feat(reconciler): PR-scoped post-merge cleanup executor + expired reviewer-lease reclaim (Closes #855)
Adds a single-target path for post-merge cleanup so a reconciler can
complete one merged PR without a batch sweep across unrelated PRs.
## PR-scoped selector
gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups gains an optional pr_number. When set,
only that merged PR is assessed and acted on: the PR is resolved live and
fails closed on an invalid/non-positive number, an unresolvable or
ambiguous PR, or an unmerged PR; reviewer scratch worktrees are filtered
to that PR; and the report's entry set is pinned to exactly [pr_number],
failing closed on any drift. The existing execute loop then operates on
the single pinned entry only -- worktree removal, ownership reassessment,
then remote-branch delete -- with no unrelated target. Batch behaviour is
unchanged when pr_number is omitted.
## Expired reviewer-lease reclaim (AC4)
An expired or stale reviewer lease no longer protects an already-merged
branch forever. branch_cleanup_guard.assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim
makes the decision explicitly and fail-closed: reclaim only when the lease
is a reviewer lease, its status is expired/stale, the PR is proven merged,
the owner process is proven dead, and no competing active claimant uses
the branch. _collect_branch_ownership_records supplies that evidence from
authoritative state (live PR merged-state, lease owner liveness, and the
full ownership inventory for competing-claimant detection) and evaluates
it only after the complete inventory is built, so the post-worktree-removal
reassessment is what unblocks the branch delete. Any unknown fails closed.
Author/merger/controller/reconciler leases are untouched; active leases,
worktree bindings, issue locks, and live sessions still block.
## Tests
- tests/test_issue_855_expired_reviewer_reclaim.py: full fail-closed matrix
for the reclaim decision plus collector wiring (merged+dead+uncontested
reclaims; unmerged, live-owner, competing-worktree, and author-lease
cases stay protective).
- tests/test_branch_cleanup_guard.py: exact-PR selector coverage (ignores
newer PRs in the batch queue, execute mutates only the selected PR,
unknown/not-merged/invalid fail closed, batch mode preserved).
Changed-surface suites pass; the 2 pre-existing test_branch_cleanup_guard
failures and test_reconciler_supersession_close reproduce identically on
master 6d0015ca and are unrelated to this change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1639,6 +1639,358 @@ class TestSecondRemediationIntegration(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
self.assertTrue(ownership_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestIssue855ExactPrSelector(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""#855: exact pr_number pin for reconcile_merged_cleanups (#851 lifecycle)."""
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self._remotes = patch.dict(
|
||||
mcp_server.REMOTES,
|
||||
{
|
||||
"prgs": {
|
||||
"host": "gitea.example.com",
|
||||
"org": "Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
"repo": "Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
self._remotes.start()
|
||||
patch("gitea_audit.audit_enabled", return_value=False).start()
|
||||
self.mock_api = patch("mcp_server.api_request").start()
|
||||
self.mock_all = patch("mcp_server.api_get_all", return_value=[]).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.get_auth_header", return_value=FAKE_AUTH).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.is_head_ancestor_of_ref",
|
||||
return_value=True,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.get_profile",
|
||||
return_value=dict(RECONCILER_WITH_DELETE),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._profile_operation_gate",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
return_value={"records": [], "inventory_error": False},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.discover_reviewer_scratch_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=[],
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server.verify_preflight_purity", return_value=None).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.audit_reconciliation_mode.check_cleanup_execution_allowed",
|
||||
return_value=(True, []),
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
|
||||
def tearDown(self):
|
||||
patch.stopall()
|
||||
|
||||
def _merged_pr(self, number, branch, sha="c" * 40):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"number": number,
|
||||
"title": f"PR {number}",
|
||||
"body": f"Closes #{number - 4}",
|
||||
"merged": True,
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-23T12:00:00Z",
|
||||
"merge_commit_sha": "f" * 40,
|
||||
"state": "closed",
|
||||
"head": {"ref": branch, "sha": sha},
|
||||
"base": {"ref": "master"},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_848_ignores_newer_852_in_batch_queue(self):
|
||||
"""pr_number=848 selects only #848 even when #852 is newer/first."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
pr_848 = self._merged_pr(
|
||||
848, "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers", sha="c3f282ba" + "0" * 32
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Closed list would rank #852 first in batch mode; exact pin must ignore it.
|
||||
closed_batch = [
|
||||
self._merged_pr(852, "fix/issue-851-cleanup-worktree-before-remote-delete"),
|
||||
pr_848,
|
||||
self._merged_pr(849, "fix/issue-849-other"),
|
||||
self._merged_pr(846, "fix/issue-846-other"),
|
||||
self._merged_pr(845, "fix/issue-845-other"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
batch_fetch_calls = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and url.rstrip("/").endswith("/pulls/848"):
|
||||
return dict(pr_848)
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "/pulls/" in url:
|
||||
raise AssertionError(f"unexpected PR fetch: {url}")
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "/branches/" in url:
|
||||
return {"name": "present"}
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_all(url, auth, limit=None):
|
||||
batch_fetch_calls.append((url, limit))
|
||||
if "state=open" in url:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
if "state=closed" in url:
|
||||
# Exact mode must not use the closed batch list.
|
||||
raise AssertionError(
|
||||
"exact pr_number mode must not page closed PRs: " + url
|
||||
)
|
||||
return []
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
self.mock_all.side_effect = fake_all
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._remote_branch_exists",
|
||||
return_value=True,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
side_effect=lambda **kwargs: {
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": int(pr["number"]),
|
||||
"head_branch": (pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref"),
|
||||
"issue_number": 844,
|
||||
"remote_branch": {
|
||||
"safe_to_delete_remote": True,
|
||||
"head_branch": (pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
|
||||
"worktree_path": (
|
||||
"/tmp/branches/fix-issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
|
||||
),
|
||||
},
|
||||
"planned_execution_order": (
|
||||
mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.plan_cleanup_execution_order(
|
||||
remote_assessment={"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
local_assessment={"safe_to_remove_worktree": True},
|
||||
)
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
for pr in kwargs.get("closed_prs") or []
|
||||
if pr.get("merged_at") or pr.get("merged")
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
"merged_pr_count": len(kwargs.get("closed_prs") or []),
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=True,
|
||||
pr_number=848,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("performed"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selection_mode"), "exact_pr")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selected_pr_number"), 848)
|
||||
entries = res.get("entries") or []
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(entries), 1, entries)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(entries[0].get("pr_number"), 848)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
entries[0].get("head_branch"),
|
||||
"fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers",
|
||||
)
|
||||
# No other PR appears in plan.
|
||||
self.assertEqual(list((res.get("planned_execution_orders") or {}).keys()), ["848"])
|
||||
plan = (res.get("planned_execution_orders") or {}).get("848") or []
|
||||
actions = [s.get("action") for s in plan]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
actions,
|
||||
[
|
||||
"remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
"reassess_branch_ownership",
|
||||
"delete_remote_branch",
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Prove we never scanned the multi-PR closed batch.
|
||||
self.assertFalse(any("state=closed" in (u or "") for u, _ in batch_fetch_calls))
|
||||
# closed_batch fixture must remain unused (sanity).
|
||||
self.assertEqual(closed_batch[0]["number"], 852)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_execute_only_mutates_selected_pr(self):
|
||||
"""Execute with pr_number must never touch #845/#846/#849/#852."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
pr_848 = self._merged_pr(848, "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers")
|
||||
worktree_path = "/tmp/branches/fix-issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"
|
||||
remove_calls = []
|
||||
delete_api_calls = []
|
||||
ownership_branches = []
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and url.rstrip("/").endswith("/pulls/848"):
|
||||
return dict(pr_848)
|
||||
if method == "DELETE":
|
||||
delete_api_calls.append(url)
|
||||
# Forbid foreign PR branch deletion by URL content.
|
||||
for forbidden in ("845", "846", "849", "852"):
|
||||
self.assertNotIn(forbidden, url)
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_remove(project_root, branch, worktree_path=None):
|
||||
remove_calls.append({"branch": branch, "worktree_path": worktree_path})
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"success": True,
|
||||
"performed": True,
|
||||
"message": f"removed {worktree_path}",
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_collect(**kwargs):
|
||||
ownership_branches.append(kwargs.get("branch"))
|
||||
return {"records": [], "inventory_error": False}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_probe(h, o, r, auth, br):
|
||||
return guard.classify_branch_readback_http_status(
|
||||
404, not_found_scope=guard.NOT_FOUND_SCOPE_BRANCH
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
self.mock_all.side_effect = lambda url, auth, limit=None: []
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._remote_branch_exists", return_value=True).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"entries": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"pr_number": 848,
|
||||
"head_branch": "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers",
|
||||
"remote_branch": {"safe_to_delete_remote": True},
|
||||
"local_worktree": {
|
||||
"safe_to_remove_worktree": True,
|
||||
"worktree_path": worktree_path,
|
||||
},
|
||||
"planned_execution_order": [
|
||||
{"action": "remove_local_worktree", "phase": 1},
|
||||
{"action": "reassess_branch_ownership", "phase": 2},
|
||||
{"action": "delete_remote_branch", "phase": 3},
|
||||
],
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [
|
||||
# Foreign scratch must be filtered before report execute loop;
|
||||
# if present here it would still be a test failure if acted on.
|
||||
],
|
||||
"merged_pr_count": 1,
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.remove_local_worktree",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_remove,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records",
|
||||
side_effect=fake_collect,
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
patch("mcp_server._probe_remote_branch", side_effect=fake_probe).start()
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
pr_number=848,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
org="Scaled-Tech-Consulting",
|
||||
repo="Gitea-Tools",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("performed") or res.get("executed"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selection_mode"), "exact_pr")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selected_pr_number"), 848)
|
||||
actions = res.get("actions") or []
|
||||
pr_numbers_touched = {
|
||||
a.get("pr_number") for a in actions if a.get("pr_number") is not None
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.assertTrue(pr_numbers_touched.issubset({None, 848}) or not pr_numbers_touched)
|
||||
removes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "remove_local_worktree"]
|
||||
deletes = [a for a in actions if a.get("action") == "delete_remote_branch"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(removes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(remove_calls[0]["branch"], "fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(deletes), 1)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertTrue(deletes[0].get("after_worktree_removal"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(delete_api_calls), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
ownership_branches, ["fix/issue-844-exclude-epic-containers"]
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_unknown_fails_closed_without_mutation(self):
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and "/pulls/99999" in url:
|
||||
raise RuntimeError("HTTP 404 Not Found")
|
||||
raise AssertionError(f"unexpected API call {method} {url}")
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=True,
|
||||
pr_number=99999,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("performed"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("blocker_kind"), "pr_unresolvable")
|
||||
self.assertIn("99999", " ".join(res.get("reasons") or []))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_not_merged_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api(method, url, *args, **kwargs):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and url.rstrip("/").endswith("/pulls/900"):
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"number": 900,
|
||||
"merged": False,
|
||||
"merged_at": None,
|
||||
"state": "open",
|
||||
"head": {"ref": "feat/x", "sha": "a" * 40},
|
||||
}
|
||||
raise AssertionError(f"unexpected {method} {url}")
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = fake_api
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=False,
|
||||
execute_confirmed=True,
|
||||
pr_number=900,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("performed"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("blocker_kind"), "pr_not_merged")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_exact_pr_invalid_number_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(
|
||||
dry_run=True,
|
||||
pr_number=0,
|
||||
remote="prgs",
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("blocker_kind"), "invalid_pr_number")
|
||||
self.mock_api.assert_not_called()
|
||||
|
||||
def test_batch_mode_still_works_without_pr_number(self):
|
||||
"""Unfiltered batch path remains backward compatible."""
|
||||
from mcp_server import gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups
|
||||
|
||||
self.mock_all.side_effect = lambda url, auth, limit=None: []
|
||||
self.mock_api.side_effect = lambda *a, **k: {}
|
||||
patch(
|
||||
"mcp_server.merged_cleanup_reconcile.build_reconciliation_report",
|
||||
return_value={
|
||||
"entries": [],
|
||||
"reviewer_scratch_entries": [],
|
||||
"merged_pr_count": 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
).start()
|
||||
res = gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups(dry_run=True, remote="prgs", limit=10)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(res.get("success"))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.get("selection_mode"), "batch")
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(res.get("selected_pr_number"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
|
||||
"""#855 AC4: an expired reviewer lease must not indefinitely protect an
|
||||
already-merged branch when no live claimant exists.
|
||||
|
||||
Two layers are covered:
|
||||
|
||||
* ``branch_cleanup_guard.assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim`` — the pure,
|
||||
fail-closed reclaim decision. Every condition must be provably satisfied or
|
||||
the lease keeps protecting the branch.
|
||||
* ``gitea_mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records`` — the wiring that
|
||||
supplies authoritative evidence (PR merged state, owner-process liveness,
|
||||
competing ownership) to that decision, and flips an expired reviewer lease
|
||||
to reclaimable only under the full policy.
|
||||
|
||||
All inputs are fabricated; no real repository, lease, or credential is used.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
import importlib
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
from unittest.mock import patch
|
||||
|
||||
import branch_cleanup_guard
|
||||
|
||||
mcp_server = importlib.import_module("gitea_mcp_server")
|
||||
|
||||
FAKE_AUTH = "token fake"
|
||||
REMOTE = "prgs"
|
||||
ORG = "Scaled-Tech-Consulting"
|
||||
REPO = "Gitea-Tools"
|
||||
HOST = "gitea.prgs.cc"
|
||||
BRANCH = "feat/issue-638-webui-app-shell-phase1"
|
||||
PR_NUMBER = 818
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestAssessExpiredReviewerLeaseReclaim(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""Pure fail-closed reclaim decision (#855 AC4)."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _call(self, **overrides):
|
||||
base = dict(
|
||||
role="reviewer",
|
||||
status="expired",
|
||||
pr_merged=True,
|
||||
owner_pid_alive=False,
|
||||
competing_active_claimant=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
base.update(overrides)
|
||||
return branch_cleanup_guard.assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim(**base)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_full_policy_satisfied_allows_reclaim(self):
|
||||
out = self._call()
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["reasons"], [])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["decision"], "reclaim_expired_reviewer_lease")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_dead_process_reviewer_also_reclaimable(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(status="stale_dead_process")
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_non_reviewer_role_never_reclaims(self):
|
||||
for role in ("author", "merger", "controller", "reconciler", "unknown"):
|
||||
with self.subTest(role=role):
|
||||
out = self._call(role=role)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
self.assertTrue(out["reasons"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(out["decision"], "keep_protecting")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_active_status_never_reclaims(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(status="active")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_not_merged_blocks_reclaim(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(pr_merged=False)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_pr_merged_unknown_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(pr_merged=None)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owner_process_alive_blocks_reclaim(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(owner_pid_alive=True)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owner_liveness_unknown_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(owner_pid_alive=None)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_active_claimant_blocks_reclaim(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(competing_active_claimant=True)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_claimant_unknown_fails_closed(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(competing_active_claimant=None)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(out["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_reasons_never_leak_secrets(self):
|
||||
out = self._call(role="author")
|
||||
blob = " ".join(out["reasons"]).lower()
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("token", blob)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("password", blob)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class _FakeLease(dict):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestCollectorExpiredReviewerReclaimWiring(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
"""`_collect_branch_ownership_records` supplies authoritative evidence and
|
||||
flips an expired reviewer lease to reclaimable only under the full policy."""
|
||||
|
||||
def _run(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
lease_role="reviewer",
|
||||
lease_freshness="stale_dead_process",
|
||||
owner_pid_alive=False,
|
||||
pr_merged=True,
|
||||
extra_leases=None,
|
||||
worktree_on_branch=False,
|
||||
):
|
||||
lease = _FakeLease(
|
||||
role=lease_role,
|
||||
work_kind="pr",
|
||||
work_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
branch=BRANCH,
|
||||
status="active",
|
||||
owner_pid=999999,
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
host=HOST,
|
||||
freshness={
|
||||
"freshness": lease_freshness,
|
||||
"owner_pid": 999999,
|
||||
"owner_pid_alive": owner_pid_alive,
|
||||
"expired_by_time": lease_freshness == "expired",
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
leases = [lease] + list(extra_leases or [])
|
||||
|
||||
pr_payload = {
|
||||
"number": PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
"merged": pr_merged,
|
||||
"merged_at": "2026-07-23T00:00:00Z" if pr_merged else None,
|
||||
"head": {"ref": BRANCH},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def fake_api_request(method, url, *a, **k):
|
||||
if method == "GET" and f"/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}" in url:
|
||||
return pr_payload
|
||||
raise AssertionError(f"unexpected api_request {method} {url}")
|
||||
|
||||
wt_entries = []
|
||||
if worktree_on_branch:
|
||||
wt_entries = [{"branch": BRANCH, "path": f"/x/branches/{BRANCH}"}]
|
||||
|
||||
with patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server.lease_lifecycle,
|
||||
"list_active_leases",
|
||||
return_value={"leases": leases},
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server.control_plane_db, "get_db", return_value=object(), create=True
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server.issue_lock_store, "iter_lock_files", return_value=[]
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server.worktree_cleanup_audit,
|
||||
"list_worktrees",
|
||||
return_value=wt_entries,
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server, "api_get_all", return_value=[]
|
||||
), patch.object(
|
||||
mcp_server, "api_request", side_effect=fake_api_request
|
||||
):
|
||||
return mcp_server._collect_branch_ownership_records(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE,
|
||||
host=HOST,
|
||||
org=ORG,
|
||||
repo=REPO,
|
||||
branch=BRANCH,
|
||||
pr_number=PR_NUMBER,
|
||||
project_root="/x",
|
||||
auth=FAKE_AUTH,
|
||||
base_api="https://gitea.prgs.cc/api/v1/repos/x/y",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
def _reviewer_records(self, bundle):
|
||||
return [
|
||||
rec
|
||||
for rec in bundle["records"]
|
||||
if rec.get("category")
|
||||
== branch_cleanup_guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_REVIEWER_LEASE
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
def test_merged_dead_uncontested_reviewer_lease_is_reclaimable(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run()
|
||||
self.assertFalse(bundle["inventory_error"])
|
||||
recs = self._reviewer_records(bundle)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(recs), 1)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
# And the guard consequently does not block deletion on it.
|
||||
ownership = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_active_branch_ownership(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, branch=BRANCH, host=HOST,
|
||||
records=bundle["records"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(ownership["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unmerged_pr_keeps_reviewer_lease_protective(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run(pr_merged=False)
|
||||
recs = self._reviewer_records(bundle)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(recs), 1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
ownership = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_active_branch_ownership(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, branch=BRANCH, host=HOST,
|
||||
records=bundle["records"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(ownership["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_owner_process_alive_keeps_reviewer_lease_protective(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run(owner_pid_alive=True, lease_freshness="expired")
|
||||
recs = self._reviewer_records(bundle)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_competing_worktree_binding_keeps_reviewer_lease_protective(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run(worktree_on_branch=True)
|
||||
recs = self._reviewer_records(bundle)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
ownership = branch_cleanup_guard.assess_active_branch_ownership(
|
||||
remote=REMOTE, org=ORG, repo=REPO, branch=BRANCH, host=HOST,
|
||||
records=bundle["records"],
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(ownership["block"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_expired_author_lease_never_reclaimed_by_reviewer_policy(self):
|
||||
bundle = self._run(lease_role="author")
|
||||
author_recs = [
|
||||
rec
|
||||
for rec in bundle["records"]
|
||||
if rec.get("category")
|
||||
== branch_cleanup_guard.OWNERSHIP_CATEGORY_AUTHOR_LEASE
|
||||
]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(author_recs), 1)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(author_recs[0]["reclaim_allowed"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user