")
|
||||
|
||||
def _seed_bootstrap_and_mark(self, k: PlatformKernel, dominance) -> str:
|
||||
"""Seed a full bootstrap with a caller-supplied dominance set, then
|
||||
attempt the marker insert. Returns the classified failure code (or
|
||||
INSTALLED). Rolls back on failure so no partial rows remain."""
|
||||
now = "2026-01-01T00:00:00Z"
|
||||
k._conn.execute("BEGIN IMMEDIATE")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with k.actor_context(INSTALLER, "installer", "install"):
|
||||
c = k._conn
|
||||
class_id = c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principal_equivalence_classes(created_at) VALUES (?)", (now,)
|
||||
).lastrowid
|
||||
c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO principals(principal_id, actor_kind, current_class_id, issuer_id, registered_by, created_at) "
|
||||
"VALUES (?, 'installer', ?, NULL, ?, ?)",
|
||||
(INSTALLER, class_id, INSTALLER, now),
|
||||
)
|
||||
issuer_id = c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO authoritative_issuers(issuer_kind, issuer_ref, created_at) VALUES ('operator-key', ?, ?)",
|
||||
(DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, now),
|
||||
).lastrowid
|
||||
c.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE principals SET issuer_id = ? WHERE principal_id = ?",
|
||||
(issuer_id, INSTALLER),
|
||||
)
|
||||
c.executemany(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO authority_dominance(dominant, subordinate) VALUES (?, ?)",
|
||||
dominance,
|
||||
)
|
||||
c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO platform_bootstrap_seed(seed_id, installer_principal_id, created_at) VALUES (1, ?, ?)",
|
||||
(INSTALLER, now),
|
||||
)
|
||||
c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO platform_bootstrap_grants(grantee_principal_id, granted_by, active, created_at) VALUES (?, NULL, 1, ?)",
|
||||
(INSTALLER, now),
|
||||
)
|
||||
c.execute("INSERT INTO platform_active_invariant(id, active_count) VALUES (1, 1)")
|
||||
c.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO install_state(id, marker, installed_at) VALUES (1, 'installed', ?)",
|
||||
(now,),
|
||||
)
|
||||
k._conn.execute("COMMIT")
|
||||
return INSTALLED
|
||||
except sqlite3.Error as exc:
|
||||
k._safe_rollback()
|
||||
return PlatformKernel._classify(exc)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Arch01ConcurrencyTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Concurrency invariants require file-backed DBs and independent connections."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "p.sqlite3")
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC10 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_concurrent_install(self) -> None: # t_concurrent_install(concurrency)
|
||||
k1 = PlatformKernel(self.path, busy_timeout_ms=0)
|
||||
k2 = PlatformKernel(self.path, busy_timeout_ms=0)
|
||||
barrier = threading.Barrier(2)
|
||||
results = {}
|
||||
|
||||
def _install(name, kernel):
|
||||
barrier.wait()
|
||||
results[name] = kernel.install_platform(INSTALLER).code
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2) as ex:
|
||||
f1 = ex.submit(_install, "a", k1)
|
||||
f2 = ex.submit(_install, "b", k2)
|
||||
f1.result()
|
||||
f2.result()
|
||||
codes = sorted(results.values())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(codes.count(INSTALLED), 1, f"exactly one install expected: {results}")
|
||||
other = [c for c in results.values() if c != INSTALLED][0]
|
||||
self.assertIn(other, (ALREADY_INSTALLED, CONCURRENT_INSTALLATION_LOST))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(k1.is_installed())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(_count(k1, "install_state"), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(_count(k1, "principals"), 1)
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
k1.close()
|
||||
k2.close()
|
||||
|
||||
# -- AC11 ------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_concurrent_last_grant_revoke(self) -> None: # t_concurrent_last_grant_revoke
|
||||
setup = PlatformKernel(self.path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(setup.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
setup.register_principal("op1", "operator", DISTINGUISHED_ISSUER_ID, actor_principal=INSTALLER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(setup.grant_platform_bootstrap("op1", INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(setup.active_grant_count(), 2)
|
||||
gids = [
|
||||
r[0]
|
||||
for r in setup._conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT grant_id FROM platform_bootstrap_grants WHERE active = 1 ORDER BY grant_id"
|
||||
).fetchall()
|
||||
]
|
||||
setup.close()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(gids), 2)
|
||||
|
||||
k1 = PlatformKernel(self.path, busy_timeout_ms=3000)
|
||||
k2 = PlatformKernel(self.path, busy_timeout_ms=3000)
|
||||
barrier = threading.Barrier(2)
|
||||
results = {}
|
||||
|
||||
def _revoke(name, kernel, gid):
|
||||
barrier.wait()
|
||||
results[name] = kernel.revoke_platform_bootstrap(gid, actor_principal=INSTALLER).code
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=2) as ex:
|
||||
f1 = ex.submit(_revoke, "a", k1, gids[0])
|
||||
f2 = ex.submit(_revoke, "b", k2, gids[1])
|
||||
f1.result()
|
||||
f2.result()
|
||||
codes = list(results.values())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(codes.count(INSTALLED), 1, f"exactly one revoke should win: {results}")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(codes.count(AUTHORIZATION_DENIED), 1, f"one revoke must be denied: {results}")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(k1.active_grant_count(), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(_count_where(k1, "platform_bootstrap_grants", "active = 1"), 1)
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
k1.close()
|
||||
k2.close()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_revoke_final_grant_denied(self) -> None:
|
||||
k = PlatformKernel(self.path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(k.install_platform(INSTALLER).code, INSTALLED)
|
||||
gid = k._conn.execute(
|
||||
"SELECT grant_id FROM platform_bootstrap_grants WHERE active = 1"
|
||||
).fetchone()[0]
|
||||
res = k.revoke_platform_bootstrap(gid, actor_principal=INSTALLER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.code, AUTHORIZATION_DENIED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(k.active_grant_count(), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(_count_where(k, "platform_bootstrap_grants", "active = 1"), 1)
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
k.close()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -1266,6 +1266,378 @@ class TestSecondRemediationIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertIn("delete_acknowledged", delete_actions[0])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(delete_actions[0].get("verified_absent"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_worktree_removed_when_remote_blocked_only_by_worktree_binding(self):
|
||||
"""#851: remote blocked by worktree_binding must not skip safe worktree removal.
|
||||
|
||||
Lifecycle: remove clean owned worktree → reassess ownership → delete
|
||||
remote only if independently safe. Unrelated entries stay untouched.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
target_branch = "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
|
||||
foreign_branch = "fix/issue-999-unrelated-active"
|
||||
worktree_path = "/tmp/branches/fix-issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
|
||||
ownership_calls = []
|
||||
remove_calls = []
|
||||
delete_api_calls = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
|
||||
ownership_calls.append(dict(kwargs))
|
||||
# Ownership is reassessed *after* independent worktree removal (#851).
|
||||
# Target worktree is already gone → no worktree_binding remains.
|
||||
# Foreign branch keeps an active author lease → remote delete blocked.
|
||||
if kwargs.get("branch") == foreign_branch:
|
||||
# Match session-bound org/repo + host used by the tool resolve path.
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"records": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"category": guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_AUTHOR_LEASE,
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"remote": kwargs.get("remote") or "prgs",
|
||||
"host": kwargs.get("host") or "gitea.example.com",
|
||||
"org": kwargs.get("org") or "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
"repo": kwargs.get("repo") or "Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
"branch": foreign_branch,
|
||||
"reclaim_allowed": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"inventory_error": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
return {"records": [], "inventory_error": False}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_remove(project_root, branch, worktree_path=None):
|
||||
remove_calls.append(
|
||||
{"branch": branch, "worktree_path": worktree_path}
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"message": f"removed worktree {worktree_path}",
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_probe(h, o, r, auth, br):
|
||||
return guard.classify_branch_readback_http_status(
|
||||
404, not_found_scope=guard.NOT_FOUND_SCOPE_BRANCH
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, auth, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "DELETE":
|
||||
delete_api_calls.append(url)
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
|
||||
report = {
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 848,
|
||||
"head_branch": target_branch,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 999,
|
||||
"head_branch": foreign_branch,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": False,
|
||||
"worktree_path": None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
"role": "reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.close",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value=report,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
|
||||
return_value=(True, []),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_collect,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._probe_remote_branch", side_effect=fake_probe).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_remove,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("performed") or res.get("executed"))
|
||||
actions = res.get("actions") or []
|
||||
|
||||
remove_actions = [
|
||||
a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(remove_actions), 1, actions)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(remove_actions[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(remove_calls[0]["branch"], target_branch)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(remove_calls[0]["worktree_path"], worktree_path)
|
||||
|
||||
# Target remote delete succeeds after worktree removal + reassessment.
|
||||
target_deletes = [
|
||||
a
|
||||
for a in actions
|
||||
if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
|
||||
and a.get("branch") == target_branch
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(target_deletes), 1, actions)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("after_worktree_removal"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("ownership_reassessed"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(target_deletes[0].get("verified_absent"))
|
||||
|
||||
# Foreign branch remains protected (author lease) and is not deleted.
|
||||
foreign_deletes = [
|
||||
a
|
||||
for a in actions
|
||||
if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
|
||||
and a.get("branch") == foreign_branch
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(foreign_deletes), 1, actions)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(foreign_deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
foreign_deletes[0].get("blocker_kind"), "active_branch_ownership"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_AUTHOR_LEASE,
|
||||
foreign_deletes[0].get("blocking_categories") or [],
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Only the target branch should hit the DELETE API.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(delete_api_calls), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
# Ownership collected for target (post-removal) and foreign; worktree
|
||||
# removal happened before target remote delete in the action log.
|
||||
target_idx = next(
|
||||
i
|
||||
for i, a in enumerate(actions)
|
||||
if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"
|
||||
)
|
||||
delete_idx = next(
|
||||
i
|
||||
for i, a in enumerate(actions)
|
||||
if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
|
||||
and a.get("branch") == target_branch
|
||||
and a.get("success")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertLess(target_idx, delete_idx)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_dirty_worktree_not_removed_and_remote_stays_protected(self):
|
||||
"""#851: dirty/foreign worktrees remain protected; no unsafe cleanup."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
branch = "fix/issue-851-dirty"
|
||||
remove_calls = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"records": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"category": guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_WORKTREE_BINDING,
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"remote": kwargs.get("remote") or "prgs",
|
||||
"host": kwargs.get("host") or "gitea.example.com",
|
||||
"org": kwargs.get("org") or "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
"repo": kwargs.get("repo") or "Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
"branch": branch,
|
||||
"reclaim_allowed": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"inventory_error": False,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
report = {
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 851,
|
||||
"head_branch": branch,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": False,
|
||||
"worktree_path": "/tmp/dirty-wt",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
"role": "reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value=report,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
|
||||
return_value=(True, []),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_collect,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
side_effect=lambda *a, **k: remove_calls.append(k) or {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = lambda *a, **k: {}
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions = res.get("actions") or []
|
||||
self.assertEqual(remove_calls, [])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
any(a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree" for a in actions)
|
||||
)
|
||||
deletes = [
|
||||
a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(deletes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(deletes[0].get("blocker_kind"), "active_branch_ownership")
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_WORKTREE_BINDING,
|
||||
deletes[0].get("blocking_categories") or [],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_idempotent_resume_when_worktree_already_absent(self):
|
||||
"""#851: partial failures remain resumable and idempotent."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
branch = "fix/issue-851-resume"
|
||||
ownership_calls = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
|
||||
ownership_calls.append(kwargs)
|
||||
return {"records": [], "inventory_error": False}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_remove(project_root, branch, worktree_path=None):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": False,
|
||||
"performed": False,
|
||||
"message": f"worktree not found: {worktree_path}",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_probe(h, o, r, auth, br):
|
||||
return guard.classify_branch_readback_http_status(
|
||||
404, not_found_scope=guard.NOT_FOUND_SCOPE_BRANCH
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
report = {
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 851,
|
||||
"head_branch": branch,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
|
||||
"worktree_path": "/tmp/already-gone",
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-reconciler",
|
||||
"role": "reconciler",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.delete",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value=report,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
|
||||
return_value=(True, []),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_collect,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._probe_remote_branch", side_effect=fake_probe).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_remove,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = lambda *a, **k: {}
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions = res.get("actions") or []
|
||||
removes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"]
|
||||
deletes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(removes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(removes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(deletes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("after_worktree_removal"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(ownership_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,581 @@
|
||||
"""Authoritative controller cross-role generic queue allocation (#840)."""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
from allocator_service import (
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
|
||||
OUTCOME_NO_SAFE,
|
||||
OUTCOME_PREVIEW,
|
||||
OUTCOME_WAIT,
|
||||
ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
ROLE_MERGER,
|
||||
ROLE_RECONCILER,
|
||||
ROLE_REVIEWER,
|
||||
WorkCandidate,
|
||||
allocate_next_work,
|
||||
build_selection_dict,
|
||||
classify_skip,
|
||||
required_namespace_for_role,
|
||||
required_profile_for_role,
|
||||
resolve_allocation_mode,
|
||||
selected_action_for_candidate,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB
|
||||
import role_session_router
|
||||
from role_session_router import (
|
||||
ROUTE_ALLOWED,
|
||||
ROUTE_AMBIGUOUS,
|
||||
ROUTE_WRONG_ROLE,
|
||||
route_task_session,
|
||||
)
|
||||
import namespace_workspace_binding as nwb
|
||||
import task_capability_map
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class CrossRoleAllocationModeTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_controller_defaults_to_cross_role(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
resolve_allocation_mode(ROLE_CONTROLLER),
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_worker_defaults_to_role_scoped(self) -> None:
|
||||
for role in (ROLE_AUTHOR, ROLE_REVIEWER, ROLE_MERGER, ROLE_RECONCILER):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
resolve_allocation_mode(role),
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_explicit_modes(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
resolve_allocation_mode(ROLE_CONTROLLER, "role_scoped"),
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
resolve_allocation_mode(ROLE_AUTHOR, "cross_role"),
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class CrossRoleSelectionPayloadTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_selection_contains_required_fields(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=840,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
title="cross-role",
|
||||
priority=20,
|
||||
)
|
||||
sel = build_selection_dict(
|
||||
c,
|
||||
active_role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
required_role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-controller",
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sel["number"], 840)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sel["kind"], "issue")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sel["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sel["selected_action"], "implement")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sel["action"], "implement")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sel["required_profile"], "prgs-author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sel["required_namespace"], "gitea-author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sel["pinned"]["number"], 840)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(sel["pinned"]["head_sha"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_profile_prefix_preserved(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
required_profile_for_role(ROLE_REVIEWER, profile_name="dadeschools-controller"),
|
||||
"dadeschools-reviewer",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
required_namespace_for_role(ROLE_MERGER),
|
||||
"gitea-merger",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_selected_actions_per_role(self) -> None:
|
||||
issue = WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=1, labels=("status:ready",))
|
||||
pr_review = WorkCandidate(kind="pr", number=2, head_sha="a" * 40)
|
||||
pr_rc = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=3,
|
||||
head_sha="b" * 40,
|
||||
request_changes_current_head=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
pr_merge = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=4,
|
||||
head_sha="c" * 40,
|
||||
approval_on_current_head=True,
|
||||
mergeable=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
pr_recon = WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=5,
|
||||
head_sha="d" * 40,
|
||||
approval_contaminated=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(selected_action_for_candidate(issue, ROLE_AUTHOR), "implement")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
selected_action_for_candidate(pr_rc, ROLE_AUTHOR),
|
||||
"address_pr_change_requests",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
selected_action_for_candidate(pr_review, ROLE_REVIEWER), "review"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(selected_action_for_candidate(pr_merge, ROLE_MERGER), "merge")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
selected_action_for_candidate(pr_recon, ROLE_RECONCILER),
|
||||
"reconcile_contaminated_approval",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class CrossRoleAllocateServiceTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3"))
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _alloc(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
defaults = dict(
|
||||
db=self.db,
|
||||
session_id="ctrl-session",
|
||||
role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
candidates=[],
|
||||
apply=False,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-controller",
|
||||
username="controller-bot",
|
||||
controller_instance_id="ctrl-1",
|
||||
)
|
||||
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return allocate_next_work(**defaults)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_eligible_author_work(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=100,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
title="author work",
|
||||
priority=20,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_PREVIEW)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["allocation_mode"], ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(res["selected"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 100)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected_action"], "implement")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_profile"], "prgs-author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_namespace"], "gitea-author")
|
||||
self.assertIn("allocate", res["controller_allowed_actions"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("merge", res["controller_forbidden_actions"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["allocation_evidence"]["lease_created"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_eligible_reviewer_work(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=200,
|
||||
head_sha="e" * 40,
|
||||
title="needs review",
|
||||
priority=30,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 200)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_REVIEWER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected_action"], "review")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_profile"], "prgs-reviewer")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["pinned"]["head_sha"], "e" * 40)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_eligible_merger_work(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=300,
|
||||
head_sha="f" * 40,
|
||||
approval_on_current_head=True,
|
||||
mergeable=True,
|
||||
priority=40,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 300)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_MERGER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected_action"], "merge")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_eligible_reconciler_work(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=400,
|
||||
head_sha="1" * 40,
|
||||
approval_contaminated=True,
|
||||
priority=50,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 400)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_RECONCILER)
|
||||
self.assertIn("reconcile", res["selected_action"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_eligible_work(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=10,
|
||||
labels=("status:blocked",),
|
||||
blocked=True,
|
||||
priority=99,
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=11,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
dependency_unmet=True,
|
||||
dependency_reason="blocked by #10",
|
||||
priority=98,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_NO_SAFE)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res["selected"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["allocation_mode"], ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_leased_work_skipped(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=50,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=20,
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=51,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=10,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
# Seed a foreign lease on issue 50 via assign_and_lease under another session.
|
||||
other = allocate_next_work(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
session_id="other-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="org",
|
||||
repo="repo",
|
||||
candidates=cands[:1],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-author",
|
||||
controller_instance_id="other-ctrl",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(other["outcome"], "assigned_work")
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(res["selected"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 51)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any(s["number"] == 50 for s in res["skipped"]))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["claims_excluded"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dependencies_skipped(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=1,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=99,
|
||||
dependency_unmet=True,
|
||||
dependency_reason="needs #2",
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=2,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=1,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 2)
|
||||
skipped = {s["number"]: s["reason"] for s in res["skipped"]}
|
||||
self.assertIn(1, skipped)
|
||||
self.assertIn("needs #2", skipped[1])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pagination_limit_only_truncates_skip_report(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Ranking uses full inventory; reporting limit is MCP-layer only.
|
||||
|
||||
Service ranks all candidates; prove higher-priority eligible item
|
||||
wins even when many skipped precede it.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
cands = []
|
||||
for n in range(1, 30):
|
||||
cands.append(
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=n,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=100 - n,
|
||||
dependency_unmet=True,
|
||||
dependency_reason=f"dep {n}",
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
cands.append(
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=999,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 999)
|
||||
self.assertGreaterEqual(len(res["skipped"]), 29)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_role_scoped_controller_legacy_still_restricts(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""role_scoped controller only takes reconciler-needed items."""
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=1,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=50,
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=2,
|
||||
head_sha="a" * 40,
|
||||
approval_contaminated=True,
|
||||
priority=1,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(
|
||||
candidates=cands,
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["allocation_mode"], ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_RECONCILER)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_cross_role_prefers_highest_priority_across_roles(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=10,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=10,
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=20,
|
||||
head_sha="b" * 40,
|
||||
priority=50,
|
||||
),
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="pr",
|
||||
number=30,
|
||||
head_sha="c" * 40,
|
||||
approval_on_current_head=True,
|
||||
mergeable=True,
|
||||
priority=20,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
# PR #20 highest priority → reviewer
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["selected"]["number"], 20)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_REVIEWER)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_apply_creates_lease_evidence_for_required_role(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=777,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
priority=20,
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands, apply=True)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], "assigned_work")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["allocation_evidence"]["lease_created"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["allocation_evidence"]["lease_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
proof = res["lease_proof"]
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(proof["lease_id"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(proof["lease_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
self.assertIn("implement", proof["allowed_actions"])
|
||||
# Controller isolation: controller still forbids merge/push/create_pr
|
||||
self.assertIn("merge", res["controller_forbidden_actions"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("push", res["controller_forbidden_actions"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_metadata_consistency_role_is_controller(self) -> None:
|
||||
cands = [
|
||||
WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=1,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready",),
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
res = self._alloc(candidates=cands)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["role"], ROLE_CONTROLLER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["routing_role"], ROLE_CONTROLLER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ProcessWorkQueueRouterTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
role_session_router.clear_route_state()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_process_work_queue_allowed_for_controller(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = route_task_session(
|
||||
"process_work_queue",
|
||||
active_profile="prgs-controller",
|
||||
active_role_kind="controller",
|
||||
allowed_in_current_session=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["route_result"], ROUTE_ALLOWED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], "controller")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["downstream_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_process_work_queue_hyphen_alias(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = route_task_session(
|
||||
"process-work-queue",
|
||||
active_profile="prgs-controller",
|
||||
active_role_kind="controller",
|
||||
allowed_in_current_session=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["route_result"], ROUTE_ALLOWED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_process_work_queue_wrong_role_for_author(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = route_task_session(
|
||||
"process_work_queue",
|
||||
active_profile="prgs-author",
|
||||
active_role_kind="author",
|
||||
allowed_in_current_session=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["route_result"], ROUTE_WRONG_ROLE)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], "controller")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["downstream_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_still_ambiguous(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = route_task_session(
|
||||
"not_a_real_task",
|
||||
active_profile="prgs-controller",
|
||||
active_role_kind="controller",
|
||||
allowed_in_current_session=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["route_result"], ROUTE_AMBIGUOUS)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_capability_map_process_work_queue_is_controller(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
task_capability_map.required_role("process_work_queue"),
|
||||
"controller",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
task_capability_map.required_permission("process_work_queue"),
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ControllerRoleMetadataTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_normalize_role_kind_controller(self) -> None:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
nwb.normalize_role_kind("controller"),
|
||||
"controller",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
nwb.normalize_role_kind("author", profile_name="prgs-controller"),
|
||||
"controller",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
nwb.normalize_role_kind("reconciler", profile_name="prgs-controller"),
|
||||
"controller",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_profile_role_kind_prefers_declared_controller(self) -> None:
|
||||
# Import from worktree package path via sys.path already set by pytest.
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server as mcp
|
||||
|
||||
profile = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-controller",
|
||||
"role": "controller",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.issue.comment",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.close",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.pr.approve",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.merge",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
# Declared role wins even if permissions look reconciler-like.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(mcp._profile_role_kind(profile), "controller")
|
||||
# Name-based fallback.
|
||||
profile_no_role = dict(profile)
|
||||
profile_no_role["role"] = None
|
||||
profile_no_role["role_kind"] = None
|
||||
self.assertEqual(mcp._profile_role_kind(profile_no_role), "controller")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_permission_inference_without_controller_name_stays_reconciler(self) -> None:
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server as mcp
|
||||
|
||||
# Pure permission inference still may return reconciler when no controller
|
||||
# declaration exists — that is intentional for reconciler profiles.
|
||||
role = mcp._role_kind(
|
||||
["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.close", "gitea.issue.comment"],
|
||||
["gitea.pr.approve", "gitea.pr.merge", "gitea.pr.create", "gitea.branch.push"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(role, "reconciler")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class DashboardRemainsExplanatoryTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_dashboard_prompt_points_at_allocator_not_self_select(self) -> None:
|
||||
import workflow_dashboard as wd
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertIn("gitea_allocate_next_work", wd.PROMPT_CONTROLLER)
|
||||
self.assertIn("process_work_queue", wd.PROMPT_CONTROLLER)
|
||||
self.assertIn("never replaces allocator", wd.PROMPT_CONTROLLER.lower())
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("self-select", wd.PROMPT_CONTROLLER.lower())
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ClassifySkipCrossRoleTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_controller_cross_role_accepts_author_issue(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=1, labels=("status:ready",))
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(
|
||||
classify_skip(
|
||||
c,
|
||||
role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
terminal_pr=None,
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_controller_skips_author_issue(self) -> None:
|
||||
c = WorkCandidate(kind="issue", number=1, labels=("status:ready",))
|
||||
reason = classify_skip(
|
||||
c,
|
||||
role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
terminal_pr=None,
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(reason)
|
||||
self.assertIn("does not require controller", reason or "")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -0,0 +1,682 @@
|
||||
"""Cross-role allocation handoff consumable by independent workers (#843).
|
||||
|
||||
Regression coverage for the controller→required-role consume path:
|
||||
|
||||
* controller allocates author work; independent author adopts successfully
|
||||
* author adoption succeeds after allocating controller process exits
|
||||
* author adoption without sharing controller session identity
|
||||
* wrong-role adoption rejected
|
||||
* concurrent/second adoption rejected without state corruption
|
||||
* terminal allocation adoption rejected
|
||||
* successful adoption produces authoritative ownership evidence
|
||||
* genuine abandoned-lease recovery remains valid
|
||||
* process_work_queue / allocate results include consume identifiers
|
||||
* same-role allocation behavior remains compatible
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import timedelta
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
from allocator_service import (
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
|
||||
OUTCOME_ASSIGNED,
|
||||
ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
ROLE_REVIEWER,
|
||||
WorkCandidate,
|
||||
allocate_next_work,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from control_plane_db import ControlPlaneDB, ForeignLeaseError, _ts, _utc_now
|
||||
import lease_lifecycle as ll
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class CrossRoleHandoffTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.db_path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3")
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(self.db_path)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="ctrl-session",
|
||||
role="controller",
|
||||
profile="prgs-controller",
|
||||
pid=99999999, # dead-looking pid
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
profile="prgs-author",
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
profile="prgs-author",
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="reviewer-worker",
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
profile="prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.wt = self._tmp.name
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _ready_issue(self, number: int = 843, title: str = "handoff target") -> WorkCandidate:
|
||||
return WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=number,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready", "type:bug"),
|
||||
title=title,
|
||||
priority=20,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _controller_allocate(self, number: int = 843, **kwargs):
|
||||
defaults = dict(
|
||||
db=self.db,
|
||||
session_id="ctrl-session",
|
||||
role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
candidates=[self._ready_issue(number)],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-controller",
|
||||
username="controller-user",
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
defaults.update(kwargs)
|
||||
return allocate_next_work(**defaults)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_controller_allocates_author_independent_author_adopts(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
self.assertIn("consume_allocation", res)
|
||||
consume = res["consume_allocation"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(consume["tool"], "gitea_adopt_workflow_lease")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(consume["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(consume["controller_session_required"])
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(consume["lease_id"], lid)
|
||||
self.assertIn(lid, res["next_valid_command"])
|
||||
|
||||
adopted = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(adopted["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["adopted_from_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
raw = adopted["read_after_write"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["status"], "active")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["phase"], "adopted")
|
||||
|
||||
# Authoritative re-read
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["assignment"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["provenance"]["handoff_status"], "adopted")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_adoption_after_controller_process_exits(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=900)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
# Force owner_pid dead + freshness stale_dead_process
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET owner_pid = 99999999 WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
(lid,),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
fr = ll.classify_lease_freshness(
|
||||
state["lease"], pid_checker=lambda _p: False
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(fr["freshness"], "stale_dead_process")
|
||||
|
||||
adopted = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
# No abandon required
|
||||
state2 = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state2["lease"]["status"], "active")
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(state2["lease"]["status"], "abandoned")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_adoption_without_sharing_controller_session_identity(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=901)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
adopted = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(adopted["adopted_by_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(adopted["same_owner"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(adopted["adopted_from_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_role_adoption_rejected(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=902)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ll.LeaseLifecycleError) as ctx:
|
||||
ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="reviewer-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_REVIEWER,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("wrong role", str(ctx.exception).lower())
|
||||
# State unchanged
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(state["lease"].get("adopted_by_session_id") or None)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["provenance"]["handoff_status"], "pending")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_second_adoption_rejected_without_corruption(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=903)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
first = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(first["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ll.LeaseLifecycleError):
|
||||
ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["assignment"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["status"], "active")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_terminal_allocation_adoption_rejected(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=904)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
# Abandon as terminal
|
||||
proof = ll.AbandonProof(
|
||||
dead_process=True,
|
||||
missing_worktree=True,
|
||||
no_open_pr=True,
|
||||
no_live_mutation_risk=True,
|
||||
owner_pid=99999999,
|
||||
worktree_path="/nonexistent/for-843",
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Attach dead pid / missing wt for abandon eligibility
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET owner_pid = 99999999, worktree_path = ? WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
("/nonexistent/for-843", lid),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
abandoned = ll.abandon_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
requester_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
proof=proof,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(abandoned["outcome"], "abandoned")
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ll.LeaseLifecycleError) as ctx:
|
||||
ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("abandoned", str(ctx.exception).lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_successful_adoption_read_after_write_ownership(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=905)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
adopted = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
raw = adopted["read_after_write"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["lease_id"], lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(raw["adopted_from_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
# Re-fetch proves durable write
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], raw["session_id"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
state["lease"]["adopted_by_session_id"], raw["adopted_by_session_id"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_genuine_abandoned_recovery_still_valid(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Same-role author lease abandoned remains reclaimable via abandon path."""
|
||||
same = allocate_next_work(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
candidates=[self._ready_issue(906, "same-role")],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-author",
|
||||
username="author-user",
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_ROLE_SCOPED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(same["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
lid = same["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"UPDATE leases SET owner_pid = 99999999, worktree_path = ? WHERE lease_id = ?",
|
||||
("/nonexistent/same-role", lid),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
proof = ll.AbandonProof(
|
||||
dead_process=True,
|
||||
missing_worktree=True,
|
||||
no_open_pr=True,
|
||||
no_live_mutation_risk=True,
|
||||
owner_pid=99999999,
|
||||
worktree_path="/nonexistent/same-role",
|
||||
)
|
||||
abandoned = ll.abandon_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
requester_session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
proof=proof,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(abandoned["outcome"], "abandoned")
|
||||
# Foreign author cannot handoff-consume an abandoned non-handoff lease
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ll.LeaseLifecycleError):
|
||||
ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Reclaim path still works for expired/abandoned after force-expire
|
||||
reclaimed = ll.reclaim_expired_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reclaimed["outcome"], "reclaimed")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reclaimed["assignment"]["session_id"], "author-worker-2")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_allocate_payload_includes_consume_identifiers(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=907)
|
||||
self.assertIn("consume_allocation", res)
|
||||
c = res["consume_allocation"]
|
||||
for key in (
|
||||
"tool",
|
||||
"lease_id",
|
||||
"assignment_id",
|
||||
"required_role",
|
||||
"required_profile",
|
||||
"required_namespace",
|
||||
"instructions",
|
||||
"handoff_status",
|
||||
):
|
||||
self.assertIn(key, c)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(c["required_namespace"], "gitea-author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(c["required_profile"], "prgs-author")
|
||||
self.assertIn("gitea_adopt_workflow_lease", c["instructions"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["lease_proof"]["cross_role_handoff"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["lease_proof"]["handoff_status"], "pending")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_same_role_allocation_remains_compatible(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = allocate_next_work(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
candidates=[self._ready_issue(908)],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-author",
|
||||
username="author-user",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("consume_allocation", res)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
# No cross-role handoff provenance
|
||||
prov = state.get("provenance") or {}
|
||||
self.assertFalse(prov.get("cross_role_handoff"))
|
||||
# Owner resume still works
|
||||
resume = ll.adopt_lease(
|
||||
self.db,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(resume["same_owner"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(resume["outcome"], "adopted_owner_resume")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_inspect_points_required_role_at_consume(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=909)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
decision = ll.inspect_lease(
|
||||
self.db, lid, caller_session_id="author-worker"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
decision["safe_next_action"], ll.SAFE_CONSUME_CROSS_ROLE
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision["block"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(decision["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_db_cas_rejects_concurrent_second_consume(self) -> None:
|
||||
res = self._controller_allocate(number=910)
|
||||
lid = res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
# First consume via DB layer directly
|
||||
first = self.db.adopt_lease(
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
provenance={
|
||||
"cross_role_handoff": True,
|
||||
"handoff_status": "adopted",
|
||||
"required_role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(first["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
# Second CAS must fail
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(ForeignLeaseError):
|
||||
self.db.adopt_lease(
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
adopter_session_id="author-worker-2",
|
||||
role=ROLE_AUTHOR,
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
provenance={
|
||||
"cross_role_handoff": True,
|
||||
"handoff_status": "pending",
|
||||
"required_role": "author",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class MCPBoundaryAdoptRoleBindingTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#843 F1: MCP-boundary role binding for ``gitea_adopt_workflow_lease``.
|
||||
|
||||
The library-level wrong-role test calls ``lease_lifecycle.adopt_lease``
|
||||
directly. These tests prove the MCP entry point derives the adopter role
|
||||
authoritatively from the active authenticated profile and rejects any
|
||||
caller-supplied role that disagrees, so a reviewer/merger profile cannot
|
||||
consume an author handoff by passing ``role="author"``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
AUTHOR_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-author",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
REVIEWER_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-reviewer",
|
||||
"role": "reviewer",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.review",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.approve",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.request_changes",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.create", "gitea.branch.push"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
MERGER_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-merger",
|
||||
"role": "merger",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["gitea.read", "gitea.pr.merge"],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": ["gitea.pr.create", "gitea.branch.push"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
FOREIGN_AUTHOR_PROFILE = {
|
||||
"profile_name": "dadeschools-author",
|
||||
"role": "author",
|
||||
"allowed_operations": [
|
||||
"gitea.read",
|
||||
"gitea.pr.create",
|
||||
"gitea.branch.push",
|
||||
],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.db_path = os.path.join(self._tmp.name, "cp.sqlite3")
|
||||
self.db = ControlPlaneDB(self.db_path)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="ctrl-session",
|
||||
role="controller",
|
||||
profile="prgs-controller",
|
||||
pid=99999999,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.db.upsert_session(
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
profile="prgs-author",
|
||||
pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.wt = self._tmp.name
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self) -> None:
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _ready_issue(self, number: int) -> WorkCandidate:
|
||||
return WorkCandidate(
|
||||
kind="issue",
|
||||
number=number,
|
||||
labels=("status:ready", "type:bug"),
|
||||
title="handoff target",
|
||||
priority=20,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _handoff_lease(self, number: int = 843) -> str:
|
||||
res = allocate_next_work(
|
||||
db=self.db,
|
||||
session_id="ctrl-session",
|
||||
role=ROLE_CONTROLLER,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
candidates=[self._ready_issue(number)],
|
||||
apply=True,
|
||||
profile_name="prgs-controller",
|
||||
username="controller-user",
|
||||
allocation_mode=ALLOCATION_MODE_CROSS_ROLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], OUTCOME_ASSIGNED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["required_role"], ROLE_AUTHOR)
|
||||
return res["assignment"]["lease_id"]
|
||||
|
||||
def _call_adopt_tool(self, profile: dict, **kwargs):
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server as mcp_server
|
||||
|
||||
with (
|
||||
patch.object(mcp_server, "get_profile", return_value=profile),
|
||||
patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server,
|
||||
"_control_plane_db_or_error",
|
||||
return_value=(self.db, []),
|
||||
),
|
||||
):
|
||||
return mcp_server.gitea_adopt_workflow_lease(
|
||||
remote="prgs", **kwargs
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _assert_handoff_untouched(self, lease_id: str) -> None:
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lease_id)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(state["lease"].get("adopted_by_session_id") or None)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["status"], "active")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["provenance"]["handoff_status"], "pending")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reviewer_profile_cannot_consume_author_handoff_via_role_author(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(920)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.REVIEWER_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="reviewer-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["profile_role_kind"], "reviewer")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["supplied_role"], "author")
|
||||
self.assertIn("does not match", result["reasons"][0])
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merger_profile_cannot_consume_author_handoff_via_role_author(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(921)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.MERGER_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="merger-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["profile_role_kind"], "merger")
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reviewer_profile_rejected_without_role_argument(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Even without a spoofed role, the profile-derived role binds."""
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(922)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.REVIEWER_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="reviewer-worker",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertIn("wrong role", result["reasons"][0].lower())
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_profile_mismatching_supplied_role_rejected(self) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(923)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.AUTHOR_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["profile_role_kind"], "author")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["supplied_role"], "reviewer")
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_profile_name_rejected_for_author_handoff(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Provenance required_profile binds even when the role matches."""
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(924)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.FOREIGN_AUTHOR_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="foreign-author-worker",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "blocked")
|
||||
self.assertIn("wrong profile", result["reasons"][0].lower())
|
||||
self._assert_handoff_untouched(lid)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_profile_consumes_author_handoff(self) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(925)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.AUTHOR_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
role="author",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["adopted_from_session_id"], "ctrl-session")
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
state["lease"]["adopted_by_session_id"], "author-worker"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["assignment"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["provenance"]["handoff_status"], "adopted")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_author_profile_consumes_author_handoff_without_role_argument(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
lid = self._handoff_lease(926)
|
||||
result = self._call_adopt_tool(
|
||||
self.AUTHOR_PROFILE,
|
||||
lease_id=lid,
|
||||
session_id="author-worker",
|
||||
worktree_path=self.wt,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(result["success"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result["outcome"], "adopted_cross_role_handoff")
|
||||
state = self.db.get_lease_workflow_state(lid)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["session_id"], "author-worker")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(state["lease"]["role"], "author")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,551 @@
|
||||
"""Merged-PR awareness for the worktree cleanup audit (#858).
|
||||
|
||||
Before #858 an ``issue_work`` worktree could never leave ``active_issue_work``:
|
||||
the audit had no PR linkage at all (``pr_number`` was structurally ``None``)
|
||||
and its only route to ``clean_stale_removable`` was a TTL derived from a
|
||||
``last_used_at`` that nothing ever populated. A merged, clean, unprotected
|
||||
worktree was therefore reported as active work forever, disagreeing with the
|
||||
PR-scoped reconciler.
|
||||
|
||||
These tests use fabricated temporary repositories and synthetic PR records
|
||||
only. Nothing here removes a worktree or deletes a branch.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(__import__("pathlib").Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
import merged_cleanup_reconcile as mcr # noqa: E402
|
||||
import worktree_cleanup_audit as wca # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
MERGED_BRANCH = "feat/issue-777-timeline"
|
||||
MERGED_PATH = "/repo/branches/issue-777-timeline"
|
||||
HEAD_SHA = "a" * 40
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _pr(number, branch, *, merged=True, sha=HEAD_SHA, state=None):
|
||||
"""Synthetic Gitea PR payload."""
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"number": number,
|
||||
"head": {"ref": branch, "sha": sha},
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-24T01:00:00Z" if merged else None,
|
||||
"state": state or ("closed" if merged else "open"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _porcelain(*entries):
|
||||
out = []
|
||||
for path, branch, sha in entries:
|
||||
out.append(f"worktree {path}")
|
||||
out.append(f"HEAD {sha}")
|
||||
if branch is None:
|
||||
out.append("detached")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
out.append(f"branch refs/heads/{branch}")
|
||||
out.append("")
|
||||
return "\n".join(out)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _AuditHarness(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Runs audit_branches_directory over a fabricated worktree listing."""
|
||||
|
||||
PORCELAIN = _porcelain(
|
||||
("/repo", "master", "f" * 40),
|
||||
(MERGED_PATH, MERGED_BRANCH, HEAD_SHA),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def run_audit(self, *, dirty_paths=(), contained=True, **kwargs):
|
||||
def fake_dirty(path):
|
||||
if path in dirty_paths:
|
||||
return {"exists": True, "dirty": True, "dirty_files": [" M x.py"]}
|
||||
return {"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []}
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(self.PORCELAIN),
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty", side_effect=fake_dirty
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=contained
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory("/repo", **kwargs)
|
||||
return {wt["path"]: wt for wt in report["worktrees"]}, report
|
||||
|
||||
def merged_audit(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
kwargs.setdefault("pr_index", wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]))
|
||||
kwargs.setdefault("master_ref", "prgs/master")
|
||||
return self.run_audit(**kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergedWorktreeBecomesRemovable(_AuditHarness):
|
||||
def test_clean_merged_issue_worktree_is_linked_and_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path, report = self.merged_audit()
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_MERGED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"], [])
|
||||
self.assertIn(MERGED_PATH, [c["path"] for c in report["removable_candidates"]])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_number_populated_from_authoritative_linkage(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(by_path[MERGED_PATH]["pr_number"], 849)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_regression_without_pr_evidence_stays_active_issue_work(self):
|
||||
"""The pre-#858 behaviour, still correct when no PR state is supplied."""
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit()
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(entry["pr_number"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestProtectiveSignalsSurvive(_AuditHarness):
|
||||
def test_open_pr_worktree_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index([_pr(900, MERGED_BRANCH, merged=False)])
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(
|
||||
pr_index=index,
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
open_pr_branches={MERGED_BRANCH},
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_OPEN_PR)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
# linkage still reports the owning PR, it just is not merge proof
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_OPEN)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["pr_number"], 900)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dirty_tracked_worktree_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(dirty_paths=(MERGED_PATH,))
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_DIRTY_LOCAL)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"worktree has uncommitted changes",
|
||||
entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_untracked_only_worktree_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
"""``git status --porcelain`` reports untracked files as dirty too."""
|
||||
def untracked(path):
|
||||
if path == MERGED_PATH:
|
||||
return {"exists": True, "dirty": True, "dirty_files": ["?? scratch.txt"]}
|
||||
return {"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []}
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(self.PORCELAIN),
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty", side_effect=untracked
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=True
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
"/repo",
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = {wt["path"]: wt for wt in report["worktrees"]}[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_DIRTY_LOCAL)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_active_lease_by_issue_number_is_protective(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(leased_issue_numbers={777})
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["has_active_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_active_lease_by_branch_is_protective(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(leased_branches={MERGED_BRANCH})
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["has_active_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_active_issue_lock_is_protective(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(active_issue_branches={MERGED_BRANCH})
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["has_active_issue_lock"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_session_worktree_is_protective(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(live_session_paths={MERGED_PATH})
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(entry["has_live_session"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_head_not_contained_in_master_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(contained=False)
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"worktree head is not contained in authoritative master "
|
||||
"(unmerged commits remain)",
|
||||
entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_containment_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit(contained=None)
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"containment of the worktree head in master is unknown",
|
||||
entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_master_ref_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)])
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(by_path[MERGED_PATH]["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unmerged_owning_pr_is_not_removable(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index([_pr(901, MERGED_BRANCH, merged=False)])
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(pr_index=index, master_ref="prgs/master")
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"owning PR #901 is not merged",
|
||||
entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_control_checkout_is_never_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.merged_audit()
|
||||
control = by_path["/repo"]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(control["is_protected"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(control["classification"], wca.CLASS_UNSAFE_UNKNOWN)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(control["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_control_checkout_not_removable_even_if_linked_and_merged(self):
|
||||
"""A merged PR on the control checkout must not unlock removal."""
|
||||
porcelain = _porcelain(("/repo", MERGED_BRANCH, HEAD_SHA))
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees", return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(porcelain)
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty",
|
||||
return_value={"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []},
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=True
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
"/repo",
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = report["worktrees"][0]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_UNSAFE_UNKNOWN)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAmbiguousLinkageFailsClosed(_AuditHarness):
|
||||
def test_competing_prs_on_one_branch_fail_closed(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index(
|
||||
[_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH), _pr(860, MERGED_BRANCH)]
|
||||
)
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(pr_index=index, master_ref="prgs/master")
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_AMBIGUOUS)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(entry["pr_number"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["classification"], wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merged_plus_open_pr_on_one_branch_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index(
|
||||
[_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH), _pr(861, MERGED_BRANCH, merged=False)]
|
||||
)
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(pr_index=index, master_ref="prgs/master")
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_AMBIGUOUS)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_owning_pr_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
by_path, _ = self.run_audit(
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, "feat/other-branch")]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = by_path[MERGED_PATH]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entry["merged_pr_linkage"]["status"], wca.LINKAGE_NONE)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(entry["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_malformed_pr_records_are_dropped_not_guessed(self):
|
||||
index = wca.build_pr_index(
|
||||
[
|
||||
{"number": None, "head": {"ref": MERGED_BRANCH}},
|
||||
{"number": 5, "head": {}},
|
||||
{"number": "not-an-int", "head": {"ref": MERGED_BRANCH}},
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(index, {})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.resolve_owning_pr(branch=MERGED_BRANCH, pr_index=index)["status"],
|
||||
wca.LINKAGE_NONE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_detached_worktree_has_no_branch_linkage(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.resolve_owning_pr(branch=None, pr_index={})["status"],
|
||||
wca.LINKAGE_UNKNOWN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestUnrelatedClassificationsUnchanged(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Non-issue_work worktrees keep their pre-#858 classifications."""
|
||||
|
||||
PORCELAIN = _porcelain(
|
||||
("/repo", "master", "f" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/review-pr42", "review-pr42", "2" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/baseline-master-x", "baseline-master-x", "3" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/conflict-fix-pr50", "conflict-fix-pr50", "4" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/review-pr99", None, "5" * 40),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _audit(self, **kwargs):
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(self.PORCELAIN),
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty",
|
||||
return_value={"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []},
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=True
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory("/repo", **kwargs)
|
||||
return {wt["path"]: wt for wt in report["worktrees"]}
|
||||
|
||||
def test_classifications_identical_with_and_without_pr_evidence(self):
|
||||
without = self._audit()
|
||||
with_evidence = self._audit(
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
{p: e["classification"] for p, e in without.items()},
|
||||
{p: e["classification"] for p, e in with_evidence.items()},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_lease_on_issue_does_not_capture_similarly_named_scratch_trees(self):
|
||||
"""A lease on issue 777 protects issue work, not baseline/review trees."""
|
||||
porcelain = _porcelain(
|
||||
("/repo/branches/baseline-master-issue-777", "baseline-issue-777", "7" * 40),
|
||||
("/repo/branches/issue-777-timeline", MERGED_BRANCH, HEAD_SHA),
|
||||
)
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "list_worktrees", return_value=wca.parse_worktree_porcelain(porcelain)
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "read_worktree_dirty",
|
||||
return_value={"exists": True, "dirty": False, "dirty_files": []},
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "git_worktree_list", return_value="(mocked)"
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
wca, "is_head_ancestor_of_ref", return_value=True
|
||||
):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
"/repo",
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([_pr(849, MERGED_BRANCH)]),
|
||||
master_ref="prgs/master",
|
||||
leased_issue_numbers={777},
|
||||
)
|
||||
by_path = {wt["path"]: wt for wt in report["worktrees"]}
|
||||
|
||||
baseline = by_path["/repo/branches/baseline-master-issue-777"]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(baseline["has_active_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(baseline["classification"], wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
|
||||
|
||||
issue_work = by_path["/repo/branches/issue-777-timeline"]
|
||||
self.assertTrue(issue_work["has_active_lease"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(issue_work["removable"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_review_and_baseline_still_removable(self):
|
||||
by_path = self._audit(
|
||||
pr_index=wca.build_pr_index([]), master_ref="prgs/master"
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
by_path["/repo/branches/review-pr42"]["classification"],
|
||||
wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
by_path["/repo/branches/baseline-master-x"]["classification"],
|
||||
wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
by_path["/repo/branches/review-pr99"]["classification"],
|
||||
wca.CLASS_DETACHED_REVIEW_LEFTOVER,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_conflict_fix_ttl_behaviour_unchanged(self):
|
||||
"""conflict_fix still needs only TTL expiry; #858 did not touch it."""
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_CONFLICT_FIX,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
),
|
||||
wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_CONFLICT_FIX,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=False,
|
||||
),
|
||||
wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_work_ttl_alone_no_longer_grants_removal(self):
|
||||
"""Age is not landing proof: TTL alone must not reclaim issue work."""
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
),
|
||||
wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAssessorPerformsNoDeletion(_AuditHarness):
|
||||
def test_audit_never_removes_a_worktree(self):
|
||||
with patch.object(wca, "remove_worktree") as removal:
|
||||
self.merged_audit()
|
||||
removal.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_audit_shells_out_to_no_destructive_git_command(self):
|
||||
seen = []
|
||||
real_run = subprocess.run
|
||||
|
||||
def recording_run(cmd, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
seen.append(cmd)
|
||||
return real_run(["true"], *args, **kwargs)
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.object(subprocess, "run", side_effect=recording_run):
|
||||
wca.audit_branches_directory("/nonexistent-repo-for-audit")
|
||||
|
||||
joined = [" ".join(c) if isinstance(c, list) else str(c) for c in seen]
|
||||
for cmd in joined:
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("worktree remove", cmd)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("branch -D", cmd)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("push", cmd)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAgreementWithPrScopedReconciler(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""The audit and merged_cleanup_reconcile must agree on identical input.
|
||||
|
||||
Uses a real throwaway git repository so containment is computed by git
|
||||
rather than asserted. Nothing outside the temporary directory is touched.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def _git(self, *args):
|
||||
subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", self.root, *args],
|
||||
check=True,
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.root = os.path.realpath(self._tmp.name)
|
||||
self._git("init", "-b", "master", ".")
|
||||
self._git("config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
|
||||
self._git("config", "user.name", "Test")
|
||||
with open(os.path.join(self.root, "seed.txt"), "w") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write("seed\n")
|
||||
self._git("add", "seed.txt")
|
||||
self._git("commit", "-m", "seed")
|
||||
|
||||
self.branch = "feat/issue-777-timeline"
|
||||
self._git("checkout", "-b", self.branch)
|
||||
with open(os.path.join(self.root, "feature.txt"), "w") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write("feature\n")
|
||||
self._git("add", "feature.txt")
|
||||
self._git("commit", "-m", "feature")
|
||||
self.head_sha = subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", self.root, "rev-parse", "HEAD"],
|
||||
capture_output=True, text=True, check=True,
|
||||
).stdout.strip()
|
||||
self._git("checkout", "master")
|
||||
self._git("merge", "--no-ff", "-m", "merge feature", self.branch)
|
||||
|
||||
self.worktree = os.path.join(self.root, "branches", "issue-777-timeline")
|
||||
self._git("worktree", "add", self.worktree, self.branch)
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
self._tmp.cleanup()
|
||||
|
||||
def _pr_index(self):
|
||||
return wca.build_pr_index(
|
||||
[
|
||||
{
|
||||
"number": 849,
|
||||
"head": {"ref": self.branch, "sha": self.head_sha},
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-24T01:00:00Z",
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _audit_entry(self):
|
||||
report = wca.audit_branches_directory(
|
||||
self.root, pr_index=self._pr_index(), master_ref="master"
|
||||
)
|
||||
return next(wt for wt in report["worktrees"] if wt["path"] == self.worktree)
|
||||
|
||||
def _reconciler_entry(self):
|
||||
return mcr.assess_local_worktree_cleanup(
|
||||
pr_number=849,
|
||||
head_branch=self.branch,
|
||||
merged=True,
|
||||
worktree_state=mcr.resolve_cleanup_worktree_state(
|
||||
project_root=self.root,
|
||||
head_branch=self.branch,
|
||||
issue_number=777,
|
||||
pr_head_sha=self.head_sha,
|
||||
target_ref="master",
|
||||
),
|
||||
active_lock=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_both_assessors_agree_the_worktree_is_safe(self):
|
||||
audit_entry = self._audit_entry()
|
||||
reconciler = self._reconciler_entry()
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertTrue(reconciler["safe_to_remove_worktree"], reconciler)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(audit_entry["removable"], audit_entry)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(audit_entry["pr_number"], reconciler["pr_number"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(audit_entry["merged_pr_cleanup"]["block_reasons"], [])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(reconciler["block_reasons"], [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_both_assessors_agree_a_dirty_worktree_is_unsafe(self):
|
||||
with open(os.path.join(self.worktree, "feature.txt"), "a") as fh:
|
||||
fh.write("local edit\n")
|
||||
|
||||
audit_entry = self._audit_entry()
|
||||
reconciler = self._reconciler_entry()
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertFalse(audit_entry["removable"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(reconciler["safe_to_remove_worktree"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_worktree_still_present_after_audit(self):
|
||||
self._audit_entry()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(os.path.isdir(self.worktree))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,630 @@
|
||||
"""Durable linked-issue lock head refresh + merge-sync dead-session recovery (#871).
|
||||
|
||||
``gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge`` advances a PR's *remote* head but historically
|
||||
never advanced the linked durable issue lock's recorded head. After the owning
|
||||
session died the drifted lock became unrecoverable and no further synchronization
|
||||
was possible (PR #866 / issue #855).
|
||||
|
||||
Two halves are covered:
|
||||
|
||||
* the write-side refresh (``issue_lock_store.assess/apply_durable_lock_head_refresh``)
|
||||
that records the new synced head under compare-and-swap with read-after-write; and
|
||||
* the read-side recovery relation (``issue_lock_recovery`` +
|
||||
``issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance``) that lets a dead-session lock
|
||||
whose recorded head is a merge-sync *ancestor* of the live PR head be recovered —
|
||||
and nothing else.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import subprocess
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
import issue_lock_recovery # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_store # noqa: E402
|
||||
import issue_lock_worktree # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
ISSUE = 8710
|
||||
PR_NUMBER = 8711
|
||||
BRANCH = f"fix/issue-{ISSUE}-durable-lock-head-refresh"
|
||||
IDENTITY = "example-user"
|
||||
PROFILE = "example-author"
|
||||
OLD = "a" * 40
|
||||
NEW1 = "b" * 40
|
||||
NEW2 = "c" * 40
|
||||
BASE = "d" * 40
|
||||
REMOTE = "prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "ExampleOrg"
|
||||
REPO = "ExampleRepo"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def dead_pid() -> int:
|
||||
proc = subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, "-c", "pass"])
|
||||
proc.wait()
|
||||
return proc.pid
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def future_ts(hours: int = 4) -> str:
|
||||
return (
|
||||
(datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(hours=hours))
|
||||
.isoformat()
|
||||
.replace("+00:00", "Z")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _git(cwd, *args):
|
||||
return subprocess.run(
|
||||
["git", "-C", cwd, *args],
|
||||
capture_output=True,
|
||||
text=True,
|
||||
check=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _rev(cwd, ref="HEAD") -> str:
|
||||
return _git(cwd, "rev-parse", ref).stdout.strip()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_merge_sync_repo(tmp: str) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Build a repo where a feature branch was synced by merging master in.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns a dict with the prior (branch) head, the synced merge-commit head,
|
||||
the master tip, plus a rebase-style linear descendant and an unrelated head.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
_git(tmp, "init", "-q", "-b", "master")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "config", "user.name", "T")
|
||||
Path(tmp, "base.txt").write_text("base\n")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "commit", "-q", "-m", "root")
|
||||
|
||||
# Feature branch cut from root, one commit — this is the PRIOR/recorded head.
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", "-b", BRANCH)
|
||||
Path(tmp, "feature.txt").write_text("feature\n")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "commit", "-q", "-m", "feature work")
|
||||
prior = _rev(tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
# Master advances (the base the sync will merge in).
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", "master")
|
||||
Path(tmp, "base.txt").write_text("base\nmore\n")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "commit", "-q", "-m", "master advance")
|
||||
master_tip = _rev(tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
# Sync: merge master INTO the feature branch → merge commit, first parent = prior.
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", BRANCH)
|
||||
_git(tmp, "merge", "-q", "--no-ff", "-m", "Merge master into feature", "master")
|
||||
synced = _rev(tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
# A plain linear descendant of prior (NOT a merge) — a rebase/extra-commit shape.
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", "-b", "linear-branch", prior)
|
||||
Path(tmp, "extra.txt").write_text("extra\n")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(tmp, "commit", "-q", "-m", "extra linear commit")
|
||||
linear = _rev(tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
# An unrelated root (force-push / rewritten history shape).
|
||||
unrelated_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "init", "-q", "-b", "x")
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "config", "user.email", "[email protected]")
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "config", "user.name", "T")
|
||||
Path(unrelated_dir, "z.txt").write_text("z\n")
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "add", "-A")
|
||||
_git(unrelated_dir, "commit", "-q", "-m", "unrelated")
|
||||
unrelated = _rev(unrelated_dir)
|
||||
|
||||
# Leave the worktree checked out on the feature branch at the PRIOR head, as
|
||||
# a dead author session that never advanced would have left it.
|
||||
_git(tmp, "checkout", "-q", BRANCH)
|
||||
_git(tmp, "reset", "-q", "--hard", prior)
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"prior": prior,
|
||||
"master_tip": master_tip,
|
||||
"synced": synced,
|
||||
"linear": linear,
|
||||
"unrelated": unrelated,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ─────────────────────────── write-side refresh ───────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDurableLockHeadRefresh(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.lock_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
self.wt = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
lock_data = {
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.wt,
|
||||
"remote": REMOTE,
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
|
||||
"work_lease": {
|
||||
"operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": self.wt,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
|
||||
"expires_at": future_ts(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
issue_lock_store.bind_session_lock(lock_data, lock_dir=self.lock_dir)
|
||||
|
||||
def _apply(self, **over):
|
||||
kw = dict(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.wt, pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE, current_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
expected_old_head=OLD, new_head=NEW1, synced_at=future_ts(0),
|
||||
base_head=BASE, lock_dir=self.lock_dir,
|
||||
)
|
||||
kw.update(over)
|
||||
return issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh(**kw)
|
||||
|
||||
def _load(self):
|
||||
return issue_lock_store.load_issue_lock(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
lock_dir=self.lock_dir,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_first_sync_updates_recorded_head(self):
|
||||
"""AC1: first base sync writes the resulting head to the durable lock."""
|
||||
res = self._apply()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["refreshed"], res["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["read_after_write_ok"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self._load().get("synced_pr_head"), NEW1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_second_sync_after_master_advance(self):
|
||||
"""AC2: a later master advance permits a second sanctioned sync."""
|
||||
self.assertTrue(self._apply()["refreshed"])
|
||||
res2 = self._apply(expected_old_head=NEW1, new_head=NEW2)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res2["refreshed"], res2["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self._load().get("synced_pr_head"), NEW2)
|
||||
history = self._load().get("branch_sync_history")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(history), 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(history[0]["last_synced_pr_head"], NEW1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(history[1]["prior_pr_head"], NEW1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_cas_detects_concurrent_head_change(self):
|
||||
"""AC6: CAS refuses when the recorded synced head is not the old head."""
|
||||
self.assertTrue(self._apply()["refreshed"]) # recorded head now NEW1
|
||||
# A second sync claiming the old head is still OLD must fail closed.
|
||||
res = self._apply(expected_old_head=OLD, new_head=NEW2)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("CAS" in r or "concurrent" in r for r in res["reasons"]))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self._load().get("synced_pr_head"), NEW1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_issue_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(issue_number=999999)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_branch_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(branch_name="fix/issue-8710-wrong")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_repo_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(repo="OtherRepo")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_identity_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(identity="intruder")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_profile_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(profile="prgs-reviewer")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_foreign_session_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""A refresh is not a recovery: the current process must own the lock."""
|
||||
path = issue_lock_store.lock_file_path(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
lock_dir=self.lock_dir,
|
||||
)
|
||||
rec = issue_lock_store.read_lock_file(path)
|
||||
rec["session_pid"] = dead_pid()
|
||||
rec["pid"] = rec["session_pid"]
|
||||
issue_lock_store.save_lock_file(path, rec)
|
||||
res = self._apply()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("current session" in r or "live owner" in r for r in res["reasons"]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_new_equals_old_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._apply(expected_old_head=OLD, new_head=OLD)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_full_sha_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self._apply(new_head="deadbeef")["refreshed"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self._apply(expected_old_head="xyz")["refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_lock_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
assessment = issue_lock_store.assess_durable_lock_head_refresh(
|
||||
None, remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, issue_number=ISSUE,
|
||||
branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.wt, pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE, current_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
expected_old_head=OLD, new_head=NEW1,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assessment["allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ─────────────────────── merge-sync provenance (real git) ───────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergeSyncProvenanceObservation(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
self.shas = build_merge_sync_repo(self.tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merge_sync_is_recognized(self):
|
||||
obs = issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
self.tmp, prior_head_sha=self.shas["prior"],
|
||||
synced_head_sha=self.shas["synced"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["is_merge_sync"], obs["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["prior_is_ancestor"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["synced_is_merge"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["first_parent_reaches_prior"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_linear_descendant_is_not_a_merge_sync(self):
|
||||
"""A plain non-merge descendant (rebase/extra commit) is not a sync."""
|
||||
obs = issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
self.tmp, prior_head_sha=self.shas["prior"],
|
||||
synced_head_sha=self.shas["linear"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(obs["probe_ok"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obs["is_merge_sync"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obs["synced_is_merge"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unrelated_history_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""A rewritten/force-pushed head where prior is unreachable fails closed."""
|
||||
obs = issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
self.tmp, prior_head_sha=self.shas["prior"],
|
||||
synced_head_sha=self.shas["unrelated"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obs["is_merge_sync"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_args_fail_closed(self):
|
||||
obs = issue_lock_worktree.read_merge_sync_provenance(
|
||||
self.tmp, prior_head_sha=None, synced_head_sha=self.shas["synced"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(obs["is_merge_sync"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ──────────────────── merge-sync dead-session recovery ──────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def make_dead_lock(worktree, **over):
|
||||
pid = dead_pid()
|
||||
lock = {
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree,
|
||||
"remote": REMOTE,
|
||||
"org": ORG,
|
||||
"repo": REPO,
|
||||
"session_pid": pid,
|
||||
"pid": pid,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
|
||||
"work_lease": {
|
||||
"operation_type": issue_lock_store.AUTHOR_ISSUE_WORK_LEASE,
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE,
|
||||
"branch": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree,
|
||||
"claimant": {"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE},
|
||||
"expires_at": future_ts(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
lock.update(over)
|
||||
return lock
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def sync_prov(prior, synced, **over):
|
||||
d = {
|
||||
"prior_head_sha": prior,
|
||||
"synced_head_sha": synced,
|
||||
"probe_ok": True,
|
||||
"prior_present": True,
|
||||
"synced_present": True,
|
||||
"prior_is_ancestor": True,
|
||||
"synced_is_merge": True,
|
||||
"first_parent_reaches_prior": True,
|
||||
"is_merge_sync": True,
|
||||
"first_parent_sha": prior,
|
||||
"parent_count": 2,
|
||||
"proof": f"{synced} merged base into branch above {prior}",
|
||||
"reasons": [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
d.update(over)
|
||||
return d
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergeSyncRecovery(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
self.shas = build_merge_sync_repo(self.tmp)
|
||||
self.prior = self.shas["prior"]
|
||||
self.synced = self.shas["synced"]
|
||||
|
||||
def _assess(self, **over):
|
||||
lock = over.pop("_lock", None) or make_dead_lock(self.tmp)
|
||||
kw = dict(
|
||||
issue_number=ISSUE, branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.tmp,
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE,
|
||||
current_branch=BRANCH, porcelain_status="",
|
||||
head_sha=self.prior, remote_head_sha=self.synced,
|
||||
pr_head_sha=self.synced, pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
competing_live_locks=[], candidate_branches=[BRANCH],
|
||||
current_pid=os.getpid(),
|
||||
remote_branch_exists=True,
|
||||
sync_provenance=sync_prov(self.prior, self.synced),
|
||||
)
|
||||
kw.update(over)
|
||||
return issue_lock_recovery.assess_dead_session_lock_recovery(lock, **kw)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merge_sync_drift_is_recoverable(self):
|
||||
"""AC3/AC4: dead session, recorded head is a merge-sync ancestor of PR head."""
|
||||
res = self._assess()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.RECOVERY_SANCTIONED, res["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
res["evidence"]["head_relation"],
|
||||
issue_lock_recovery.HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["evidence"]["accepted_head"], self.synced)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_provenance_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""No server-derived provenance → cannot accept a remote ahead of local."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(sync_provenance=None)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_ancestor_recorded_head_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC7: provenance that does not prove ancestry is rejected."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(
|
||||
sync_provenance=sync_prov(
|
||||
self.prior, self.synced, prior_is_ancestor=False, is_merge_sync=False,
|
||||
reasons=["prior head is not an ancestor"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_force_pushed_history_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC8: a rewritten head (not a merge sync) stays protected."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(
|
||||
sync_provenance=sync_prov(
|
||||
self.prior, self.synced, is_merge_sync=False, synced_is_merge=False,
|
||||
reasons=["not a merge-based sync"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_provenance_for_other_commits_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""Provenance whose endpoints differ from the heads under assessment is rejected."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(
|
||||
sync_provenance=sync_prov("f" * 40, self.synced),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dirty_worktree_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC11: dirty worktrees remain protected."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(porcelain_status=" M feature.txt\n")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_live_owner_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC10: a live recorded owner is not a dead-session recovery."""
|
||||
lock = make_dead_lock(self.tmp, session_pid=os.getpid(), pid=os.getpid())
|
||||
res = self._assess(_lock=lock)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_claimant_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC13: a competing live lock blocks recovery."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(
|
||||
competing_live_locks=[{
|
||||
"issue_number": ISSUE, "branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"worktree_path": "/some/other/wt", "pid": os.getpid(),
|
||||
}]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_branch_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""AC9: worktree on a different branch fails closed."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(current_branch="fix/issue-8710-other")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_wrong_identity_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
res = self._assess(identity="intruder")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_head_mismatch_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""The open PR must sit at the synced remote head."""
|
||||
res = self._assess(pr_head_sha="e" * 40)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.REFUSED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owning_pr_evidence_for_merge_sync(self):
|
||||
res = self._assess()
|
||||
ev = issue_lock_recovery.owning_pr_recovery_evidence(res)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(ev)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ev["pr_number"], PR_NUMBER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(ev["head_sha"], self.synced)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
ev["head_relation"],
|
||||
issue_lock_recovery.HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_recovered_owning_pr_from_persisted_record(self):
|
||||
res = self._assess()
|
||||
record = issue_lock_recovery.build_recovery_record(res, recovered_at=future_ts(0))
|
||||
lock = {"issue_number": ISSUE, "branch_name": BRANCH,
|
||||
"dead_session_recovery": record}
|
||||
rebuilt = issue_lock_recovery.recovered_owning_pr_from_lock(lock)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(rebuilt)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(rebuilt["head_sha"], self.synced)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
rebuilt["head_relation"],
|
||||
issue_lock_recovery.HEAD_RELATION_REMOTE_MERGE_SYNCED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestExistingRelationsUnchanged(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC14/AC15: equal-head recovery still works; merge-sync did not weaken it."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.tmp = tempfile.mkdtemp()
|
||||
self.shas = build_merge_sync_repo(self.tmp)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_equal_head_recovery_still_sanctioned(self):
|
||||
# Worktree at prior head; remote also at prior head → the #753 equal case.
|
||||
prior = self.shas["prior"]
|
||||
lock = make_dead_lock(self.tmp)
|
||||
res = issue_lock_recovery.assess_dead_session_lock_recovery(
|
||||
lock, issue_number=ISSUE, branch_name=BRANCH, worktree_path=self.tmp,
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, identity=IDENTITY, profile=PROFILE,
|
||||
current_branch=BRANCH, porcelain_status="",
|
||||
head_sha=prior, remote_head_sha=prior,
|
||||
pr_head_sha=prior, pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
competing_live_locks=[], candidate_branches=[BRANCH],
|
||||
current_pid=os.getpid(), remote_branch_exists=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["outcome"], issue_lock_recovery.RECOVERY_SANCTIONED, res["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
res["evidence"]["head_relation"], issue_lock_recovery.HEAD_RELATION_EQUAL,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestUpdatePrWrapperPartialFailure(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC5/AC16: the tool advances the remote head then refreshes the durable lock.
|
||||
|
||||
When the durable refresh fails after the remote advance, the tool must report a
|
||||
partial lifecycle failure and NOT a fully successful synchronization. Exact PR-
|
||||
head / base-head pinning is preserved (delegated to the real preflight, stubbed
|
||||
here only to isolate the post-update lifecycle branch).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server as gms # noqa: E402
|
||||
self.gms = gms
|
||||
self._orig = {}
|
||||
|
||||
def _patch(name, value):
|
||||
self._orig[name] = getattr(gms, name)
|
||||
setattr(gms, name, value)
|
||||
|
||||
_patch("get_profile", lambda *a, **k: {
|
||||
"allowed_operations": ["gitea.branch.push"],
|
||||
"forbidden_operations": [],
|
||||
"profile_name": "prgs-author",
|
||||
})
|
||||
_patch("_role_kind", lambda *a, **k: "author")
|
||||
_patch("_profile_operation_gate", lambda *a, **k: None)
|
||||
_patch("_permission_block_report", lambda *a, **k: {})
|
||||
_patch("_resolve", lambda *a, **k: ("gitea.prgs.cc", ORG, REPO))
|
||||
_patch("_verify_role_mutation_workspace", lambda *a, **k: None)
|
||||
_patch("_get_workspace_porcelain", lambda *a, **k: "")
|
||||
_patch("_canonical_local_git_root", lambda *a, **k: "/x")
|
||||
_patch("_master_parity_block", lambda *a, **k: None)
|
||||
_patch("_auth", lambda *a, **k: {"token": "x"})
|
||||
_patch("repo_api_url", lambda *a, **k: "http://api")
|
||||
_patch("_redact", lambda s: s)
|
||||
_patch("_work_lease_claimant", lambda *a, **k: {
|
||||
"username": IDENTITY, "profile": PROFILE,
|
||||
})
|
||||
_patch("_prove_author_ownership_for_pr", lambda *a, **k: {
|
||||
"has_author_lock": True, "matched_issue": ISSUE,
|
||||
"matched_via": "branch", "linked_issues": [ISSUE],
|
||||
"recovered_owning_pr": None, "reasons": [],
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
# Real preflight is unit-tested elsewhere; stub it to isolate the
|
||||
# post-update durable-lock lifecycle branch under test.
|
||||
orig_pf = gms.pr_sync_status.assess_update_pr_branch_preflight
|
||||
self._orig_pf = orig_pf
|
||||
gms.pr_sync_status.assess_update_pr_branch_preflight = (
|
||||
lambda *a, **k: {"mutation_allowed": True, "reasons": [], "performed": False}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Sequence the two GET /pulls calls: OLD before update, NEW after.
|
||||
self._pull_calls = {"n": 0}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api_request(method, url, auth, *a, **k):
|
||||
m = method.upper()
|
||||
if m == "GET" and url.endswith(f"/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}"):
|
||||
self._pull_calls["n"] += 1
|
||||
head = OLD if self._pull_calls["n"] == 1 else NEW1
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"state": "open",
|
||||
"head": {"sha": head, "ref": BRANCH},
|
||||
"base": {"sha": BASE, "ref": "master"},
|
||||
"mergeable": True, "title": "t", "body": "b",
|
||||
}
|
||||
if m == "GET" and "/branches/" in url:
|
||||
return {"commit": {"id": BASE}}
|
||||
if m == "POST" and "/update" in url:
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
|
||||
_patch("api_request", fake_api_request)
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
for name, value in self._orig.items():
|
||||
setattr(self.gms, name, value)
|
||||
self.gms.pr_sync_status.assess_update_pr_branch_preflight = self._orig_pf
|
||||
|
||||
def _run(self):
|
||||
return self.gms.gitea_update_pr_branch_by_merge(
|
||||
pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
expected_pr_head_sha=OLD,
|
||||
expected_base_head_sha=BASE,
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
worktree_path="/tmp/branches/wt-871",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_partial_failure_when_refresh_fails(self):
|
||||
self._orig["apply_durable_lock_head_refresh"] = (
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh = (
|
||||
lambda **k: {"refreshed": False, "reasons": ["forced refresh failure"]}
|
||||
)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
res = self._run()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh = (
|
||||
self._orig["apply_durable_lock_head_refresh"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["new_pr_head_sha"], NEW1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["partial_lifecycle_failure"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res["durable_lock_refreshed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_full_success_when_refresh_succeeds(self):
|
||||
self._orig["apply_durable_lock_head_refresh"] = (
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh = (
|
||||
lambda **k: {"refreshed": True, "read_after_write_ok": True,
|
||||
"new_head": NEW1, "reasons": ["ok"]}
|
||||
)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
res = self._run()
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
self.gms.issue_lock_store.apply_durable_lock_head_refresh = (
|
||||
self._orig["apply_durable_lock_head_refresh"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["success"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["performed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["durable_lock_refreshed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res["fully_synchronized"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res["new_pr_head_sha"], NEW1)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
|
||||
"""Documentation acceptance for the MCP restart governance ADR (#656).
|
||||
|
||||
Enforces issue #656 acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
* AC1 — policy document exists with an authorization matrix and the recorded
|
||||
v1 decision (controller approval + automated safety gates).
|
||||
* AC2 — restart is stated as a last resort with enumerated narrower recoveries.
|
||||
* AC3 — a unilateral LLM full restart with affected sessions is forbidden.
|
||||
* AC4 — break-glass conditions are listed.
|
||||
* AC5 — the ADR is linked to #655, #652, #653, #630, #642, and is cross-linked
|
||||
from the safety model and the web-console deployment boundary docs.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
|
||||
ADR = REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "architecture" / "mcp-restart-governance.md"
|
||||
ADR_BASENAME = "mcp-restart-governance.md"
|
||||
|
||||
CROSS_LINK_DOCS = (
|
||||
REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "safety-model.md",
|
||||
REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "webui-deployment.md",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
LINKED_ISSUES = ("#655", "#652", "#653", "#630", "#642")
|
||||
POLICY_IDS = ("RG-01", "RG-02", "RG-03", "RG-04", "RG-05", "RG-06", "RG-07", "RG-08")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _read(path: Path) -> str:
|
||||
assert path.is_file(), f"missing {path.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)}"
|
||||
return path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac1_adr_exists_with_matrix_and_v1_decision():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert text.lstrip().startswith("#"), "ADR lacks a title"
|
||||
assert "#656" in text
|
||||
assert "authorization matrix" in lower
|
||||
# The matrix is a real table with the worker and privileged roles.
|
||||
for role in ("author", "reviewer", "merger", "reconciler", "controller",
|
||||
"operator", "admin"):
|
||||
assert role in lower, f"authorization matrix missing role {role!r}"
|
||||
# Recorded v1 decision.
|
||||
assert "restart-governance/v1" in text
|
||||
assert "controller approval" in lower and "automated safety gates" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac2_restart_is_last_resort_with_narrower_recoveries():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "last resort" in lower
|
||||
# Enumerated narrower recoveries precede full restart on the ladder.
|
||||
for rung in ("reconnect", "rebind", "scoped restart", "full restart",
|
||||
"host"):
|
||||
assert rung in lower, f"recovery ladder missing rung {rung!r}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac3_forbids_unilateral_llm_full_restart_with_affected_sessions():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "forbidden" in lower
|
||||
assert "llm" in lower and "restart" in lower
|
||||
assert "unilateral" in lower
|
||||
# A worker role must not perform or authorize full/host restart.
|
||||
assert "must not" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac4_break_glass_conditions_listed():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "break-glass" in lower
|
||||
assert "incident" in lower
|
||||
assert "audit" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac5_adr_links_issue_lineage():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
for issue in LINKED_ISSUES:
|
||||
assert issue in text, f"ADR must link issue {issue}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ac5_safety_model_and_deployment_cross_link_adr():
|
||||
for path in CROSS_LINK_DOCS:
|
||||
text = _read(path)
|
||||
assert ADR_BASENAME in text, (
|
||||
f"{path.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)} must cross-link {ADR_BASENAME} "
|
||||
f"(issue #656 acceptance criterion 5)"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_policy_ids_present_for_enforcement_code():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
for pid in POLICY_IDS:
|
||||
assert pid in text, f"policy id {pid} missing from ADR"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_failure_behavior_denies_on_ambiguity():
|
||||
text = _read(ADR)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "ambiguous" in lower and "deny" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_cross_links_do_not_embed_secrets():
|
||||
for path in (ADR,) + CROSS_LINK_DOCS:
|
||||
text = _read(path)
|
||||
for marker in ("ghp_", "BEGIN PRIVATE KEY", "Authorization: Bearer"):
|
||||
assert marker not in text, f"{path} contains {marker!r}"
|
||||
@@ -12,6 +12,59 @@ import merged_cleanup_reconcile as mcr # noqa: E402
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestMergedCleanupAssessment(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_issue_851_plan_order_worktree_then_reassess_then_remote(self):
|
||||
"""#851 dry-run plan: remove worktree, reassess ownership, then remote."""
|
||||
plan = mcr.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": True},
|
||||
)
|
||||
actions = [s["action"] for s in plan]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
actions,
|
||||
[
|
||||
"remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
"reassess_branch_ownership",
|
||||
"delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(plan[0]["phase"], 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(plan[-1]["phase"], 3)
|
||||
self.assertIn("independently_safe", plan[0]["reason"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("reassessment", plan[-1]["reason"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_plan_remote_only_when_worktree_not_safe(self):
|
||||
plan = mcr.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": False},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([s["action"] for s in plan], ["delete_remote_branch"])
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("reassess_branch_ownership", [s["action"] for s in plan])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_plan_worktree_only_when_remote_not_safe(self):
|
||||
plan = mcr.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": False},
|
||||
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": True},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([s["action"] for s in plan], ["remove_local_worktree"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_issue_851_entry_includes_planned_execution_order(self):
|
||||
entry = mcr.build_pr_cleanup_entry(
|
||||
pr={
|
||||
"number": 848,
|
||||
"title": "Closes #844",
|
||||
"body": "",
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-23T00:00:00Z",
|
||||
"head": {"ref": "fix/issue-844-x", "sha": "a" * 40},
|
||||
},
|
||||
project_root="/tmp/not-a-real-root",
|
||||
open_pr_heads=set(),
|
||||
remote_branch_exists=True,
|
||||
head_on_master=True,
|
||||
delete_capability_allowed=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn("planned_execution_order", entry)
|
||||
self.assertIsInstance(entry["planned_execution_order"], list)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_extract_linked_issue_from_closes(self):
|
||||
issue = mcr.extract_linked_issue(
|
||||
"feat: cleanup (Closes #269)",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,703 @@
|
||||
"""Console authorization, redaction, and audit model tests (#633).
|
||||
|
||||
Covers each acceptance criterion and each required test named in the issue:
|
||||
|
||||
* AC1 — RBAC matrix and privileged-action list.
|
||||
* AC2 — redaction rules, unit-tested against sample payloads.
|
||||
* AC3 — audit event schema with required fields and retention defaults.
|
||||
* AC4 — Phase 2 integration points.
|
||||
* AC5 — local-dev mode with explicit insecurity warnings.
|
||||
|
||||
Required tests: redaction units (token, keychain, password patterns),
|
||||
default-deny for unauthenticated write stubs, and audit record creation for a
|
||||
simulated privileged preview.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import datetime
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import pathlib
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
|
||||
from starlette.testclient import TestClient
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]))
|
||||
|
||||
from task_capability_map import TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP # noqa: E402
|
||||
from webui import console_audit, console_authz # noqa: E402
|
||||
from webui.app import create_app # noqa: E402
|
||||
from webui.console_redaction import ( # noqa: E402
|
||||
REDACTED,
|
||||
redact_payload,
|
||||
redact_text,
|
||||
redaction_policy,
|
||||
scan_for_secrets,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
DOCS = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "docs"
|
||||
AUTHZ_DOC = DOCS / "webui-authz-audit.md"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _principal(role: str) -> console_authz.Principal:
|
||||
return console_authz.Principal(
|
||||
subject=f"{role}@example.com",
|
||||
role=role,
|
||||
identity_source=console_authz.IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY,
|
||||
authenticated=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRoleMatrix(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC1 — the written RBAC matrix and privileged-action list."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_roles_are_ordered_least_to_most_authority(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_authz.ROLE_ORDER,
|
||||
("viewer", "operator", "controller", "admin"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_role_has_a_description(self):
|
||||
for role in console_authz.ROLE_ORDER:
|
||||
with self.subTest(role=role):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(console_authz.ROLE_DESCRIPTIONS[role].strip())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_higher_roles_inherit_lower_role_actions(self):
|
||||
matrix = {
|
||||
entry["role"]: set(entry["permitted_actions"])
|
||||
for entry in console_authz.rbac_matrix()["roles"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
for lower, higher in zip(
|
||||
console_authz.ROLE_ORDER, console_authz.ROLE_ORDER[1:]
|
||||
):
|
||||
with self.subTest(lower=lower, higher=higher):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(matrix[lower].issubset(matrix[higher]))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_viewer_holds_no_write_action(self):
|
||||
matrix = {
|
||||
entry["role"]: set(entry["permitted_actions"])
|
||||
for entry in console_authz.rbac_matrix()["roles"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(matrix["viewer"], set())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_privileged_action_list_is_non_empty_and_classified(self):
|
||||
privileged = console_authz.privileged_actions()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(privileged)
|
||||
ids = {action.action_id for action in privileged}
|
||||
# Merge and branch deletion are the canonical privileged pair.
|
||||
self.assertIn("merge_pr", ids)
|
||||
self.assertIn("delete_branch", ids)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merge_and_delete_require_dual_control_and_break_glass(self):
|
||||
for action_id in ("merge_pr", "delete_branch"):
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action_id):
|
||||
action = console_authz.get_action(action_id)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(action.dual_control)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(action.break_glass)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(action.requires_confirmation)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_write_action_requires_confirmation(self):
|
||||
for action in console_authz.ACTIONS.values():
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action.action_id):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(action.requires_confirmation)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_delete_branch_is_admin_only(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_authz.get_action("delete_branch").minimum_role,
|
||||
console_authz.ADMIN,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_actions_map_to_real_mcp_capability_vocabulary(self):
|
||||
"""The console must not invent an authority the MCP layer lacks."""
|
||||
for action in console_authz.ACTIONS.values():
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action.action_id):
|
||||
self.assertIn(action.task_key, TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
action.mcp_permission,
|
||||
TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP[action.task_key]["permission"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
action.mcp_role,
|
||||
TASK_CAPABILITY_MAP[action.task_key]["role"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_matrix_declares_deny_by_default_and_execution_disabled(self):
|
||||
matrix = console_authz.rbac_matrix()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(matrix["default_decision"], "deny")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(matrix["execution_enabled"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAuthorizeDefaultDeny(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Fail-closed behaviour of the authorization decision."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_anonymous_is_denied_every_action(self):
|
||||
for action_id in console_authz.ACTIONS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action_id):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(action_id)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_UNAUTHENTICATED
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_action_is_denied(self):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(
|
||||
"not_a_real_action", _principal("admin")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_UNKNOWN_ACTION)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_role_is_denied(self):
|
||||
rogue = console_authz.Principal(
|
||||
subject="[email protected]",
|
||||
role="superuser",
|
||||
identity_source=console_authz.IDENTITY_ACCESS_PROXY,
|
||||
authenticated=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize("comment_issue", rogue)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_UNKNOWN_ROLE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_insufficient_role_is_denied(self):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize("merge_pr", _principal("operator"))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_INSUFFICIENT_ROLE
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sufficient_role_allows_preview_only(self):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize("merge_pr", _principal("controller"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.execution_enabled)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_execution_is_refused_while_phase_is_not_active(self):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(
|
||||
"merge_pr", _principal("controller"), for_execution=True
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.allowed)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
decision.reason_code, console_authz.DENY_PHASE_NOT_ACTIVE
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_allowed_decision_never_reports_execution_enabled(self):
|
||||
for action_id in console_authz.ACTIONS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action_id):
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(
|
||||
action_id, _principal("admin")
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(decision.execution_enabled)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestIdentityResolution(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC5 — identity sources, including the insecure local-dev mode."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_auth_mode_yields_anonymous_viewer(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(env={})
|
||||
self.assertFalse(principal.authenticated)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.identity_source, console_authz.IDENTITY_NONE)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_local_dev_mode_warns_that_identity_is_unverified(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
env={
|
||||
console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "local-dev",
|
||||
console_authz.DEV_SUBJECT_ENV: "[email protected]",
|
||||
console_authz.DEV_ROLE_ENV: "admin",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(principal.authenticated)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, "admin")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(principal.warnings)
|
||||
self.assertIn("asserted", " ".join(principal.warnings).lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_local_dev_without_subject_falls_back_to_anonymous(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
env={console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "local-dev"}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(principal.authenticated)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_local_dev_unknown_role_degrades_to_viewer(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
env={
|
||||
console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "local_dev",
|
||||
console_authz.DEV_SUBJECT_ENV: "[email protected]",
|
||||
console_authz.DEV_ROLE_ENV: "root",
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_access_proxy_without_header_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
"""A proxy-mode request that did not traverse the proxy is anonymous."""
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
headers={},
|
||||
env={console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(principal.authenticated)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_access_proxy_role_comes_from_server_config_not_client(self):
|
||||
env = {
|
||||
console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy",
|
||||
console_authz.ROLE_MAP_ENV: json.dumps(
|
||||
{"[email protected]": "controller"}
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
headers={
|
||||
console_authz.ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER: "[email protected]",
|
||||
"x-role": "admin", # client-supplied role must be ignored
|
||||
},
|
||||
env=env,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, "controller")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_access_proxy_unmapped_subject_defaults_to_viewer(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
headers={
|
||||
console_authz.ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER: "[email protected]"
|
||||
},
|
||||
env={console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_malformed_role_map_does_not_raise_and_denies(self):
|
||||
principal = console_authz.resolve_principal(
|
||||
headers={console_authz.ACCESS_SUBJECT_HEADER: "[email protected]"},
|
||||
env={
|
||||
console_authz.AUTH_MODE_ENV: "access_proxy",
|
||||
console_authz.ROLE_MAP_ENV: "{not json",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(principal.role, console_authz.VIEWER)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_probe_auth_is_opt_in(self):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(console_authz.probe_auth_required(env={}))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
console_authz.probe_auth_required(
|
||||
env={console_authz.REQUIRE_PROBE_AUTH_ENV: "1"}
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_probe_auth_is_declared_but_not_yet_enforced(self):
|
||||
"""Phase 1 declares the probe-auth policy; no route enforces it yet.
|
||||
|
||||
The flag exists so the Phase 2 action framework has a declared policy
|
||||
to honour instead of inventing a second one. Pinning the current
|
||||
not-enforced status here means wiring it later is a deliberate change
|
||||
that updates this test and the documentation together, rather than a
|
||||
silent behaviour shift. The documentation must say so plainly, because
|
||||
an operator who sets the variable believing it protects a probe is
|
||||
worse off than one who knows it does not.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import inspect
|
||||
|
||||
from webui import app as webui_app
|
||||
|
||||
source = inspect.getsource(webui_app)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(
|
||||
"probe_auth_required",
|
||||
source,
|
||||
msg=(
|
||||
"webui.app now consults probe_auth_required, so probe auth is "
|
||||
"no longer merely declared. Update the 'Probe authentication' "
|
||||
"section of docs/webui-authz-audit.md, which states it "
|
||||
"enforces nothing, and replace this test with real "
|
||||
"enforcement coverage."
|
||||
),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIn(
|
||||
"enforces nothing today",
|
||||
AUTHZ_DOC.read_text(encoding="utf-8"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRedaction(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC2 — required redaction units: token, keychain, password patterns."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_token_assignment_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("GITEA_TOKEN=abcd1234efgh5678ijkl")
|
||||
self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("abcd1234efgh5678ijkl", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_password_assignment_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("password: hunter2supersecret")
|
||||
self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("hunter2supersecret", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_keychain_reference_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("keychain:gitea-prgs-token")
|
||||
self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("gitea-prgs-token", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_keychain_command_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("security find-generic-password -s gitea -w")
|
||||
self.assertIn(REDACTED, out)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("find-generic-password -s gitea", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_bearer_credential_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text("Authorization: Bearer abcdef1234567890abcdef")
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("abcdef1234567890abcdef", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_jwt_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
token = "eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxIn0.abcdefghijklmnop"
|
||||
out = redact_text(f"session={token}")
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(token, out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_private_key_block_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
pem = (
|
||||
"-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\n"
|
||||
"MIIEowIBAAKCAQEAsecretmaterial\n"
|
||||
"-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----"
|
||||
)
|
||||
out = redact_text(pem)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("MIIEowIBAAKCAQEAsecretmaterial", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_api_key_assignment_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
out = redact_text('api_key = "sk-live-9f8e7d6c5b4a3210"')
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("sk-live-9f8e7d6c5b4a3210", out)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_nested_payload_is_redacted_recursively(self):
|
||||
payload = {
|
||||
"token": "abc123456789",
|
||||
"nested": {"note": "password=letmein12345"},
|
||||
"list": ["keychain:some-entry"],
|
||||
"safe": "plain text",
|
||||
}
|
||||
out = redact_payload(payload)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["token"], REDACTED)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("letmein12345", json.dumps(out))
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("some-entry", json.dumps(out))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["safe"], "plain text")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_scan_reports_findings_before_and_none_after(self):
|
||||
dirty = "password: hunter2supersecret"
|
||||
self.assertTrue(scan_for_secrets(dirty))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(redact_text(dirty)), [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_strings_pass_through_untouched(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(redact_text(42), 42)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
redact_payload({"n": 1, "b": True}), {"n": 1, "b": True}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_policy_is_documented_and_declares_redact_before_persist(self):
|
||||
policy = redaction_policy()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy["redact_before_persist"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("audit_records", policy["applies_to"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy["console_rules"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_policy_statement_contains_no_secret_material(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(redaction_policy()), [])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAuditSchema(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC3 — audit event schema, required fields, and retention defaults."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _event(self, action_id="merge_pr", **kwargs):
|
||||
return console_audit.build_event(
|
||||
action_id=action_id,
|
||||
result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED,
|
||||
decision=console_authz.authorize(action_id, _principal("operator")),
|
||||
target={"kind": "pr", "ref": "#123"},
|
||||
request_id="req-test",
|
||||
**kwargs,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_required_field_is_present(self):
|
||||
event = self._event()
|
||||
for field in console_audit.REQUIRED_FIELDS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(field=field):
|
||||
self.assertIn(field, event)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_actor_carries_who_and_how_they_were_identified(self):
|
||||
event = self._event()
|
||||
for field in console_audit.REQUIRED_ACTOR_FIELDS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(field=field):
|
||||
self.assertIn(field, event["actor"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_correlation_ids_are_present(self):
|
||||
event = self._event()
|
||||
for field in console_audit.REQUIRED_CORRELATION_FIELDS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(field=field):
|
||||
self.assertIn(field, event["correlation"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(event["correlation"]["request_id"], "req-test")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(event["correlation"]["mcp_task"], "merge_pr")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_timestamp_is_timezone_aware_utc_iso8601(self):
|
||||
now = datetime.datetime(
|
||||
2026, 7, 22, 10, 16, 42, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc
|
||||
)
|
||||
event = self._event(now=now)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(event["timestamp"], "2026-07-22T10:16:42+00:00")
|
||||
parsed = datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(event["timestamp"])
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(parsed.tzinfo)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_retention_defaults_by_class(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS[console_audit.RETENTION_STANDARD], 90
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS[console_audit.RETENTION_PRIVILEGED],
|
||||
365,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS[console_audit.RETENTION_BREAK_GLASS],
|
||||
730,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_break_glass_action_retains_longest(self):
|
||||
event = self._event("merge_pr")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
event["retention"]["class"], console_audit.RETENTION_BREAK_GLASS
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_routine_write_uses_standard_retention(self):
|
||||
event = self._event("comment_issue")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
event["retention"]["class"], console_audit.RETENTION_STANDARD
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_action_retains_as_privileged_not_standard(self):
|
||||
"""Conservative direction: keep an unclassifiable record longer."""
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
console_audit.retention_class_for(None),
|
||||
console_audit.RETENTION_PRIVILEGED,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_retention_expiry_matches_declared_days(self):
|
||||
now = datetime.datetime(2026, 7, 22, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc)
|
||||
event = self._event("comment_issue", now=now)
|
||||
expires = datetime.datetime.fromisoformat(
|
||||
event["retention"]["expires_at"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual((expires - now).days, 90)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_invalid_result_degrades_to_failed(self):
|
||||
event = console_audit.build_event(action_id="merge_pr", result="banana")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(event["result"], console_audit.RESULT_FAILED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_denied_result_is_representable(self):
|
||||
"""An authorization denial has no MCP-side mutation record."""
|
||||
self.assertIn(console_audit.RESULT_DENIED, console_audit.RESULTS)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_event_is_redacted_before_it_is_returned(self):
|
||||
event = console_audit.build_event(
|
||||
action_id="merge_pr",
|
||||
result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED,
|
||||
detail="failed with token=abcdef1234567890",
|
||||
metadata={"password": "hunter2supersecret"},
|
||||
)
|
||||
serialized = json.dumps(event)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("abcdef1234567890", serialized)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("hunter2supersecret", serialized)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(event["redacted"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_audit_policy_reports_schema_and_retention(self):
|
||||
policy = console_audit.audit_policy()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy["append_only"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(policy["redact_before_persist"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
policy["retention_defaults_days"], console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAuditSink(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Append-only persistence behaviour."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_write_is_a_noop_when_sink_is_unconfigured(self):
|
||||
saved = os.environ.pop(console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV, None)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
self.assertFalse(console_audit.audit_enabled())
|
||||
self.assertFalse(console_audit.write_event({"schema_version": 1}))
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
if saved is not None:
|
||||
os.environ[console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV] = saved
|
||||
|
||||
def test_records_append_one_json_line_each(self):
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
|
||||
sink = os.path.join(tmp, "console-audit.jsonl")
|
||||
for _ in range(3):
|
||||
event = console_audit.build_event(
|
||||
action_id="merge_pr", result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(console_audit.write_event(event, path=sink))
|
||||
with open(sink, encoding="utf-8") as handle:
|
||||
lines = [json.loads(line) for line in handle if line.strip()]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(lines), 3)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len({line["event_id"] for line in lines}), 3)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_record_that_still_carries_a_secret_is_not_persisted(self):
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
|
||||
sink = os.path.join(tmp, "console-audit.jsonl")
|
||||
leaky = {
|
||||
"schema_version": 1,
|
||||
"detail": "password: hunter2supersecret",
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.assertFalse(console_audit.write_event(leaky, path=sink))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(os.path.exists(sink))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_write_never_raises_on_a_bad_path(self):
|
||||
self.assertFalse(
|
||||
console_audit.write_event(
|
||||
{"schema_version": 1}, path="/nonexistent-dir/audit.jsonl"
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_simulated_privileged_preview_creates_an_audit_record(self):
|
||||
"""Required test: audit record creation for a privileged preview."""
|
||||
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
|
||||
sink = os.path.join(tmp, "console-audit.jsonl")
|
||||
os.environ[console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV] = sink
|
||||
try:
|
||||
decision = console_authz.authorize(
|
||||
"merge_pr", _principal("controller")
|
||||
)
|
||||
outcome = console_audit.record_event(
|
||||
action_id="merge_pr",
|
||||
result=console_audit.RESULT_PREVIEWED,
|
||||
decision=decision,
|
||||
target={"kind": "pr", "ref": "#123"},
|
||||
request_id="req-preview",
|
||||
)
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
os.environ.pop(console_audit.AUDIT_LOG_ENV, None)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(outcome["written"])
|
||||
with open(sink, encoding="utf-8") as handle:
|
||||
record = json.loads(handle.read().strip())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["action"], "merge_pr")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["result"], console_audit.RESULT_PREVIEWED)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["action_class"], "privileged")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(record["decision"]["allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertFalse(record["decision"]["execution_enabled"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(record["actor"]["role"], "controller")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_decision_block_survives_redaction(self):
|
||||
"""Regression: naming it 'authorization' collided with a secret hint.
|
||||
|
||||
``gitea_audit._SECRET_KEY_HINTS`` contains "authorization" (for the
|
||||
HTTP header), so a block under that key was replaced wholesale by the
|
||||
placeholder and the record lost its decision entirely.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
event = console_audit.build_event(
|
||||
action_id="merge_pr",
|
||||
result=console_audit.RESULT_DENIED,
|
||||
decision=console_authz.authorize("merge_pr", _principal("admin")),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertIsInstance(event["decision"], dict)
|
||||
self.assertIn("allowed", event["decision"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestConsoleRoutes(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC4 — the wired Phase 2 integration points, still fail-closed."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.client = TestClient(create_app(bind_host="127.0.0.1"))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unauthenticated_write_stub_is_denied(self):
|
||||
"""Required test: default-deny for unauthenticated write stubs."""
|
||||
response = self.client.post(
|
||||
"/api/actions/merge_pr/attempt", json={"pr_number": 99}
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 403)
|
||||
body = response.json()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(body["success"])
|
||||
authorization = body["authorization"]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(authorization["allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
authorization["reason_code"], console_authz.DENY_UNAUTHENTICATED
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(authorization["execution_enabled"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_preview_reports_an_authorization_decision(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/api/actions/merge_pr/preview?pr_number=7")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
|
||||
authorization = response.json()["authorization"]
|
||||
self.assertFalse(authorization["allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(authorization["dual_control"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(authorization["required_role"], "controller")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_action_preview_still_404s(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/api/actions/no_such_action/preview")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 404)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_security_model_endpoint_publishes_all_three_policies(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/api/console/security-model")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
|
||||
body = response.json()
|
||||
self.assertIn("rbac", body)
|
||||
self.assertIn("redaction", body)
|
||||
self.assertIn("audit", body)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(body["rbac"]["default_decision"], "deny")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_security_model_endpoint_leaks_no_secrets(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/api/console/security-model")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(response.json()), [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_security_model_rejects_writes(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.post("/api/console/security-model", json={})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 405)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_existing_read_routes_are_unaffected(self):
|
||||
for path in ("/", "/health", "/actions", "/api/actions"):
|
||||
with self.subTest(path=path):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.client.get(path).status_code, 200)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAuthzAuditDoc(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""The model must be written down, not only coded."""
|
||||
|
||||
@classmethod
|
||||
def setUpClass(cls):
|
||||
cls.text = (
|
||||
AUTHZ_DOC.read_text(encoding="utf-8") if AUTHZ_DOC.exists() else ""
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_exists(self):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(AUTHZ_DOC.exists(), f"missing {AUTHZ_DOC}")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_covers_each_required_section(self):
|
||||
for heading in (
|
||||
"Identity sources",
|
||||
"Role matrix",
|
||||
"Privileged actions",
|
||||
"Secret redaction",
|
||||
"Audit event schema",
|
||||
"Retention",
|
||||
"Phase 2 integration",
|
||||
"Local-dev mode",
|
||||
):
|
||||
with self.subTest(heading=heading):
|
||||
self.assertIn(heading, self.text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_names_every_role(self):
|
||||
for role in console_authz.ROLE_ORDER:
|
||||
with self.subTest(role=role):
|
||||
self.assertIn(role, self.text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_names_every_console_action(self):
|
||||
for action_id in console_authz.ACTIONS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(action=action_id):
|
||||
self.assertIn(action_id, self.text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_states_retention_defaults(self):
|
||||
for days in console_audit.RETENTION_DAYS.values():
|
||||
with self.subTest(days=days):
|
||||
self.assertIn(str(days), self.text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_warns_local_dev_is_insecure(self):
|
||||
self.assertIn("INSECURE", self.text.upper())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_states_default_deny(self):
|
||||
self.assertIn("deny", self.text.lower())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_doc_contains_no_secret_material(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_for_secrets(self.text), [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_deployment_doc_links_to_the_model(self):
|
||||
deployment = (DOCS / "webui-deployment.md").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
self.assertIn("webui-authz-audit", deployment)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__": # pragma: no cover
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for the Phase 1 operator console application shell (#638)."""
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
from starlette.routing import Route
|
||||
from starlette.testclient import TestClient
|
||||
|
||||
from webui import layout
|
||||
from webui.app import create_app
|
||||
from webui.nav import NAV_GROUPS, STUB_PAGES, nav_hrefs
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestShellNav(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.client = TestClient(create_app())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_nav_group_labels_present(self):
|
||||
text = self.client.get("/").text
|
||||
for group in NAV_GROUPS:
|
||||
with self.subTest(group=group.label):
|
||||
self.assertIn(f">{group.label}<", text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_phase1_group_labels_cover_expected_ia(self):
|
||||
labels = {group.label for group in NAV_GROUPS}
|
||||
for expected in (
|
||||
"Health",
|
||||
"Traffic",
|
||||
"Runtime/Sessions",
|
||||
"Projects",
|
||||
"Inventory",
|
||||
"Timeline",
|
||||
"Policy",
|
||||
"Insights",
|
||||
):
|
||||
with self.subTest(label=expected):
|
||||
self.assertIn(expected, labels)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_nav_href_resolves_to_a_get_route(self):
|
||||
app = create_app()
|
||||
get_paths = {
|
||||
route.path
|
||||
for route in app.routes
|
||||
if isinstance(route, Route) and "GET" in route.methods
|
||||
}
|
||||
for href in nav_hrefs():
|
||||
with self.subTest(href=href):
|
||||
self.assertIn(href, get_paths, f"nav href {href} has no GET route")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_legacy_hrefs_still_navigable(self):
|
||||
text = self.client.get("/").text
|
||||
for href in ("/queue", "/projects", "/prompts", "/runtime",
|
||||
"/audit", "/worktrees", "/leases", "/actions"):
|
||||
with self.subTest(href=href):
|
||||
self.assertIn(f'href="{href}"', text)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestShellBadges(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.client = TestClient(create_app())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mode_badge_present(self):
|
||||
self.assertIn("mode: read-only", self.client.get("/").text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_environment_badge_present(self):
|
||||
self.assertIn("env:", self.client.get("/").text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_default_environment_is_local(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(layout.environment_label(), "local")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_remote_bind_reports_remote_environment(self):
|
||||
import os
|
||||
|
||||
prior = os.environ.get("WEBUI_HOST")
|
||||
os.environ["WEBUI_HOST"] = "10.0.0.5"
|
||||
try:
|
||||
self.assertEqual(layout.environment_label(), "remote")
|
||||
finally:
|
||||
if prior is None:
|
||||
os.environ.pop("WEBUI_HOST", None)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
os.environ["WEBUI_HOST"] = prior
|
||||
|
||||
def test_docs_link_present(self):
|
||||
text = self.client.get("/").text
|
||||
self.assertIn(layout.DOCS_URL, text)
|
||||
self.assertIn(">Docs<", text)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestShellStubs(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.client = TestClient(create_app())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stub_routes_render_200(self):
|
||||
for path, (title, _desc) in STUB_PAGES.items():
|
||||
with self.subTest(path=path):
|
||||
response = self.client.get(path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200, path)
|
||||
self.assertIn(title, response.text)
|
||||
self.assertIn("placeholder", response.text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stub_routes_are_read_only(self):
|
||||
for path in STUB_PAGES:
|
||||
with self.subTest(path=path):
|
||||
response = self.client.post(path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 405)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.json()["error"], "read-only-mvp")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stub_pages_carry_nav_and_badges(self):
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/inventory")
|
||||
self.assertIn("mode: read-only", response.text)
|
||||
self.assertIn('href="/queue"', response.text)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestShellHome(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.client = TestClient(create_app())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_home_summarizes_console(self):
|
||||
text = self.client.get("/").text
|
||||
self.assertIn("Operator console", text)
|
||||
self.assertIn("Phase 1", text)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_home_links_legacy_pages(self):
|
||||
text = self.client.get("/").text
|
||||
self.assertIn("MVP legacy pages", text)
|
||||
for href in ("/queue", "/audit", "/leases"):
|
||||
with self.subTest(href=href):
|
||||
self.assertIn(f'href="{href}"', text)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
|
||||
"""Tests for the read-only system-health API (#634).
|
||||
|
||||
Covers the acceptance criteria directly: a structured payload with readiness
|
||||
and a dependency list (AC1), version and uptime when knowable (AC2), stale
|
||||
runtime reported without a false mutation-safe claim (AC3), and the healthy /
|
||||
degraded-dependency / redaction cases (AC4).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import sqlite3
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
import tempfile
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
from unittest import mock
|
||||
|
||||
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
|
||||
|
||||
from starlette.testclient import TestClient
|
||||
|
||||
import control_plane_db
|
||||
from webui.app import create_app
|
||||
from webui.deployment_boundary import scan_text_for_client_secrets
|
||||
from webui.system_health import (
|
||||
API_PATH,
|
||||
STATUS_DEGRADED,
|
||||
STATUS_DOWN,
|
||||
STATUS_OK,
|
||||
STATUS_SKIPPED,
|
||||
DependencyProbe,
|
||||
StaleRuntime,
|
||||
assess_stale_runtime,
|
||||
clear_probe_cache,
|
||||
load_system_health,
|
||||
namespace_summaries,
|
||||
probe_control_plane_db,
|
||||
probe_gitea,
|
||||
process_uptime,
|
||||
redact,
|
||||
redact_url,
|
||||
snapshot_to_dict,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _probe(name, status, *, required=True, detail="detail", kind="test"):
|
||||
return DependencyProbe(
|
||||
name=name,
|
||||
kind=kind,
|
||||
status=status,
|
||||
detail=detail,
|
||||
required=required,
|
||||
latency_ms=1.5,
|
||||
metadata={},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
_ALL_HEALTHY = (
|
||||
_probe("control_plane_db", STATUS_OK, kind="sqlite"),
|
||||
_probe("repository", STATUS_OK, kind="git"),
|
||||
_probe("gitea", STATUS_OK, required=False, kind="http"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
_CLEAN_PARITY = StaleRuntime(
|
||||
daemon_head="abc123",
|
||||
checkout_head="abc123",
|
||||
remote_head="abc123",
|
||||
stale=False,
|
||||
determinable=True,
|
||||
mutation_safe=True,
|
||||
reasons=(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class CleanParityMixin:
|
||||
"""Pin parity for tests about aggregation rather than staleness.
|
||||
|
||||
Without this the assertions depend on the real checkout: a worktree whose
|
||||
branch is ahead of its upstream is genuinely stale, which would degrade the
|
||||
overall status and make these cases fail for an unrelated reason.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
super().setUp()
|
||||
patcher = mock.patch(
|
||||
"webui.system_health.assess_stale_runtime",
|
||||
return_value=_CLEAN_PARITY,
|
||||
)
|
||||
patcher.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(patcher.stop)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestDependencyAggregation(CleanParityMixin, unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC1 — readiness and dependency list derived from probe results."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_all_healthy_is_ok_and_ready(self):
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=_ALL_HEALTHY, daemon_head="abc123")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(snapshot.status, STATUS_OK)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(snapshot.ready)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(snapshot.readiness_complete)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(snapshot.readiness_reasons, ())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(snapshot.dependencies), 3)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_required_dependency_down_blocks_readiness(self):
|
||||
probes = (
|
||||
_probe("control_plane_db", STATUS_DOWN, detail="file missing", kind="sqlite"),
|
||||
_probe("repository", STATUS_OK, kind="git"),
|
||||
_probe("gitea", STATUS_OK, required=False, kind="http"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=probes, daemon_head="abc123")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(snapshot.status, STATUS_DOWN)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(snapshot.ready)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("control_plane_db" in reason for reason in snapshot.readiness_reasons)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_optional_dependency_down_degrades_but_stays_ready(self):
|
||||
"""A failing optional probe must not claim the process itself is unready."""
|
||||
probes = (
|
||||
_probe("control_plane_db", STATUS_OK, kind="sqlite"),
|
||||
_probe("repository", STATUS_OK, kind="git"),
|
||||
_probe("gitea", STATUS_DOWN, required=False, detail="timeout", kind="http"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=probes, daemon_head="abc123")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(snapshot.status, STATUS_DEGRADED)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(snapshot.ready)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(any("gitea" in reason for reason in snapshot.readiness_reasons))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unrun_required_probe_leaves_readiness_incomplete(self):
|
||||
"""Not probed is not the same as passing."""
|
||||
probes = (
|
||||
_probe("control_plane_db", STATUS_OK, kind="sqlite"),
|
||||
_probe("repository", STATUS_SKIPPED, detail="offline", kind="git"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=probes, daemon_head="abc123")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(snapshot.ready)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(snapshot.readiness_complete)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(snapshot.status, STATUS_DEGRADED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_skipped_optional_probe_does_not_block_readiness(self):
|
||||
probes = (
|
||||
_probe("control_plane_db", STATUS_OK, kind="sqlite"),
|
||||
_probe("repository", STATUS_OK, kind="git"),
|
||||
_probe("gitea", STATUS_SKIPPED, required=False, kind="http"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=probes, daemon_head="abc123")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(snapshot.ready)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(snapshot.readiness_complete)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestVersionAndUptime(CleanParityMixin, unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC2 — version and uptime present when knowable."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_uptime_and_start_time_present(self):
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=_ALL_HEALTHY, daemon_head="abc123")
|
||||
self.assertGreaterEqual(snapshot.uptime_seconds, 0.0)
|
||||
self.assertIn("T", snapshot.started_at)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_process_uptime_helper_matches_shape(self):
|
||||
started_at, uptime = process_uptime()
|
||||
self.assertIn("T", started_at)
|
||||
self.assertGreaterEqual(uptime, 0.0)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_version_reports_python_and_schema_version(self):
|
||||
probes = (
|
||||
DependencyProbe(
|
||||
name="control_plane_db",
|
||||
kind="sqlite",
|
||||
status=STATUS_OK,
|
||||
detail="ok",
|
||||
required=True,
|
||||
latency_ms=1.0,
|
||||
metadata={"schema_version": control_plane_db.SCHEMA_VERSION},
|
||||
),
|
||||
_probe("repository", STATUS_OK, kind="git"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=probes, daemon_head="abc123")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
snapshot.version.control_plane_schema_version,
|
||||
control_plane_db.SCHEMA_VERSION,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(snapshot.version.python_version)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_version_known_flag_false_when_sha_unavailable(self):
|
||||
with mock.patch("webui.system_health._git", return_value=None):
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=_ALL_HEALTHY, daemon_head="abc")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(snapshot.version.git_sha)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(snapshot.version.known)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestStaleRuntime(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC3 — stale runtime reflected without a false mutation-safe claim."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_matching_commits_are_mutation_safe(self):
|
||||
assessment = assess_stale_runtime(
|
||||
Path("/tmp"),
|
||||
daemon_head="aaa",
|
||||
git_reader=lambda *args: "aaa",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assessment.stale)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(assessment.determinable)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(assessment.mutation_safe)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_diverged_commits_are_stale_and_not_mutation_safe(self):
|
||||
reads = {"HEAD": "aaa", "@{upstream}": "bbb"}
|
||||
assessment = assess_stale_runtime(
|
||||
Path("/tmp"),
|
||||
daemon_head="aaa",
|
||||
git_reader=lambda *args: reads.get(args[-1]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(assessment.stale)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assessment.mutation_safe)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(assessment.reasons)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_remote_is_not_mutation_safe(self):
|
||||
"""Indeterminate must never read as safe."""
|
||||
reads = {"HEAD": "aaa", "@{upstream}": None}
|
||||
assessment = assess_stale_runtime(
|
||||
Path("/tmp"),
|
||||
daemon_head="aaa",
|
||||
git_reader=lambda *args: reads.get(args[-1]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assessment.determinable)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assessment.mutation_safe)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(assessment.stale)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("indeterminate" in reason for reason in assessment.reasons)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unobservable_daemon_head_is_disclosed(self):
|
||||
assessment = assess_stale_runtime(
|
||||
Path("/tmp"),
|
||||
git_reader=lambda *args: "aaa",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
any("not observable" in reason for reason in assessment.reasons)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_runtime_degrades_overall_status(self):
|
||||
reads = {"HEAD": "aaa", "@{upstream}": "bbb"}
|
||||
# Pinned rather than inherited: this path uses the default git reader,
|
||||
# so the assertion must hold whether or not the suite runs offline.
|
||||
with mock.patch.dict(os.environ, {"WEBUI_TEST_OFFLINE": ""}), mock.patch(
|
||||
"webui.system_health._git",
|
||||
side_effect=lambda repo, *args: reads.get(args[-1]),
|
||||
):
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=_ALL_HEALTHY, daemon_head="aaa")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(snapshot.stale_runtime.stale)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(snapshot.stale_runtime.mutation_safe)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(snapshot.status, STATUS_DEGRADED)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestControlPlaneDbProbe(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""The required local dependency, probed read-only."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.tmp = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(self.tmp.cleanup)
|
||||
self.db_path = str(Path(self.tmp.name) / "control-plane.db")
|
||||
|
||||
def _build_db(self, schema_version):
|
||||
conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db_path)
|
||||
conn.execute("CREATE TABLE schema_meta (key TEXT PRIMARY KEY, value TEXT)")
|
||||
conn.execute("CREATE TABLE leases (lease_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY, status TEXT)")
|
||||
conn.execute(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO schema_meta(key, value) VALUES ('schema_version', ?)",
|
||||
(str(schema_version),),
|
||||
)
|
||||
conn.execute("INSERT INTO leases(lease_id, status) VALUES ('l1', 'active')")
|
||||
conn.commit()
|
||||
conn.close()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_missing_database_is_down(self):
|
||||
probe = probe_control_plane_db(str(Path(self.tmp.name) / "absent.db"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(probe.status, STATUS_DOWN)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(probe.required)
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(probe.latency_ms)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_matching_schema_is_ok(self):
|
||||
self._build_db(control_plane_db.SCHEMA_VERSION)
|
||||
probe = probe_control_plane_db(self.db_path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(probe.status, STATUS_OK)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
probe.metadata["schema_version"], control_plane_db.SCHEMA_VERSION
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(probe.metadata["active_leases"], 1)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mismatched_schema_is_degraded(self):
|
||||
self._build_db(control_plane_db.SCHEMA_VERSION + 99)
|
||||
probe = probe_control_plane_db(self.db_path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(probe.status, STATUS_DEGRADED)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_probe_does_not_create_a_database(self):
|
||||
"""A health check must never initialise the substrate it inspects."""
|
||||
absent = str(Path(self.tmp.name) / "never-created.db")
|
||||
probe_control_plane_db(absent)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(Path(absent).exists())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unreadable_database_is_down_not_raised(self):
|
||||
Path(self.db_path).write_text("this is not a sqlite database")
|
||||
probe = probe_control_plane_db(self.db_path)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(probe.status, STATUS_DOWN)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestRedaction(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""AC4 — redaction. No credential-shaped text crosses the boundary."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_redacts_token_assignment(self):
|
||||
cleaned = redact("failed with token=ghp_ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ012345")
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("ghp_ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ012345", cleaned)
|
||||
self.assertIn("[redacted]", cleaned)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_redacts_authorization_header_text(self):
|
||||
cleaned = redact("Authorization: Bearer abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz123456")
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz123456", cleaned)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_redacts_long_opaque_strings(self):
|
||||
cleaned = redact("value 0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef here")
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef", cleaned)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_url_userinfo_and_query_are_stripped(self):
|
||||
cleaned = redact_url("https://user:[email protected]/api/v1?token=xyz")
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("secretpass", cleaned)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("token=xyz", cleaned)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cleaned, "https://gitea.example.com/api/v1")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_url_inside_free_text_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
cleaned = redact("GET https://u:[email protected]/x?token=abc failed")
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("u:p@", cleaned)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("token=abc", cleaned)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_gitea_probe_failure_detail_is_redacted(self):
|
||||
boom = RuntimeError(
|
||||
"connection refused for https://user:[email protected]/api/v1/version"
|
||||
)
|
||||
with mock.patch("webui.system_health.get_auth_header", return_value="token x"), \
|
||||
mock.patch("webui.system_health.api_request", side_effect=boom):
|
||||
probe = probe_gitea("gitea.example.com")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(probe.status, STATUS_DOWN)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("hunter2", probe.detail)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_text_for_client_secrets(probe.detail), [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_credential_guard_refusal_is_a_status_not_a_crash(self):
|
||||
with mock.patch(
|
||||
"webui.system_health.get_auth_header",
|
||||
side_effect=RuntimeError("daemon guard refused"),
|
||||
):
|
||||
probe = probe_gitea("gitea.example.com")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(probe.status, STATUS_DEGRADED)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(probe.required)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestNamespaceSummaries(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""A web process cannot prove IDE namespace health, and must not claim to."""
|
||||
|
||||
def test_every_namespace_reports_unproven(self):
|
||||
rows = namespace_summaries()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(rows)
|
||||
for row in rows:
|
||||
with self.subTest(namespace=row["namespace"]):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(row["status"], "unproven")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(row["ide_namespace_proven"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("client_namespace", row["reason"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestSystemHealthRoutes(CleanParityMixin, unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""The HTTP surface: versioned path, status codes, read-only guard."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
super().setUp()
|
||||
clear_probe_cache()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(clear_probe_cache)
|
||||
self.client = TestClient(create_app())
|
||||
|
||||
def _patch_snapshot(self, probes, daemon_head="abc123"):
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=probes, daemon_head=daemon_head)
|
||||
patcher = mock.patch(
|
||||
"webui.app.load_system_health",
|
||||
return_value=snapshot,
|
||||
)
|
||||
patcher.start()
|
||||
self.addCleanup(patcher.stop)
|
||||
return snapshot
|
||||
|
||||
def test_versioned_route_is_registered(self):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(API_PATH, "/api/v1/system/health")
|
||||
self._patch_snapshot(_ALL_HEALTHY)
|
||||
response = self.client.get(API_PATH)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_healthy_payload_shape(self):
|
||||
self._patch_snapshot(_ALL_HEALTHY)
|
||||
data = self.client.get(API_PATH).json()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(data["status"], STATUS_OK)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(data["readiness"]["ready"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(data["readiness"]["complete"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(data["api"], API_PATH)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(data["dependencies"]), 3)
|
||||
for key in ("version", "process", "stale_runtime", "mcp_namespaces"):
|
||||
self.assertIn(key, data)
|
||||
self.assertIn("uptime_seconds", data["process"])
|
||||
self.assertIn("mutation_safe", data["stale_runtime"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_degraded_dependency_returns_503(self):
|
||||
probes = (
|
||||
_probe("control_plane_db", STATUS_DOWN, detail="missing", kind="sqlite"),
|
||||
_probe("repository", STATUS_OK, kind="git"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._patch_snapshot(probes)
|
||||
response = self.client.get(API_PATH)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 503)
|
||||
data = response.json()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(data["readiness"]["ready"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(data["readiness"]["reasons"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dependency_entries_expose_status_and_latency(self):
|
||||
self._patch_snapshot(_ALL_HEALTHY)
|
||||
data = self.client.get(API_PATH).json()
|
||||
names = {entry["name"] for entry in data["dependencies"]}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(names, {"control_plane_db", "repository", "gitea"})
|
||||
for entry in data["dependencies"]:
|
||||
with self.subTest(dependency=entry["name"]):
|
||||
self.assertIn("status", entry)
|
||||
self.assertIn("required", entry)
|
||||
self.assertIn("latency_ms", entry)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_response_body_carries_no_client_secrets(self):
|
||||
self._patch_snapshot(_ALL_HEALTHY)
|
||||
body = self.client.get(API_PATH).text
|
||||
self.assertEqual(scan_text_for_client_secrets(body), [])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_deep_flag_is_forwarded(self):
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=_ALL_HEALTHY, daemon_head="abc")
|
||||
with mock.patch(
|
||||
"webui.app.load_system_health", return_value=snapshot
|
||||
) as loader:
|
||||
self.client.get(f"{API_PATH}?deep=1")
|
||||
loader.assert_called_once_with(deep=True)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_shallow_is_the_default(self):
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=_ALL_HEALTHY, daemon_head="abc")
|
||||
with mock.patch(
|
||||
"webui.app.load_system_health", return_value=snapshot
|
||||
) as loader:
|
||||
self.client.get(API_PATH)
|
||||
loader.assert_called_once_with(deep=False)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_route_rejects_mutation_methods(self):
|
||||
for method in ("POST", "PUT", "PATCH", "DELETE"):
|
||||
with self.subTest(method=method):
|
||||
response = self.client.request(method, API_PATH)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 405)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.json()["error"], "read-only-mvp")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_default_shallow_call_skips_the_network_probe(self):
|
||||
"""The expensive probe must not run unless it was asked for."""
|
||||
with mock.patch("webui.system_health.probe_gitea") as probe:
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(deep=False)
|
||||
probe.assert_not_called()
|
||||
gitea = next(p for p in snapshot.dependencies if p.name == "gitea")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(gitea.status, STATUS_SKIPPED)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestHealthRouteBackwardCompatibility(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""`/health` is expanded additively; MVP consumers must keep working."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.client = TestClient(create_app())
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mvp_keys_are_unchanged(self):
|
||||
data = self.client.get("/health").json()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(data["status"], "ok")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(data["service"], "mcp-control-plane-webui")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(data["mode"], "read-only-mvp")
|
||||
self.assertIn("timestamp", data)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(data["deployment"]["mode"], "internal-operator-console")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_health_points_at_the_versioned_api(self):
|
||||
data = self.client.get("/health").json()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(data["system_health_api"], API_PATH)
|
||||
self.assertIn("uptime_seconds", data)
|
||||
self.assertIn("started_at", data)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_health_runs_no_dependency_probe(self):
|
||||
"""Liveness must stay cheap: no probe, no snapshot assembly."""
|
||||
with mock.patch("webui.app.load_system_health") as loader:
|
||||
response = self.client.get("/health")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
|
||||
loader.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestSnapshotSerialisation(CleanParityMixin, unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def test_snapshot_dict_is_json_serialisable(self):
|
||||
snapshot = load_system_health(probes=_ALL_HEALTHY, daemon_head="abc123")
|
||||
encoded = json.dumps(snapshot_to_dict(snapshot))
|
||||
self.assertIn("readiness", encoded)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -134,13 +134,35 @@ class TestClassification(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_OPEN_PR)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_clean_issue_worktree_removable(self):
|
||||
# Scenario 5: clean issue worktree, TTL expired, no lock -> removable.
|
||||
def test_stale_clean_issue_worktree_needs_merged_pr_proof(self):
|
||||
# Scenario 5 (#858): age is not proof that the branch landed, so a
|
||||
# TTL-expired issue worktree stays active work. Only authoritative
|
||||
# merged-PR evidence makes it removable, which is what keeps a
|
||||
# worktree holding unmerged commits from being reclaimed by age.
|
||||
cls = wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_ACTIVE_ISSUE_WORK)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(wca.is_removable(cls))
|
||||
|
||||
cls = wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_ISSUE_WORK,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
merged_pr_cleanup={"proven": True},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(wca.is_removable(cls))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_clean_conflict_fix_worktree_removable(self):
|
||||
# conflict_fix keeps the original TTL rule; #858 changed issue work only.
|
||||
cls = wca.classify_worktree(
|
||||
workflow_type=wca.WORKFLOW_CONFLICT_FIX,
|
||||
is_dirty=False,
|
||||
ttl_expired=True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(cls, wca.CLASS_CLEAN_STALE_REMOVABLE)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(wca.is_removable(cls))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user