feat(reconciler): PR-scoped post-merge cleanup executor + expired reviewer-lease reclaim (Closes #855)

Adds a single-target path for post-merge cleanup so a reconciler can
complete one merged PR without a batch sweep across unrelated PRs.

## PR-scoped selector

gitea_reconcile_merged_cleanups gains an optional pr_number. When set,
only that merged PR is assessed and acted on: the PR is resolved live and
fails closed on an invalid/non-positive number, an unresolvable or
ambiguous PR, or an unmerged PR; reviewer scratch worktrees are filtered
to that PR; and the report's entry set is pinned to exactly [pr_number],
failing closed on any drift. The existing execute loop then operates on
the single pinned entry only -- worktree removal, ownership reassessment,
then remote-branch delete -- with no unrelated target. Batch behaviour is
unchanged when pr_number is omitted.

## Expired reviewer-lease reclaim (AC4)

An expired or stale reviewer lease no longer protects an already-merged
branch forever. branch_cleanup_guard.assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim
makes the decision explicitly and fail-closed: reclaim only when the lease
is a reviewer lease, its status is expired/stale, the PR is proven merged,
the owner process is proven dead, and no competing active claimant uses
the branch. _collect_branch_ownership_records supplies that evidence from
authoritative state (live PR merged-state, lease owner liveness, and the
full ownership inventory for competing-claimant detection) and evaluates
it only after the complete inventory is built, so the post-worktree-removal
reassessment is what unblocks the branch delete. Any unknown fails closed.

Author/merger/controller/reconciler leases are untouched; active leases,
worktree bindings, issue locks, and live sessions still block.

## Tests

- tests/test_issue_855_expired_reviewer_reclaim.py: full fail-closed matrix
  for the reclaim decision plus collector wiring (merged+dead+uncontested
  reclaims; unmerged, live-owner, competing-worktree, and author-lease
  cases stay protective).
- tests/test_branch_cleanup_guard.py: exact-PR selector coverage (ignores
  newer PRs in the batch queue, execute mutates only the selected PR,
  unknown/not-merged/invalid fail closed, batch mode preserved).

Changed-surface suites pass; the 2 pre-existing test_branch_cleanup_guard
failures and test_reconciler_supersession_close reproduce identically on
master 6d0015ca and are unrelated to this change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-24 00:49:52 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 6d0015cabc
commit 24c52abf6b
4 changed files with 893 additions and 11 deletions
+84
View File
@@ -525,6 +525,90 @@ def assess_ownership_record_activity(record: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
}
# Reviewer-lease reclaim is only reachable from a non-live (expired/stale) lease.
_RECLAIMABLE_REVIEWER_STATUSES = _EXPIRED_STATUSES | _STALE_STATUSES
def is_active_ownership_status(status: str | None) -> bool:
"""True when *status* denotes live/active ownership of a branch (#855).
Used to decide whether a *competing* active claimant still uses a branch
when weighing an expired reviewer lease for reclaim. Expired, stale,
released, and terminal statuses are not active.
"""
return _norm_str(status).lower() in _ACTIVE_OWNERSHIP_STATUSES
def assess_expired_reviewer_lease_reclaim(
*,
role: str,
status: str,
pr_merged: bool | None,
owner_pid_alive: bool | None,
competing_active_claimant: bool | None,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Decide, explicitly and fail-closed, whether an expired reviewer lease
may stop protecting an already-merged branch (#855 AC4).
An expired reviewer lease should not protect a merged branch forever once
its work is done and no live claimant remains. Reclaim is permitted only
when **every** condition below is provably satisfied; any unknown
(``None``) or contrary value keeps the lease protective:
- the lease is a ``reviewer`` lease (author/merger/controller/reconciler
leases are out of scope and always keep protecting);
- its status is expired or stale (never an active/live lease);
- the PR is proven merged (``pr_merged is True``);
- the lease owner process is proven dead (``owner_pid_alive is False``);
- no competing active claimant uses the branch
(``competing_active_claimant is False``).
Returns a decision dict with ``reclaim_allowed`` and, when refused, the
fail-closed ``reasons``. The reasons never contain secrets — only the
role, the status, and which condition was unproven.
"""
reasons: list[str] = []
normalized_role = _norm_str(role).lower()
normalized_status = _norm_str(status).lower()
if normalized_role != "reviewer":
reasons.append(
f"lease role '{normalized_role or 'unknown'}' is not a reviewer "
"lease; expired-reviewer reclaim does not apply"
)
if normalized_status not in _RECLAIMABLE_REVIEWER_STATUSES:
reasons.append(
f"lease status '{normalized_status or 'unknown'}' is not expired "
"or stale; only a non-live reviewer lease may be reclaimed"
)
if pr_merged is not True:
reasons.append(
"PR merged state is not proven true; reclaim requires an "
"already-merged PR (fail closed)"
)
if owner_pid_alive is not False:
reasons.append(
"lease owner process liveness is not proven dead; a live owner "
"still protects the branch (fail closed)"
)
if competing_active_claimant is not False:
reasons.append(
"a competing active claimant may still use the branch; reclaim "
"requires no other active ownership (fail closed)"
)
allowed = not reasons
return {
"reclaim_allowed": allowed,
"role": normalized_role,
"status": normalized_status,
"decision": (
"reclaim_expired_reviewer_lease" if allowed else "keep_protecting"
),
"reasons": [] if allowed else reasons,
}
def assess_active_branch_ownership(
*,
remote: str,