fix(bootstrap): allow author worktree bootstrap from clean control checkout (Closes #892)

Align assess_author_issue_bootstrap with bootstrap_permits_control_checkout
so gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree can create the first branches/
worktree without the lock↔worktree deadlock.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-25 18:27:18 -05:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 2b4e43042a
commit 2066623986
3 changed files with 390 additions and 52 deletions
+157 -46
View File
@@ -386,6 +386,68 @@ def run_compensating_recovery(
return recovery_info
def _normalize_sha(value: str | None) -> str | None:
"""Normalize a Git object id for comparison, or ``None`` when unknown."""
normalized = (value or "").strip().lower()
return normalized or None
def _author_bootstrap_assessment(
*,
not_applicable: bool,
allowed: bool,
block: bool,
reasons: list[str],
workspace: str,
root: str,
branch: str | None,
dirty: list[str],
under_branches: bool,
bootstrap_path: str | None = None,
local_head_sha: str | None = None,
remote_master_sha: str | None = None,
exact_next_action: str | None = None,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Structured author-bootstrap assessment consumable by bootstrap_permits (#892).
Field shape mirrors :func:`create_issue_bootstrap._result` so the shared
``bootstrap_permits_control_checkout`` predicate can prove control-checkout
eligibility for ``gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree`` the same way it
does for ``create_issue``. Allowed control assessments must use empty
``reasons`` — narrative belongs in other fields, not the refusal list.
"""
local_tip = _normalize_sha(local_head_sha)
remote_tip = _normalize_sha(remote_master_sha)
base_tips_verified = bool(local_tip and remote_tip and local_tip == remote_tip)
return {
"not_applicable": not_applicable,
"allowed": allowed,
"block": block,
"proven": bool(allowed and not block and not not_applicable),
"reasons": list(reasons),
"workspace_path": workspace,
"canonical_repo_root": root,
"current_branch": branch,
"dirty_files": list(dirty),
"under_branches": under_branches,
"exact_next_action": exact_next_action,
"bootstrap_path": bootstrap_path,
"task_scope": "author_issue_bootstrap",
"local_head_sha": local_tip,
"remote_master_sha": remote_tip,
"base_tips_verified": base_tips_verified,
}
EXACT_NEXT_ACTION_AUTHOR_BOOTSTRAP = (
"Restore the canonical control checkout to a clean accepted base branch "
"(master/main/dev) that matches live master, with no tracked local edits. "
"Re-resolve bootstrap_author_issue_worktree, then re-run "
"gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree from that clean control checkout. "
"Do not use shell git worktree add as the primary path once bootstrap is healthy."
)
def assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
*,
workspace_path: str,
@@ -397,7 +459,13 @@ def assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
remote_master_sha_error: str | None = None,
task: str | None = None,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Assess whether author issue worktree bootstrap may proceed from control or worktree root."""
"""Assess whether author issue worktree bootstrap may proceed from control or worktree root.
#892: control-checkout successes emit the full field set required by
``create_issue_bootstrap.bootstrap_permits_control_checkout`` (empty reasons,
task_scope, base tip proof, binding paths) so the #274/#604 guards can
waive control-checkout for this one sanctioned bootstrap task.
"""
root = os.path.realpath(canonical_repo_root or "")
workspace = os.path.realpath(workspace_path or root or ".")
branch = (current_branch or "").strip()
@@ -407,34 +475,50 @@ def assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
if root
else False
)
local_tip = _normalize_sha(head_sha)
remote_tip = _normalize_sha(remote_master_sha)
if not is_author_issue_bootstrap_task(task):
return {
"not_applicable": True,
"allowed": False,
"block": False,
"proven": False,
"reasons": ["task is not author_issue_bootstrap"],
}
return _author_bootstrap_assessment(
not_applicable=True,
allowed=False,
block=False,
reasons=["task is not author_issue_bootstrap"],
workspace=workspace,
root=root,
branch=branch or None,
dirty=dirty,
under_branches=under_branches,
)
# Already under branches/: ordinary #274 path applies; not a control waiver.
if under_branches:
return {
"not_applicable": False,
"allowed": True,
"block": False,
"proven": True,
"bootstrap_path": "existing_branches_worktree",
"reasons": [
"workspace is already a registered worktree under branches/"
],
}
return _author_bootstrap_assessment(
not_applicable=True,
allowed=False,
block=False,
reasons=["workspace is under branches/; ordinary #274 path applies"],
workspace=workspace,
root=root,
branch=branch or None,
dirty=dirty,
under_branches=True,
bootstrap_path="existing_branches_worktree",
local_head_sha=local_tip,
remote_master_sha=remote_tip,
)
reasons: list[str] = []
if workspace != root:
if not root or workspace != root:
reasons.append(
"bootstrap requires workspace to be canonical control checkout or branches/ worktree"
)
if branch not in author_mutation_worktree.BASE_BRANCHES:
if not branch:
reasons.append(
"control checkout is detached HEAD; expected an accepted base branch "
f"({', '.join(sorted(author_mutation_worktree.BASE_BRANCHES))})"
)
elif branch not in author_mutation_worktree.BASE_BRANCHES:
reasons.append(
f"control checkout branch '{branch}' is not an accepted base branch "
f"({', '.join(sorted(author_mutation_worktree.BASE_BRANCHES))})"
@@ -444,37 +528,64 @@ def assess_author_issue_bootstrap(
f"control checkout has tracked local edits: {', '.join(dirty[:5])}"
)
if remote_master_sha_error:
# Fail closed on missing tip proof (same bar as create_issue bootstrap #757).
if not local_tip:
reasons.append(
f"could not verify live master tip: {remote_master_sha_error}"
"control checkout HEAD SHA is unknown; base equivalence to live "
"master cannot be proven (fail closed)"
)
resolver_error = (remote_master_sha_error or "").strip() or None
if resolver_error:
reasons.append(
f"live master tip could not be resolved ({resolver_error}); "
"base equivalence cannot be proven (fail closed)"
)
elif not remote_tip:
reasons.append(
"live master tip is unknown; base equivalence cannot be proven "
"(fail closed)"
)
elif local_tip and remote_tip and local_tip != remote_tip:
reasons.append(
f"control checkout HEAD ({local_tip[:12]}) != live master tip "
f"({remote_tip[:12]})"
)
elif remote_master_sha and head_sha:
h = head_sha.strip().lower()
rm = remote_master_sha.strip().lower()
if h != rm:
reasons.append(
f"control checkout HEAD ({h[:12]}) != live master tip ({rm[:12]})"
)
if reasons:
return {
"not_applicable": False,
"allowed": False,
"block": True,
"proven": False,
"reasons": reasons,
}
return _author_bootstrap_assessment(
not_applicable=False,
allowed=False,
block=True,
reasons=reasons,
workspace=workspace,
root=root,
branch=branch or None,
dirty=dirty,
under_branches=False,
local_head_sha=local_tip,
remote_master_sha=remote_tip,
exact_next_action=EXACT_NEXT_ACTION_AUTHOR_BOOTSTRAP,
)
return {
"not_applicable": False,
"allowed": True,
"block": False,
"proven": True,
"bootstrap_path": "clean_canonical_control_checkout",
"reasons": [
"control checkout is clean on accepted base branch matching live master"
],
}
# Allowed: empty reasons so bootstrap_permits_control_checkout can pass.
return _author_bootstrap_assessment(
not_applicable=False,
allowed=True,
block=False,
reasons=[],
workspace=workspace,
root=root,
branch=branch or None,
dirty=dirty,
under_branches=False,
bootstrap_path="clean_canonical_control_checkout",
local_head_sha=local_tip,
remote_master_sha=remote_tip,
exact_next_action=(
"Call gitea_bootstrap_author_issue_worktree with the allocated "
"issue/lease pins; it will create the branches/ worktree and lock."
),
)
import fcntl