fix(restart): require both authorizations for apply, correct coordinator doc
Addresses the two blockers raised in the PR #886 review (comment 16559) for
issue #663.
B1 — apply_authorized ignored restart-class authorization.
The #663 restart-class matrix and the #661 drain-proof hard gate are
independent authorizations that first coexisted when PR #882 landed on
master and this branch merged it. The union preserved both, but the apply
decision consulted only the drain gate:
payload["apply_authorized"] = gate.allow
so a clean drain proof — or an authorized break-glass, which needs no proof
at all — reported apply_authorized: True for a class the least-privilege
matrix had just denied, in the same payload carrying allow_restart: False
and "role 'author' may not request full_mcp_restart". One environment
variable therefore collapsed the whole nine-class matrix for the apply
decision, including host_restart.
The apply decision is now the conjunction of both authorizations, and
apply_gate carries drain_gate_allow and restart_class_authorized so a denial
is attributable to the authorization that produced it. Break-glass keeps its
purpose — bypassing the drain proof — and never bypasses the class matrix.
No existing fail-closed behaviour is weakened: allow_restart, drain-proof
verification, fingerprint binding, and requester authorization are untouched.
B2 — docs/mcp-restart-coordinator.md described pre-#661 behaviour.
The document still called the drain proof "a separate child" and omitted
drain_proof_json and request_break_glass from the published signature, so a
safety document asserted there was no gate where a gate now exists. It now
documents both parameters, states that the gate executes inside this tool,
and records dry-run versus apply behaviour, authorization ordering, the
break-glass scope, and fail-closed conditions as implemented.
Regression coverage.
tests/test_issue_886_apply_authorization_conjunction.py exercises the MCP
tool itself, which previously had no test at all — that absence is why the
defect shipped. It pins both conjunction directions, proves a clean proof
cannot override a role, approval, unknown-class, or missing-target denial,
proves break-glass does not collapse the matrix for any worker role or
restricted class, and proves the existing scoped and unscoped paths and the
#661 denials still hold. Against the pre-fix tree 24 of these fail; against
this commit all 19 pass with 45 subtests.
tests/test_mcp_restart_governance_docs.py now binds the published signature
to inspect.signature() of the real tool and forbids the stale pre-#661
phrasing, so the drift that produced B2 cannot return unnoticed.
Verification: targeted restart/drain/governance/webui suites 194 passed,
113 subtests. Full suite 23 failed, 5230 passed, 6 skipped, 912 subtests —
the failure set is identical to the reviewed baseline at 9bc021e
(23 failed, 5201 passed), with +29 passing from the added tests and no new
or changed failure. Zero conflict markers; py_compile passes; the #882
union remains intact in both directions.
Refs #663, PR #886
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01V6xFqovhbArPv61j9KCGkL
This commit is contained in:
@@ -105,3 +105,120 @@ def test_cross_links_do_not_embed_secrets():
|
||||
text = _read(path)
|
||||
for marker in ("ghp_", "BEGIN PRIVATE KEY", "Authorization: Bearer"):
|
||||
assert marker not in text, f"{path} contains {marker!r}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --- Coordinator doc stays in lock-step with the tool (#886 review blocker B2) --
|
||||
#
|
||||
# PR #882 moved the #661 drain-proof hard gate *into* gitea_request_mcp_restart,
|
||||
# but the coordinator document still described the proof as "a separate child"
|
||||
# and omitted both new parameters. Nothing referenced that document, so nothing
|
||||
# caught the drift. These tests bind the prose to the real signature.
|
||||
|
||||
COORDINATOR_DOC = REPO_ROOT / "docs" / "mcp-restart-coordinator.md"
|
||||
|
||||
# Affirmative claims that were accurate before #661 landed and are now false.
|
||||
# Matched against whitespace-normalized text so re-wrapping cannot hide them.
|
||||
# Deliberately not the bare phrase "a separate child": the corrected prose uses
|
||||
# it in a negation ("no longer a separate child operation"), and a guard that
|
||||
# forbids naming the old behaviour would block explaining that it changed.
|
||||
STALE_PRE_661_PHRASES = (
|
||||
"gated by a drain proof (a separate child)",
|
||||
"is a later child gated by a drain proof",
|
||||
"mutative apply path is explicitly out of scope",
|
||||
"apply is gated by a drain proof (a separate child)",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _documented_signature_block() -> str:
|
||||
"""The fenced signature block for the tool, as published in the doc."""
|
||||
text = _read(COORDINATOR_DOC)
|
||||
marker = "gitea_request_mcp_restart("
|
||||
start = text.index(marker)
|
||||
end = text.index("```", start)
|
||||
return text[start:end]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_documented_signature_matches_the_real_tool_signature():
|
||||
import inspect
|
||||
|
||||
import gitea_mcp_server
|
||||
|
||||
block = _documented_signature_block()
|
||||
real = inspect.signature(gitea_mcp_server.gitea_request_mcp_restart)
|
||||
for name in real.parameters:
|
||||
assert name in block, (
|
||||
f"docs/mcp-restart-coordinator.md documents no {name!r} parameter; "
|
||||
"the published signature has drifted from the tool"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_drain_proof_and_break_glass_parameters_are_documented():
|
||||
block = _documented_signature_block()
|
||||
for name in ("drain_proof_json", "request_break_glass"):
|
||||
assert name in block, f"signature block missing {name}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_restart_class_and_target_scoping_parameters_survive():
|
||||
block = _documented_signature_block()
|
||||
for name in ("restart_class", "target_session_id", "target_role",
|
||||
"target_connector"):
|
||||
assert name in block, f"signature block lost #663 parameter {name}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_gate_is_documented_as_executing_inside_this_tool():
|
||||
lower = _read(COORDINATOR_DOC).lower()
|
||||
assert "inside this tool" in lower, (
|
||||
"the coordinator doc must state that the drain-proof gate executes in "
|
||||
"gitea_request_mcp_restart, not in a later child"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert "no longer a separate child operation" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_stale_pre_661_wording_cannot_return():
|
||||
normalized = " ".join(_read(COORDINATOR_DOC).split()).lower()
|
||||
for phrase in STALE_PRE_661_PHRASES:
|
||||
assert phrase not in normalized, (
|
||||
f"stale pre-#661 wording returned to the coordinator doc: {phrase!r}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_dry_run_versus_apply_behavior_is_documented():
|
||||
lower = _read(COORDINATOR_DOC).lower()
|
||||
assert "dry_run=true" in lower and "dry_run=false" in lower
|
||||
assert "apply_supported" in lower and "restart_performed" in lower
|
||||
assert "never restarts anything" in lower
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_authorization_ordering_and_conjunction_are_documented():
|
||||
text = _read(COORDINATOR_DOC)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "authorization ordering" in lower
|
||||
assert "allow_restart" in text
|
||||
assert "apply_authorized" in text
|
||||
# The conjunction itself, and the attribution fields behind it.
|
||||
assert "gate.allow and allow_restart" in text
|
||||
for field in ("drain_gate_allow", "restart_class_authorized"):
|
||||
assert field in text, f"doc omits apply_gate.{field}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_break_glass_scope_is_documented_as_drain_proof_only():
|
||||
text = _read(COORDINATOR_DOC)
|
||||
lower = text.lower()
|
||||
assert "break-glass" in lower
|
||||
assert "drain proof only" in lower, (
|
||||
"doc must state break-glass never bypasses the restart-class matrix"
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert "GITEA_BREAKGLASS_RESTART_AUTHORIZATION" in text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_fail_closed_on_apply_is_documented():
|
||||
lower = _read(COORDINATOR_DOC).lower()
|
||||
assert "fail closed" in lower
|
||||
for condition in ("expired", "unclean", "tampered", "stale"):
|
||||
assert condition in lower, f"fail-closed list omits {condition!r}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_coordinator_doc_embeds_no_secrets():
|
||||
text = _read(COORDINATOR_DOC)
|
||||
for marker in ("ghp_", "BEGIN PRIVATE KEY", "Authorization: Bearer"):
|
||||
assert marker not in text, f"{COORDINATOR_DOC} contains {marker!r}"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user